REFERENCES
- Al-Hasani, K., P. Mathiyalagan, and A. El-Osta. 2019. Epigenetics, cardiovascular disease, and cellular reprogramming. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 128:129–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.01.019.
- Ambatipudi, S., S. Horvath, F. Perrier, C. Cuenin, H. Hernandez-Vargas, F. Le Calvez-Kelm, G. Durand, G. Byrnes, P. Ferrari, L. Bouaoun, et al. 2017. DNA methylome analysis identifies accelerated epigenetic ageing associated with postmenopausal breast cancer susceptibility. European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 75:299–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.01.014.
- Ayday, E., J. L. Raisaro, U. Hengartner, A. Molyneaux, and J. P. Hubaux. 2013. Privacy-preserving processing of raw genomic data. In Data privacy management and autonomous spontaneous security, 133–147. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Aygun, D., and H. T. Bjornsson. 2020. Clinical epigenetics: A primer for the practitioner. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 62 (2):192–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14398.
- Backes, M., P. Berrang, M. Bieg, R. Eils, C. Herrmann, M. Humbert, and I. Lehmann. 2017. Identifying personal DNA methylation profiles by genotype inference. Paper presented at the 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 957–976. San Jose, CA. IEEE. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2017.21.
- Backes, M., P. Berrang, A. Hecksteden, M. Humbert, A. Keller, and T. Meyer. 2016. Privacy in epigenetics: Temporal linkability of MicroRNA expression profiles. Paper presented at the 25th USENIX Security Symposium USENIX Security, 16, 1223–1240. Austin, TX.
- Bansal, G., F. M. Zahedi, and D. Gefen. 2016. Do context and personality matter? Trust and privacy concerns in disclosing private information online. Information & Management 53 (1):1–21.
- Bayer, R. 1991. An end to HIV exceptionalism? New England Journal of Medicine 324 (21):1500–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199105233242111.
- Beltrán-García, J., R. Osca-Verdegal, S. Mena-Mollá, and J. L. García-Giménez. 2019. Epigenetic IVD tests for personalized precision medicine in cancer. Frontiers in Genetics 10:621 doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00621.
- Berdasco, M., and M. Esteller. 2019. Clinical epigenetics: Seizing opportunities for translation. Nature Reviews Genetics 20 (2):109–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0074-2.
- Berrang, P., M. Humbert, Y. Zhang, I. Lehmann, R. Eils, and M. Backes. 2018. Dissecting privacy risks in biomedical data. Paper presented at 2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) (pp. 62–76). IEEE. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSP.2018.00013.
- Beskow, L. M., W. Burke, J. F. Merz, P. A. Barr, S. Terry, V. B. Penchaszadeh, L. O. Gostin, M. Gwinn, and M. J. Khoury. 2001. Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics. JAMA 286 (18):2315–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.18.2315.
- Biswas, S., and C. M. Rao. 2017. Epigenetics in cancer: Fundamentals and beyond. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 173:118–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.011.
- Blekhman, R., J. K. Goodrich, K. Huang, Q. Sun, R. Bukowski, J. T. Bell, T. D. Spector, A. Keinan, R. E. Ley, D. Gevers, et al. 2015. Host genetic variation impacts microbiome composition across human body sites. Genome Biology 16 (1):191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0759-1.
- Blomen, V. A., and J. Boonstra. 2011. Stable transmission of reversible modifications: Maintenance of epigenetic information through the cell cycle. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 68 (1):27–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010-0505-5.
- Bollati, V., and A. Baccarelli. 2010. Environmental epigenetics. Heredity 105 (1):105–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2010.2.
- Brieger, K., G. J. M. Zajac, A. Pandit, J. R. Foerster, K. W. Li, A. C. Annis, E. M. Schmidt, C. P. Clark, K. McMorrow, W. Zhou, et al. 2019. Genes for good: Engaging the public in genetics research via social media. American Journal of Human Genetics 105 (1):65–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.05.006.
- Budowle, B.,. B. Shea, S. Niezgoda, and R. Chakraborty. 2001. CODIS STR loci data from 41 sample populations. Journal of Forensic Sciences 46 (3):453–89.
- Burris, H. H., and A. A. Baccarelli. 2014. Environmental epigenetics: From novelty to scientific discipline. Journal of Applied Toxicology: JAT 34 (2):113–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.2904.
- Canela-Xandri, O., K. Rawlik, and A. Tenesa. 2018. An atlas of genetic associations in UK Biobank. Nature Genetics 50 (11):1593–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0248-z.
- Caulfield, T., A. L. McGuire, M. Cho, J. A. Buchanan, M. M. Burgess, U. Danilczyk, C. M. Diaz, K. Fryer-Edwards, S. K. Green, M. A. Hodosh, et al. 2008. Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: Consensus statement. PLoS Biology 6 (3):e73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060073.
- Cazaly, E., J. Saad, W. Wang, C. Heckman, M. Ollikainen, and J. Tang. 2019. Making sense of the epigenome using data integration approaches. Frontiers in Pharmacology 10:126. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00126.
- Christofides, E., and K. O’Doherty. 2016. Company disclosure and consumer perceptions of the privacy implications of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. New Genetics and Society 35 (2):101–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2016.1162092.
- Clayton, E. W., B. J. Evans, J. W. Hazel, and M. A. Rothstein. 2019. The law of genetic privacy: Applications, implications, and limitations. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 6 (1):1–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsz007.
- Conesa, A., and S. Beck. 2019. Making multi-omics data accessible to researchers. Scientific Data 6 (1):1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0258-4.
- Cortessis, V. K., D. C. Thomas, A. J. Levine, C. V. Breton, T. M. Mack, K. D. Siegmund, R. W. Haile, and P. W. Laird. 2012. Environmental epigenetics: Prospects for studying epigenetic mediation of exposure-response relationships. Human Genetics 131 (10):1565–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-012-1189-8.
- Coyle, K. M., J. E. Boudreau, and P. Marcato. 2017. Genetic mutations and epigenetic modifications: Driving cancer and informing precision medicine. BioMed Research International 2017:1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9620870.
- Creanza, N., M. Ruhlen, T. J. Pemberton, N. A. Rosenberg, M. W. Feldman, and S. Ramachandran. 2015. A comparison of worldwide phonemic and genetic variation in human populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (5):1265–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424033112.
- Cunliffe, V. T. 2016. The epigenetic impacts of social stress: How does social adversity become biologically embedded? Epigenomics 8 (12):1653–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.2217/epi-2016-0075.
- Dankar, F. K., A. Ptitsyn, and S. K. Dankar. 2018. The development of large-scale de-identified biomedical databases in the age of genomics—principles and challenges. Human Genomics 12 (1):19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-018-0147-5.
- Das, B., T. S. Ghosh, S. Kedia, R. Rampal, S. Saxena, S. Bag, R. Mitra, M. Dayal, O. Mehta, A. Surendranath, et al. 2018. Analysis of the gut microbiome of rural and urban healthy Indians living in sea level and high altitude areas. Scientific Reports 8 (1):1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28550-3.
- Dawson, M. A., and T. Kouzarides. 2012. Cancer epigenetics: From mechanism to therapy. Cell 150 (1):12–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.013.
- De Lusignan, S., H. Liyanage, C. T. Di Iorio, T. Chan, and S. T. Liaw. 2016. Using routinely collected health data for surveillance, quality improvement and research: Framework and key questions to assess ethics, privacy and data access. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics 22 (4):426–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v22i4.845.
- Dupras, C., E. Beauchamp, and Y. Joly. 2020. Selling direct-to-consumer epigenetic tests: Are we ready? Nature Reviews Genetics 21:1–2.
- Dupras, C., S. Beck, M. A. Rothstein, A. Berner, K. M. Saulnier, M. Pinkesz, and Y. Joly. 2019. Potential (mis) use of epigenetic age estimators by private companies and public agencies: Human rights law should provide ethical guidance. Environmental Epigenetics 5 (3):dvz018.
- Dupras, C., Y. Joly, and E. Rial-Sebbag. 2020. Human rights in the postgenomic era: Challenges and opportunities arising with epigenetics. Social Science Information 59 (1):12–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018419900139.
- Dupras, C., and V. Ravitsky. 2016. The ambiguous nature of epigenetic responsibility. Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (8):534–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103295.
- Dupras, C., L. Song, K. M. Saulnier, and Y. Joly. 2018. Epigenetic discrimination: Emerging applications of epigenetics pointing to the limitations of policies against genetic discrimination. Frontiers in Genetics 9:202. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00202.
- Dyke, S. O., E. S. Dove, and B. M. Knoppers. 2016. Sharing health-related data: A privacy test. ? Npj Genomic Medicine 1 (1):1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/npjgenmed.2016.24.
- Dyke, S. O. M., W. A. Cheung, Y. Joly, O. Ammerpohl, P. Lutsik, M. A. Rothstein, M. Caron, S. Busche, G. Bourque, L. Rönnblom, et al. 2015. Epigenome data release: A participant-centered approach to privacy protection. Genome Biology 16 (1):142–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0723-0.
- Epstein, C. J. 2003. Is modern genetics the new eugenics? Genetics in Medicine: Medicine 5 (6):469–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.GIM.0000093978.77435.17.
- Erlich, Y., and A. Narayanan. 2014. Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy. Nature Reviews. Genetics 15 (6):409–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3723.
- Erwin, C. 2015. Ethical issues raised by epigenetic testing for alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 33 (5):662–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2204.
- Fiorito, G., S. Polidoro, P.-A. Dugué, M. Kivimaki, E. Ponzi, G. Matullo, S. Guarrera, M. B. Assumma, P. Georgiadis, S. A. Kyrtopoulos, et al. 2017. Social adversity and epigenetic aging: A multi-cohort study on socioeconomic differences in peripheral blood DNA methylation. Scientific Reports 7 (1):1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16391-5.
- Franzosa, E. 2015. Identifying personal microbiomes using metagenomic codes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 112, E2930. 8
- Garrison, N. A., K. B. Brothers, A. J. Goldenberg, and J. A. Lynch. 2019. Genomic contextualism: Shifting the rhetoric of genetic exceptionalism. The American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):51–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1544304.
- Gilbert, J. A., M. J. Blaser, J. G. Caporaso, J. K. Jansson, S. V. Lynch, and R. Knight. 2018. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nature Medicine 24 (4):392–400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4517.
- Greely, H. T. 2007. The uneasy ethical and legal underpinnings of large-scale genomic biobanks. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 8:343–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115721.
- Green, M. J., and J. R. Botkin. 2003. "Genetic exceptionalism" in medicine: Clarifying the differences between genetic and nongenetic tests. Annals of Internal Medicine 138 (7):571–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-7-200304010-00013.
- Gupta, V. K., S. Paul, and C. Dutta. 2017. Geography, ethnicity or subsistence-specific variations in human microbiome composition and diversity. Frontiers in Microbiology 8:1162. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01162.
- Hagestedt, I., Y. Zhang, M. Humbert, P. Berrang, H. Tang, X. Wang, and M. Backes. 2019. MBeacon: Privacy-preserving beacons for DNA methylation data. In NDSS. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2019.23064.
- Hamamoto, R., M. Komatsu, K. Takasawa, K. Asada, and S. Kaneko. 2019. Epigenetics analysis and integrated analysis of multiomics data, including epigenetic data, using artificial intelligence in the era of precision medicine. Biomolecules 10 (1):62. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010062.
- Hares, D. R. 2012. Expanding the CODIS core loci in the United States. Forensic Science International: Genetics 6 (1):e52–e54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.04.012.
- Hasin, Y., M. Seldin, and A. Lusis. 2017. Multi-omics approaches to disease. Genome Biology 18 (1):83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1215-1.
- Heard, E., and R. A. Martienssen. 2014. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: Myths and mechanisms. Cell 157 (1):95–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.045.
- Heeney, C., N. Hawkins, J. de Vries, P. Boddington, and J. Kaye. 2011. Assessing the privacy risks of data sharing in genomics. Public Health Genomics 14 (1):17–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000294150.
- Hellman, D. 2003. What makes genetic discrimination exceptional? American Journal of Law & Medicine 29 (1):77–116.
- Hoeyer, K. L. 2012. Size matters: The ethical, legal, and social issues surrounding large-scale genetic biobank initiatives. Norsk Epidemiologi 21 (2): 211–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v21i2.1496.
- Horsthemke, B. 2018. A critical view on transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in humans. Nature Communications 9 (1):1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05445-5.
- Horvath, S., and K. Raj. 2018. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nature Reviews Genetics 19 (6):371–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0004-3.
- Hsiao, J.-R., C.-C. Chang, W.-T. Lee, C.-C. Huang, C.-Y. Ou, S.-T. Tsai, K.-C. Chen, J.-S. Huang, T.-Y. Wong, Y.-H. Lai, et al. 2018. The interplay between oral microbiome, lifestyle factors and genetic polymorphisms in the risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 39 (6):778–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgy053.
- Jansson, J. K., and E. S. Baker. 2016. A multi-omic future for microbiome studies. Nature Microbiology 1 (5):645. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.49.
- Joly, Y., E. S. Dove, B. M. Knoppers, M. Bobrow, and D. Chalmers. 2012. Data sharing in the post-genomic world: The experience of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) Data Access Compliance Office (DACO). PLoS Computational Biology 8 (7):e1002549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002549.
- Joly, Y., G. Dalpé, C. Dupras, B. Bévière-Boyer, A. de Paor, E. S. Dove, P. Granados Moreno, C. W. L. Ho, C.-H. Ho, K. Ó Cathaoir, et al. 2020. Establishing the international genetic discrimination observatory. Nature Genetics 52 (5):466–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-020-0606-5.
- Joly, Y., C. Dupras, M. Pinkesz, S. A. Tovino, and M. A. Rothstein. 2020. Looking beyond GINA: Policy approaches to address genetic discrimination. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 21: 491–507.
- Joly, Y., S. O. Dyke, B. M. Knoppers, and T. Pastinen. 2016. Are data sharing and privacy protection mutually exclusive? Cell 167 (5):1150–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.004.
- Jovanovic, T., L. A. Vance, D. Cross, A. K. Knight, V. Kilaru, V. Michopoulos, and A. K. Smith. 2017. Exposure to violence accelerates epigenetic aging in children. Scientific Reports 7 (1):1–7.
- Kamm, L., D. Bogdanov, S. Laur, and J. Vilo. 2013. A new way to protect privacy in large-scale genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 29 (7):886–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt066.
- Karczewski, K. J., and M. P. Snyder. 2018. Integrative omics for health and disease. Nature Reviews Genetics 19 (5):299–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2018.4.
- Karimi, K.,. J. D. Fortriede, V. S. Lotay, K. A. Burns, D. Z. Wang, M. E. Fisher, T. J. Pells, C. James-Zorn, Y. Wang, V. G. Ponferrada, et al. 2018. Xenbase: A genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic model organism database. Nucleic Acids Research 46 (D1):D861–D868. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx936.
- Keohane, D. M., T. S. Ghosh, I. B. Jeffery, M. G. Molloy, P. W. O’Toole, and F. Shanahan. 2020. Microbiome and health implications for ethnic minorities after enforced lifestyle changes. Nature Medicine 26: 1–7.
- Klutstein, M., J. Moss, T. Kaplan, and H. Cedar. 2017. Contribution of epigenetic mechanisms to variation in cancer risk among tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (9):2230–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616556114.
- Komaki, S., Y. Shiwa, R. Furukawa, T. Hachiya, H. Ohmomo, R. Otomo, M. Satoh, J. Hitomi, K. Sobue, M. Sasaki, et al. 2018. iMETHYL: An integrative database of human DNA methylation, gene expression, and genomic variation. Human Genome Variation 5 (1):1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/hgv.2018.8.
- Laubach, K. 2016. Epigenetics and toxic torts: How epidemiological evidence informs causation. Washington and Lee Law Review 73:1019.
- Laurie, G. 2002. Genetic privacy: A challenge to medico-legal norms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Lauschke, V. M., I. Barragan, and M. Ingelman-Sundberg. 2018. Pharmacoepigenetics and toxicoepigenetics: Novel mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 58:161–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-053021.
- Lax, S., J. T. Hampton-Marcell, S. M. Gibbons, G. B. Colares, D. Smith, J. A. Eisen, and J. A. Gilbert. 2015. Forensic analysis of the microbiome of phones and shoes. Microbiome 3 (1):1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-015-0082-9.
- Lee, K. W., and Z. Pausova. 2013. Cigarette smoking and DNA methylation. Frontiers in Genetics 4 (132):1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00132.
- Lin, E., and H. Y. Lane. 2017. Machine learning and systems genomics approaches for multi-omics data. Biomarker Research 5 (1):2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-017-0082-y.
- Lippert, C., R. Sabatini, M. C. Maher, E. Y. Kang, S. Lee, O. Arikan, A. Harley, A. Bernal, P. Garst, V. Lavrenko, et al. 2017. Identification of individuals by trait prediction using whole-genome sequencing data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (38):10166–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711125114.
- Liu, C., R. E. Marioni, Å. K. Hedman, L. Pfeiffer, P. C. Tsai, L. M. Reynolds, and C. E. Elks. 2016. A DNA methylation biomarker of alcohol consumption. Molecular Psychiatry 23 (2):422–433.
- Lopez-Leon, M., and R. G. Goya. 2017. The emerging view of aging as a reversible epigenetic process. Gerontology 63 (5):426–31.
- Luo, A., J. Jung, M. Longley, D. B. Rosoff, K. Charlet, C. Muench, J. Lee, C. A. Hodgkinson, D. Goldman, S. Horvath, et al. 2020. Epigenetic aging is accelerated in alcohol use disorder and regulated by genetic variation in APOL2. Neuropsychopharmacology 45 (2):327–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0500-y.
- Maiella, S., A. Olry, M. Hanauer, V. Lanneau, H. Lourghi, B. Donadille, C. Rodwell, S. Köhler, D. Seelow, S. Jupp, et al. 2018. Harmonising phenomics information for a better interoperability in the rare disease field. European Journal of Medical Genetics 61 (11):706–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.01.013.
- Marini, S., K. A. Davis, T. W. Soare, Y. Zhu, M. J. Suderman, A. J. Simpkin, A. D. A. C. Smith, E. J. Wolf, C. L. Relton, and E. C. Dunn. 2020. Adversity exposure during sensitive periods predicts accelerated epigenetic aging in children. Psychoneuroendocrinology 113:104484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104484.
- Matheson, S. 2016. DNA phenotyping: Snapshot of a criminal. Cell 166 (5):1061–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.016.
- Metcalf, J. L., Z. Z. Xu, A. Bouslimani, P. Dorrestein, D. O. Carter, and R. Knight. 2017. Microbiome tools for forensic science. Trends in Biotechnology 35 (9):814–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.03.006.
- Mitchell, C., Ordish, J. E. Johnson, and T. Brigden Al. Hall. 2020. The GDPR and genomic data. PHG Foundation [Online]. https://www.phgfoundation.org/documents/gdpr-and-genomic-data-report.pdf.
- Murray, T. H. 2019. Is genetic exceptionalism past its sell-by date? On genomic diaries, context, and content. American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):13–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1552038
- National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). 2017. Highlights of revisions to the common rule. Last accessed October 22, 2020) https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/policy-issues/Human-Subjects-Research-in-Genomics/Highlights-of-Revisions-to-the-Common-Rule
- Naveed, M., E. Ayday, E. W. Clayton, J. Fellay, C. A. Gunter, J.-P. Hubaux, B. A. Malin, and X. Wang. 2015. Privacy in the genomic era. ACM Computing Surveys 48 (1):1–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2767007.
- Nebbioso, A., F. P. Tambaro, C. Dell’Aversana, and L. Altucci. 2018. Cancer epigenetics: Moving forward. PLOS Genetics 14 (6):e1007362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007362.
- Nicholls, R. D., S. Saitoh, and B. Horsthemke. 1998. Imprinting in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. Trends in Genetics: TIG 14 (5):194–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9525(98)01432-2.
- Nissenbaum, H. 2018. Respecting context to protect privacy: Why meaning matters. Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (3):831–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9674-9.
- Oh, M., and L. Zhang. 2020. DeepMicro: Deep representation learning for disease prediction based on microbiome data. Scientific Reports 10 (1):1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63159-5.
- Oliver, J. M., M. J. Slashinski, T. Wang, P. A. Kelly, S. G. Hilsenbeck, and A. L. McGuire. 2012. Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: Genome research participants' perspectives. Public Health Genomics 15 (2):106–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000334718.
- Paul, D. B. 2014. What was wrong with eugenics? Conflicting narratives and disputed interpretations. Science & Education 23 (2):259–71.
- Perez-Riverol, Y., A. Zorin, G. Dass, M. T. Vu, P. Xu, M. Glont, and H. Hermjakob. 2019. Quantifying the impact of public omics data. Nature Communications 10 (1):1–10.
- Philibert, R. A., N. Terry, C. Erwin, W. J. Philibert, S. R. Beach, and G. H. Brody. 2014. Methylation array data can simultaneously identify individuals and convey protected health information: An unrecognized ethical concern. Clinical Epigenetics 6 (1):28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1868-7083-6-28.
- Pierce, R. C., B. Fant, S. E. Swinford-Jackson, E. A. Heller, W. H. Berrettini, and M. E. Wimmer. 2018. Environmental, genetic and epigenetic contributions to cocaine addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology: Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 43 (7):1471–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0008-x.
- Qi, C., C. J. Xu, and G. H. Koppelman. 2019. The role of epigenetics in the development of childhood asthma. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology 15 (12):1287–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2020.1686977.
- Quach, A., M. E. Levine, T. Tanaka, A. T. Lu, B. H. Chen, L. Ferrucci, B. Ritz, S. Bandinelli, M. L. Neuhouser, J. M. Beasley, et al. 2017. Epigenetic clock analysis of diet, exercise, education, and lifestyle factors. Aging 9 (2):419–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101168.
- Rhodes, R. 2016. Ethical issues in microbiome research and medicine. BMC Medicine 14 (1):156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0702-7.
- Rhodes, R., N. Gligorov, and A. P. Schwab. (Eds.). 2013. The human microbiome: Ethical, legal and social concerns. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Richmond, R. C., M. Suderman, R. Langdon, C. L. Relton, and D. G. Smith. 2018. DNA methylation as a marker for prenatal smoke exposure in adults. International Journal of Epidemiology 47 (4):1120–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy091.
- Rodriguez-Castaño, G. P., A. Caro-Quintero, A. Reyes, and F. Lizcano. 2016. Advances in gut microbiome research, opening new strategies to cope with a western lifestyle. Frontiers in Genetics 7:224. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2016.00224.
- Rothstein, M. A. 2007. Genetic exceptionalism and legislative pragmatism. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35 (2 Suppl):59–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00154.x.
- Rothstein, M. A. (Ed.). 1997. Genetic secrets: Protecting privacy and confidentiality in the genetic era. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Rumbold, J. M., and B. K. Pierscionek. 2018. What are data? A categorization of the data sensitivity spectrum. Big Data Research 12:49–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2017.11.001.
- Saulnier, K. M., and C. Dupras. 2017. Race in the postgenomic era: Social epigenetics calling for interdisciplinary ethical safeguards. The American Journal of Bioethics 17 (9):58–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1353182.
- Scheibner, J., M. Ienca, S. Kechagia, J. R. Troncoso-Pastoriza, J. L. Raisaro, J.-P. Hubaux, J. Fellay, and E. Vayena. 2020. Data protection and ethics requirements for multisite research with health data: A comparative examination of legislative governance frameworks and the role of data protection technologies. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 7 (1):1–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa010.
- Schmedes, S. E., A. E. Woerner, and B. Budowle. 2017. Forensic human identification using skin microbiomes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 83 (22):1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01672-17.
- Sero, D., A. Zaidi, J. Li, J. D. White, T. B. G. Zarzar, M. L. Marazita, S. M. Weinberg, P. Suetens, D. Vandermeulen, J. K. Wagner, et al. 2019. Facial recognition from DNA using face-to-DNA classifiers. Nature Communications 10 (1):2557. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10617-y.
- Shabani, M., and L. Marelli. 2019. Re‐identifiability of genomic data and the GDPR: Assessing the re‐identifiability of genomic data in light of the EU General Data Protection Regulation. EMBO Reports 20 (6):e48316. doi:https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948316.
- Shabani, M., P. Borry, I. Smeers, and B. Bekaert. 2018. Forensic epigenetic age estimation and beyond: Ethical and legal considerations. Trends in Genetics: TIG 34 (7):489–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2018.03.006.
- Shan, Y., W. Wu, W. Fan, T. Haahtela, and G. Zhang. 2019. House dust microbiome and human health risks. International Microbiology 22: 1–8.
- Sharma, S.,. T. K. Kelly, and P. A. Jones. 2010. Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis 31 (1):27–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgp220.
- Silberman, D. M., G. B. Acosta, and M. A. Z. Zubilete. 2016. Long-term effects of early life stress exposure: Role of epigenetic mechanisms. Pharmacological Research 109 (1):64–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2015.12.033.
- Skopek, J. M. 2015. Reasonable expectations of anonymity. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Accessed May 13. 2019. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2523393.
- Stearns, J. C., M. A. Zulyniak, R. J. de Souza, N. C. Campbell, M. Fontes, M. Shaikh, M. R. Sears, A. B. Becker, P. J. Mandhane, P. Subbarao, et al. 2017. Ethnic and diet-related differences in the healthy infant microbiome. Genome Medicine 9 (1):32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-017-0421-5.
- Stoeklé, H. C., M. F. Mamzer-Bruneel, G. Vogt, and C. Hervé. 2016. 23andMe: A new two-sided data-banking market model. BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0101-9.
- Stuart, T., and R. Satija. 2019. Integrative single-cell analysis. Nature Reviews Genetics 20 (5):257–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0093-7.
- Sudlow, C., J. Gallacher, N. Allen, V. Beral, P. Burton, J. Danesh, P. Downey, P. Elliott, J. Green, M. Landray, et al. 2015. UK biobank: An open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Medicine 12 (3):e1001779. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779.
- Takeshima, H., and T. Ushijima. 2019. Accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations in normal cells and cancer risk. Precision Oncology 3 (1):1–8.
- Tompkins, J. D., C. Hall, V. C-y Chen, A. X. Li, X. Wu, D. Hsu, L. A. Couture, and A. D. Riggs. 2012. Epigenetic stability, adaptability, and reversibility in human embryonic stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (31):12544–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209620109.
- Tumes, D. J., M. Papadopoulos, Y. Endo, A. Onodera, K. Hirahara, and T. Nakayama. 2017. Epigenetic regulation of T-helper cell differentiation, memory, and plasticity in allergic asthma. Immunological Reviews 278 (1):8–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12560.
- Turnbaugh, P. J., R. E. Ley, M. A. Mahowald, V. Magrini, E. R. Mardis, and J. I. Gordon. 2006. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444 (7122):1027–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05414.
- United States. 2017. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Federal Register: Rules and Regulations Vol. 82, No. 12, 7149-7223. Last Accessed October 22, 2020. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2017-01-19/pdf/2017-01058.pdf.
- Vangay, P., B. M. Hillmann, and D. Knights. 2019. Microbiome Learning Repo (ML Repo): A public repository of microbiome regression and classification tasks. GigaScience 8 (5):giz042. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz042.
- Vears, D. F., and F. D’Abramo. 2018. Health, wealth and behavioural change: An exploration of role responsibilities in the wake of epigenetics. Journal of Community Genetics 9 (2):153–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0315-7.
- Vidaki, A., and M. Kayser. 2017. From forensic epigenetics to forensic epigenomics: Broadening DNA investigative intelligence. Genome Biology 18 (1):238 doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1373-1.
- Wagner, J., J. N. Paulson, X. Wang, B. Bhattacharjee, and H. Corrada Bravo. 2016. Privacy-preserving microbiome analysis using secure computation. Bioinformatics 32 (12):1873–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw073.
- Wang, S., X. Jiang, S. Singh, R. Marmor, L. Bonomi, D. Fox, M. Dow, and L. Ohno-Machado. 2017. Genome privacy: Challenges, technical approaches to mitigate risk, and ethical considerations in the United States. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1387 (1):73–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13259.
- Werner, R. J., A. D. Kelly, and J. P. J. Issa. 2017. Epigenetics and precision oncology. Cancer Journal (Sudbury, Mass.) 23 (5):262–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0000000000000281.
- Wiener, C. J. 2010. Transgenerational tort liability for epigenetic disease. DePaul Journal of Health Care Law 13:319.
- Yang, D., I. Jang, J. Choi, M.-S. Kim, A. J. Lee, H. Kim, J. Eom, D. Kim, I. Jung, and B. Lee. 2018. 3DIV: A 3D-genome interaction viewer and database. Nucleic Acids Research 46 (D1):D52–D57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1017.
- Yang, Z., A. Wong, D. Kuh, D. S. Paul, V. K. Rakyan, R. D. Leslie, S. C. Zheng, M. Widschwendter, S. Beck, and A. E. Teschendorff. 2016. Correlation of an epigenetic mitotic clock with cancer risk. Genome Biology 17 (1):205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1064-3.
- Zhang, Y., M. Elgizouli, B. Schöttker, B. Holleczek, A. Nieters, and H. Brenner. 2016. Smoking-associated DNA methylation markers predict lung cancer incidence. Clinical Epigenetics 8 (1):127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-016-0292-4.