Postponed Withholding: Balanced Decision-Making at the Margins of Viability

REFERENCES

• Brecht, M., and D. J. C. Wilkinson. 2015. The outcome of treatment limitation discussions in newborns with brain injury. Archives of Disease in Childhood – Fetal and Neonatal Edition 100 (2):F155–F60. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-307399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinchmann, B. S., R. Forde, and P. Nortvedt. 2002. What matters to the parents? A qualitative study of parents’ experiences with life-and-death decisions concerning their premature infants. Nursing Ethics 9 (4):388–404. doi:10.1191/0969733002ne523oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunkhorst, J., J. Weiner, and J. Lantos. 2014. Infants of borderline viability: The ethics of delivery room care. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 19 (5):290–5. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2014.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavolo, A., B. Dierckx De Casterle, G. Naulaers, and C. Gastmans. 2020. Ethics of resuscitation for extremely premature infants: A systematic review of argument-based literature. Journal of Medical Ethics. doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, D., J. Parrish, N. Kamangar, et al. 2019. Time-limited trials among critically ill patients with advanced medical illnesses to reduce nonbeneficial intensive care unit treatments: Protocol for a multicenter quality improvement study. JMIR Research Protocols 8 (11):e16301. doi:10.2196/16301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, G. S., J. D. Yoon, K. A. Rasinski, and F. A. Curlin. 2016. Us physicians’ opinions about distinctions between withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining treatment. Journal of Religion and Health 55 (5):1596–606. doi:10.1007/s10943-015-0171-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuttini, M., M. Rebagliato, P. Bortoli, G. Hansen, R. de Leeuw, S. Lenoir, J. Persson, M. Reid, M. Schroell, U. de Vonderweid, et al. 1999. Parental visiting, communication, and participation in ethical decisions: A comparison of neonatal unit policies in Europe. Archives of Disease in Childhood – Fetal and Neonatal Edition 81 (2):F84–F90. doi:10.1136/fn.81.2.F84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekema, D. S. 2004. Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243–64. doi:10.1007/s11017-004-3146-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domellof, E., A. M. Johansson, A. Farooqi, M. Domellof, and L. Ronnqvist. 2020. Risk for behavioral problems independent of cognitive functioning in children born at low gestational ages. Frontiers in Pediatrics 8:311. doi:10.3389/fped.2020.00311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einarsdottir, J. 2009. Emotional experts: Parents’ views on end-of-life decisions for preterm infants in iceland. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 23 (1):34–50. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1387.2009.01036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmerich, N., and B. Gordijn. 2019. Beyond the equivalence thesis: How to think about the ethics of withdrawing and withholding life-saving medical treatment. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (1):21–41. doi:10.1007/s11017-019-09478-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltman, D. M., H. Du, and S. R. Leuthner. 2012. Survey of neonatologists’ attitudes toward limiting life-sustaining treatments in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatology 32 (11):886–92. doi:10.1038/jp.2011.186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K., J. Martin, M. Keller, and N. Marlow. 2014. European variation in decision-making and parental involvement during preterm birth. Archives of Disease in Childhood – Fetal and Neonatal Edition 99 (3):F245–F49. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2013-305191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillam, L., D. Wilkinson, V. Xafis, and D. Isaacs. 2017. Decision-making at the borderline of viability: Who should decide and on what basis? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 53 (2):105–11. doi:10.1111/jpc.13423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Virseda, C., Y. De Maeseneer, and C. Gastmans. 2019. Relational autonomy: What does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):76. doi:10.1186/s12910-019-0417-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, E. M., Ø. B. Therkelsen, R. Førde, O. Aasland, A. Janvier, and T. W. R. Hansen. 2012. Challenges in reconciling best interest and parental exercise of autonomy in pediatric life-or-death situations. The Journal of Pediatrics 161 (1):146–51. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.01.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintz, S. R., B. R. Vohr, C. M. Bann, H. G. Taylor, A. Das, K. E. Gustafson, K. Yolton, V. E. Watson, J. Lowe, M. E. DeAnda, et al. 2018. Preterm neuroimaging and school-age cognitive outcomes. Pediatrics 142 (1):e20174058. doi:10.1542/peds.2017-4058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, B. 2002. Is there a technological imperative in health care? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 18 (3):675–89. doi:10.1017/S0266462302000491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humikowski, C. A. 2012. Confession. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 166 (7):593–4. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janvier, A., K. L. Bauer, and J. D. Lantos. 2007. Are newborns morally different from older children? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):413–25. doi:10.1007/s11017-007-9052-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaempf, J. W., N. Kockler, and M. W. Tomlinson. 2018. Shared decision-making, value pluralism and the zone of parental discretion. Acta Paediatrica 107 (2):206–8. doi:10.1111/apa.13971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaempf, J., M. Morris, E. Steffen, L. Wang, and M. Dunn. 2021. Continued improvement in morbidity reduction in extremely premature infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition 106: 265–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochen, E. M., F. Jenken, P. A. Boelen, L.M.A. Deben, J.C. Fahner, A. van den Hoogen, S.C.C.M. Teunissen, K. Geleijns, M.C. Kars. 2020. When a child dies: A systematic review of well-defined parent-focused bereavement interventions and their alignment with grief- and loss theories. BMC Palliative Care 19 (1):28. doi:10.1186/s12904-020-0529-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopelman, L. M. 1997. The best-interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):271–89. doi:10.1093/jmp/22.3.271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krick, J. A., J. S. Hogue, T. R. Reese, and M. A. Studer. 2020. Uncertainty: An uncomfortable companion to decision-making for infants. Pediatrics 146 (Supplement 1):S13–s17. nodoi:10.1542/peds.2020-0818E.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lam, H. S., S. P. S. Wong, F. Y. B. Liu, H. L. Wong, T. F. Fok, and P. C. Ng. 2009. Attitudes toward neonatal intensive care treatment of preterm infants with a high risk of developing long-term disabilities. Pediatrics 123 (6):1501–8. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantos, J. D. 2018. Ethical problems in decision making in the neonatal ICU. New England Journal of Medicine 379 (19):1851–60. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1801063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemyre, B., T. Daboval, S. Dunn, M. Kekewich, G. Jones, D. Wang, M. Mason-Ward, and G. P. Moore. 2016. Shared decision making for infants born at the threshold of viability: A prognosis-based guideline. Journal of Perinatology 36 (7):503–9. doi:10.1038/jp.2016.81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuthner, S. R. 2014. Borderline viability controversies in caring for the extremely premature infant. Clinics in Perinatology 41 (4):799–814. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2014.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mactier, H., S. E. Bates, T. Johnston, C. Lee-Davey, N. Marlow, K. Mulley, L. K. Smith, M. To, and D. Wilkinson. 2020. Perinatal management of extreme preterm birth before 27 weeks of gestation: A framework for practice. Archives of Disease in Childhood – Fetal and Neonatal Edition 105 (3):232–9. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2019-318402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow, N., C. Shaw, K. Connabeer, N. Aladangady, K. Gallagher, and P. Drew. 2021. End-of-life decisions in neonatal care: A conversation analytical study. Archives of Disease in Childhood – Fetal and Neonatal Edition 106 (2):184–319544. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2020-319544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mchaffie, H. E., I. A. Laing, M. Parker, and J. Mcmillan. 2001. Deciding for imperilled newborns: Medical authority or parental autonomy? Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2):104–9. doi:10.1136/jme.27.2.104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahan, J. 2009. Asymmetries in the morality of causing people to exist. In Harming future persons, eds Roberts, MA and Wasserman, DT, 49–68. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Mercurio, M. R., S. M. Peterec, and B. Weeks. 2008. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome, extreme prematurity, comfort care only, and the principle of justice. Pediatrics 122 (1):186–9. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moro, T., K. Kavanaugh, T. A. Savage, M. R. Reyes, R. E. Kimura, and R. Bhat. 2011. Parent decision making for life support for extremely premature infants: From the prenatal through end-of-life period. Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing 25 (1):52–60. doi:10.1097/JPN.0b013e31820377e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, P., B. Andrews, and W. Meadow. 2018. Opportunities and difficulties for counseling at the margins of viability. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 23 (1):30–4. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrhaug, H. T., K. G. Brurberg, L. Hov, and T. Markestad. 2019. Survival and impairment of extremely premature infants: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics 143 (2):e20180933. doi:10.1542/peds.2018-0933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navne, L. E., M. N. Svendsen, and T. M. Gammeltoft. 2018. The attachment imperative: Parental experiences of relation-making in a danish neonatal intensive care unit. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 32 (1):120–37. doi:10.1111/maq.12412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, H., S. Johnson, Y. Y. Ni, D. Wolke, and N. Marlow. 2020. Neuropsychological outcomes at 19 years of age following extremely preterm birth. Pediatrics 145 (2):e20192087. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-2087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, T. M., L. Gillam, P. G. Davis, and A. Janvier. 2018. The use and misuse of moral distress in neonatology. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 23 (1):39–43. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2017.09.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, T. M., L. Gillam, A. Janvier, and P. G. Davis. 2020. How should neonatal clinicians act in the presence of moral distress? Archives of Disease in Childhood – Fetal and Neonatal Edition 105 (4):348–9. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2019-317895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, C. A., H. Starks, M. R. O’Connor, E. Bourget, R. M. Hays, and A. Z. Doorenbos. 2018. Physicians perceptions of shared decision-making in neonatal and pediatric critical care. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine 35 (4):669–76. doi:10.1177/1049909117734843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieder, T. N. 2017. Saving or creating: Which are we doing when we resuscitate extremely preterm infants? The American Journal of Bioethics 17 (8):4–12. doi:10.1080/15265161.2017.1340988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risoy, S. M., and T. Sirnes. 2015. The decision: Relations to oneself, authority and vulnerability in the field of selective abortion. Biosocieties 10 (3):317–40. doi:10.1057/biosoc.2014.39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozier, M. D., C. E. Willison, R. R. Anspach, et al. 2020. Paradoxes of professional autonomy: A qualitative study of U.S. Neonatologists from 1978‐2017. Sociology of Health and Illness 42 (8):1821–1836. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rysavy, M. A., J. D. Horbar, E. F. Bell, L. Li, L. T. Greenberg, J. E. Tyson, R. M. Patel, W. A. Carlo, N. E. Younge, C. E. Green, et al. 2020. Assessment of an updated neonatal research network extremely preterm birth outcome model in the vermont oxford network. JAMA Pediatrics 174 (5):e196294. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saigal, S. 2016. In their own words: Life at adulthood after very premature birth. Seminars in Perinatology 40 (8):578–83. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. T., and B. Engelen. 2020. The ethics of nudging: An overview. Philosophy Compass 15 (4):12658. doi:10.1111/phc3.12658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, K., B. Metze, C. Buhrer, M. Cuttini, and L. Garten. 2019. End-of-life decisions 20 years after euronic: Neonatologists’ self-reported practices, attitudes, and treatment choices in germany, switzerland, and austria. Journal of Pediatrics 207:154–60. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, J. W., M. Pritchard, R. J. Heyne, L. S. Brown, M. A. Jaleel, W. D. Engle, P. J. Burchfield, and L. P. Brion. 2017. Severe intraventricular hemorrhage and withdrawal of support in preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology 37 (4):441–7. doi:10.1038/jp.2016.233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J., P. Monagle, and L. Gillam. 2014. What parents want from doctors in end-of-life decision-making for children. Archives of Disease in Childhood 99 (3):216–20. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2013-304249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursin, L. 2019a. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: Ethically equivalent? The American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):10–20. doi:10.1080/15265161.2018.1561961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursin, L. 2019b. Withholding versus withdrawing treatment: Why medical guidelines should omit “theoretical equivalence”. The American Journal of Bioethics 19 (6):W5–W9. doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1607920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursin, L., J. Syltern. 2018. In the best interest of the … Parents: Norwegian health personnel on the proper role of parents in neonatal decision-making. Pediatrics 142 (Suppl 1):S567–S73. doi:10.1542/peds.2018-0478H.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ursin, L., and J. Syltern. 2020. Protect us from ourselves: Balancing the parental instinct of saving. Nursing Ethics 27 (5):1282–96. doi:10.1177/0969733019871691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vink, E. E., E. Azoulay, A. Caplan, E. J. O. Kompanje, and J. Bakker. 2018. Time-limited trial of intensive care treatment: An overview of current literature. Intensive Care Medicine 44 (9):1369–77. doi:10.1007/s00134-018-5339-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, J. K., and L. F. Ross. 2014. Relational autonomy: Moving beyond the limits of isolated individualism. Pediatrics 133 (Supplement):S16–S23. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-3608D.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, D. J. 2011. A life worth giving? The threshold for permissible withdrawal of life support from disabled newborn infants. The American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):20–32. doi:10.1080/15265161.2010.540060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, D., E. Butcherine, and J. Savulescu. 2019. Withdrawal aversion and the equivalence test. The American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):21–8. doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1574465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, D. L., A. A. Verhagen, and E. Van Wijlick. 2014. Infants’ best interests in end-of-life care for newborns. Pediatrics 134 (4):e1163–e1168. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-0780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, H. S., S. Santhakumaran, F. M. Cowan, N. Modi, and G. Medicines For Neonates Investigator. 2016. Developmental assessments in preterm children: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics 138 (2):e20160251. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-0251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar