REFERENCES
- Algorithm Watch. 2019. The AI ethics guidelines global inventory. accessed July 20, 2021. https://algorithmwatch.org/en/ai-ethics-guidelines-global-inventory/.
- Alvarado, R., and N. Morar. 2021. Error, reliability and health-related digital autonomy in AI diagnoses of social media analysis. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):26–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1926589.
- Amann, J., A. Blasimme, E. Vayena, D. Frey, and V. I. Madai. 2020. Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: A multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 20 (1):310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6.
- Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress. 2019. Principles of biomedical ethics. Vol. 8. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Butorac, I., and A. Carter. 2021. The coercive potential of digital mental health. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):28–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1926582.
- Cuijpers, P., H. Noma, E. Karyotaki, C. H. Vinkers, A. Cipriani, and T. A. Furukawa. 2020. A network meta-analysis of the effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression. World Psychiatry 19 (1):92–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20701.
- D’Hotman, D., and J. Schnall. 2021. A new type of 'Greenwashing'? Social media companies predicting depression and other mental illnesses. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):36–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1926583.
- Duran, J. M., and K. R. Jongsma. 2021. Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI. Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (5):329–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106820.
- Floridi, L. 2019. Translating principles into practices of digital ethics: Five risks of being unethical. Philosophy & Technology 32 (2):185–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00354-x.
- Gu, C. G., E. L. Papautsky, A. D. Boyd, and J. Zulueta. 2021. Four stages in social media network analysis-building blocks for health-related digital autonomy in artificial intelligence, social media, and depression. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):38–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1926586.
- Jobin, A., M. Ienca, and E. Vayena. 2019. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (9):389–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.
- Klugman, C. M. 2021. Black boxes and bias in AI challenge autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):33–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1926587.
- Kouser, T., and J. Ward. 2021. Health-related digital autonomy: An important, but unfinished step. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):31–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1926591.
- Laacke, S., R. Mueller, G. Schomerus, and S. Salloch. 2021. Artificial intelligence, social media and depression. A new concept of health-related digital autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):4–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1863515.
- Moritz, S., Y. Nestoriuc, W. Rief, J. P. Klein, L. Jelinek, and J. Peth. 2019. It can't hurt, right? Adverse effects of psychotherapy in patients with depression. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 269 (5):577–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-018-0931-1.
- Oexle, N., V. Ajdacic-Gross, R. Kilian, M. Muller, S. Rodgers, Z. Xu, W. Rossler, and N. Rusch. 2017. Mental illness stigma, secrecy and suicidal ideation. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 26 (1):53–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796015001018.
- Ploug, T., and S. Holm. 2020. The right to refuse diagnostics and treatment planning by artificial intelligence. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 23 (1):107–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09912-8.
- Ploug, T., and S. Holm. 2021. The right to contest AI profiling based on social media data. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):21–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1926585.
- Quinn, D. M., M. K. Williams, and B. M. Weisz. 2015. From discrimination to internalized mental illness stigma: The mediating roles of anticipated discrimination and anticipated stigma. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 38 (2):103–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000136.
- Ranisch, R. 2021. Consultation with Doctor Twitter: Consent fatigue, and the role of developers in digital medical ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):24–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1926595.
- Reece, A. G., and C. M. Danforth. 2017. Instagram photos reveal predictive markers of depression. EPJ Data Science 6 (1):15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0110-z.
- Reece, A. G., A. J. Reagan, K. L. M. Lix, P. S. Dodds, C. M. Danforth, and E. J. Langer. 2017. Forecasting the onset and course of mental illness with Twitter data. Scientific Reports 7 (1):13006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12961-9.
- Rüsch, N., N. Oexle, L. Reichhardt, and S. Ventling. 2019. In Würde zu sich stehen – Konzept und Wirksamkeit eines peer-geleiteten Programms zu Offenlegung und Stigmabewältigung. Psychiatrische Praxis 46 (02):97–102.
- Schmietow, B., and G. Marckmann. 2019. Mobile health ethics and the expanding role of autonomy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (4):623–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09900-y.
- Slack, S. K. 2021. Is health-related digital autonomy setting the autonomy bar too high? The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):40–2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1926584.
- Starke, G., R. van den Brule, B. S. Elger, and P. Haselager. 2021. Intentional machines: A defence of trust in medical artificial intelligence. Bioethics doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12891.
- Véliz, C. 2019. Three things digital ethics can learn from medical ethics. Nature Electronics 2 (8):316–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-019-0294-2.
- World Health Organization. 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on mental, neurological and substance use services: Results of a rapid assessment. Geneva. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978924012455.
- Zhang, H., Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, F. Guan, H. Zhang, and Z. Guo. 2021. Artificial intelligence, social media, and suicide prevention: Principle of beneficence besides respect for autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):43–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1928793.