REFERENCES
- ‘17 U.S. Code § 107 - Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use’. n.d. LII/Legal Information Institute. Accessed 6 August 2023. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107.
- Carter, C. B., and C. F. Blanford. 2016. Plagiarism and detection. Journal of Materials Science 51 (15):7047–8. doi:10.1007/s10853-016-0004-7.
- Gao, T., H. Yen, J. Yu, and D. Chen. 2023. Enabling large language models to generate text with citations. arXiv. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2305.14627.
- Porsdam Mann, S., B. Earp, N. Moller, V. Suren, and J. Savulescu. 2023. AUTOGEN: A personalized large language model for academic enhancement—Ethics and proof of principle. American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):28–41. doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2233356.
- Quang, J. 2023. Does training AI violate copyright law? Berkeley Technology Law Journal 36 (4):1407–36.
- Samuelson, P. 2023. Generative AI meets copyright. Science (New York, N.Y.) 381 (6654):158–61. doi:10.1126/science.adi0656.
- Steven, P. 2014. ‘Why Academics Stink at Writing’. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2014, sec. The Review. https://www.chronicle.com/article/why-academics-stink-at-writing/.
- US Copyright Office. n.d. ‘What does copyright protect? (FAQ) | U.S. copyright office’. Web page. Accessed 6 August 2023. https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-protect.html.
- Zohny, H., J. McMillan, and M. King. 2023. Ethics of generative AI. Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (2):79–80. doi:10.1136/jme-2023-108909.