90
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Interests and Choices in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria

REFERENCES

  • Azoulay, E. 2005. The end-of-life family conference: communication empowers. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 171(8): 803–804.
  • Bullock, E. C. 2016. Free choice and patient best interests. Health Care Analysis 24: 374–392.
  • Gervais, K. G. 2014. The social construction of death, biological plausibility, and the brain death criterion. The American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):33–34.
  • Greer, D. M., S. D. Shemie, A. Lewis, S. Torrance, P. Varelas, F. D. Goldenberg, and G. Sung. 2020. Determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria: the world brain death project. JAMA 324 (11):1078–1097.
  • Kantor, J. E., and I. A. Hoskins. 1993. Brain death in pregnant women. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 4(4): 308–314.
  • Lazaridis, C. and L.F. Ross. 2023. The argument for personal choice in determining death. In Death determination by neurologic criteria: areas of consensus and controversy, 433–443. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Leemputte, M., and E. Paquette. 2019. Consent for conducting evaluations to determine death by neurologic criteria: a legally permissible and ethically required approach to addressing current controversies. Current Pediatrics Reports 7: 152–162.
  • Lewis, A. 2024. An overview of ethical issues raised by medicolegal challenges to death by neurologic criteria in the United Kingdom and a comparison to management of these challenges in the USA. The American Journal of Bioethics 24 (1):79–96. doi:10.1080/15265161.2022.2160516.
  • Noddings, N. 2013. Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Univ of California Press.
  • Omelianchuk, A., J. Bernat, A. Caplan, D. Greer, C. Lazaridis, A. Lewis, and D. Magnus. 2022. Revise the uniform determination of death act to align the law with practice through neurorespiratory criteria. Neurology 98 (13): 532–536.
  • Padela, A. I. 2022. Muslim disquiet over brain-death: Advancing Islamic bioethics discourses by treating death as a social construct that aligns purposes with criteria and ethical behaviours. In End-of-life care, dying and death in the islamic moral tradition, 50–80. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
  • Pope, T. M. 2023. Is consent required for clinicians to make a determination of death by neurologic criteria? In Death Determination by Neurologic Criteria: Areas of Consensus and Controversy, 287–303. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.