Advanced search
Publication Cover
The American Journal of Bioethics Volume 24, 2024 - Issue 7
Submit an article Journal homepage
273
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Machine Learning Algorithms in the Personalized Modeling of Incapacitated Patients’ Decision Making—Is It a Viable Concept?

Tomasz Rzepińskia Adam Mickiewicz UniversityCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7714-0429View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Ewa Deskur-Śmieleckab Poznań University of Medical SciencesORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3301-0662View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Michał Chojnickib Poznań University of Medical SciencesORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8159-3925View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 51-53 | Published online: 24 Jun 2024

REFERENCES

  • Bello, R., and R. Falcon. 2017. Rough sets in machine learning: A review. In Thriving rough sets. Studies in computational intelligence, vol 708, eds. G. Wang, A. Skowron, Y. Yao, D. Ślęzak, and L. Polkowski. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54966-8_5.
  • Canny, A., B. Mason, and K. Boyd. 2023. Public perceptions of advance care planning (ACP) from an international perspective: A scoping review. BMC Palliative Care 22 (1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01230-4.
  • Durán, J. M., and K. Jongsma. 2021. Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI. Journal of Medical Ethics 47:329–35. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106820.
  • Earp, B., S. Mann, J. Allen, S. Salloch, V. Suren, K. Jongsma, M. Braun, D. Wilkinson, W. Sinnott-Armstrong, S. Rid, et al. 2024. A personalized patient preference predictor for substituted judgments in healthcare: Technically feasible and ethically desirable. The American Journal of Bioethics 24 (7):13–26. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2296402.
  • John, S. D. 2018. Messy autonomy: Commentary on patient preference predictors and the problem of naked statistical evidence. Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):864–864. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104941.
  • London, A. J. 2019. Artificial intelligence and black-box medical decisions: Accuracy versus explainability. The Hastings Center Report 49 (1):15–21. doi: 10.1002/hast.973.
  • Rzepiński, T. 2024. Problems and limitations of clinical trials for advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP). Accessed April 15, 2024. https://etykabadan.komisja.uj.edu.pl/documents/149614951/151135720/03.+Ekspertyza+ATMP+%28wersja+angielska%29/57f106a0-c504-4734-b386-628b3ff7442c
  • Rzepiński, T. 2014. Randomized controlled trials versus rough set analysis: Two competing approaches for evaluating clinical data. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (4):271–88. doi: 10.1007/s11017-014-9283-7.
  • Sharadin, N. P. 2018. Patient preference predictors and the problem of naked statistical evidence. Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):857–62. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104509.
  • Sparrow, R., and J. Hatherley. 2020. High hopes for “deep medicine”? AI, economics, and the future of care. The Hastings Center Report 50 (1): 14–7. doi: 10.1002/hast.1079.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.