“It’s Just Who I Am … I Have Brown Hair. I Have a Mysterious Father”: An Exploration of Donor-Conceived Offspring’s Identity Construction

REFERENCES

• American Pregnancy Association (2010–2011). Donor insemination. Retrieved from http://www.americanpregnancy.org/infertility/donorinsemination.html
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, R. L., & Ballard, S. J. (2011). From narrative inheritance to narrative momentum: Past, present, and future stories in an international adoptive family. Journal of Family Communication, 11, 69 –84. doi:10.1080/15267431.2011.554618.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2004). Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11, 1 –22. doi:10.1111/j.475-6811.2004.00068.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. (1996). Relating: Dialogues & dialectics. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, K. M., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2009). Identity as constituted in communication. In W. F. Eadie ( Ed.), 21^st century communication ( pp. 165 –173). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, K. M., Suter, E. A., & Daas, K. L. (2006). “About as solid as a fish net”: Symbolic construction of a legitimate parental identity for nonbiological lesbian mothers. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 201 –220. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0603_3.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspectives and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., Bach, B. W., Baxter, L. A., DiVerniero, R., Hammonds, J. R., Hosek, A. M., Willer, E. K., & Wolf, B. M. (2010). Constructing family: A typology of voluntary kin. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 388 –407. doi:10.1177/0265407510361615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication, 11, 123 –151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (1994). Comforting messages: Features, functions, and outcomes. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann ( Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication ( pp. 135 –161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10, 1 –23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBS News (2011). Sperm donor siblings find family ties. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/17/60minutes/main1414965_page4.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005). Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 national survey of family growth. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_025.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cushing, A. L. (2010). “I just want more information about who I am”: The search experience of sperm-donor offspring, searching for information about their donors and genetic heritage. Information Research, 15. Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/15-2/paper428.html
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, K. R., & Meadows, L. (2006). Sharing information with adults conceived as a result of donor insemination. Human Fertility, 9, 93 –99. doi:10.1080/14647270500509699.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniels, K. R., & Taylor, K. (1993). Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics and the Life Sciences, 12, 155 –170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitch, K. L. (1994). Criteria for evidence in qualitative research. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 32 –39.
   Google Scholar
• Freeark, K., Rosenblum, K. L., Hus, V., & Root, B. (2008). Fathers, mothers, and marriages: What shapes adoption conversations in families with young adopted children. Adoption Quarterly, 11, 1 –23.
   Google Scholar
• Friedlander, M. L. (1999). Ethnic identity development of internationally adopted children and adolescents: Implications for family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 43 –60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo, H. L., & Mellon-Gallardo, D. L. A. (2007). Stepmothering and identity: A co-constructed narrative. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 48, 125 –139.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, K. (2003). International and transracial adoption: A communication research agenda. Journal of Family Communication, 3, 237 –253.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, K. (2005). Joined by hearts and words: Adoptive family relationships. In K. Floyd & M. T. Morman ( Eds.), Widening the family circle: New research in family communication ( pp. 137 –153). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., MacCallum, F., Goodman, E., & Rutter, M. (2002). Families with children conceived by donor insemination: A follow-up at age twelve. Child Development, 73, 952 –968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, V. M., Daniels, K. R., & Gillett, W. (2007). The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents’ constructions in the case of donor insemination. Social Science & Medicine, 66, 301 –314. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, K., & Daniels, K. (2007). Parents dilemmas in sharing donor insemination conception stories with their children. Children & Society, 21, 420 –431. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2006.00079.x.
   Google Scholar
• Harrigan, M. M. (2010). Exploring the narrative process: An analysis of the adoption stories mothers tell their internationally adopted children. Journal of Family Communication, 10, 24 –39 doi:10.1080/15267430903385875.
   Google Scholar
• Harrigan, M. M., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2010). Discursive struggles in families formed through visible adoption: An exploration of dialectical unity. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 127 –144. doi:10.1080/00909881003639536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrigan, M. M., Dieter, S., Leinwohl, J., & Marrin, L. (2014). Redefining family: An analysis of adult donor-conceived offspring’s discursive meaning-making. Iowa Journal of Communication, 46, 16 –32.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, L. D. (1999). Symbolic interactionism, African American families, and the transracial adoption controversy. Social Work, 44, 443 –453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C., & Hackett, S. (2007). Communicative openness within adoptive families: Adoptive parents’ narrative accounts of the challenges of adoption talk and the approaches used to manage these challenges. Adoption Quarterly, 10, 157 –178.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M. (2003). Parents’ contributions to the narrative identity of offspring of donor-assisted conception. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 2229 –2242. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00099-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranstuber, H., & Koenig Kellas, J. (2011). “Instead of growing under her heart, I grew in it”: The relationship between adoption entrance narratives and adoptees’ self-concept. Communication Quarterly, 59, 179 –199. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.563440.
   Google Scholar
• Krusiewicz, E. S., & Wood, J. T. (2001). ‘He was our child from the moment we walked into that room’: Entrance stories of adoptive parents. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 18, 785 –803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (2006). Social theories: Social constructionism and symbolic interactionism. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter ( Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives ( pp. 229 –242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, S. W. (1999). Theories of human communication (6th ed.). Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., & Steimel, S. J. (2009). Creating and responding to the gen(d)realized others: Women miners’ community-constructed identities. Women’s Studies in Communication, 32, 320 –347.
   Google Scholar
• Lycett, E., Daniels, K., Curson, R., Chir, M. B., & Golombok, S. (2004). Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: A study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure. Fertility and Sterility, 82, 172 –179. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt, E., Glenn, N. D., & Clark, K. (2010). My daddy’s name is donor: A new study of young adults conceived through sperm donation. New York, NY: Institute for American Values.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, & society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nachtigall, R. D., Becker, G., Quiroga, S. S., & Tschann, J. M. (1998). The disclosure decision: Concerns and issues of parents of children conceived through donor insemination. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 178, 1165 –1170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, H. J., & Lee, B. (2012). The effect of computer-mediated social support in online communities on patient empowerment and doctor-patient communication. Health Communication, 27, 30 –41. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.567449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, M. R. (2011). Boundary conditions for the application of three theories of computer-mediated communication to MySpace. Journal of Communication, 61, 557 –575. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01569.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penman, R. (2000). Reconstructing communicating: Looking to a future. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. A. (2010). ‘I can air my feelings instead of eating them’: Blogging as social support for the morbidly obese. Communication Studies, 61, 567 –584. doi:10.1080/10510974.2010.514676.
   Google Scholar
• Sants, H. J. (1964). Genealogical bewilderment in children with substitute parents. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 37, 133 –141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenfield, F., & Steele, S. J. (1997). What are the effects of anonymity and secrecy on the welfare of the child in gamete donation? Human Reproduction, 12, 392 –395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretive phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology, 5, 9 –27. doi:10.1080/17437199.2010.510659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A., Daas, K. L., & Bergen, K. M. (2008). Negotiating lesbian family identity via symbols and rituals. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 26 –47. doi:10.1177/0192513X07305752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Anonymous Us Project. (2012). Stories from donor conceived. Retrieved from http://anonymous.org/stories/index.php
   Google Scholar
• The Donor Sibling Registry. (2011). Home. Retrieved from https://www.donorsiblingregistry.com/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting realities. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. J., & Coyle, A. (2000). What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counseling and therapy. Human Reproduction, 15, 2041 –2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, L. H., & West, R. (2006). Perspectives on family communication (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, I., & Broderick, P. (1999). The psychology of assisted reproduction – or psychology assisting its reproduction? Australian Psychologist, 34, 38 –44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrobel, G. M., Kohler, J. K., Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (2003). The family adoption communication (FAC) model: Identifying pathways of adoption-related communication. Adoption Quarterly, 7, 53 –84. doi:10.1300/J145v07n02_04.
   Google Scholar