No Matter What: A Qualitative Analysis of How LGBTQ Families and Allies Define Family through an Interactive Art Project

References

• Allen, K. R., Blieszner, R., & Roberto, K. A. (2011). Perspectives on extended family and fictive kin in the later years: Strategies and meanings of kin reinterpretation. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 1156–1177. doi:10.1177/0192513X11404335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barriage, S. (2018). Task-centered activities as an approach to data collection in research with children and youth. Library and Information Science Research, 40(1), 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2018.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2015). Theorizing the communicative construction of “family”: The three r’s. In L. A. Baxter (Ed.), Remaking “family” communicatively (pp. 33–47). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., Norwood, K. M., Asbury, B., & Scharp, K. M. (2014). Narrating adoption: Resisting adoption as “second best” in online stories of domestic adoption told by adoptive parents. Journal of Family Communication, 14, 253–269. doi:10.1080/15267431.2014.908199
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, K. M., Suter, E. A., & Daas, K. L. (2006). “About as solid as a fish net”: Symbolic construction of a legitimate parental identity for nonbiological lesbian mothers. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 201–220. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0603_3
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Kellner, H. K. (1964). Marriage and the construction of reality. Diogenes, 12(46), 1–23. doi:10.1177/039219216401204601
   Google Scholar
• Bernardes, J. (1999). We must not define “the family”! Marriage & Family Review, 28(3–4), 21–41. doi:10.1300/J002v28n03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss, P. (1987). In an educational tape coordinated by Bert Adams: What is family? Annenberg School of Communication, CPB course on family, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., Bach, B. W., Baxter, L. A., DiVerniero, R., Hammonds, J. R., Hosek, A. M., … Wolf, B. M. (2010). Constructing family: A typology of voluntary kin. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 388–407. doi:10.1177/0265407510361615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. P., & Graham, E. E. (2009). The relationship between individuals’ definitions of family and implicit personal theories of communication. The Journal of Family Communication, 9, 191–208. doi:10.1080/15267430903070147
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (2007). On the differences between scientific and artistic approaches to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 10(4), 5–9. doi:10.3102/0013189x010004005
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, K. M. (2006). Diversity’s impact on defining the family: Discourse-dependence and identity. The Family Communication Sourcebook, 3–20. doi:10.4135/9781452233024.n1
   Google Scholar
• Gates, G. J. (2015). Marriage and family: LGBT individuals and same-sex couples. Future of Children, 25, 67–87. doi:10.1353/foc.2015.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. (2015). Method meets art: Arts-based research practce (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. (2017). Handbook of arts-based research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, I. (1999). What phenomenon is family? Marriage and Family Review, 28, 93–104. doi:10.1300/J002v28n03_08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Literat, I. (2013). “A pencil for your thoughts”: Participatory drawing as a visual research method with children and youth. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 84–98. doi:10.1177/160940691301200143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J., & Tipper, B. (2008). Being related: How children define and create kinship. Childhood, 15, 441–460. doi:10.1177/0907568208097201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noe, A. (2000). Experience and experiment in art. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7, 123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1955). The American family: Its relations to personality and the social structure, Family socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto, N. (2018). After Marriage: The legal landscape for LGBT family rights. Juris Magazine. Retrieved from http://sites.law.duq.edu/juris/2018/01/12/after-marriage-the-legal-landscape-for-lgbt-family-rights/
   Google Scholar
• Recent developments in LGBT family law - The National LGBT Bar Association. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://lgbtbar.org/what-we-do/member-groups/the-lgbt-family-law-institute/recent-developments-in-lgbt-family-law/
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, I. (1987). In an educational tape coordinated by Bert Adams: What is family? Annenberg School of Communication, CPB course on family, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. (2011). Unhitched: Love, marriage, and family values from West Hollywood to western China (NYU series in social and cultural analysis). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A., Baxter, L. A., Seurer, L. M., & Thomas, L. J. (2014). Discursive constructions of the meaning of “family” in online narratives of foster adoptive parents. Communication Monographs, 81, 1–20. doi:10.1080/03637751.2014.880791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift, A. (2014, May 30). Most Americans say same-sex couples entitled to adopt. Gallup. Retrieved from http://news.gallup.com
   Google Scholar
• Takach, M. (2017). Pridefest 2017 sets a new attendance record. Rise! Pridefest Milwaukee. Retrieved from http://pridefest.com/2017/06/13/pridefest-2017-sets-a-new-attendance-record/
   Google Scholar
• Turner, L. H., & West, R. (2014). The SAGE handbook of family communication. doi:10.4135/9781483375366
   Google Scholar
• van Eeden-Moorefield, B., Few-Demo, A. L., Benson, K., Bible, J., & Lummer, S. (2017). A content analysis of LGBT research in top family journals 2000–2015. Journal of Family Issues, 39, 1374–1395. doi:10.1177/0192513X17710284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar