Setting the Agenda: Poetic Inquiry as Critical Family Communication Methodology

References

• Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University.
   Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, G. (1992). The new mestiza nation: A multicultural movementFeminist theory reader, local and global perspectives (C. R. McCann & S. K. Kim, Eds., 3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315680675
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L. (2017). Embodiment in qualitative research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L. (2012). That baby will cost you: An intended ambivalent pregnancy. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(4), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411431564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L. (2014). Family stories, poetry, and women’s work: Knit four, frog one (Poems). Sense/Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L. (2016). TEN: (The promise of arts-based, ethnographic, and narrative research in critical family communication research and praxis). Journal of Family Communication, 16(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2015.1111218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L. (2017). MotherWork collage (A queer scrapbook). QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking, 4(1), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.14321/qed.4.1.0166
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L. Crank up the feminism: Poetic inquiry as feminist methodology. (2018a). Humanities, 2018. 7(3), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/h7030085
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L. (2018b). Mother-poems: Using the confessional as critique in autoethnographic Poetry. In S. H. Jones & M. Pruyn (Eds.), Creative selves/creative cultures: Critical autoethnography, performance, and pedagogy (pp. 103–111). Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L. (2020). Poetic inquiry: Craft, method, and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L. (2021). Buttered nostalgia: Feeding my parents during #COVID19. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(6), 1877–1900. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211012478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L. (2023). “Bringing up baby.” The Autoethnographer. https://theautoethnographer.com/collage-and-erasure-poems-baby/?fbclid=IwAR1K5RqXeeZHyaWUldEd2vxsW_GzbAq4O-ASfTBsw-gebg8Szo7Wz-kB8vQ
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L., & Nicole, C. (2016). Embodied poetics in mother poetry: Dialectics and discourses of mothering. In K. Galvin & M. Prendergast (Eds.), Poetic inquiry II: Seeing, caring, understanding: Using poetry as and for inquiry (pp. 81–98). Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L., Stafford, L., & Kuiper, K. (2022). Family communication as an art. In J. Manning, J. Allen, & K. Denker (Eds.), Family Communication as … (pp. 155–166). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L., & Trotter, S. (2017). Arts-based methods in qualitative research. In C. S. Davis & R. F. Potter (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communication research methods. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0250
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L., Watson, W. K., Pollino, M. A., & Reese, J. (2022). Poetic portraiture as critical arts-based pedagogy and methodology: Older women’s relationships through the lifecourse. Qualitative Inquiry, 28(10), 987–997. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221097058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, R. (2004). Using poetry and narrative as qualitative data: Exploring a father’s cancer through poetry. Families Systems & Health, 22(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/1091-7527.22.2.162
   Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J. (1998). Female masculinity. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huopalainen, A. S., & Satama, S. T. (2019). Mothers and researchers in the making: Negotiating ‘new’ motherhood within the ‘new’ academia. Human Relations, 72(1), 98–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718764571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantor, J. (2005). Expecting trouble: The book they love to hate. The New York Times, September 15. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/15/fashion/thursdaystyles/expecting-trouble-the-book-they-love-to-hate.html
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, P. (2018). Introduction to arts-based research. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The handbook of arts-based research (pp. 3–21). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, J. (2014). A constitutive approach to interpersonal communication. Communication Studies, 65(4), 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2014.927294
   Google Scholar
• Murkoff, H., & Mazel, S. (2016). What to expect when you’re expecting (5th ed.). Workman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• O’hare, I. (2020). Erase the patriarchy: An anthology of erasure poetry. University of Hell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, C. (2020, July/August). On erasure. KR Online, https://kenyonreview.org/kr-online-issue/2020-julyaug/selections/cecily-parks-656342/
   Google Scholar
• Pelias, R. J. (2019). The creative qualitative researcher: Writing that makes readers want to read. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poets.org. (n.d.). Erasure: Explore the glossary of poetic terms. Poets.org. https://poets.org/glossary/erasure
   Google Scholar
• Reed, T. V. (2005). The poetic is political: Feminist poetry and the poetics of women’s rightsFeminist theory reader, local and global perspectives (C. R. McCann & S. K. Kim, Eds., 3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315680675
   Google Scholar
• Scotti, V., & Chilton, G. (2017). Collage as arts-based research. In P. Leavy (Ed.), Handbook of arts-based research (pp. 355–376). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Souffrant, L. (2009). Mother delivers experiment: Poetry of motherhood: Plath, Derricotte, Zucker, and Holbrook. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 37(2), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.0.0198
   Google Scholar
• Steinorth, J. S. (2021). Her read. Texas Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A. (2016). Introduction: Critical approaches to family communication research: Representation, critique, and praxis. Journal of family communication, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2015.1111219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A. (2018). The promise of contrapuntal and intersectional methods for advancing critical interpersonal and family communication. Communication monographs, 85(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1375131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A., & Norwood, K. M. (2017). Critical theorizing in family communication studies: (Re)reading relational dialectics. Communication Theory, 27(3), 290–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacker, B. (2004). Family doggerel. Journal of lesbian studies, 8(3–4), 141–143. https://doi.org/10.1300/J155v08n03_24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner, C., & Wolff, R. (Eds.). (2007). Not for mothers only: Contemporary poems on child-getting and child-rearing. Fence Books.
   Google Scholar
• West, D. (2011). Deaf-hearing family life: Three mothers’ poetic voices of resistance. Qualitative inquiry, 17(8), 732 740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411420974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer, E. K. (2019). The hea/r/tist part: Turning the point of mothering toward 100%. Health communication, 34(9), 1069–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1455137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar