Dynamics of Global and Organizational Self-Esteem at Work

References

• Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Donnellan, B. M., & Tisak, J. (2013). An application of the LC-LSTM framework to the self-esteem instability case. Psychometrika, 78(4), 769–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9326-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asendorpf, J. B., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2006). Predictive validity of personality types versus personality dimensions from early childhood to adulthood: Implications for the distinction between core Page 2 of 4 and surface traits. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 486–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802393649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, J. W., & Schmidt, A. M. (2018). Negative relationships between self-efficacy and performance can be adaptive: The mediating role of resource allocation. Journal of Management, 44(2), 555–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, D., & Willoughby, M. T. (2017). On the practical interpretability of cross‐lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development, 88(4), 1186–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling, N. A., Eschleman, K. J., Wang, Q., Kirkendall, C., & Alarcon, G. (2010). A meta‐analysis of the predictors and consequences of organization‐based self‐esteem. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X454382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brief, A. P. (1998). Attitudes in and around organizations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D., & Dutton, K. A. (1995). The thrill of victory, the complexity of defeat: Self-esteem and people's emotional reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 712–722 doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D., & Zeigler‐Hill, V. (2018). Self‐esteem. In D. Ferris, R. Johnson, & C. Sedikides (Eds.), The self at work: Fundamental theory and research (pp. 40–71). New York Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Di Giunta, L., Panerai, L., & Eisenberg, N. (2010). The contribution of agreeableness and self-efficacy beliefs to prosociality. European Journal of Personality, 24(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Goddard, T. G., & Casper, W. J. (2004). Examination of the relationships among general and work-specific self-evaluations, work-related control beliefs, and job attitudes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00175.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano, R., & Grandey, A. A. (1998). If politics is a game, then what are the rules? Three suggestions for ethical management. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Organizations and ethics: Morally managing people and processes (pp. 133–152). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson, P. G., & Wood, J. V. (1998). Self-esteem and the cognitive accessibility of strengths and weaknesses after failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Kenny, D. A., Trzesniewski, K. H., Lucas, R. E., & Conger, R. D. (2012). Using trait–state models to evaluate the longitudinal consistency of global self-esteem from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 634–645.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Robins, R. W. (2011). Self-esteem: Enduring issues and controversies. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, & A. Furnham (Eds.), The wiley-blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 718–746). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dormann, C., & Griffin, M. A. (2015). Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayard, J. V., Roberts, B. W., Robins, R. W., & Watson, D. (2012). Uncovering the affective core of conscientiousness: The role of self‐conscious emotions. Journal of Personality, 80(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00720.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filosa, L., & Alessandri, G. (2022). Validation of the Organizational-Based General Self-Esteem Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865153
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Halbesleben, J. R., & Wheeler, A. R. (2008). The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave. Work & Stress, 22(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802383962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2018). The Lifespan Self-Esteem Scale: Initial validation of a new measure of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(1), 84–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, D., Ferris, D. L., Brown, D., & Watson, D. (2009). The influence of work personality on job satisfaction: Incremental validity and mediation effects. Journal of Personality, 77(4), 1051–1084. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00574.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korman, A. K. (1970). Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuster, F., Orth, U., & Meier, L. L. (2013). High self-esteem prospectively predicts better work conditions and outcomes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 668–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613479806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R. (2012). Sociometer theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 141–159). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, M., & Baumeister, R. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lievens, F., De Corte, W., & Schollaert, E. (2008). A closer look at the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores and validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., McClear, K., & Knight, D. (1996). Self-esteem and work. International Review of Industrial/Organizational Psychology, 11, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2(2), 77–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 133–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Gerlach, E., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Brettschneider, W. D. (2007). Longitudinal study of preadolescent sport self‐concept and performance: Reciprocal effects and causal ordering. Child Development, 78(6), 1640–1656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01094.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Academic self‐concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X503501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & O’Mara, A. (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Xu, M., & Martin, A. J. (2012). Self-concept: A synergy of theory, method, and application. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 427–458). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63(3), 365–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61(3), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159–181). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (19982018). Mplus USER’S GUIDE (Eighth Edition ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Orth, U., & Robins, R. W. (2019). Development of self-esteem across the lifespan. In D. P. McAdams, R. L. Shiner, & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 328–344). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orth, U., & Robins, R. W. (2022). Is high self-esteem beneficial? Revisiting a classic question. American Psychologist, 77(1) , 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000922
   Google Scholar
• Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Schaufeli, W. B., & van Wijhe, C. I. (2012). Good morning, good day: A diary study on positive emotions, hope, and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(9), 1129–1154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711429382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management, 30(5), 591–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization based self-esteem: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32 (3) , 622–648. https://doi.org/10.5465/256437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentzsch, K., & Schröder-Abé, M. (2022). Top down or bottom up? Evidence from the longitudinal development of global and domain-specific self-esteem in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(4), 714–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpello, V., & Campbell, J. P. (1983). Job satisfaction: Are all the parts there? Personnel Psychology, 36(3), 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb02236.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck, J., Kim, Y. J., & Peng, A. C. (2012). The self-concept in organizational psychology: Clarifying and differentiating the constructs. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology: Vol. 27. International review of industrial and organizational psychology 2012 (pp. 1–38). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, W. B., Jr., Chang-Schneider, C., & McClarty, K. L. (2007). Do people’s self-views matter? Self-concept and self-esteem in everyday life. American Psychologist, 62(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharenou, P. (1979). Employee self-esteem: A review of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 15(3), 316–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90028-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R. M., & Mitchell, M. S. (2017). The motivational effects of diminished self-esteem for employees who experience abusive supervision. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2218–2251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314566462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121
   Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigler-Hill, V. (2013). The importance of self-esteem. In V. Zeigler-Hill (Ed.), Self-esteem (pp. 1–20). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zyphur, M. J., Voelkle, M. C., Tay, L., Allison, P. D., Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., … Diener, E. (2020). From data to causes II: Comparing approaches to panel data analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 23(4), 688–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119847280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar