203
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

International Case Studies of Psychosocial Ripple Effects of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) in European Countries

, , , , &
Pages 1092-1095 | Published online: 20 Aug 2009

REFERENCES

  • Becker, T., Benner, E., and Glitsch, K., 2000. Consumer perception of fresh meat quality in Germany, Br. Food J. 102 (2000), pp. 246–266.
  • Berg, L., 2004. Trust in food in the age of mad cow disease: A comparative study of consumers’ evaluation of food safety in Belgium, Britain and Norway, Appetite 42 (2004), pp. 21–32.
  • Burton, M., and Young, T., 1996. The impact of BSE on the demand for beef and other meats in Great Britain, Appl. Econ. 28 (1996), pp. 687–693.
  • Cade, J., Calvert, C., and Barrett, J., 1998. How could the BSE crisis affect nutrient intake? Comparison of beef and non-beef eating meat eaters from the UK Women's Cohort Study, Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 52 (1998), pp. 151–152.
  • Caskie, P., Davis, J., and Moss, J. E., 1999. The economic impact of BSE: A regional perspective, Appl. Econ. 31 (1999), pp. 1623–1630.
  • Chatard-Pannetier, A., Rousset, S., Bonin, D., Guillaume, S., and Droit-Volet, S., 2004. Nutritional knowledge and concerns about meat of elderly French people in the aftermath of the crises over BSE and foot-and-mouth, Appetite 42 (2004), pp. 175–183.
  • Fearne, A., Hornibrook, S., and Dedman, S., 2001. The management of perceived risk in the food supply chain: a comparative study of retailer-led beef quality assurance schemes in Germany and Italy, Int. Food Agribusiness Manage. Rev. 4 (2001), pp. 19–36, .
  • Frewer, L. J., and Salter, B., 2002. Public attitudes, scientific advice and the politics of regulatory policy: The case of BSE, Sci. Public Policy 29 (2002), pp. 137–145.
  • Glitsch, K., 2000. Consumer perceptions of fresh meat quality: Cross-national comparison, Br. Food J. 102 (2000), pp. 177–194.
  • Gray, G. M., and Ropeik, D. P., 2002. Dealing with the dangers of fear: The role of risk communication, Health Affairs 21 (2002), pp. 106–116.
  • Green, J. M., Draper, A. K., and Dowler, E. A., 2003. Short cuts to safety: Risk and ‘rules of thumb’ in accounts of food choice, Health Risk Soc. 5 (2003), pp. 33–52.
  • Green, J. M., Draper, A. K., Dowler, E. A., Fele, G., Hagenhoff, V., Rusanen, M., and Rusanen, T., 2005. Public understanding of food risks in four European countries: A qualitative study, Eur. J. Public Health 15 (2005), pp. 523–527.
  • Jacob, M., and Hellström, T., 2000. Policy understanding of science, public trust and the BSE–CJD crisis, J. Hazard. Mater. 78 (2000), pp. 303–317.
  • Jasanoff, S., 1997. Civilization and madness: The great BSE scare of 1996, Public Understand. Sci. 6 (1997), pp. 221–232.
  • Latouche, K., Rainelli, P., and Vermersch, D., 1998. Food safety issues and the BSE scare: Some lessons from the French case, Food Policy 23 (1998), pp. 347–356.
  • Lemyre, L., Gibson, S., Brazeau, I., Markon, M.P.L., Turner, M., Carroll, A., Boutette, P., and Krewski, D, 2008. Descriptive report on national public survey on risk perceptions and risk acceptability of prion disease and food safety. Ottawa, ON, Canada: University of Ottawa in partnership with PrioNet Canada, NCE, CRTI, McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; 2008.
  • Miles, S., and Frewer, L. J., 2003. Public perception of scientific uncertainty in relation to food hazards, J. Risk Res. 6 (2003), pp. 267–283.
  • Reynolds, D., and Balinbin, W. M., 2003. Mad cow disease: An empirical investigation of restaurant strategies and consumer response, J. Hosp. Tourism Res. 27 (2003), pp. 358–368.
  • Rosati, S., and Saba, A., 2004. The perception of risks associated with food-related hazards and the perceived reliability of sources of information, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 39 (2004), pp. 491–500.
  • Setbon, M., Raude, J., Fischler, C., and Flahault, A., 2005. Risk perception of the “mad cow disease” in France: Determinants and consequences, Risk Anal. 25 (2005), pp. 813–826.
  • Shaw, A., 2002. “It just goes against the grain.” Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK, Public Understand. Sci. 11 (2002), pp. 1–19.
  • Shaw, A., 2004. Discourses of risk in lay accounts of microbiological safety and BSE: a qualitative interview study, Health Risk Soc. 6 (2004), pp. 151–171.
  • Smith, A., Young, J., and Gibson, J., 1999. How now, mad cow? Consumer confidence and source credibility during the 1996 BSE scare, Eur. J. Market. 33 (1999), pp. 1107–122.
  • www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/040526/d040526e.htm, Statistics Canada. 2004. Food consumption 2003. The Daily.
  • Verbeke, W., and Viaene, J., 1999. Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: Empirical evidence from a consumer survey, Food Qual. Preference 10 (1999), pp. 437–445.
  • Verbeke, W., Ward, R. W., and Viaene, J., 2000. Probit analysis of fresh meat consumption in Belgium: Exploring BSE and television communication impact, Agribusiness 16 (2000), pp. 215–234.
  • Weitkunat, R., Pottgieber, C., Meyer, N., Crispin, A., Fischer, R., Schotten, K., Kerr, J., and Überla, K., 2003. Perceived risk of bovine spongiform encephalopathy and dietary behaviour, J. Health Psychol. 8 (2003), pp. 373–381.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.