A template of information needs for decision-making about delaying remediation on contaminated lands to protect human health

References

• Baier-Anderson, C. 2006. Risk assessment, remedial decisions and the challenge to protect public health: The perchlorate case study. Anal. Chimica. Acta. 567:13–19. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2006.02.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardos, P. 2014. Progress in sustainable remediation. Remed. J. 25. doi:10/1002/rem.21412.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnee, G., J. P. Mathews, J. Pinkham, A. Smith, and J. Stanfill. 2011. Nez Perce involvement with solving environmental problems: History, perspectives, treaty rights, and obligations. In Stakeholders and scientists: Achieving implementable solutions to energy and environmental issues, ed. J. Burger, 149–84. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, P. H., and H. Rechberger. 2015. Waste to energy – Key elements for sustainable waste management. Waste Manage. 37:3–12. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J. 2011. Stakeholders and scientists: Achieving implementable solutions to energy and environmental issues, ed. J. Burger. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, J. 2019. Costs and benefits of delaying remediation on ecological resources at contaminated sites. EcoHealth 16 (3):454–75. doi:10.1007/s10393-019-01437-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 2016. Health risks to ecological workers on contaminated sites – The department of energy as a case study. J. Commun. Med. Health Educ. 6. doi:10.4172/2160711.1000427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burger, J., M. Gochfeld, D. S. Kosson, K. G. Brown, L. S. Bliss, A. Bunn, J. H. Clarke, H. J. Mayer, and J. A. Salisbury. 2019a. The costs of delaying remediation on human, ecological, and eco-cultural resources: Considerations for the department of energy: A methodological framework. Sci. Total Environ. 649:1054–64. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J., M. Gochfeld, D. S. Kosson, K. G. Brown, J. A. Salisbury, and C. Jeitner. 2019b. Evaluation of ecological resources at operating facilities at contaminated sites: The department of energy’s hanford site as a case study. Environ. Res. 170:452–62. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappuyns, V. 2016. Inclusion of social indicators in decision support tools for the selection of sustainable site remediation options. J. Environ. Manage. 184:45–65. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC). 2013. We are salmon people, CRITFC. http://critfc.org/salmon-culture/columbia-river-salmon/columbia-river-salmon-species.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP). 2015a. Final methodology for the hanford site-wide risk review project. Nashville, TN: CRESP, Vanderbilt University. http://www.cresp.org/hanford/methodology.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP). 2018. Hanford site-wide risk review final report. CRESP, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. http://www.cresp.org/hanford/Hanford Risk Review Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., R. de Groot, L. Braat, I. Kubiszewski, L. Fioramonti, P. Sutton, S. Farber, and M. Grasso. 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecol. Serv. 28:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza, R. R., R. D Groot, P. Sutton, S. van der Ploeg, S. J. Anderson, I. Kubiszewski, S. Farber, and R. K. Turner. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environ. Change 26:152–58. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRESP 2015b Interim Report for the Hanford Site-wide Risk Review. CRESP, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN. http://www.cresp.org/hanford/Hanford Risk Review Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Cundy, A. B., R. P. Bardos, A. Church, M. Puschenreiter, W. Friesl-Hunt, I. Muller, S. Neu, M. Mench, N. Witters, and J. Vangronsveld. 2013. Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for “gentle” remediation approaches: The European context. J. Environ. Manage. 129:283–91. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Energy (DOE). 2000. Status report on paths to closure. DOE/EM-0526, DOE, Office of Environmental Management, Washington, DC. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/03/f8/StatusReportOnPathsToClosure_2000.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy (DOE). 2002. A review of the environmental management program. Washington, DC: Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy (DOE). 2015a. Environmental management: 2015 year in review. Washington DC: Department of Energy. Accessed December 29, 2019. https://energy.gov/em/articles/DOE,-office-environmental-management-2015-year-review.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy (DOE). 2015b. Safety culture improvement panel. Department of Energy. Accessed December 29, 2018. https://energy.gov/safety-culture/safety-culture-improvement-panel.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy (DOE). 2016. Hanford lifecycle scope, schedule and cost report. DOE,/RL-2015-10, Department of Energy, Washington, DC. Accessed December 8, 2018. http://www.hanford.gov/files.cfm/2016_LCR_Report_Appendices_Final_Draft.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy (DOE). 2018. Worker safety and health program. 10 CFR 851/DOE, O 440.1B. Author, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy (DOE). 2019. Hanford lifecycle scope, schedule, and cost report. DOE/RL-2018-45, Rev 0, Richland Operations Office, Richland, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy (DOE). 2014. DOE, standard: Preparation of nonreactor nuclear facility documented safety analysis. DOE,-STD 3009-2014. Department of Energy, Washington DC. Accessed December 8, 2019. https://www.standards.DOE.gov/standards-documents/3000/3009-astd-2014/@@images/file.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, D. E., and P. W. Hadley. 2009. Sustainable remediation white paper – Integrating sustainable principles, practices, and metrics into remediation projects. Remediation. doi:10.1002/rem.20210.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2004. Cleaning us the Nation’s waste sites: Markets and technology trends, 2004 edition. Washington DC: EPA.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency-Science Advisory Board (EPA). 2002. A framework for assessing and reporting on ecological condition. An SAB report, EPA-SAB-EPEC-02-009. EPA Science Advisory Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, T., . B., J. Brooks, E. J. Nilles, P. N. Pham, and P. Vinck. 2019. Environmental health effects attributed to toxic and infectious agents following hurricanes, cyclones, flash floods and major hydrometeorological events. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 22:157–71. doi:10.1080/10937404.2019.1654422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Accounting Office. 2019. Government Accountability Office. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M., J. Burger, M. Gochfeld, D. Kosson, K. Lowrie, and H. Mayer. 2005. End-state land uses, sustainably protective systems, and risk management: A challenge for remediation and multigenerational stewardship. Remediat J. 17:91–105. doi:10.1002/rem.20072.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M., M. Frisch, L. Solitare, and K. Lowrie. 2000. Downsizing US department of energy facilities: Evaluating alternatives for the region surrounding the Savannah River nuclear weapons site region. Eval. Program Plann. 23:255–65. doi:10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00002-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harclerode, M. A., T. W. Macbeth, M. E. Miller, C. J. Gurr, and T. S. Myers. 2016. Early decision framework for integrating sustainable risk management for complex remediation sites: Drivers, barriers, and performance metrics. J. Environ. Manage. 184:57–66. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, S. G., and B. L. Harper. 2000. Using eco-cultural dependency webs in risk assessment and characterization of risks to tribal health and cultures. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2:91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Harwell, M. A., J. H. Gentile, L. D. McKinney, J. W. Tunnell Jr., W. C. Dennison, R. H. Kelsey, K. M. Stanzel, G. W. Stunz, K. Withers, and J. Tunnell. 2019. Conceptual framework for assessing ecosystem health. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 15:544–64. doi:10.1002/ieam.4152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, K. S. 2011. A framework for sustainable remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:7116–17. doi:10.1021/es202595w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, D., and A. Al-Tabbaa. 2014. Sustainability: A new imperative in contaminated land remediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. 39:25–34. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, D., A. Al-tabbaa, P. Guthrie, J. Hellings, and Q. Gu. 2014. Using a hybrid LCA method to evaluate the sustainability of sediment remediation at the London Olympic Park. J. Clean Prod. 83:87–95. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffon, B., E. Pásaro, and V. Valdiglesias. 2016. Effects of exposure to oil spills on human health: Updated review. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 19:105–28. doi:10.1080/10937404.2016.1168730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, C., and M. Temple. 2006. Health impact assessment and community involvement in land remediation decisions. Public Health 120:915–22. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2006.05.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, H. J., and M. R. Greenberg. 2005. Using integrated geospatial mapping and conceptual site models to guide risk-based environmental clean-up decisions. Risk Anal. 25:429–46. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00600.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, G., M. Salyers, A. L. Rollins, M. Monroe-DeVita, and C. Pfahler. 2012. Burnout in mental health services: A review of the problem and its remediation. Adm. Policy Mental. Health 39:341–52. doi:10.1007/s10488-011-0352-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy Press (NAP). 2019. Independent assessment of science and technology for the department of energy’s defense environmental cleanup program. Washington, DC: Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. M. 2014. Protecting worker and public health during response to catastrophic disasters – Learning from the world trade center experience. Am. J. Indust. Med. 57:1285–98. doi:10.1002/ajim.22386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 1990. Hazardous waste operations and emergency response. https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARD&p_id=9765.
   Google Scholar
• Owsianiak, M., G. Lemming, M. Z. Hauschild, and P. L. Bjerg. 2013. Assessing environmental sustainability of remediation technologies in a life cycle perspective is not so easy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47:1182–83. doi:10.1021/es305279t.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PCCRARM (Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management). 1997. Risk assessment and risk management in regulatory decision-making. Washington, DC: Congressional Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, K. R. 2010. Technical challenges in in-situ remediation of polluted sites. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 28:211–21. doi:10.1007/s10706-008-9235-y.
   Google Scholar
• Sandifer, P. A., A. Sutteon-Grier, and B. P. Ward. 2015. Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosys. Serv. 12:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandifer, P. A., and A. E. Sutton-Grier. 2014. Connecting stressors, ocean ecosystem services, and human health. Nat. Resource Forum 38:157–67. doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderqvist, T., P. Brinkhoff, T. Norberg, L. Rosen, P.-E. Back, and J. Norrman. 2015. Cost-benefit analysis as a part of sustainability assessment of remediation alternatives for contaminated land. J. Environ. Manage. 157:267–78. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. M., D. L. Larson, J. A. DalSoglio, J. A. Harris, P. Labus, E. J. Rosi-Marshall, and E. Skrabis. 2015. A framework for establishing restoration goals for contaminated ecosystems. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 12:264–72. doi:10.1002/ieam.1709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wcisło, E., J. Bronder, A. Bubak, E. Rodríguez-Valdés, and J. L. R. Gallego. 2015. Human health risk assessment in restoring safe and productive use of abandoned contaminated sites. Environ. Int. 94:436–48. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar