Prevention through design: insights from computational fluid dynamics modeling to predict exposure to ultrafine particles from 3D printing

References

• Alberts, E., M. Ballentine, E. Barnes, and A. Kennedy. 2021. Impact of metal additives on particle emission profiles from a fused filament fabrication 3D printer. Atmos. Environ. 244 :117956. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSI/CAN/UL. 2019. ANSI/CAN/UL 2904: Standard method for testing and assessing particle and chemical emissions from 3D printers. Ottawa, Ontario: Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, T. R. 2009. Mathematical models for estimating occupational exposures to chemicals. Falls Church, VA: AIHA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Azimi, P., D. Zhao, C. Pouzet, N. E. Crain, and B. Stephens. 2016. Emissions of ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds from commercially available desktop three-dimensional printers with multiple filaments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (3):1260–68. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b04983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimi, P., T. Fazli, and B. Stephens. 2017. Predicting concentrations of ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds resulting from desktop 3D printer operation and the impact of potential control strategies. J. Ind. Ecol. 21 (S1):S107–S119. doi:10.1111/jiec.12578.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H., F. Herzberg, A. Schulte, and M. Kolossa-Gehring. 2011. The carcinogenic potential of nanomaterials, their release from products and options for regulating them. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 214 (3):231–38. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. D., K. L. Zeman, and A. M. Jarabek. 2007. Nasal contribution to breathing and fine particle deposition in children versus adults. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 71 (3):227–37. doi:10.1080/15287390701598200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, A., E. Deuermeyer, B. Nam, S. L. Chu, and F. Quek. 2018. Exploring the 3D printing process for young children in curriculum-aligned making in the classroom. Paper read at Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Buchman, J. T., N. V. Hudson-Smith, K. M. Landy, and C. L. Haynes. 2019. Understanding nanoparticle toxicity mechanisms to inform redesign strategies to reduce environmental impact. Acc. Chem. Res. 52 (6):1632–42. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrley, P., B. J. George, W. K. Boyes, and K. Rogers. 2019. Particle emissions from fused deposition modeling 3D printers: Evaluation and meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 655:395–407. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, F. L., C.-Y. Hon, S. M. Tarlo, N. Rajaram, and R. House. 2020. Emissions and health risks from the use of 3D printers in an occupational setting. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 83 (7):279–87. doi:10.1080/15287394.2020.1751758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, F. L., R. House, I. Kudla, J. C. Lipszyc, N. Rajaram, and S. M. Tarlo. 2018. Health survey of employees regularly using 3D printers. Occup. Med. (Chic Ill) 68 (3):211–14. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqy042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J. C., and S. R. Hanna. 2004. Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 87 (1–3):167–96. doi:10.1007/s00703-003-0070-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., B. Hu, Y. Liu, J. Xu, G. Yang, D. Xu, and C. Chen. 2016. Beyond PM2. 5: The role of ultrafine particles on adverse health effects of air pollution. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (Bba)-general Subjects 1860 (12):2844–55. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.03.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. Y., Q. Zhang, J. P. S. Wong, R. J. Weber, and M. S. Black. 2019. Characterization of volatile organic compound emissions from consumer level material extrusion 3D printers. Build. Environ. 160:106209. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrovolskaia, M. A., M. Shurin, and A. A. Shvedova. 2016. Current understanding of interactions between nanoparticles and the immune system. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 299:78–89. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2015.12.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farcas, M. T., A. B. Stefaniak, A. K. Knepp, L. Bowers, W. K. Mandler, M. Kashon, S. R. Jackson, T. A. Stueckle, J. D. Sisler, S. A. Friend, et al. 2019. Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polycarbonate (PC) filaments three-dimensional (3-D) printer emissions-induced cell toxicity. Toxicol. Lett. 317:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.09.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farcas, M. T., W. McKinney, C. Qi, K. W. Mandler, L. Battelli, S. A. Friend, A. B. Stefaniak, M. Jackson, M. Orandle, A. Winn, et al. 2020. Pulmonary and systemic toxicity in rats following inhalation exposure of 3-D printer emissions from acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) filament. Inhal Toxicol 32 (11–12):403–18. doi:10.1080/08958378.2020.1834034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci, C., D. Heidel, C. Sayes, L. Hodson, P. Schulte, A. Eastlake, and S. Brenner. 2015. Perspectives on the design of safer nanomaterials and manufacturing processes. J. Nanopart. Res. 17 (9):17. doi:10.1007/s11051-015-3152-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümperlein, I., E. Fischer, G. Dietrich‐Gümperlein, S. Karrasch, D. Nowak, R. A. Jörres, and R. Schierl. 2018. Acute health effects of desktop 3D printing (fused deposition modeling) using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and polylactic acid materials: An experimental exposure study in human volunteers. Indoor Air 28 (4):611–23. doi:10.1111/ina.12458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyekye, S. A., and S. Salminen. 2009. Educational status and organizational safety climate: Does educational attainment influence workers’ perceptions of workplace safety? Saf Sci 47 (1):20–28. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2007.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinzerling, A., J. Hsu, and F. Yip. 2016. Respiratory health effects of ultrafine particles in children: A literature review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 227 (1):32. doi:10.1007/s11270-015-2726-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, R., N. Rajaram, and S. M. Tarlo. 2017. Case report of asthma associated with 3D printing. Occup. Med. (Chic Ill) 67 (8):652–54. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqx129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, M., A. J. Kennedy, C. Detzel, P. Vikesland, and M. A. Chappell. 2012. Moving beyond mass: The unmet need to consider dose metrics in environmental nanotoxicology studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (20):10881-82. doi:10.1021/es3035285.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T. K., B.-C. Jeon, E. Bae, K. K. Bae, K.-T. Han, and E.-C. Park. 2017. Association between personal protective equipment use and injury occurrence among the Republic of Korea armed forces. Mil. Med. 182 (7):e1900–e1907. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, O., C. Yoon, S. Ham, J. Park, J. Lee, D. Yoo, and Y. Kim. 2017. Characterization and control of nanoparticle emission during 3D printing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (18):10357–68. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, E., and C. T. Liverman. 2011. Section 4 - Using PPE: Individual and Organizational Issues; Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Personnel to Prevent Transmission of Pandemic Influenza and Other Viral Respiratory Infections: Current Research Issues. Preventing transmission of pandemic influenza and other viral respiratory diseases: Personal protective equipment for healthcare personnel: Update 2010. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-H., P.-H. Lee, H.-J. Liang, C.-H. Tang, T.-F. Chen, T.-J. Cheng, and C.-Y. Lin. 2020. Brain lipid profiles in the spontaneously hypertensive rat after subchronic real-world exposure to ambient fine particulate matter. Sci. Total Environ. 707:135603. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. H., C. C. Shen, Y. W. Cheng, S. H. Huang, C. C. Wu, C. C. Kao, J. W. Liao, and J. J. Kang. 2012. Organ biodistribution, clearance, and genotoxicity of orally administered zinc oxide nanoparticles in mice. Nanotoxicology 6 (7):746–56. doi:10.3109/17435390.2011.620717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MakersEmpire. 2020. Best 3D printers for schools (with built-in air filtration). Claymont, DE: MakersEmpire.
   Google Scholar
• Mele, B., R. Strode, D. Hall, C. Strode, and A. Korchevskiy. 2016. Evaluating exhaust ventilation: What every industrial hygienist should know about fan selection.Synergist (October).
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, L., A. Kangas, K. Kukko, B. Molgaard, A. Saamanen, T. Kanerva, I. F. Ituarte, M. Huhtiniemi, H. Stockmann-Juvela, J. Partanen, et al. 2017. Characterization of emissions from a Desktop 3D printer. J. Ind. Ecol. 21 (S1):S94–S106. doi:10.1111/jiec.12569.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, H.-L., B. Robinson, B. A. Muggenburg, N. A. Gillett, and R. A. Guilmette. 1990. Particle distribution in lung and lymph node tissues of rats and dogs and the migration of particle-containing alveolar cells in vitro. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 30 (3):141–65. doi:10.1080/15287399009531419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster, G., E. Oberdörster, and J. Oberdörster. 2005. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ. Health Perspect. 113 (7):823–39. doi:10.1289/ehp.7339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster, G., Z. Sharp, V. Atudorei, A. Elder, R. Gelein, W. Kreyling, and C. Cox. 2004. Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain. Inhalation Toxicology 16 (6–7):437–45. doi:10.1080/08958370490439597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlwein, S., R. Kappeler, M. Kutlar Joss, N. Künzli, and B. Hoffmann. 2019. Health effects of ultrafine particles: A systematic literature review update of epidemiological evidence. Int. J. Public Health 64 (4):547–59. doi:10.1007/s00038-019-01202-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OSHA. Air sampling and analytical procedures for determining concentrations of cotton dust. In Occupational safety and health standards - toxic and hazardous substances. e-CFR.
   Google Scholar
• Pepi, M., N. Zander, and M. Gillan. 2018. Towards expeditionary battlefield manufacturing using recycled, reclaimed, and scrap materials. J. Occup. Med. 70:2359–64.
   Google Scholar
• Petretta, M., G. Desando, B. Grigolo, and L. Roseti. 2019. 3D printing of musculoskeletal tissues: Impact on safety and health at work. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 82 (16):891–912. doi:10.1080/15287394.2019.1663458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phuong, N. L., and K. Ito. 2015. Investigation of flow pattern in upper human airway including oral and nasal inhalation by PIV and CFD. Build. Environ. 94:504–15. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poikkimaki, M., V. Koljonen, N. Leskinen, M. Narhi, O. Kangasniemi, O. Kausiala, and M. D. Maso. 2019. Nanocluster aerosol emissions of a 3D printer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (23):13618–28. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b05317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, J. F., Jr, and R. X. Schwartz. 2019. 3D printing: Overview, impacts, and the federal role. Congressional Res. Service R45852.
   Google Scholar
• Schraufnagel, D. E. 2020. The health effects of ultrafine particles. Exp. Mol. Med. 52 (3):311–17. doi:10.1038/s12276-020-0403-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, W.-Y., J.-H. Kim, G. Lee, S. Choi, S. R. Kim, Y.-C. Hong, and S. M. Park. 2020. Exposure to ambient fine particulate matter is associated with changes in fasting glucose and lipid profiles: A nationwide cohort study. BMC Public Health 20 (1):1–11. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08503-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, R. M., C. TeeSy, L. Franzi, A. Weir, P. Westerhoff, J. E. Evans, and K. E. Pinkerton. 2013. Biological response to nano-scale titanium dioxide (TiO2): Role of particle dose, shape, and retention. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 76 (16):953–72. doi:10.1080/15287394.2013.826567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slezakova, K., C. Peixoto, M. Do Carmo Pereira, and S. Morais. 2019. (Ultra) Fine particle concentrations and exposure in different indoor and outdoor microenvironments during physical exercising. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 82 (9):591–602. doi:10.1080/15287394.2019.1636494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, A. B., A. R. Johnson, S. Du Preez, D. R. Hammond, J. R. Wells, J. E. Ham, R. F. LeBouf, S. B. Martin Jr, M. G. Duling, and L. N. Bowers. 2019. Insights into emissions and exposures from use of industrial-scale additive manufacturing machines. Saf Health Work 10 (2):229–36. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2018.10.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, A. B., R. F. LeBouf, M. G. Duling, J. Yi, A. B. Abukabda, C. R. McBride, and T. R. Nurkiewicz. 2017a. Inhalation exposure to three-dimensional printer emissions stimulates acute hypertension and microvascular dysfunction. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 335:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2017.09.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, AB, RF LeBouf, MG Duling, J Yi, AB Abukabda, CR McBride, and TR Nurkiewicz. 2017b. Inhalation exposure to three-dimensional printer emissions stimulates acute hypertension and microvascular dysfunction. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 335:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, B., P. Azimi, Z. El Orch, and T. Ramos. 2013. Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers. Atmos. Environ. 79:334–39. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command. 2020. Additive manufacturing. U.S. Army 2017 Accessed April 21, 2020. https://www.army.mil/standto/archive_2017-08-08/
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2020. What are the air quality standards for PM? October 11, 2019. Accessed May 22, 2020. https://www3.epa.gov/region1/airquality/pm-aq-standards.html
   Google Scholar
• Ventä-Olkkonen, L., H. Hartikainen, B. Norouzi, N. Iivari, and M. Kinnula. 2019. A literature review of the practice of educating children about technology making. Paper read at IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Paphos, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Wojityla, S., P. Klama, and T. Bara. 2017. Is 3D printing safe? Analysis of the thermal treatment of thermoplastics: ABS, PLA, PET, and nylon. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 14 (6):D80–D85. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1285489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, G., and J. Wang. 2017. CFD modeling of particle dispersion and deposition coupled with particle dynamical models in a ventilated room. Atmos. Environ. 166:300–14. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, J., R. F. LeBouf, M. G. Duling, T. Nurkiewicz, B. T. Chen, D. Schwegler-Berry, M. A. Virji, and A. B. Stefaniak. 2016. Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3D) printer. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 79 (11):453–65. doi:10.1080/15287394.2016.1166467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, J.-S., J.-W. Seo, S. Han, and K.-J. Jeon. 2019. Characteristics of nanoparticle formation and hazardous air pollutants emitted by 3D printer operations: From emission to inhalation. RSC Adv 9 (34):19606–12. doi:10.1039/C9RA03248G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., G. Sharma, J. P. S. Wong, A. Y. Davis, M. S. Black, P. Biswas, and R. J. Weber. 2018. Investigating particle emissions and aerosol dynamics from a consumer fused deposition modeling 3D printer with a lognormal moment aerosol model. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 52 (10):1099–111. doi:10.1080/02786826.2018.1464115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., J. P. S. Wong, A. Y. Davis, M. S. Black, and R. J. Weber. 2017. Characterization of particle emissions from consumer fused deposition modeling 3D printers. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 51 (11):1275–86. doi:10.1080/02786826.2017.1342029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., M. Pardo, Y. Rudich, I. Kaplan-Ashiri, J. P. S. Wong, A. Y. Davis, M. S. Black, and R. J. Weber. 2019. Chemical composition and toxicity of particles emitted from a consumer-level 3D printer using various materials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (20):12054–61. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b04168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., X. Kong, A. Chen, and S. Cao. 2015. Investigation of ultrafine particle emissions of desktop 3D printers in the clean room. Procedia Eng. 121:506–12. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1099.
   Google Scholar
• Zolnik, B. S., Á. González-Fernández, N. Sadrieh, and M. A. Dobrovolskaia. 2010. Minireview: Nanoparticles and the immune system. Endocrinology 151 (2):458–65. doi:10.1210/en.2009-1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zontek, T. L., S. Hollenbeck, J. Jankovic, and B. R. Ogle. 2019. Modeling particle emissions from three-dimensional printing with acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene polymer filament. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (16):9656–63. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b02818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar