REFERENCES
- Barr, S. 2009. Examining the technique class: Re-examining feedback. Research in Dance Education 10(1):33–45.
- Bishop, C. 2006. Collaboration and its discontents. Art Forum, February. http://www.gc.cuny.edu/CUNY_GC/media/CUNY-Graduate-Center/PDF/Programs/Art%20History/Social-Turn.pdf ( accessed May 24, 2015).
- Bruce, B. C. 2013. Editorial for the series of three issues: Progressive education: Past, present and future. International Journal of Progressive Education 9(1):7–9.
- Dyer, B. 2010. The perils, privileges, and pleasures of seeking right from wrong: Reflecting upon student perspectives of social processes, value systems, agency, and the becoming of identity in the dance technique classroom. Research in Dance Education 11(2):108–29.
- Ehrlich, T., ed. 2000. Civic responsibility and higher education. Westport, CT: Oryx.s
- Fitzgerald, M. 2009. Aesthetic considerations in community dance: A practitioner’s perspective. The International Journal of the Arts in Society 4(3):10–17.
- Green, J. 2001. Socially constructed bodies in American dance classrooms. Research in Dance Education 2(2):155–73. http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/J_Green_Socially_2001.pdf ( accessed September 29, 2013).
- Green, J. 2008. American body pedagogies: Somatics and the cultural construction of bodies in the institution of higher education. Congress on Research in Dance Proceedings 39(1):85–89. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=COR&volumeId=39&seriesId=0&issueId=S1 ( accessed September 29, 2013).
- Hogan, C. 2002. Understanding facilitation, theories and principles. London: Kogan Page. http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/lib/asulib/reader.action?docID=10502446 ( accessed March 24, 2015).
- Kerr-Berry, J., K. Clemente, and D. Risner. 2008. The politics of pedagogy: Examining teacher identities. Journal of Dance Education 8(3):94–101.
- Kuppers, P., and G. Robertson, eds. 2007. The community performance reader. London: Routledge.
- Lakes, R. 2005. The messages behind the methods: The authoritarian pedagogical legacy in western concert dance technique training and rehearsals. Arts Education Policy Review 106(5):3–18. http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/docview/211015396?pq-origsite=summon ( accessed July 29, 2015).
- Moore-McBride, A., and E. Mlyn. 2013. Civic engagement and higher education at a crossroads. The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amanda-moore-mcbride/civic-engagement-and-higher-education_b_4218389.html ( accessed July 28, 2014).
- Prior, J. 2002. Social psychology of a learning environment and the acquisition of critical thinking. Social Work Education 19(5):501–11.
- Rimmer, R. 2013. Improvising with material in the higher education dance technique class: Exploration and ownership. Journal of Dance Education 13(4):105–18.
- Roche, J. 2011. Embodying multiplicity: The independent contemporary dancer’s moving identity. Research in Dance Education 2(12):105–18. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14647893.2011.575222#preview ( accessed August 1, 2013).
- Rouhiainen, L., and S. Hamalainen. 2013. Emotions and feelings in a collaborative dance-making process. International Journal of Education & the Arts 14(6). http://www.ijea.org/v14n6/ ( accessed January 3, 2015).
- Shah, D. V., N. Kwak, and R. L. Holbert. 2001. Connecting and disconnecting with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication 18:141–62. https://www.journalism.wisc.edu/~dshah/PC2001.pdf ( accessed August 12, 2014).
- Shapiro, S. B., ed. 1998. Dance, power, and difference. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
- Shrewsbury, C. M. 1987. What is feminist pedagogy? Women’s Studies Quarterly 15(3–4):6–14.
- Stanton, E. 2011. Doing, re-doing and undoing: Practice, repetition and critical evaluation as mechanisms for learning in a dance technique class “laboratory.” Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 2(1):86–98. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ibh&AN=59330205&site=ehost-live ( accessed October 1, 2014).