444
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The identification-guilt paradox revisited – Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between group-level self-investment and group-based guilt

ORCID Icon &
Pages 369-388 | Received 19 Oct 2018, Accepted 03 Mar 2019, Published online: 16 Mar 2019

References

  • Barth, M., Jugert, P., Wutzler, M., & Fritsche, I. (2015). Absolute moral standards and global identity as independent predictors of collective action against global injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 918–931.
  • Barth, M., & Stürmer, S. (2016). Comparison of the effects of individual and group-level perspective taking on intergroup reconciliation. Social Psychology, 47, 311–326.
  • Becker, J. C., & Tausch, N. (2014). When group memberships are negative: the concept, measurement, and behavioral implications of psychological disidentification. Self and Identity, 13, 294–321.
  • Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49–66). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
  • Branscombe, N. R. (2004). A social psychological process perspective on collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 320–334). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Branscombe, N. R., Slugoski, B., & Kappen, D. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt - International perspectives (pp. 16–34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brown, R., & Cehajic, S. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669–684.
  • Castano, E. (2008). On the perils of glorifying the in-group: Intergroup violence, in-group glorification, and moral disengagement. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 154–170.
  • Castano, E., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804–818.
  • Čehajić, S., Brown, R., & Castano, E. (2008). Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29, 351–367.
  • Cohen, J. E. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Devine, P. G., & Monteith, M. J. (1993). The role of discrepancy-associated affect in prejudice reduction. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 317–344). New York: Academic Press.
  • Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). Consequences of national ingroup identification for responses to immoral historical events. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 95–111). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886.
  • Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt: The effects of ingroup identification. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 325–338.
  • Dumont, K., & Waldzus, S. (2014). Group-based guilt and reparation in the context ofsocial change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 331–341.
  • Ferguson, M. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2014). The social psychology of collective guilt. In C. von Scheve & M. Salmela (Eds.), Series in affective science. Collective emotions: Perspectives from psychology, philosophy, and sociology (pp. 251–265). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
  • Figueiredo, A., Doosje, B., & Valentim, J. P. (2015). Group-based compunction and anger: Their antecedents and consequences in relation to colonial conflicts. International Journal of Conflict and Violence., 9, 1–15.
  • Giguère, B., Lalonde, R. N., & Taylor, D. M. (2014). Drinking too much and feeling bad about it? How group identification moderates experiences of guilt and shame following norm transgression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(5), 617–632.
  • Gordijn, E. H., Yzerbyt, V., Wigboldus, D., & Dumont, M. (2006). Emotional reactions to harmful intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 15–30.
  • Hansen, N., & Sassenberg, K. (2006). Does social identification harm or serve as a buffer? The impact of social identification on anger after experiencing social discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 983–996.
  • Harth, N. S., Kessler, T., & Leach, C. W. (2008). Advantaged group’s emotional reactions to inter-group inequality: The dynamics of pride, guilt, and sympathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 115–129.
  • Hartley, L. K., McGarty, C., & Donaghue, N. (2013). Understanding disagreement within the majority about action to atone for past wrongs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 246–261.
  • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.
  • Hoffman, M. (1998). Varieties of empathy-based guilt. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 91–112). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Iyer, A., & Leach, C. W. (2009). Emotion in inter-group relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 86–125.
  • Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Crosby, F. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117–129.
  • Iyer, A., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 572–587.
  • Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2005). Ashamed to be an American?: The role of identification in predicting vicarious shame for anti-Arab prejudice after 9–11. Self and Identity, 4, 331–348.
  • Kachanoff, F. J., Ysseldyk, R., Taylor, D. M., de la Sablonnière, R., & Crush, J. (2016). The good, the bad and the central of group identification: Evidence of a U-shaped quadratic relation between in-group affect and identity centrality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 563–580.
  • Klein, O., Licata, L., & Pierucci, S. (2011). Does group identification facilitate or prevent collective guilt about past misdeeds? Resolving the paradox. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 563–572.
  • Leach, C. W., Iyer, A., & Pedersen, A. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1232–1245.
  • Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165.
  • Lickel, B., Schmader, T., Curtis, M., Scarnier, M., & Ames, D. R. (2005). Vicarious shame and guilt. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 145–157.
  • Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2014). Intergroup emotions. In M. Mikulincer, P.R. Shaver, J. Dovidio & J. Simpson (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 263–293). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2017). Group-based emotion in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 658–668.
  • Mackie, D. M., Smith, E. R., & Ray, D. G. (2008). Intergroup emotions and intergroup relations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1866–1880.
  • Maitner, A. T., Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and guilt following ingroup aggression. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 223–237.
  • Masson, T. (2018). Different (ways of) identification, different effects: Group-level self-investment and self-definition as predictors of collective cognition, emotion, and behavior. Unpublished doctoral Thesis. Leipzig: University of Leipzig.
  • Masson, T., & Fritsche, I. (2014). Group identification and adherence to (non-)beneficial ingroup norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 455–465.
  • Masson, T., & Fritsche, I. (2018). Loyal peripherals? The interactive effects of identification and peripheral group membership on deviance from non-beneficial ingroup norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1–17. online first. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2501
  • Masson, T., Jugert, P., & Fritsche, I. (2016). Collective self-fulfilling prophecies: Group identification biases perceptions of environmental group norms among high identifiers. Social Influence, 11, 185–198.
  • McGarty, C., & Bliuc, A. (2004). Refining the meaning of the “collective” in collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 112–129). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McGarty, C., Pedersen, A., Leach, C. W., Mansell, T., Waller, J., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2005). Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 659–680.
  • Meyer, A. (2015). Does education increase pro-environmental behavior? Evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics, 116, 108–121.
  • Miller, J. W., Stromeyer, W. R., & Schwietermann, M. A. (2013a). Extensions of the johnson-neyman technique to linear models with curvilinear effects: Derivations and analytical tools. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 267–300.
  • Miller, J. W., Stromeyer, W. R., & Schwietermann, M. A. (2013b). Technical Appendix for “Extensions of the Johnson-Neyman Technique to Linear Models with Curvilinear Effects”. The Ohio State University.
  • Modrek, S., Hamad, R., & Cullen, M. R. (2015). Psychological well-being during the great recession: Changes in mental health care utilization in an occupational cohort. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 304–310.
  • Myers, E., Hewstone, M., & Cairns, E. (2009). Impact of conflict on mental health in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of intergroup forgiveness and collective guilt. Political Psychology, 30, 269–290.
  • Roccas, S., Klar, Y., & Liviatan, I. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698–711.
  • Roth, J., & Mazziotta, A. (2015). Adaptation and validation of a German multidimensional and multicomponent measure of social identification. Social Psychology, 46, 277–290.
  • Roth, J., Mazziotta, A., & Barth, M. (2018). The two-dimensions-five-components structure of in-group identification is invariant across various identification patterns in different social groups. Self and Identity. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2018.1511465.
  • Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2006). Stigma and shame: Emotional responses to the stereotypic actions of one’s ethnic ingroup. In S. Levin & C. van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 261–285). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schmitt, M. T., Miller, D. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Brehm, J. W. (2008). The difficulty of making reparations affects the intensity of collective guilt. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 267–279.
  • Situ, Q., Li, J., & Dou, K. (2016). Reexamining the linear and U-shaped relationships between self-control and emotional and behavioural problems. Asian Journal Of Social Psychology, 19, 177–185.
  • Smith, E. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297–315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Smith, E. R., Seger, C. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 431–446.
  • Solomatina, I., & Austers, I. (2014). Collective guilt makes conflicting parties more collaborative: Quasi-experimental study of the Israeli-palestinian conflict. Psychology Research, 4, 271–284.
  • Spears, R., Leach, C., van Zomeren, M., Ispas, A., Sweetman, J., & Tausch, N. C. (2010). Intergroup emotions: More than the sum of the parts. In I. Nyklicek, A. J. M. Vingerhoets, & M. Zeelenberg (Eds.), Emotion regulation and well-being (pp. 121–145). New York: Springer.
  • Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., Branscombe, N. R., Rothschild, Z. K., & Cronin, T. J. (2013). Self-harm focus leads to greater collective guilt: The case of the U.S.–Iraq conflict. Political Psychology, 34, 573–587.
  • Sullivan, G. B. (2015). Collective emotions. Social and personality. Psychology Compass, 9, 383–393.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
  • Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R., & KIar, Y. (2006). Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one’s group has done wrong or been wronged. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 1–37.
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Dumont, M., Wigboldus, D., & Gordijn, E. (2003). I feel for us: The impact of categorisation and identification on emotions and action tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 533–549.
  • Zagefka, H., Pehrson, S., Mole, R. C. M., & Chan, E. (2010). The effect of essentialism in settings of historic intergroup atrocities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 7l8–732.
  • Zebel, S., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2009a). The threat of those who “understand”: Ways in which out-groups induce guilt. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 154–162.
  • Zebel, S., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2009b). How perspective-taking helps and hinders group-based guilt as a function of group identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 61–78.
  • Zebel, S., Pennekamp, S. F., van Zomeren, M., Doosje, B., van Kleef, G. A., Vliek, M. L. W., & van der Schalk, J. (2007). Vessels with gold or guilt: emotional reactions to family involvement associated with glorious or gloomy aspects of the colonial past. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 71–86.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.