Advanced search
Publication Cover
Self and Identity Volume 19, 2020 - Issue 7
Submit an article Journal homepage
710
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Is “me-search” necessarily less rigorous research? Social and personality psychologists’ stereotypes of the psychology of religion

Kimberly RiosDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USACorrespondence[email protected]
&
Zachary C. RothDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA
Pages 825-840 | Received 11 Jul 2019, Accepted 31 Oct 2019, Published online: 13 Nov 2019

References

  • Beauchamp, A., & Rios, K. (in press). Secularism in science: The role of religious affiliation in assessments of scientists’ trustworthiness. Manuscript accepted pending minor revisions. Public Understanding of Science.
  • Cowgill, C. M., Rios, K., & Simpson, A. (2017). Generous heathens? Reputational concerns and atheists’ behavior toward Christians in economic games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 169–179.
  • Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 496–503.
  • Johnson, C. S., Smith, P. K., & Wang, C. (2017). Sage on the stage: Women’s representation at an academic conference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 493–507.
  • Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., & LaBouff, J. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 119–126.
  • Kunzendorf, R. G. (2015). Psychological subscales of liberalism and conservatism as related to political party, race, education, religion, geographical region, and gender. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 35, 84–103.
  • Mackey, C. D., Silver, C., Rios, K., Cowgill, C. M., & Hood, R. W. (2019). Concealment of nonreligious identity. Invited resubmission. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.
  • Mallett, R., & Monteith, M. (Eds.). (2019). Confronting bias, prejudice, and discrimination: The science of changing minds and behaviors. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Nisbett, R. E. (1990). The anticreativity letters: Advice from a senior tempter to a junior tempter. American Psychologist, 45, 1078–1082.
  • Rios, K., & Aveyard, M. (2019). Science-religion compatibility beliefs across American and Middle Eastern young adult samples: The role of cross-cultural exposure. Public Understanding of Science, 28(8), 949–957.
  • Rios, K., Cheng, Z. H., Totton, R. R., & Shariff, A. F. (2015). Negative stereotypes cause Christians to underperform in and disidentify with science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 959–967.
  • Roth, Z. C., & Rios, K. (2019). Feeling correct is feeling prejudiced: The differential effects of attitude correctness and attitude clarity on evaluations of outgroups. Manuscript under Review.
  • Shariff, A. F., Willard, A. K., Andersen, T., & Norenzayan, A. (2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 27–48.
  • Sharp, C., Leicht, C., Rios, K., & Elsdon-Baker, F. (2019). Religious diversity in science: Social identities and stereotypes. Invited resubmission. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.
  • Simpson, A., McCurrie, C., & Rios, K. (2019). Perceived morality and anti-atheist prejudice: A replication and extension. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 29(3), 172–183.
  • Simpson, A., Piazza, J., & Rios, K. (2016). Belief in divine moral authority: Validation of a shortened scale with implications for social attitudes and moral cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 256–265.
  • Simpson, A., & Rios, K. (2016). How do U.S. Christians and atheists stereotype one another’s moral values? The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26(4), 320–336.
  • Simpson, A., & Rios, K. (2017). The moral contents of anti‐atheist prejudice (and why atheists should care about it). European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 501–508.
  • Simpson, A., & Rios, K. (2019). Is science for atheists? Perceived threat to religious cultural authority explains U.S. Christians’ distrust in secularized science. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 740–758.
  • Simpson, A., Rios, K., & Cowgill, C. M. (2017). Godless in essence? Psychological essentialism, theistic meta-beliefs, and anti-atheist prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 35–45.
  • Sosa, N., & Rios, K. (2019). The utilitarian scientist: Humanization of scientists in moral dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 103818.
  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.
  • Williams, T. (2015). What makes Templeton tick? And just how scary is this place? An inside look. https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2015/1/6/what-makes-templeton-tick-and-just-how-scary-is-this-place-a.html

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.