Can your darkness be measured? Analyzing the full and brief version of the Dark Factor of Personality in Swedish

References

• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckström, M. (2007). Higher-order factors in a five-factor personality inventory and its relation to social desirability. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.2.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, M., Hartung, J., Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., Moshagen, M., & Wilhelm, O. (2021). Themes of the Dark Core of Personality. Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, M., Horsten, L. K., Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., & Moshagen, M. (2022). Measuring the dark core of personality in German: Psychometric properties, measurement invariance, predictive validity, and self-other agreement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(5), 660–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1984931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, M., Jobst, L. J., & Moshagen, M. (2022). Sample size requirements for bifactor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 29(5), 772–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.2019587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. https://edres.org//irt/baker/
   Google Scholar
• Baker, F. B., & Kim, S.-H. (2017). The basics of item response theory using R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2018.1462078
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. A. H., & Dan O’Hair, H. (2007). Machiavellians’ motives in organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35(3), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880701434232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, J., Solodukhin, E., & Forth, A. E. (2014). A meta-analysis exploring the relationship between psychopathy and instrumental versus reactive violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(7), 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813519629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonifay, W., Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., & Meijer, R. R. (2015). When are multidimensional data unidimensional enough for structural equation modeling? An evaluation of the DETECT multidimensionality index. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(4), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.938596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2201–2209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613490749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtăverde, V., Oprea, B., Miulescu, A., & Ene, C. (2022). Seeking important people and taking revenge: Network and IRT analysis of the Short Dark Triad (SD3). Current Psychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02969-4
   Google Scholar
• Castro, Á., Barrada, J. R., Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., & Fernández-Del-Río, E. (2020). Profiling dating apps users: Sociodemographic and personality characteristics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NE0 personality imentory manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of tshe NEO personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crysel, L. C., Crosier, B. S., & Webster, G. D. (2013). The Dark Triad and risk behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377033.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueber, D. M. (2017). Bifactor indices calculator: A Microsoft Excel-based tool to calculate various indices relevant to bifactor CFA models. https://doi.org/10.13023/edp.tool.01
   Google Scholar
• Eid, M., Geiser, C., Koch, T., & Heene, M. (2017). Anomalous results in G -factor models: Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, D., MacDonald, S., & Rapp-Ricciardi, M. (2017). Factor analysis of the Swedish version of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen. PsyCh Journal, 6(2), 166–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, D., Persson, B. N., Al Nima, A., Brulin, J. G., Rapp-Ricciardi, M., & Kajonius, P. J. (2018). IRT analyses of the Swedish Dark Triad Dirty Dozen. Heliyon, 4(3), e00569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, D., Rosenberg, P., MacDonald, S., Räisänen, C., & Ricciardi, M. R. (2017). Measuring malevolent character: Data using the Swedish version of Jonason’s Dark Triad Dirty Dozen. Data in Brief, 14, 648–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.08.020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (pp. 7–28) Tilburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Exploratory Factor Analysis. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 231–258). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_6
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R. (2001). Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured means modeling and MIMIC approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika, 66(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future: A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D. (1985). Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.1.7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartung, J., Bader, M., Moshagen, M., & Wilhelm, O. (2022). Age and gender differences in socially aversive (“dark”) personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 36(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890207020988435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbig, B. E., Moshagen, M., Horsten, L. K., & Zettler, I. (2021). Agreeableness is dead. Long live Agreeableness? Reply to Vize and Lynam. Journal of Research in Personality, 91, 104074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsten, L. K., Moshagen, M., Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2021). Theoretical and empirical dissociations between the dark factor of personality and low honesty-humility. Journal of Research in Personality, 95, 104154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudek-Knezevic, J., Kardum, I., & Banov, K. (2021). The effects of the Dark Triad personality traits on health protective behaviours: Dyadic approach on self-reports and partner-reports. Psychology & Health, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1998497
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., & Samuels, H. (2021). Dark desires: The Dark Tetrad and relationship control. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (pp. 1–41). www.InTestCom.org
   Google Scholar
• Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(2), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the dark triad. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajonius, P. J. (2014). Honesty-humility in contemporary students: Manipulations of self-image by inflated IQ estimations. Psychological Reports, 115(1), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.2466/17.04.PR0.115c13z8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajonius, P. J. (2016). Honesty-Humility predicting self-estimated academic performance. International Journal of Personality Psychology, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21827/a3374008-1e51-028e-cf60-f7988e238525
   Google Scholar
• Kajonius, P. J., & Björkman, T. (2020a). Dark malevolent traits and everyday perceived stress. Current Psychology, 39(6), 2351–2356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9948-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajonius, P. J., & Björkman, T. (2020b). Individuals with dark traits have the ability but not the disposition to empathize. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 109716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajonius, P. J., Persson, B. N., Rosenberg, P., & Garcia, D. (2016). The (mis)measurement of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen: Exploitation at the core of the scale. PeerJ, 4, e1748. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S. B., Yaden, D. B., Hyde, E., & Tsukayama, E. (2019). The light vs. dark triad of personality: Contrasting two very different profiles of human nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(8), 2207–2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Multivariate behavioral psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, machiavellianism, and narcissism in the five-factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Vize, C., Crowe, M. L., & Lynam, D. R. (2019). A critical appraisal of the dark-triad literature and suggestions for moving forward. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morizot, J. M., Ainsworth, A. T., & Reise, S. P. (2007). Towards modern psychometrics: Application ofitem response theory models in personality research. In R. Robins, R. Fraley, & R. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook ofresearch methods in personality psychology (pp. 407–423). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M., & Auerswald, M. (2018). On congruence and incongruence of measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M., Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M., Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2020). Measuring the dark core of personality. Psychological Assessment, 2(32), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000778
   Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M., Zettler, I., Horsten, L. K., & Hilbig, B. E. (2020). Agreeableness and the common core of dark traits are functionally different constructs. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, 103986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. ETS Research Report Series, 1, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1992.tb01436.x
   Google Scholar
• Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616666070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L., Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Jones, D. N. (2020). Screening for dark personalities. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37, 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-01262-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, B. N., Kajonius, P. J., & Garcia, D. (2019). Revisiting the structure of the short dark triad. Assessment, 26(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117701192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prusik, M., Konopka, K., & Kocur, D. (2021). Too many shades of gray: The Dark Triad and its linkage to coercive and coaxing tactics to obtain sex and the quality of romantic relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computig. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., & Yu, J. (1990). Parameter recovery in the graded response model using multilog. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00738.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizopoulos, D. (2006). LTM: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016a). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016b). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–100). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_5
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrödter, R., Laborde, S., & Allen, M. S. (2021). The dark core of personality and sexism in sport. Personality and Individual Differences, 183, 111119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ścigała, K. A., Schild, C., Moshagen, M., Lilleholt, L., Zettler, I., Stückler, A., & Pfattheicher, S. (2021). Aversive personality and COVID-19. European Psychologist, 26(4), 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevi, B., Urganci, B., & Sakman, E. (2020). Who cheats? An examination of light and dark personality traits as predictors of infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 164, 110126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, C. G., Luyten, N., Purnomo, M., Mobberley, A., Wootton, L. W., Hammond, M. D., Sengupta, N., Perry, R., West-Newman, T., Wilson, M. S., McLellan, L., Hoverd, W. J., & Robertson, A. (2011). The Mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40(3), 142–159.
   Google Scholar
• Sliter, K. A., & Zickar, M. J. (2014). An IRT examination of the psychometric functioning of negatively worded personality items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413504584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ten Berge, J. M. F., & Sočan, G. (2004). The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 69(4), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, S., Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2021). The dark factor of personality and risk-taking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8400. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vize, C. E., Collison, K. L., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2020). The “Core” of the Dark Triad: A test of competing hypotheses. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vize, C. E., & Lynam, D. R. (2021). On the importance of the assessment and conceptualization of Agreeableness: A commentary on “Agreeableness and the common core of dark traits are functionally different constructs. Journal of Research in Personality, 90, 104059–104148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vize, C. E., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2021). Examining the conceptual and empirical distinctiveness of Agreeableness and “dark” personality items. Journal of Personality, 89(3), 594–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijters, B., & Baumgartner, H. (2012). Misresponse to reversed and negated items in surveys: A review. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., Sun, T., Cao, M., & Drasgow, F. (2021). Using bifactor models to examine the predictive validity of hierarchical constructs: Pros, cons, and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 24(3), 530–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120915522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar