A study of Test-Taking strategies of Iranian IELTS repeaters: Any change in the strategy use?

References

• Al Fraidan, A. (2019). New test-taking patterns and their effect on language test validity. Language Testing in Asia, 9(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-019-0088-5
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D. (2016). Investigating washback to the learner from the IELTS test in the Japanese tertiary context. Language Testing in Asia, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-016-0030-z
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D. (2017). Investigating Japanese undergraduates’ English language proficiency with IELTS: Predicting factors and washback. (IELTS Partnership Research Papers, No. 2). https://www.ielts.org/teaching-and-research/research-reports
   Google Scholar
• Barkaoui, K. (2014). Quantitative approaches for analyzing longitudinal data in second language research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 65–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkaoui, K. (2016). What changes and what doesn’t? An examination of changes in the linguistic characteristics of IELTS repeaters’ Writing Task 2 scripts. (IELTS Research Report Series, No. 3). www.ielts.org/teaching-and-research/research-reports
   Google Scholar
• Barkaoui, K. (2017). Examining repeaters’ performance on second language proficiency tests: A review and a call for research. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(4), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1347790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkaoui, K. (2019). Examining sources of variability in repeaters’ L2 writing scores: The case of the PTE Academic writing section. Language Testing, 36(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217750692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (2007). On the origins of latent curve models. In R. Cudeck, & R. MacCallum (Eds.), Factor analysis at 100 (pp. 79–98). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, P., Yates, L., Benson, P. (2019). Investigating test preparation practices: Reducing risks. (IELTS Research Reports Online Series, No. 3). https://www.ielts.org/-/media/research-reports/20193-chappell_et_al_layout.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., & Blood, I. A. (2020). An analysis of TOEFL® Primary™ repeaters: How much score change occurs? Language Testing, 37(4), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220927751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (2011). Test-taking strategies. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, B. O’Sullivan, & S. Stoynoff (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language assessment (pp. 96–104). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (2012). Test taker strategies and task design. In G. Fulcher & F. Davidson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language testing in a nutshell (pp. 262–277). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Strycker, L. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, C., O'Loughlin, K. (2003). Investigating the relationship between intensive English language study and band score gain on IELTS. (IELTS Research Reports, Vol. 4). https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=909050898723873;res=IELHSS
   Google Scholar
• Estaji, M., & Banitalebi, Z. (2022). Assessing test-taking strategies of IELTS test-takers: development and validation of an IELTS test-taking strategy questionnaire. International Journal of Language Testing, 12(1), 59–81.
   Google Scholar
• Estaji, M., & Tajeddin, Z. (2012). The learner factor in washback context: An empirical study investigating the washback of the IELTS academic writing test. Language Testing in Asia, 2(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-2-1-5
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, C. J. (2018). Behind a spoken performance: Test takers’ strategic reactions in a simulated part 3 of the IELTS speaking test. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0073-4
   Google Scholar
• Gan, Z. (2009). IELTS preparation course and student IELTS performance: A case study in Hong Kong. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 40(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208101449
   Google Scholar
• Gebril, A., & Eid, M. (2017). Test preparation beliefs and practices in a high-stakes context: A teachers’ perspective. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(4), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1353607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2005). EAP study recommendations and score gains on the IELTS Academic writing test. Assessing Writing, 10(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2006). Washback to the learner: Learner and teacher perspectives on IELTS preparation course expectations and outcomes. Assessing Writing, 11(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2006.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2007). Washback to learning outcomes: A comparative study of IELTS preparation and university pre‐sessional language courses. Assessment in Education, 14(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701272880
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. B. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Knoch, U., Huisman, A., Elder, C., Kong, X., & McKenna, A. (2020). Drawing on repeat test takers to study test preparation practices and their links to score gains. Language Testing, 37(4), 550–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220927407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanteigne, B., & Sulieman, H. (2021). Score changes with repetition of paper version (s) of the TOEFL in an Arab Gulf state: A natural experiment. In B. Lanteigne, C. Coombe, & J. D. Brown (Eds.), Challenges in language testing around the world (pp. 147–165). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. M., & Chen, M. (2020). Understanding writing quality change: A longitudinal study of repeaters of a high-stakes standardized English proficiency test. Language Testing, 37(4), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220925448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L. (2014). Investigating the relationship between test preparation and TOEFL iBT® performance. (ETS Research Report Series, Vol. 2). https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12016
   Google Scholar
• Menard, S. (2008). Introduction: Longitudinal research design and analysis. In S. Menard (Ed.), Handbook of longitudinal research: Design, measurement, and analysis (pp. 3–12). Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Mickan, P., Motteram, J. (2009). The preparation practices of IELTS candidates: Case studies (IELTS Research Reports, Vol. 10). https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=103243737967283;res=IELHSS
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26–56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt243oa
   Google Scholar
• Powers, D. E. (1987). Who benefits most from preparing for a ‘coachable’ admissions test? Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt243oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J. (2010). Latent growth curve models. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 185–198). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Purpura, J. E. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test takers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 47(2), 289–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.91997009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purpura, J. E. (1999). Learner strategy use and performance on language tests: A structural equation modeling approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasti, I. (2009). Iranian candidates’ attitudes towards IELTS. Asian EFL Journal, 11(3), 110–155.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, W. T., & Radwan, N. (2015). Impact of inclusion of varying percentages of repeaters on equating. International Journal of Testing, 15(3), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.976865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saif, S., Ma, J., May, L., & Cheng, L. (2019). Complexity of test preparation across three contexts: Case studies from Australia, Iran and China. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1700211
   Google Scholar
• Shi, B., Huang, L., & Lu, X. (2020). Effect of prompt type on test-takers’ writing performance and writing strategy use in the continuation task. Language Testing, 37(3), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220911626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, X., & Cheng, L. (2006). Language learner strategy use and test performance of Chinese learners of English. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(3), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0303_2
   Google Scholar
• Stenlund, T., Eklöf, H., & Lyrén, P. E. (2017). Group differences in test-taking behaviour: An example from a high-stakes testing program. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1142935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Moere, A., & Hanlon, S. (2020). A Bayesian approach to improving measurement precision over multiple test occasions. Language Testing, 37(4), 482–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220934203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winke, P., & Lim, H. (2017). The effects of test preparation on second-language listening test performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(4), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1399396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, A. D., Chen, M. Y., & Stone, J. E. (2018). Investigating how test-takers change their strategies to handle difficulty in taking a reading comprehension test: Implications for score validation. International Journal of Testing, 18(3), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1396464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Q. (2013). Does test preparation work? Implications for score validity. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2012.721423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Q. (2015). Do component weighting and testing method affect time management and approaches to test preparation? A study on the washback mechanism. System, 50, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Q., & Andrews, S. (2013). Do test design and uses influence test preparation? Testing a model of washback with Structural Equation Modeling. Language Testing, 30(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212442634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeom, S., & Jun, H. (2020). Young Korean EFL learners’ reading and test-taking strategies in a paper and a computer-based reading comprehension tests. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(3), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2020.1731753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Goh, C. C., & Kunnan, A. J. (2014). Analysis of test takers’ metacognitive and cognitive strategy use and EFL reading test performance: A multi-sample SEM approach. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(1), 76–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2013.853770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Liu, M., Zhao, S., & Xie, Q. (2011). English test-taking strategy use and students’ test performance. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 133–168.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. (2008). Repeater analyses for TOEFL iBT. (Research Memorandum ETS RM-08 05.) Educational Testing Service. www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RM-08-05.pdf
   Google Scholar