Exploring the Determinants of Government-Sponsored R&D Performance in Korea

References

• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. J. (1970). Communication networks in R&D laboratories. R&D Management, 1(1), 14–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1970.tb01193.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bank of Korea. (2009). A regional inter-industry relation table in 2005. August.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. G., & Svenson, R. A. (1988). Measuring R&D productivity. Research Technology Management, 31(4), 11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman, J. G. (2011). Understanding evaluation in nonprofit organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(3), 350–377. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576340302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. (2005). Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation and effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chiesa, V., Frattini, F., Lazzarotti, V., & Manzini, R. (2008). Designing a performance measurement system for the research activities: A reference framework and an empirical study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 25, 213–226. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. Y., Lee, J. H., & Sohn, S. Y. (2009). Impact analysis for national R&D funding in science and technology using quantification method II. Research Policy, 38(10), 1534–1544. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuadrado-Roura, J. R., Garcia-Greciano, B., & Raymond, J. L. (1999). Regional convergence in productivity and productive structure: The Spanish case. International Regional Science Review, 22(1), 35–53. doi:10.1177/016001799761012190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Del Canto, J. G., & González, I. S. (1999). A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a firm’s R&D activities. Research Policy, 28(8), 891–905. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00029-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rassenfosse, G., & de Potterie, B. V. P. (2009). A policy insight into the R&D-patent relationship. Research Policy, 38(5), 779–792. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geer, B. W., Maher, J. K., & Cole, M. T. (2008). Managing nonprofit organizations: The importance of transformational leadership and commitment to operating standards for nonprofit accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(1), 51–75. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576320103
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135. doi:10.2307/41166664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29(4), 567–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (1999). Australian science and technology academics and university–industry research links. Higher Education, 38(1), 83–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herranz, J. (2010a). The logic model as a tool for developing a network performance measurement system. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(1), 56–80. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576340104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herranz, J. (2010b). Network performance and coordination: A theoretical review and framework. Public Performance & Management Review, 33(3), 311–341. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576330301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, F.-M., Horng, D.-J., & Hsueh, C.-C. (2009). The effect of government-sponsored R&D programmes on additionality in recipient firms in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(3), 204–217. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H. S., & Feiock, R. C. (2007). Public versus private funding of nonprofit organizations: Implication for collaboration. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(2), 174–190. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576310202
   Google Scholar
• Kerssens–van Drongelen, I. C., Nixon, B., & Pearson, A. (2000). Performance measurement in industrial R&D. International Journal of Management Review, 2(2), 111–143.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2000). The global public management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B., & Oh, H. (2002). An effective R&D performance measurement system. International Journal of Management Science, 30(1), 19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (1993). Science and technology policy theory. Seoul, KR: Daeyoung.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2010). Improving performance in U.S. state governments: Risk-taking, innovativeness, and proactiveness practices. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(1), 104–129. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576340106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, M., Traore, N., & Godin, B. (1996). An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity. Higher Education, 32(3), 1–19. doi:10.1007/bf00138868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Park, Y., & Choi, H. (2009). Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous object: A DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 847–855. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. doi:10.1177/0306312705052359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDavid, J. C., & Hawthorn, L. R. L. (2006). Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. E., & Rebne, D. S. (1995). Nonlinear effects of teaching and consulting on academic research productivity. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 29(1), 47–57. doi:10.1016/0038-0121(95)98606-v
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1998). Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27(5), 507–523. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00066-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science, & Technology Council (NSTC). (2009). Evaluation results of national R&D programs (Annual Report, Vol. 1). Washinton, DC: NSTC.
   Google Scholar
• Onida, F., & Malerba, F. (1989). R&D cooperation between industry, universities and research organizations in Europe. Technovation, 9(2), 137–195. doi:10.1016/0166-4972(89)90055-2
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation, & Development (OECD). (2002). Frascati manual: Proposed standard practice for survey on research and experimental development. Paris, FR: OECD. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9202081e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, R. A., & Remer, D. S. (1985). Measuring R&D productivity. Research Management, 28(3), 15–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. (1987). Hybrid organizational arrangements: New form or transitional development? California Management Review, 30(1), 67–87. doi:10.2307/41165267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do Networks Really Work? A framework for evaluating public-Sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, E. B., & Bellotti, P. R. (2002). Managerial determinants of industrial R&D performance: An analysis of the global chemicals/materials industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 69(2), 129–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, Y., Lee, K., Lee, H., & Seo, E. (2009). Analysis on correlation between evaluation and outcome of national R&D programs. Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 19(4), 129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, M., & Belschan, A. (1991). Technology life cycles and regional types: An evolutionary interpretation and some stylized facts. Technovation, 11(8), 483–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, V. J., Sharma, S., & Jain, S. K. (2010). Using patents and publications to assess R&D efficiency in the states of the USA. World Patent Information, 33(1), 4–10. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2010.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, E. W. K. (1998). Motives for strategic alliance: A resourced-based perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–221. doi:10.1016/s0956-5221(97)00036-5
   Google Scholar
• van Dooren, W., de Caluwe, C., & Lonti, Z. (2012). How to measure public administration performance: A conceptual model with applications for budgeting, human resources management, and open government. Public Performance and Management Review, 35(3), 489–508. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576350306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rijnsoever, F. J., Hessels, L. K., & Vandeberg, R. L. J. (2008). A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy, 37(8), 1255–1266. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watjatrakul, B. (2005). Determinants of IS sourcing decisions: A comparative study of transaction cost theory versus the resource-based view. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(4), 389–415. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2005.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, B. M., & Souder, W. E. (1997). Measuring R&D performance: State of the art. Research-Technology Management, 40(2), 34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J. (2006). Science and technology policy theory. Seoul, KR: Kyungmoon.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, A., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, R. (2003). A study of the R&D efficiency and productivity of Chinese firms. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(3), 444–464. doi:10.1016/s0147-5967(03)00055-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., & Dhaliwal, J. (2009). An investigation of resource-based and institutional theoretic factors in technology adoption for operations and supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 252–269. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar