Complex Grant-Contracting and Social Equity: Barriers to Municipal Access in Federal Block Grant Programs

References

• Andrew, S. A. (2009). Recent development in the study of interjurisdictional agreements: An overview and assessment. State and Local Government Review, 41(2), 133–142. doi:10.1177/0160323x0904100208
   Google Scholar
• Ban, C., Drahnak-Faller, A., & Towers, M. (2003). Human resource challenges in human service and community development organizations: Recruitment and retention of professional staff. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23(2), 133–153. doi:10.1177/0734371x03023002004
   Google Scholar
• Bayoumi, T., & Masson, P. R. (1995). Fiscal flows in the United States and Canada: Lessons for monetary union in Europe. European Economic Review, 39(2), 253–274. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(94)e0130-q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beam, D. R., & Conlan, T. J. (2001). Grants. In L. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of governance: A guide to the new governance (pp. 340–380). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2008). Factors explaining local privatization: A meta-regression analysis. Public Choice, 139(1–2), 105–119. doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9381-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D., & Lecours, A. (2014). Fiscal federalism and American exceptionalism: Why is there no federal equalisation system in the United States? Journal of Public Policy, 34(02), 303–329. doi:10.1017/s0143814x14000038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, R., Deichert, J., & Drozd, D. J. (2008). State rural development policy: The role of the community development block grant program. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 20(1), 108–132.
   Google Scholar
• Blewett, L. A., & Davern, M. (2007). Distributing State Children’s Health Insurance Program funds: A critical review of the design and implementation of the funding formula. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 32(3), 415–455. doi:10.1215/03616878-2007-010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blochliger, H., & Charbit, C. (2008). Fiscal equalisation. OECD Economic Studies, 44(1), 1–22. http://www.oecd.org/eco/growth/42506135.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boadway, R., & Watts, R. L. (2004). Fiscal federalism in Canada, the USA, and Germany. Kingston, ON, Canada: Queen’s University (Institute of Intergovernmental Relations). http://www.queensu.ca/iigr/WorkingPapers/watts/wattsboadway.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. D. S. (2014). Looking back and looking ahead: CDBG and the future of federal urban policy. Housing Policy Debate, 24(1), 303–309. doi:10.1080/10511482.2013.865657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003a). Contract-management capacity in municipal and county governments. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 153–164. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003b). Managing contract performance: A transaction costs approach. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(2), 275–297. doi:10.1002/pam.10117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003c). Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 441–468. doi:10.1093/jpoart/mug030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2004). Managing the public service market. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 656–668. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2005). Transaction costs and contracting: The practitioner perspective. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 326–351.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2006). Contracting for management: Assessing management capacity under alternative service delivery arrangements. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(2), 323–346. doi:10.1002/pam.20175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1950). Federalism and fiscal equity. American Economic Review, 40(4), 583–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1952). Federal grants and resource allocation. Journal of Political Economy, 60(3), 208–217. doi:10.1086/257209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, B. K. (2011). Agency forms and reforms: Institutional design for state-centric networks and block grant administration. In J. W. Meek, & K. Thurmaier (Eds.), Networked governance: The future of intergovernmental management (pp. 127–145). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, B. K., & Gerber, B. J. (2006). Redistributive policies and devolution: Is state administration a road block (grant) to equitable access to federal funding? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 613–632. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, B. K., & Gerber, B. J. (2008). Taken for granted? Managing for social equity in grant programs. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1128–1141. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00960.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlan, T. (2006). From cooperative to opportunistic federalism: Reflections on the half-century anniversary of the Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. Public Administration Review, 66(5), 663–676. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00631.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlan, T. J., & Posner, P. L. (2011). Inflection point? Federalism and the Obama administration. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 41(3), 421–446. doi:10.1093/publius/pjr020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyrenne, P., & Pandey, M. (2014). Fiscal equalization, government expenditures and endogenous growth. International Tax and Public Finance, 22, 311–329. doi:10.1007/s10797-014-9310-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2007). Rational choice and regional government. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(1), 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., & Scholz, J. T. (2009s). Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence from US federal transfer programs. Public Choice, 113(1–2), 25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, D. G., & Frederickson, H. G. (2006). Measuring the performance of the hollow state public management and change series. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, W. A., Gabris, G. T., & Krane, D. A. (1980). Dynamics in rural policy development: The uniqueness of county government. Public Administration Review, 40(1), 24–28. doi:10.2307/976104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girth, A. M., Hefetz, A., Johnston, J. M., & Warner, M. E. (2012). Outsourcing public service delivery: Management responses in noncompetitive markets. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 887–900. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02596.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office. (2005). Community development block grant formula: Targeting assistance to high-need communities could be enhanced. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office. http://www.gao.gov/assets/120/111590.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. (2008). Assessing local capacity for federal grant-getting. American Review of Public Administration, 38(4), 463–479. doi:10.1177/0275074007311385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. (2010). The distribution of federal economic development grant funds: A consideration of need and the urban/rural divide. Economic Development Quarterly, 24(4), 311–324. doi:10.1177/0891242410366562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L., & Handley, D. M. (2011). City adoption of federal performance measurement requirements. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(4), 443–466. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576340401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, D. M. (2008). Strengthening the intergovernmental grant system: Long-term lessons for the federal–local relationship. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 126–136. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00842.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. E. (2012). Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market, and management characteristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 289–317. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., Warner, M., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2015). Professional management and local government service delivery: Strategic decisions across alternative markets. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(2), 261–283. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.983829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabine, T. B., Gerstein, A. M., & Louis, T. A. (2003). Statistical issues in allocating funds by formula. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/read/10580
   Google Scholar
• Joaquin, E. M., & Greitens, T. J. (2012). Contract management capacity breakdown? An analysis of U.S. local governments. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 807–816. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02587.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. M., & Girth, A. M. (2012). Government contracts and “managing the market”: Exploring the costs of strategic management responses to weak vendor competition. Administration & Society, 44(1), 3–29. doi:10.1177/0095399711417396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. M., Romzek, B. S., & Wood, C. H. (2004). The challenges of contracting and accountability across the federal system: From ambulances to space shuttles. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 34(3), 155–182. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a005035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2002). Managing indirect governance. In L. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 490–510). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manna, P., & Ryan, L. L. (2011). Competitive grants and educational federalism: President Obama’s Race to the Top program in theory and practice. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 41(3), 522–546. doi:10.1093/publius/pjr021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, R., Deller, S. C., & Halstead, J. M. (2010). Alternative methods of service delivery in small and rural municipalities. Public Administration Review, 70(6), 894–905. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02221.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1958). The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1997). Devolution, grants, and fiscal competition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), 65–72. doi:10.1257/jep.11.4.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Orlebeke, C. J., & Weicher, J. C. (2014). How CDBG came to pass. Housing Policy Debate, 24(1), 14–45. doi:10.1080/10511482.2013.852989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E. (1981). City limits. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. (2002). The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 670–687. doi:10.2307/3088407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. (2001). Incentive effects of expanding federal mass transit formula grants. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(2), 239–261. doi:10.1002/pam.2024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F., & Camöes, P. J. (2007). Local service delivery choices in Portugal: A political transaction costs framework. Local Government Studies, 33(4), 535–553. doi:10.1080/03003930701417544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, D. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–187. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K. F., Hsieh, J. Y., & Li, T. S. (2009). Contracting capacity and perceived contracting performance: Nonlinear effects and the role of time. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 681–696. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Feiock, R. C. (2009). City managers’ policy leadership in council-manager cities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 461–476. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar