Citizens’ Use of Social Media in Government, Perceived Transparency, and Trust in Government

References

• Andersen, K. N., Henriksen, H. Z., Medaglia, R., Danziger, J. N., Sannarnes, M. K., & Enemærke, M. (2010). Fads and facts of e-government: A review of impacts of e-government (2003–2009). International Journal of Public Administration, 33(11), 564–579. doi:10.1080/01900692.2010.517724
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, A. M. (2005). Creating trust? A critical perspective on trust-enhancing efforts in public services. Public Performance & Management Review, 28, 465–486.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E. M. (1997). Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review, 57, 105–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. G., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264–271. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunch, N. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modeling using SPSS and AMOS. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K., & Davis, W. (1994). Causal indicator models: Identification, estimation, and testing. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Convention 1994, Miami, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Bonson, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., Lægreid, P., & Van de Walle, S. (2005). Trust, quality measurement models, and value chain monitoring. Public Performance & Management Review, 28, 460–464.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999–1023. doi:10.2307/2111684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. doi:10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 1295–1336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2005). Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public Performance & Management Review, 28, 487–511.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. E., & Gronke, P. (2005). The skeptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. Journal of Politics, 67, 784–803. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00339.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 319–326. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, D., & Meijer, A. J. (2006). Does transparency strengthen legitimacy? Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 11(2), 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2009). Public administration: An action orientation. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17, 263–282. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1203–1218. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2014). Social media update 2014. Pew Research Center. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/01/PI_SocialMediaUpdate20144.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1–26. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinal, R., Hartlyn, J., & Morgan, J. (2006). Performance still matters: Explaining trust in government in the Dominican Republic. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2), 200–223. doi:10.1177/0010414005281933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, J., Plowman, K. D., & Rawlins, B. L. (2007). Transparency in government communication. Journal of Public Affairs, 7, 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J., van Heerde, J., & Tucker, A. (2010). Does one trust judgement fit all? Linking theory and empirics. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 12(2), 161–188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2009.00401.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440–452. doi:10.2307/3151718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, O. W. (1995). Political efficacy and trust. In J. van Deth, & E. Scarbrough (Eds.), The impact of values (pp. 357–389). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (2014). The use of ICT for open government in U.S. municipalities: Perceptions of chief administrative officers. Public Performance & Management Review, 37, 365–387. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576370302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getha-Taylor, H. (2012). Cross-sector understanding and trust. Public Performance & Management Review, 36, 216–229. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576360203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2009). Do transparent government agencies strengthen trust? Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 14(3), 173–186.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2011). Being transparent or spinning the message? An experiment into the effects of varying message content on trust in government. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 16(1), 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Welch, E. W. (2012). Developing and testing a theoretical framework for computer-mediated transparency of local governments. Public Administration Review, 72, 562–571. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02532.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. doi:10.1111/puar.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A., & Greiling, D. (2013). Transparency, e-government, and accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 36, 572–584. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576360404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., Melitski, J., Rho, S.-Y., & Schwester, R. (2004). Restoring trust in government: The potential of digital citizen participation. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government. http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/HolzerReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M. (2011). Why there is basically only one form of political trust. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 13, 269–275. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2010.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K., & Goldberger, A. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10, 631–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, K.-N., Wang, F., & Wang, D. (2014). E-government use and perceived government transparency and service capacity: Evidence from a Chinese local government. Public Performance & Management Review, 38, 125–151. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576380106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampen, J. K., Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2006). Assessing the relation between satisfaction with public service delivery and trust in government: The impact of the predisposition of citizens toward government on evaluations of its performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 29, 387–404.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Keele, L. (2007). Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 241–254. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00248.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2012). E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review, 72, 819–828. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M. (1996). Divergent realities and convergent disappointments in the hierarchic relation: Trust and the intuitive auditor at work. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 216–245). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lederer, A. L, & Sethi, V. (1992). Root causes of strategic information systems planning implementation problems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 25–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 20(1), 492–503. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R., & Browne, M. (1993). The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: Some practical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 533–541. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2013). Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public Administration Review, 73, 429–439. doi:10.1111/puar.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. (2013). A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 327–334. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergel, I., & Bretschneider, S. I. (2013). A three-stage adoption process for social media use in government. Public Administration Review, 73, 390–400. doi:10.1111/puar.12021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michener, G., & Bersch, K. (2013). Identifying transparency. Information Polity, 18, 233–242.
   Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, S., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Cohen, N. (2009). Trust, participation, and performance in public administration: An empirical examination of health services in Israel. Public Performance & Management Review, 33, 7–33. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576330101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, S., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Van Ryzin, G. (2010). Public sector management, trust, performance, and participation: A citizens survey and national assessment in the United States. Public Performance & Management Review, 34, 268–312. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576340207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J. (2003). Can IT help government to restore public trust? Declining public trust and potential prospects of IT in the public sector. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI. http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2003/1874/05/187450134a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. V., III, VanAmburg, D., & Mithas, S. (2011). Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 257–283. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakki, P., Back, A., Ropponen, T., Kronqvist, J., Hintikka, K. A., Harju, A., … , Kola, P. (2011). Social media for citizen participation. Helsinki, FI: VTT Technical Research Center. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/2011/P755.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newton, K., & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence in public institutions: Faith, culture or performance? In S. J. Pharr, & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? (pp. 52–73). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F., & Reddick, C. G. (2012). Local e-government in the United States: Transformation or incremental change? Public Administration Review, 73, 165–175. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02647.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/bf03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Purser, K. (2012). Using social media in local government: 2011 survey report. Sydney, AU: Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government, University of Technology. http://www.acelg.org.au/system/files/publication-documents/1340860323_SocialMediaReport_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. L., III. (1980). Interpersonal trust: A comparison of attitudinal and situational factors. Human Relations, 33, 805–812. doi:10.1177/001872678003301103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharoni, S. (2012). E-citizenship. Electronic Media & Politics, 1(8), 119–135.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi:10.1037//1082-989x.7.4.422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2010). Government online: The internet gives citizens new paths to government services and information. Pew Research Center. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Government_Online_2010_with_topline.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2013). Smartphone ownership—2013 update. Pew Research Center. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_Smartphone_adoption_2013_PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L. (2011). Limitations to building institutional trustworthiness through e-government: A comparative study of two e-services in Chile. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 26(1), 78–93. doi:10.1057/jit.2010.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snead, J. T. (2013). Social media use in the U.S. executive branch. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 56–63. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, D. W. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 147–169. doi:10.2307/248922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. W. (1998). Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. Administration and Society, 30(2), 166–193. doi:10.1177/0095399798302003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66, 354–369. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2012). E-government survey 2012: E-government for the people. Available at http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2012-Survey/unpan048065.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural Equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(2), 5–40.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003). Public service performance and trust in government: The problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8–9), 891–913. doi:10.1081/pad-120019352
   Google Scholar
• Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2006). Citizens’ perceptions of politics and ethics in public administration: A five-year national study of their relationship to satisfaction with services, trust in governance, and voice orientations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 285–305. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 371–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthy, B. (2010). More open but not more trusted? The effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government. Governance, 23(4), 561–582. doi:10.1111/j.1468–0491.2010.01498.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2005). Assessing citizen involvement efforts by local governments. Public Performance & Management Review, 29, 191–216.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The performance–trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114–126. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00560.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavattaro, S. M., & Sementelli, A. J. (2014). A critical examination of social media adoption in government: Introducing omnipresence. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 257–264. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar