External Government Performance Evaluation in China: Evaluating the Evaluations

References

• Accenture. (2012). Delivering public service for the future: Navigating the shifts. Arlington, VA: Accenture. http://m.accenture.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/PDF/Accenture-Delivering-Public-Service-for-the-Future-112812.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H. (2009). Performance management (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, C. (2008). The politics of governance ratings. International Public Management Journal, 11(3), 275–297. doi:10.1080/10967490802301278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H., & Wells, R. B. (1997). A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, G., & Zhang, Z. (2008). Analysis on self-discipline realization of the third-sector for China government performance evaluation. Chinese Public Administration, 2008(1), 49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2002). The psychological barriers to performance management: or, Why isn’t everyone jumping on the performance-management bandwagon? Public Performance & Management Review, 26(1), 5–25. doi:10.2307/3381295
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E., & Wang, X. (2000). Performance measurement in U.S. counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 409–420. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. M., & Bowen, C.-C. (2008). Content analysis. In G. Miller & K. Yang (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in public administration (pp. 689–704). New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J. P., & Zhou, Z. (2010). Performance management in the government of the People’s Republic of China: Accountability and control in the implementation of public policy. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 10(2), 1–28. doi:10.1787/budget-10-5km7h1rvtlnq
   Google Scholar
• Center for Public Participation Studies. (2010). China administrative transparency annual watch, 2009. Beijing: China Law Press (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Center for Public Policy Studies. (2009). 2009 annual report on China’s fiscal transparency. Shanghai: Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Press (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., & Cai, Y. (2007). Public services of governments in China: Regime change and regional comprehensive evaluation. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Li, D., & Wang, J. (2010). Citizens’ attitudes toward local government public services: A comparative analysis between the City of Xiamen and the City of Phoenix. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(2), 221–235. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576340204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, C. K. (2003). A report card on report cards. Public Performance & Management Review, 27(2), 53–76.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, C. K., & Brunet, J. R. (2006). Organizational report cards: Significant impact or much ado about nothing? Public Administration Review, 66(1), 90–100. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00558.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coplin, W. D., Merget, A. E., & Bourdeaux, C. (2002). The professional researcher as change agent in the government performance movement. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 699–711. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalehite, E. G. (2008). Determinants of performance measurement: An investigation into the decision to conduct citizen surveys. Public Administration Review, 68(5), 891–907. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00930.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lancer Julnes, P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organization: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693–708. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, H., & Lou, C. (2012). Foreign-body measurement: The path selection and the construction of theory on government performance measurement in China. Chinese Public Administration, 2012(9), 46–59 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Gao, J. (2009). Governing by goals and numbers: A case study in the use of performance measurement to build state capacity in China. Public Administration and Development, 29(1), 21–31. doi:10.1002/pad.514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J. (2010). Hitting the target but missing the point: The rise of non-mission-based targets in performance measurement of Chinese local governments. Administration & Society, 42(s1), s56–s76. doi:10.1177/0095399710361854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J. (2012). How does Chinese local government respond to citizen satisfaction surveys? A case study of Foshan city. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(2), 136–147. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00760.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gormley, W. T., Jr. (1998). Assessing health care report cards. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3), 325–352. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024387
   Google Scholar
• Gormley, W. T., Jr, & Weimer, D. L. (1999). Organizational report cards. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. (2006). Performance measurement: Getting results. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• He, B. (2006). Participatory and deliberative institutions in China. In E. Leib & B. He (Eds.), The search for deliberative democracy in China (pp. 175–196). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• He, B. (2011). Civic engagement through participatory budgeting in China: Three different logics at work. Public Administration and Development, 31(2), 122–133. doi:10.1002/pad.598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C. J. (1999). Do government bureaucrats make effective use of performance management information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(3), 363–394. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024415
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A., & Coates, P. (2004). Citizen-initiated performance assessment: The initial Iowa experience. Public Performance & Management Review, 27(3), 29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., & Yang, K. (2004). Performance measurement and improvement: An assessment of the state of the art. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(1), 15–31. doi:10.1177/0020852304041228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Dixon, R., & Beeston, C. (2008). Rating the rankings: Assessing international rankings of public service performance. International Public Management Journal, 11(3), 298–328. doi:10.1080/10967490802301286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoontis, P., & Kim, T. (2012). Antecedents to municipal performance measurement implementation. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(1), 158–173. doi:10.2753/pmr1530–9576360108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, H., Xin, X., & Yi, D. (2012). Chinese municipal basic public service capacity assessment (2011–2012). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. M. (2003). Citizen satisfaction and administrative performance measures: Is there really a link? Urban Affairs Review, 38(6), 855–866. doi:10.1177/1078087403038006005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. M., & Swindell, D. (2002). A multiple-indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: Correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 610–621. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2002). The transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty-first century America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., & Zhou, L.-A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1743–1762. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberthal, K. (2004). Governing China: From revolution through reform (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Litwin, M. S. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity (Vol. 7). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maskin, E., Qian, Y., & Xu, C. (2000). Incentives, information, and organizational form. Review of Economic Studies, 67(2), 359–378. doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. doi:10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of performance-measurement use in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 180–190. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer. (2012). Quality of living worldwide city rankings 2012. New York: Mercer.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. doi:10.2307/259247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. J., & Li, L. (1999). Selective policy implementation in rural China. Comparative Politics, 31(2), 167–186. doi:10.2307/422143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B. (1984). Linking objective and subjective measures of performance. Public Administration Review, 44(2), 118–127. doi:10.2307/975862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J., & Ansah, E. S. I. (2010). Organizational assessment tools: Report cards and scorecards of the federal agencies. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(1), 109–142.
   Google Scholar
• Podger, A., Wanna, J., Chan, H. S., Ma, J., & Su, T.-T. (2012). Putting the citizens at the centre: Making government more responsive. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(2), 101–110. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H. (2003). Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saich, T. (2007). Citizens’ perceptions of governance in rural and urban China. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 12(1), 1–28. doi:10.1007/s11366-007-9003-5
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, H. L. (2010). Objective and subjective performance measures. Administration & Society, 42(5), 550–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, B. W. Y. (2014). Civic engagement in the performance evaluation of the public sector in China. Public Management Review, 16(3), 341–357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.770055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stipak, B. (1979). Citizen satisfaction with urban services: Potential misuse as a performance indicator. Public Administration Review, 39(1), 46–52. doi:10.2307/3110378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S., & Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance and Management Review, 25(3), 267–281. doi:10.2307/3381236
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., & Wu, J. (2010). Future prospects for performance management in Chinese city governments. Administration & Society, 42(s1), s34–s55. doi:10.1177/0095399710361853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. S. (1999). Performance-based management: Responding to the challenges. Public Productivity & Management Review, 22 (3), 288–307. doi:10.2307/3380705
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. W. (2003). Measuring government in the early twentieth century. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 643–659. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Yan, B. (2006). Who is the best evaluator: An analysis of the stakeholders in borough-county level government performance evaluation. Management Review, 18(4), 46–53 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W. (Ed.). (2012). Building service-oriented government in China: Lessons, challenges and prospects. Singapore: World Scientific Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W., Yu, W., Lin, T., Wang, J., & Tam, W. (2012). Evaluating public service performance in urban China: Findings from the 2011 Lien Chinese Cities Service-Oriented Government Project. In W. Wu (Ed.), Building service-oriented government in China: Lessons, challenges and prospects (pp. 1–26). Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, S. (2011). Third party assessment model in government performance management and its improvement. Chinese Public Administration, 2011(1), 28–32 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Xue, L., & Liou, K. T. (2012). Government reform in China: Concepts and reform cases. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(2), 115–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114–126. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00560.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Wu, J. (2013). Are the “bigger fish” caught? China’s experience of engaging citizens in performance management system. Public Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 143–173.
   Google Scholar
• Ying, Z. (2005). Xiaokang Index of China Credibility in 2005 is scored 60.2. China Xiaokang (9), 17–18 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W. (2011). Open government information: Challenges faced by public human resource management in China. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(13), 879–888. doi:10.1080/01900692.2011.616023
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W., & Ma, L. (2014). External government performance evaluation in China: A case study of the Lien Service-Oriented Government Project. Public Money and Management, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. (2007). The accountability system of township government. Chinese Sociology and Anthropology, 39(2), 64–73. doi:10.2753/csa0009-4625390207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (1998). Media, market, and democracy in China: Between the party line and the bottom line. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, F. (2008). An empirical study on overall performance evaluation of local governments by the third party: A case study on city and county governments of Guangdong province. Chinese Public Administration 2008(5), 13–17 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. (2010). Society must be defended: Reform, openness, and social policy in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 19(67), 799–818. doi:10.1080/10670564.2010.508579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar