Accountability Forums and Dispute System Design

References

• Amsler, L. B. (2014). Combating structural bias in dispute system designs that use arbitration: Transparency, the universal sanitizer. Yearbook on Arbitration & Mediation, 6, 32–55. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2479014
   Google Scholar
• Amsler, L. B. (2016). Collaborative governance: Integrating management, politics, and law. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 700–711. doi:10.1111/puar.12605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsler, L. B., Martinez, J. K., & Smith, S. E. (2015). Christina Merchant and the state of dispute system design. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 33(S1), S7–S26. doi:10.1002/crq.21149.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K., Mnookin, R. H., Ross, L., Tversky, A., & Wilson, R. (Eds.). (1995). Barriers to conflict resolution. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Bayles, M. D. (1990). Procedural justice: Allocating to individuals. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1932-7
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. (1993). Negotiating rationally. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Berenbeim, R. (1980). Nonunion complaint systems: A corporate appraisal. New York, NY: The Conference Board.
   Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior ( Vol. 9, pp. 289–319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, R. J. Bies, & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations(pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Casual accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it’s not my fault? Communication Research, 15(4), 381–399. doi:10.1177/009365088015004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B. (2008–9). Designing justice: Legal institutions and other systems for managing conflict. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 24, 1–50. Retrieved from https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/1811/76882/OSJDR_V24N1_001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B., & Wise, C. (1996). The administrative dispute resolution act of 1990: How do we evaluate its success? Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 6, 383–414. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024318
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O’Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 547–558. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B., Hallberlin, C. J., Walker, D. A., & Chung W. T. (2009). Dispute system design and justice in employment dispute resolution: Mediation at the workplace. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 14, 1–50. Retrieved from http://www.hnlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/DISPUTE_SYSTEM_DESIGN_AND_JUSTICE_IN_EMPLOYMENT_DISPUTE_RESOLUTION_MEDIATION_AT_.doc
   Google Scholar
• Birke, R., & Fox, C. R. (1999). Psychological principles in negotiating civil settlements. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 4, 1–57. Retrieved from http://www.hnlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/PSYCHOLOGICAL_PRINCIPLES_IN_NEGOTIATING_CIVIL_SETTLEMENTS.doc
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2010). Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946–967. doi:10.1080/01402382.2010.486119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., & Schillemans, T. (2014). Meaningful accountability. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 673–682). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199641253-e-038
   Google Scholar
• Brett, J. M. (2011). Negotiating globally (3d ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, R. A. B., & Folger, J. (2005). The promise of mediation: The transformative approach to conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Conbere, J. P. (2001). Theory building for conflict management system design. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 19(2), 215–236. doi:10.1002/crq.3890190206
   Google Scholar
• Costantino, C. A., & Merchant, C. S. (1996). Designing conflict management systems: A guide to creating productive and healthy organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. (2002, August/September). Seeking salvation for accountability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA. Retrieved from http://mjdubnick.dubnick.net/papersrw/2002/salv2002.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 376–417. doi:10.1080/15309576.2005.11051839
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. J., & Frederickson, H. G. (2009). Accountable agents: Federal performance measurement and third-party government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(Suppl. 1), i143–i159. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup039
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. J., & Frederickson, H. G. (2011a). Introduction. In M. J. Dubnick & H. G. Frederickson (Eds.), Accountable governance: Problems and promises (pp. xi–xxx). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. doi:10.4324/9781315706771
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. J., & Frederickson, H. G. (2011b). Public accountability: Performance measurement, the extended state, and the search for trust. Washington, DC: National Academy of Public Administration & Dayton, OH: The Kettering Foundation. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1875024
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. J., & Yang, K. (2011). The pursuit of accountability: Promise, problems, and prospects. In D. C. Menzel & H. L. White (Eds.), The state of public administration: Issues, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 171–186). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. doi:10.4324/9781315698977
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, D. W. (1989). Justice on the job: Resolving grievances in the nonunion workplace. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folger, R. D., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452225777
   Google Scholar
• Gadlin, H. (2000). The ombudsman: What’s in a name? Negotiation Journal, 16(1), 37–48. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00201.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. A. (2005). The handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (2014). Accountability overloads. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 555–565). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199641253-e-011
   Google Scholar
• Hresko, T. (2007). Restoration and relief: Procedural justice and the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. Gonzaga Law Review, 42, 95–131. Retrieved from http://blogs.gonzaga.edu/gulawreview/files/2011/01/Hresko.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. J., & Svara, J. H. (Eds.). (2011). Justice for all: Promoting social equity in public administration. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. doi:10.4324/9781315703060
   Google Scholar
• Koppell, J. G. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder.” Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00434.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2015). Negotiation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, D. (1987). Dispute resolution in the nonunion firm: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(3), 465–502. doi:10.1177/0022002787031003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press/Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4
   Google Scholar
• Lind, E. A., Maccoun, R. J., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J., & Tyler, T. R. (1990). In the eye of the beholder: Tort litigants’ evaluations of their experiences in the civil justice system. Law and Society Review, 24(4), 953–996. doi:10.2307/3053616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, D. (2015). The future of conflict management systems. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 33, S27–S34. doi:10.1002/crq.21133
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, D. B., Seeber, R. L., & Fincher, R. D. (2003). Emerging systems for managing workplace conflict: Lessons from American corporations for mangers and dispute resolution professionals. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, J. F. (2001). Beyond ADR: A systems approach to conflict management. Negotiation Journal, 17(3), 207–216. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2001.tb00237.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, J. F. (2003). Integrated conflict management programs emerge as an organization development strategy. Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, 21(5), 99–113. doi:10.1002/alt.3810210505
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. (1988). Corporate nonunion complaint procedures and systems: A strategic human resources management analysis. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2005). Goal-based learning and the future of performance management. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 203–216. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 77–89. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00557.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2014). Accountability deficits. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 545–554). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199641253-e-010
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. (2007). The institutionalization of alternative dispute resolution in the federal government. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 646–661. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00750.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (Eds.). (2003). The promise and performance of environmental conflict resolution. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. doi:10.4324/9781936331741
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., & Raines, S. S. (2001). Lessons learned from two decades of alternative dispute resolution at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 661–671. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, R. A. (1993). The problems of jurisprudence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238. doi:10.2307/975901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. H. (2007). Reinventing administrative prescriptions: The case for democratic‐constitutional impact statements and scorecards. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 28–39. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00694.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, M. P. (1984). The non-union complaint system at MIT: An upward-feedback mediation model. Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, 2(4), 10–18. doi:10.1002/alt.3810020407
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, M. P. (1997). Dispute resolution in the non-union environment: An evolution toward integrated systems for conflict management. In S. E. Gleason (Ed.), Workplace dispute resolution: Directions for the twenty-first century (pp. 79–106). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. Retrieved from http://ombud.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/reso.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, M. P., & Baker, M. (1984). Are you hearing enough employee concerns? Harvard Business Review, 62, 127–136. Retrieved from http://ombud.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/employee-concerns.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, E. V., & Kellough, J. E. (2012). Does civil service reform affect behavior? Linking alternative personnel systems, perceptions of procedural justice, and complaints. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 121–141. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, J., & Brown, B. R. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J., & Sander, F. (1991). Culture, negotiation, and the eye of the beholder. Negotiation Journal, 7(3), 249–254. doi:10.1007/bf01000428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. (2010). Justice: What’s the right thing to do? New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Senger, J. M. (2003). Federal dispute resolution. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Slaikeu, K. A., & Hasson, R. H. (1998). Controlling the costs of conflict: How to design a system for your organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. E., & Martinez, J. K. (2009). An analytic framework for dispute systems design. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 14, 123–170. Retrieved from http://www.hnlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/123-170.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (2000). Procedural justice. In J. Sanders & L. V. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 65–92). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. doi:10.1007/0-306-47379-8_3
   Google Scholar
• Ury, W. L., Brett, J. M., & Goldberg, S. B. (1988). Getting disputes resolved: Designing systems to cut the cost of conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & De Haan, N. (2010). Normative and empirical justice research: A preliminary exploration of public administrators in the health care context. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 16(1), 51–74. Retrieved from https://28b3dd4c-a-e2cc6547-s-sites.googlegroups.com/a/jpmsp.com/new-jpmsp/Vol16Iss1-Yang-DeHaan.pdf
   Google Scholar