12,297
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Transforming Input Into Output: How Downward Networking Mediates the Effect of External Networking on Organizational Performance

References

  • Akkerman, A., Torenvlied, R., & Schalk, J. (2012). Two-level effects of inter-organizational network collaboration on graduate satisfaction: A comparison of five inter-college networks in Dutch higher education. American Review of Public Administration, 42(6), 654–677. doi:10.1177/0275074011425418.
  • Aldrich, H. A. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Amagoh, F. (2008). Perspectives on organizational change: Systems and complexity theories. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 13(3), 1–14. Retrieved from http://innovation.cc/scholarly-style/amagoh3dec2008jag2rev1.pdf
  • Andrews, R., & Brewer, G. A. (2014). Social capital and public service performance: Does managerial strategy matter. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(2), 187–213. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.983821.
  • Barr, J., & Saltmarsh, S. (2014). It all comes down to the leadership role of the school principal in fostering parent–school engagement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 491–505. doi:10.1177/1741143213502189.
  • Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018.
  • Barrett-Baxendale, D., & Burton, D. (2009). Twenty-first-century head teacher: Pedagogue, visionary leader or both? Phase 1: A reflection on the historical perspective and critical analysis of contemporary perception and practice. School Leadership and Management, 29(2), 91–107. doi:10.1080/13632430902775368.
  • Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., Jr., & Walker, R. M. (Eds.). (2006). Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511488511.
  • Brannick, M. T., Chan, D., Conway, J. M., Lance, C. E., & Spector, P. E. (2010). What is method variance and how can we cope with it? A panel discussion. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 407–420. doi:10.1177/1094428109360993.
  • Brehm, J., & Gates, S. (1997). Working, shirking, and sabotage. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/mpub.15149.
  • Chun, Y. H., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Consequences of goal ambiguity in public organizations. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O’Toole Jr., & R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 92–112). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511488511.006.
  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6.
  • Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: A literature review. Nottingham, UK: DfES. Available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120504190742/http://education.gov.uk/publications/eorderingdownload/rr433.pdf
  • DiPaola, M. F., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2005). Bridging or buffering? The impact of schools’ adaptive strategies on student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(1), 60–71. doi:10.1108/09578230510577290.
  • DiStefano, C., & Hess, B. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: An empirical review. Journal of Psycho-educational Assessment, 23(3), 225–241. doi:10.1177/073428290502300303.
  • Dumay, X. (2009). Origins and consequences of schools’ organizational culture for student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(4), 523–555. doi:10.1177/0013161x09335873.
  • Dutch Education Council. (2008). Opbrengstgerichtheid en wegwerken van tekorten (Results-oriented performance culture and eliminating deficits). The Hague, Netherlands: Author. Available at https://www.onderwijsraad.nl/upload/documents/publicaties/volledig/opbrengstgerichtheid_en_wegwerken_van_tekorten.pdf
  • Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Favero, N., & Bullock, J. B. (2014). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285–308. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu020.
  • Favero, N., Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2014). Goals, trust, participation, and feedback: Linking internal management with performance outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 327–343. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu044.
  • Frank, K. A. (2009). Quasi-ties: Directing resources to members of a collective. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(12), 1613–1645. doi:10.1177/0002764209331529.
  • Fuhrman, S. H., Goertz, M. E., & Weinbaum, E. H. (2007). Educational governance in the United States: Where are we? How did we get here? Why should we care? In D. K. Cohen, S. Fuhrman, & F. Mosher (Eds.), The state of education policy research (pp. 41–61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Geletkanycz, M. A., Brian, K., Boyd, B. K., & Finkelstein, S. (2001). The strategic value of CEO external directorate networks: Implications for CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 889–898.
  • Goerdel, H. T. (2006). Taking initiative: Proactive management and organizational performance in networked environments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 351–367. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui051.
  • Gordon, M. F., & Seashore Louis, K. (2009). Linking parent and community involvement with student achievement: Comparing principal and teacher perceptions of stakeholder influence. American Journal of Education, 116(1), 1–31. doi:10.1086/605098.
  • Hassard, J. (1995). Sociology and organization theory: Positivism, paradigms and postmodernity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557651.
  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (30th Anniv. ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. doi:10.7758/9781610446631.
  • Lockwood, C. M., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1998, March). Bootstrapping the standard error of the mediated effect. Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of SAS Users Group International, Nashville, TN. Available at http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi23/Posters/p180.pdf
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 593–614. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542.
  • Maroy, C. (2009). Convergences and hybridization of educational policies around “post‐bureaucratic” models of regulation. Compare, 39(1), 71–84. doi:10.1080/03057920801903472.
  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2013). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 429–456. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus057.
  • Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., & Hicklin, A. (2010). I’ve seen fire and I’ve seen rain: Public management and performance after a natural disaster. Administration & Society, 41(8), 979–1003. doi:10.1177/0095399709349027.
  • Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2007). Strategic management and the performance of public organizations: Testing venerable ideas against recent theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 357–377. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul017.
  • Mintrop, H., & Sunderman, G. L. (2009). Predictable failure of federal sanctions-driven accountability for school improvement—And why we may retain it anyway. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 353–364. doi:10.3102/0013189x09339055.
  • Mokken, R. J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110813203.
  • Montuori, L. A. (2000). Organizational longevity-integrating systems thinking, learning and conceptual complexity. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(1), 61–73. doi:10.1108/09534810010310249.
  • Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Muijs, D., Ainscow, M., Chapman, C., & West, M. (2011). Collaboration and networking in education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science + Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0283-7.
  • Nicholson-Crotty, S., & O’Toole, L. J. (2004). Public management and organizational performance: The case of law enforcement agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 1–18. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh001.
  • O’Toole, L. J., Jr., & Meier, K. J. (1999). Modeling the impact of public management: The implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 505–526.
  • O’Toole, L. J., Jr., & Meier, K. J. (2011). Public management: Organizations, governance, and performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511784040.
  • O’Toole, L. J., Jr., Meier, K. J., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2005). Managing upward, downward and outward: Networks, hierarchical relationships and performance. Public Management Review, 7(1), 45–68. doi:10.1080/1471903042000339419.
  • O’Toole, L. J., Jr., Torenvlied, R., Akkerman, A., & Meier, K. J. (2013). Human resource management and public organizational performances: Educational outcomes in the Netherlands. In R. J. Burke, A. J. Noblet, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Human resource management in the public sector (pp. 270–285). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9780857937322.00025.
  • Pappas, J. M., Flaherty, K. E., & Wooldridge, B. (2004). Tapping into hospital champions–strategic middle managers. Health Care Management Review, 29(1), 8–16. doi:10.1097/00004010-200401000-00003.
  • Paulsen, J. M. (2014). Norwegian superintendents as mediators of change initiatives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 407–423. doi:10.1080/15700763.2014.945654.
  • Perry, J. L., & Porter, L. W. (1982). Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 89–98. doi:10.5465/amr.1982.4285475.
  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003). The external control of organizations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. doi:10.3758/bf03206553.
  • Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762–800. doi:10.1177/1094428109332834.
  • Ryu, S. (2014). Networking partner selection and its impact on the perceived success of collaboration. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(4), 632–657. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576370405.
  • Sanders, M. G. (2014). Principal leadership for school, family, and community partnerships: The role of a systems approach to reform implementation. American Journal of Education, 120(2), 233–255. doi:10.1086/674374.
  • Sartory, K., Jungermann, A.-K., & Järvinen, H. (2016). Support for school-to-school networks: How networking teachers perceive support activities of a local coordinating agency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 1–13. doi:10.1080/00071005.2016.1184742.
  • Schalk, J., Torenvlied, R., & Allen, J. (2010). Network embeddedness and public agency performance: The strength of strong ties in Dutch higher education. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 629–653. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup018.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire a cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. doi:10.1177/0013164405282471.
  • Scott, R. W. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312. doi:10.2307/270723.
  • Spillane, J. P., & Kim, C. M. (2012). An exploratory analysis of formal school leaders’ positioning in instructional advice and information networks in elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 73–102. doi:10.1086/667755.
  • Spillane, J. P., Hopkins, M., & Sweet, T. M. (2015). Intra-and interschool interactions about instruction: Exploring the conditions for social capital development. American Journal of Education, 122(1), 71–110. doi:10.1086/683292.
  • Swinth, R. L. (1974). Organizational systems for management: Designing, planning and implementation. Columbus, OH: Grid.
  • Torenvlied, R., & Akkerman, A. (2012). Effects of managers’ work motivation and networking activity on their reported levels of external red tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 445–471. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur076.
  • Torenvlied, R., & Akkerman, A. (2014). Managerial networking. In R. Alhaij & J. Rokne (Eds.), The encyclopedia of social network analysis and mining (pp. 845–848). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_276.
  • Torenvlied, R., Akkerman, A., Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2013). The multiple dimensions of managerial networking. American Review of Public Administration, 43(3), 251–272. doi:10.1177/0275074012440497.
  • Turkenburg, M. (2008). De school bestuurd: Schoolbesturen over goed bestuur en de maatschappelijke opdracht van de school [Governing the school: School boards on good governance and the social mission of the school]. The Hague, Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Social Research/SCP. Available at http://www.scp.nl/Publicaties/Alle_publicaties/Publicaties_2008/De_school_bestuurd
  • Van den Bekerom, P., Torenvlied, R., & Akkerman, A. (2016). Managing all quarters of the compass? How internally oriented managerial networking moderates the impact of environmental turbulence on organizational performance. American Review of Public Administration, 46(6), 639–659. doi:10.1177/0275074015571123.
  • Van den Bekerom, P., Torenvlied, R., & Akkerman, A. (2017). Constrained by red tape: How managerial networking moderates the effects of red tape on public service performance. American Review of Public Administration, 47(3), 300–322. doi:10.1177/0275074015623856.
  • Van Schuur, W. H. (2003). Mokken scale analysis: Between the Guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Political Analysis, 11(2), 139–163. doi:10.1093/pan/mpg002.
  • Verger, A., & Curran, M. (2014). New public management as a global education policy: Its adoption and re-contextualization in a Southern European setting. Critical Studies in Education, 55(3), 253–271. doi:10.1080/17508487.2014.913531.
  • Walker, R. M., & Andrews, R. (2013). Local government management and performance: A review of evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 101–133. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut038.
  • Walker, R. M., Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2010)). Wakeup call: Strategic management, network alarms, and performance. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 731–741. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02201.x.
  • Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Williams, L. J., Vandenberg, R. J., & Edwards, J. R. (2009). Structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 543–604. doi:10.1080/19416520903065683.
  • Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 295–320. doi:10.1177/014920639201800205.
  • Wright, P. M., & Snell, S. A. (1991). Toward an integrative view of strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 1(3), 203–225. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90015-5.
  • Zhu, L., Robinson, S. E., & Torenvlied, R. (2015). A Bayesian approach to measurement bias in networking studies. American Review of Public Administration, 45(5), 542–564. doi:10.1177/0275074014524299.