979
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Performance of Public–Private Partnerships and the Influence of Contractual Arrangements

References

  • Albalate, D., Bel, G., Bel-Piñana, P., & Geddes, R. R. (2015). Risk mitigation and sharing in motorway PPPs: A comparative policy analysis of alternative approaches. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17(5), 481–501. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1010788.
  • Baeza, M.D. L.Á., & Vassallo, J. M. (2010). Private concession contracts for toll roads in Spain: Analysis and recommendations. Public Money & Management, 30(5), 299–304.
  • Baker, N. B. (2016). Transaction costs in public–private partnerships: The weight of institutional quality in developing countries revisited. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(2), 431–455. doi:10.1080/15309576.2016.1244092.
  • Becker, F., & Patterson, V. (2005). Public: Private partnerships: Balancing financial returns, risks, and roles of the partners. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(2), 125–144. doi:10.2307/20447583.
  • Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006). Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 455–476.
  • Bing, L., Akintoye, A., Edwards, P. J., & Hardcastle, C. (2005). The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK. International Journal of Project Management, 23(1), 25–35.
  • Bogus, S. M., Shane, J. S., & Molenaar, K. R. (2010). Contract payment provisions and project performance: An analysis of municipal water and wastewater facilities. Public Works Management & Policy, 15(1), 20–31. doi:10.1177/1087724x10364535.
  • Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2005). Transaction costs and contracting: The practitioner perspective. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 326–351.
  • Burstein, P. (1991). Policy domains: Organization, culture, and policy outcomes. Annual Review of Sociology, 17(1), 327–350. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001551.
  • California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission (CDIAC). (2008). Public–private partnerships: A guide to selecting a private partner. Sacramento, CA: California Debt & Investment Advisory Commission.
  • Cox, D. O., Molenaar, K. R., Ernzen, J. J., Henk, G., Matthews, T. C., Smith, N., …, & Yakowenko, G. (2002). Contract administration: Technology and practice in Europe. Alexandria, VA: American Trade Initiatives.
  • Cruz, C. O., & Marques, R. C. (2013). Flexible contracts to cope with uncertainty in public–private partnerships. International Journal of Project Management, 31(3), 473–483. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.006.
  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251–283.
  • De Bettignies, J. E., & Ross, T. W. (2004). The economics of public–private partnerships. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 30(2), 135–154.
  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
  • ENO Center for Transportation. (2014). Partnership financing: Improving transportation infrastructure through public private partnerships. Washington, DC: Eno Center for Transportation.
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2010). Project Finance Primer (2010). Washington, DC: FHWA. Available at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/finance/resources/general
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2017a). Project profile: Dulles greenway. Available at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/project_profiles/va_dulles_greenway.aspx
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2017b). Project profile: Pocahontas parkway. Available at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/project_profiles/va_pocahontas.aspx
  • Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. S., & Buhl, S. (2002). Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie? Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 279–295. doi:10.1080/01944360208976273.
  • George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Graddy, E. (2009). Cross-sectoral governance and performance in service delivery. International Review of Public Administration, 13(s1), 61–73.
  • Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships: The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Grossman, S. A. (2012). The management and measurement of public–private partnerships. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(4), 595–616.
  • Hackbart, M., Sapp, S. P., & Hur, Y. (2004). Debt capacity and debt limits: A state road fund perspective. Lexington, KY: Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Kentucky.
  • Hodge, G. A. (2010). 5. Reviewing public–private partnerships: Some thoughts on evaluation. In G. A. Hodge, C. Greve & A. E. Boardman (Eds.), International handbook on public–private partnerships(pp. 81–112). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2007). Public–private partnerships: An international performance review. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 545–558.
  • Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2013). Public–private partnership in developing and governing mega-projects. In H. Priemus & B. van Wee (Eds.), International handbook on mega projects (pp. 182–208). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Kay, A., & Baker, P. (2015). What can causal process tracing offer to policy studies? A review of the literature. Policy Studies Journal, 43(1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/psj.12092.
  • Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). The impact of contract characteristics on the performance of public–private partnerships (PPPs). Public Money & Management, 36(6), 455–462. doi:10.1080/09540962.2016.1206756.
  • Kort, M., & Klijn, E.-H. (2011). Public–private partnerships in urban regeneration projects: Organizational form or managerial capacity? Public administration review, 71(4), 618–626. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02393.x.
  • Lapré, M. A., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2003). Managing learning curves in factories by creating and transferring knowledge. California Management Review, 46(1), 53–71.
  • Martz, M. (2013). Pocahontas Parkway to change control—Official says customers using Pocahontas 895 won’t be affected. Richmond Times-Dispatch. Available at http://www.richmond.com/news/local/henrico/article_5a059a66-f9be-5f1d-91ca-3611fdbebb29.html
  • Mohamed, S.A. M. (2003). Performance in international construction joint ventures: Modeling perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(6), 619–626.
  • Ni, A. Y. (2012). The risk-averting game of transport public–private partnership. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(2), 253–274.
  • Petsoulas, C., Allen, P., Hughes, D., Vincent-Jones, P., & Roberts, J. (2011). The use of standard contracts in the English National Health Service: A case study analysis. Social science & medicine, 73(2), 185–192.
  • Regimbal, J. J. (2004). An analysis of the evolution of the Public–Private Transportation Act of 1995. Charlottesville, VA: Southern Environmental Law Center.
  • Samuel, P. (2004). Pocahontas Parkway revenues about half forecast. TOLLROADSNEWS. Available at http://tollroadsnews.com/news/pocahontas-parkway-revenues-about-half-forecast
  • Sharma, D., Cui, Q., Chen, L., & Lindly, J. (2010). Balancing private and public interests in public–private partnership contracts through optimization of equity capital structure. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2151, 60–66.
  • Silvestre, H. C., & De Araujo, J. (2012). Public–private partnerships/private finance initiatives in Portugal: Theory, practice, and results. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(2), 316–339. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576360208.
  • United Kingdom National Audit Office (UKNAO). (2001). Managing the relationship to secure a successful partnership in PFI projects. Available at https://www.nao.org.uk/report/managing-the-relationship-to-secure-a-successful-partnership-in-pfi-projects
  • United States General Accounting Office(USGAO). (2004). Highways and transit private sector sponsorship of and investment in major projects has been limited. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office.
  • Van Den Hurk, M., & Verhoest, K. (2016). The challenge of using standard contracts in public–private partnerships. Public Management Review, 18(2), 278–299.
  • Van De Velde, D., Veeneman, W., & Schipholt, L. L. (2008). Competitive tendering in The Netherlands: Central planning vs. functional specifications. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(9), 1152–1162.
  • Velotti, L., Botti, A., & Vesci, M. (2012). Public–private partnerships and network governance: What are the challenges? Public Performance & Management Review, 36(2), 340–365. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576360209.
  • Vining, A. R., Boardman, A. E., & Poschmann, F. (2005). Public–private partnerships in the US and Canada: “There are no free lunches”. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 7(3), 199–220.
  • Wang, H., Xiong, W., Wu, G., & Zhu, D. (2017). Public–private partnership in public administration discipline: A literature review. Public Management Review ( forthcoming).
  • Wang, Y. (2015). Evolution of public–private partnership models in American toll road development: Learning based on public institutions’ risk management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 684–696. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.006.
  • Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA). (1998). Route 895 Connector comprehensive traffic and revenue study. Columbia, SC: Wilbur Smith Associates.
  • Yang, Y., Hou, Y., & Wang, Y. (2013). On the development of public–private partnerships in transitional economies: An explanatory framework. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 301–310. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02672.x.
  • Ybarra, S. J. (2004). Private sector participation in transportation. Testimony before House Committee on Government Reform Subcommittee on Energy Policy. Natural Resources and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, D.C., USA.
  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Zhao, Z. J. (2011). Advancing public interest in public–private partnership of state highway development (Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs Report no. MN/Rc2011-09). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Department of Transportation

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.