Handing over the Keys: Nonprofit Economic Development Corporations and Their Implications for Accountability and Inclusion

References

• Bauroth, N. (2009). Quasi-governmental institutions as a form of local boundary change: Explanations for the proliferation of economic development corporations in Texas. Public Administration Quarterly, 33(2), 270–296. doi:10.2307/41219981.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, J. P., Fichtenbaum, R. H., & Swaney, J. A. (1984). The market for jobs: Locational decisions and the competition for economic development. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 20(1), 64–77. doi:10.1177/004208168402000106.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., & Peters, B. G. (2002). Performance measurement and management: The Achilles’ heel in administrative modernization. Public performance & Management Review, 25(4), 359–362. doi:10.1080/15309576.2002.11643672.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. J., Van Slyke, D. M., & Rogers, J. D. (2015). An empirical examination of public involvement in public-private partnerships: Qualifying the benefits of public involvement in PPPs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 45–61. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, A. O. M., & Pagano, M. A. (1992). City intervention: An analysis of the public capital mobilization process. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27(3), 356–374.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, T. K., & Blakely, E. J. (1999). What are “third-wave” state economic development efforts? From incentives to industrial policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 13(3), 229–244. doi:10.1177/089124249901300303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Government–nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22(1), 19–30. doi:10.1002/pad.203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003a). Managing contract performance: A transaction costs approach. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(2), 275–297. doi:10.1002/pam.10117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003b). Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 441–468. doi:10.1093/jpoart/mug030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., Potoski, M., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2009). Contracting for complex products. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(s1), i41–i58. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup034.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross‐sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. doi:10.1111/puar.12432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushouse, B. K. (2017). Leveraging nonprofit and voluntary action research to inform public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 50–73. doi:10.1111/psj.12195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312. doi:10.1080/01944369608975696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clingermayer, J. C., & Feiock, R. C. (1997). Leadership turnover, transaction costs, and external city service delivery. Public Administration Review, 57(3), 231–239. doi:10.2307/976654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. doi:10.1017/s0003055404001194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coston, J. M. (1998). A model and typology of government-NGO relationships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(3), 358–382. doi:10.1177/0899764098273006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377033.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Deslatte, A. (2016). Boundaries and speed bumps: The role of modernized counties managing growth in the fragmented metropolis. Urban Affairs Review, 53, 658–688. doi:10.1177/1078087416655401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslatte, A., & Stokan, E. (2017). Hierarchies of need in sustainable development: A resource dependence approach for local governance. Urban Affairs Review. doi:10.1177/1078087417737181.
   Google Scholar
• Deslatte, A., & Swann, W. L. (2016). Is the price right? Gauging the marketplace for local sustainable policy tools. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(4), 581–596.
   Google Scholar
• Deslatte, A., & Swann, W. L. (2017). Context matters: A Bayesian analysis of how organizational environments shape the strategic management of sustainable development. Public Administration, 95(3), 807–824. doi:10.1111/padm.12330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslatte, A., Feiock, R. C., & Wassel, K. (2017). Urban pressures and innovations: Sustainability commitment in the face of fragmentation and inequality. Review of Policy Research, 34, 700–724. doi:10.1111/ropr.12242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M., 2005. Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 376–417. doi:10.1080/15309576.2005.11051839.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2013). The institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 397–425. doi:10.1111/psj.12023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., & Jang, H. S. (2009). Nonprofits as local government service contractors. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 668–680. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02016.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C. W., & Licari, M. J. (2012). Theories of governance. In The public administration theory primer (2nd ed.), pp. 219–244. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gazley, B. (2010). Linking collaborative capacity to performance measurement in government-nonprofit partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(4), 653–673. doi:10.1177/0899764009360823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazley, B., & Brudney, J. L. (2007). The purpose (and perils) of government-nonprofit partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 389–415. doi:10.1177/0899764006295997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazley, B., & Dignam, M. (2010). The decision to give: What motivates individuals to support professional associations. ASAE & The Center for Association Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, J., & Meier, K. J. (2000). Public administration research and practice: A methodological manifesto. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 157–199. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024262.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, J., & Witko, C. (2013). Bayesian analytical methods: A methodological prescription for public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 457–494. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godschalk, D. R. (2004). Land use planning challenges: Coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1), 5–13. doi:10.1080/01944360408976334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G., & Sidney, M. (1995). Community development corporations as neighborhood advocates: a study of the political activism of nonprofit developers. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 3(1), 1–20. doi:10.1016/s1068-8595(95)80010-7.
   Google Scholar
• Green, G. P., & Haines, A. (2015). Asset building & community development (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781483398631.
   Google Scholar
• Green, G. P., Haines, A., Dunn, A., & Sullivan, D. M. (2002). The role of local development organizations in rural America. Rural Sociology, 67(3), 394–415. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2002.tb00110.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollyer, J. R., Rosendorff, B. P., & Vreeland, J. R. (2014). Measuring transparency. Political Analysis, 22(4), 413–434. doi:10.1093/pan/mpu001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homsy, G. C., & Warner, M. E. (2015). Cities and sustainability: Polycentric action and multilevel governance. Urban Affairs Review, 51(1), 46–73. doi:10.1177/1078087414530545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H. S., & Feiock, R. C. (2007). Public versus private funding of nonprofit organizations: Implications for collaboration. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(2), 174–190. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576310202.
   Google Scholar
• Jarmon, C. A., Vanderleeuw, J. M., Pennington, M. S., & Sowers, T. E. (2012). The role of economic development corporations in local economic development: Evidence from Texas cities. Economic Development Quarterly, 26(2), 124–137. doi:10.1177/0891242412437877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (1988). Performance and accountability: The challenge of government by proxy for public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 18(1), 9–28. doi:10.1177/027507408801800102.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Warner, M. E. (2016). Pragmatic municipalism: Local government service delivery after the Great Recession. Public Administration, 94(3), 789–805. doi:10.1111/padm.12267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamothe, S., & Lamothe, M. (2006). The dynamics of local service delivery arrangements and the role of nonprofits. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(10–11), 769–797. doi:10.1080/01900690600770454.
   Google Scholar
• Lamothe, S., & Lamothe, M. (2016). Service shedding in local governments: Why do they do it? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 359–374. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh, N. G., & Blakely, E. J. (2016). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice(6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K. (2012). Who benefits from nonprofit economic development? Examining the revenue distribution of tax-exempt development organizations among US cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(1), 65–80. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2011.00573.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K., & Feeney, M. K. (2014). Nonprofit organizations and civil society in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203073438.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M., & Smith, S. R. (1989). Nonprofit organizations, government, and the welfare state. Political Science Quarterly, 104(4), 625–648. doi:10.2307/2151102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Feiock, R. C., & Ramirez de la Cruz, E. E. (2009). Local institutions and the politics of urban growth. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 649–665. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00392.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel, S. C., & Brudney, J. L. (2012). Putting the NP in PPP: The role of nonprofit organizations in public-private partnerships. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(4), 617–642. doi:10.2753/pmr1530-9576350403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkoff, S. L., 2012. The proximate polity: Spatial context and political risk in local developmental goods provision. Urban Affairs Review, 48(3), 354–388. doi:10.1177/1078087411428049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opp, S. M., & Saunders, K. L. (2013). Pillar talk: Local sustainability initiatives and policies in the United States—Finding evidence of the “three E’s”: Economic development, environmental protection, and social equity. Urban Affairs Review, 49(5), 678–717. doi:10.1177/1078087412469344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, J. L., Opp, S. M., & DeMasters, M. (2017). Exploring the intersection of local economic development and environmental policy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(2), 260–276. doi:10.1111/juaf.12316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. doi:10.1126/science.1172133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagano, M. A., & Bowman, A. O. M. (1995). The state of American federalism, 1994–1995. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 25(3), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S., Pandey, S., & Pandey, S. K. (2015). Is there a nonprofit advantage? Examining the impact of institutional context on individual–organizational value congruence. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 585–596. doi:10.1111/puar.12357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney, K. E. (2013). Taking sustainable cities seriously: Economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American cities(2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quélin, B. V., Kivleniece, I., & Lazzarini, S. (2017). Public‐private collaboration, hybridity and social value: Towards new theoretical perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 763–792. doi:10.1111/joms.12274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez de la Cruz, E. E. (2009). Local political institutions and smart growth: An empirical study of the politics of compact development. Urban Affairs Review, 45(2), 218–246. doi:10.1177/1078087409334309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, L. A. (1998). Sharing the benefits of economic development: What cities use Type II policies? Urban Affairs Review, 33(5), 686–711. doi:10.1177/107808749803300504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J. (1988). Shoot anything that flies; claim anything that falls: Conversations with economic development practitioners. Economic Development Quarterly, 2(3), 236–251. doi:10.1177/089124248800200304.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2015). The resilient sector revisited: the new challenge to nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., & Sokolowski, S. W. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: New insights from QCEW data. Monthly Labor Review, 128, 19–26. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/09/art3full.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., & Toepler, S. (2015). Government–Nonprofit cooperation: Anomaly or necessity? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(6), 2155–2177. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9651-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapotichne, J., Reese, L. A., & Ye, M. (2017). Won’t you be my neighbor? An integrated model of urban policy interdependence. Urban Affairs Review. doi:10.1177/1078087417712899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatteman, A., & Bingle, B. (2015). Philanthropy supporting government: An analysis of local library funding. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 1(2), 74–86. doi:10.20899/jpna.1.2.74-86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclar, E. D. 2000. You don’t always get what you pay for: The economics of privatization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (2009). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snavely, K., & Desai, U. (2001). Mapping local government-nongovernmental organization interactions: A conceptual framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(2), 245–264. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinacker, A. (2002). The use of bargaining games in local development policy. Review of Policy Research, 19(4), 120–153. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00335.x.
   Google Scholar
• Stokan, E. (2013). Testing Rubin’s model 25 years later: A multilevel approach to local economic development incentive adoption. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(4), 301–315. doi:10.1177/0891242413491315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svara, J. H., Watt, T. C., & Jang, H. S. (2013). How are US cities doing sustainability? Who is getting on the sustainability train, and why? Cityscape, 15(1), 9–44. doi:10.2307/41958955.
   Google Scholar
• Trounstine, J. (2016). Segregation and inequality in public goods. American Journal of Political Science, 60(3), 709–725. doi:10.1111/ajps.12227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, D. M. (2006). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–187. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S., & Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267–281. doi:10.1080/15309576.2002.11643661.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, K., & Gill, J. (2005). Bayesian inference in public administration research: Substantive differences from somewhat different assumptions. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(1–2), 5–35. doi:10.1081/pad-200044556.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Hawkins, C. V., Lebredo, N., & Berman, E. M. (2012). Capacity to sustain sustainability: A study of U.S. cities. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 841–853. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02566.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Zheng, L. (2013). Business incentive adoption in the recession. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(2), 90–101. doi:10.1177/0891242413479140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., & Carter, D. P. (2017). Advancing policy process research at its overlap with public management scholarship and nonprofit and voluntary action studies. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 22–49. doi:10.1111/psj.12194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witesman, E. M., & Fernandez, S. (2013). Government contracts with private organizations: Are there differences between nonprofits and for-profits? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 689–715. doi:10.1177/0899764012442592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. R. (1999). Complementary, supplementary, or adversarial? A theoretical and historical examination of nonprofit-government relations in the United States. In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 31–67). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., & Warner, M. (2010). Business incentive use among U.S. local governments: A story of accountability and policy learning. Economic Development Quarterly, 24(4), 325–336. doi:10.1177/0891242410376237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar