979
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Central Government Strategies to Promote Local Governments’ Transparency: Guidance or Enforcement?

Pages 357-382 | Received 17 Jul 2017, Accepted 05 Mar 2018, Published online: 14 Sep 2018

References

  • Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2015). Reengineering the open government concept: An empirical support for a proposed model. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 453–463.
  • Albalate del Sol, D. A. (2013). The institutional, economic and social determinants of local government transparency. Journal of Economic Policy Reform 16(1), 90–107.
  • Armstrong, C. L. (2011). Providing a clearer view: An examination of transparency on local government Websites. Government Information Quarterly 28(1), 11–16.
  • Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 399–418.
  • Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Municipal performance: does mayoral quality matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 285–312.
  • Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Bearfield, D. A., & Bowman, A. O. (2016). Can you find it on the web? An assessment of municipal e-government transparency. The American Review of Public Administration, 275074015627694.
  • Berliner, D. (2017). Sunlight or window dressing? Local government compliance with South Africa’s promotion of access to information act. Governance, 30(4), 641–661.
  • Berliner, D., & Erlich, A. (2015). Competing for transparency: Political competition and institutional reform in mexican states. American Political Science Review 109(1): 110–128. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000616.
  • Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2007). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier and C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 223–260). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Bookman, Z., & Amparán, J. P. G. (2009). Two steps forward, one step back: Assessing the implementation of Mexico’s freedom of information act. Mexican Law Review, 1(2), 4–51.
  • Carley, S., Nicholson-Crotty, S., & Fisher, E. J. (2015). Capacity, guidance, and the implementation of the american recovery and reinvestment act. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12294.
  • Chubb, J. E. (1985). The political economy of federalism. The American Political Science Review 79(4), 994. doi:10.2307/1956245.
  • Consejo para la Transparencia. (2015). Modelo de Gestión en Transparencia Municipal: Estudio de Impacto. Ediciones Consejo para la Transparencia.
  • Cooper, C. L., & Robertson, I. (Eds.). (1986). International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2014). The impact of functional decentralization and externalization on local government transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 265–277.
  • Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review 77, 32–44.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14(1): 57–74. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4279003.
  • Freedom of Information Advocates Network. (2013). Global Right to Information Update: An Analysis by Region.
  • Ganapati, S., & Reddick C. G. (2014). The use of ICT for open government in U. S. municipalities: Perceptions of chief administrative officers. Public Performance & Management Review 37(3), 365–387. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576370302.
  • Gandía, J. L., & Archidona, M. C. (2008). Determinants of web site information by Spanish city councils. Online Information Review, 32(1), 35–57.
  • Gascó, M. (2015). Special issue on open government: An introduction. Social Science Computer Review, 33(5), 535–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560676
  • Gerrish, E., & Spreen, T. L. (2017). Does benchmarking encourage improvement or convergence? Evaluating North Carolina’s fiscal benchmarking tool. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(4), 596–614.
  • Gesuele, B., & Metallo, C. (2017). Factors influencing mandatory and voluntary e-disclosure diffusion by municipalities. In K. Corsi, N. Castellano, R. Lamboglia, and D. Mancini (Eds.), Reshaping accounting and management control systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Gil-García, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216.
  • Gofen, A. (2014). Mind the gap: Dimensions and influence of street-level divergence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 473–493.
  • Goggin, M. L., Bowman, A., Lester, J. P., & O’Toole, L. J. (1990). Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
  • Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Feeney, M. K. (2017). Developing and testing an integrative framework for open government adoption in local governments. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 579–590.
  • Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(1), 137–157.
  • Grogan, C. M., & Rigby, E. (2009). Federalism, partisan politics, and shifting support for state flexibility: The case of the U.S. State children’s health insurance program. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 39(1), 47–69.
  • Guillamón, M. D., Bastida, F., and Benito, B. (2011). The determinants of local government's financial transparency. Local Government Studies, 37(4), 391–406.
  • Halachmi, A., & Greiling, D. (2013). Transparency, e-government, and accountability: Some issues and considerations. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(4), 572–584.
  • Hazell, R., Worthy, B., & Glover, M. (2010). The impact of the freedom of information act on central government in the UK: Does FOI work? London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hill, M. J., & Hupe, P. L. (2014). Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and practice. London: Sage.
  • Hines, J. R., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: The flypaper effect. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 217–226.
  • Holsen, S., & Pasquier, M. (2012). Insight on oversight: The role of information commissioners in the implementation of access to information policies. Journal of Information Policy, 2, 214–241. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.2.2012.0214.
  • Holsen, S., & Pasquier, M. (2015). More power to you? A case against binding decisions as the ultimate access to information enforcement tool. Administration & Society, 95399715611171.
  • Jennings, E. T., Hall, J. L., & Zhang, Z. (2012). The American recovery and reinvestment act and state accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(3), 527–549.
  • Jones, P. E. (2013). The effect of political competition on democratic accountability. Political Behavior 35(3), 481–515. doi:10.1007/s11109-012-9203-3.
  • Jun, K.-N., Wang, F., & Wang, D. (2014). E-government use and perceived government transparency and service capacity: Evidence from a Chinese local government. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(1), 125–151.
  • Kelman, S., Hong, S., & Turbitt, I. (2012). Are there managerial practices associated with the outcomes of an interagency service delivery collaboration? Evidence from British crime and disorder reduction partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(3), 609–630. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus038.
  • Kimball, M. B. (2011). Mandated state-level open government training programs. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.003.
  • Kosack, S., & Fung, A. (2014). Does transparency improve governance? Annual Review of Political Science 17(1), 65–87. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-144356.
  • Latham, G., & Pinder, C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485–516.
  • Lepore, L., & Pisano, S. (2013). Determinants of Internet-based performance reporting released by Italian local government authorities. In Accounting information systems for decision making (pp. 63–72). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy, 30th ann. Ed.: dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.
  • May, P. J., & Winter, S. C. (2009). Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum030.
  • McCubbins, M., Noll, R., & Weingast, B. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3(2), 243–277.
  • McDermott, K. A. (2004). Incentives, capacity, and implementation: Evidence from Massachusetts education reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui024.
  • Michener, G. (2015). Assessing freedom of information in Latin America a decade later: Illuminating a transparency causal mechanism. Latin American Politics and Society, 57(3), 77–99. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00275.x.
  • Neuman, L. (2009). Enforcement models: Content and context. Communication for governance and accountability programme (CommGAP). Retrieved from http://foiadvocates.net/wp-content/uploads/Publication_WBI_EnforcementModels.pdf
  • Neuman, L., & Calland, R. (2007). Making the law work: The challenges of implementation. In A. Florini (Ed.), The right to know: Transparency for an open world (179–213). New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2004). Goal conflict and fund diversion in federal grants to the states. American Journal of Political Science 48(1), 110–122.
  • O’Toole, L. J. (2000). Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 263–288.
  • O’Toole, L. J. (2017). Implementation for the real world. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(2), 376–379. doi:10.1093/jopart/muw071
  • Oliver, J. E. (2001). Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323.
  • Piotrowski, S. J., Zhang, Y., Lin, W., & Yu, W. (2009). Key issues for implementation of Chinese open government information regulations. Public Administration Review, 69, S129–S135.
  • Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1984). Implementation. University of California Press.
  • Roberts, A. (2010). A great and revolutionary law? The first four years of India’s right to information act. Public Administration Review, 70(6), 925–933.
  • Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Muñoz, L.A., & López Hernández, A. M. (2013). Determinants of financial transparency in government. International Public Management Journal, 16(4), 557–602. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.849169.
  • Roll, S., Moulton, S., & Sandfort, J. (2017). A comparative analysis of two streams of implementation research. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 3(1), 3.
  • Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.
  • Saez-Martin, A., Caba-Perez, C., & Lopez-Hernandez, A. (2017). Freedom of information in local government: Rhetoric or reality? Local Government Studies, 43(2), 245–273.
  • Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-García, J. R. (2016). Toward an integrative assessment of open government: Proposing conceptual lenses and practical components. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1–2), 170–192.
  • Scheberle, D. (1997). Federalism and environmental policy: Trust and the politics of implementation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Stoker, R. P. (1991). Reluctant partners: Implementing federal policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Tavares, A. F., & Ferreira da Cruz, N. (2014). The determinants of local government transparency: A preliminary analysis. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance doi:10.1145/2691195.2691291.
  • Tejedo-Romero, F., & de Araujo, J. F. F. E. (2018). Determinants of local governments’ transparency in times of crisis: Evidence from municipality-level panel data. Administration & Society, 50(4), 527–554. doi:10.1177/0095399715607288.
  • Terman, J. N., & Feiock, R. C. (2015). Improving outcomes in fiscal federalism: Local political leadership and administrative capacity. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 25(4), 1059–1080.
  • Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488.
  • Weissert, C. S. (2001). Reluctant partners: The role of preferences, incentives, and monitoring in program compliance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 435–453.
  • Wong, W, & Welch, E. (2004). Does E-government promote accountability? A comparative analysis of Website openness and government accountability. Governance, 17(2), 275–297. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00246.x.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
  • World Bank. (2016). Public access to information for development: A guide to the effective implementation of right to information laws. The World Bank. Retrieved from http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/978-1-4648-0879-1
  • Worthy, B. (2013). Some are more open than others? Comparing the impact of the freedom of information act 2000 on local and central government in the UK. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(5), 395–414.
  • Yavuz, N., & Welch, E. W. (2014). Factors affecting openness of local government Websites: Examining the differences across planning, finance and police departments. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.004.
  • Yu, W. (2011). Open government information: Challenges faced by public human resource management in China. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(13), 879–888.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.