15,130
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Administrative Delay, Red Tape, and Organizational Performance

References

  • Alford, J. (2002). Defining the client in the public sector: a social-exchange perspective. Public Administration Review, 62(3), 337–346.
  • Arceneaux, K. (2012). Cognitive biases and the strength of political arguments. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 271–285.
  • Balla, S. J. (1998). Administrative procedures and political control of the bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 92(3): 663–673.
  • Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.
  • Borry, E. L. (2016). A new measure of red tape: Introducing the three-item red tape (TIRT) scale. International Public Management Journal, 19(4), 573–593.
  • Bozeman, B. (1993). A theory of government “red tape”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273–304.
  • Bozeman, B. (2012). Multidimensional red tape: A theory coda. International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 245–265.
  • Bozeman, B., & Bretschneider, S. (1994). The “publicness puzzle” in organization theory: A test of alternative explanations of differences between public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(2), 197–223.
  • Bozeman, B., & Kingsley, G. (1998). Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 58(2), 109–118.
  • Bozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2011). Rules and red tape: A prism for public administration theory and research, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  • Bozeman, B., Reed, P. N., & Scott, P. (1992). Red tape and task delays in public and private organizations. Administration & Society, 24(3), 290–322.
  • Bozeman, B., & Scott, P. (1996). Bureaucratic red tape and formalization: Untangling conceptual knots. The American Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 1–17.
  • Bretschneider, S. (1990). Management information systems in public and private organizations: An empirical test. Public Administration Review, 50(5), 536–545.
  • Bretschneider, S., & Bozeman, B. (1995). Understanding red tape and bureaucratic delays. In A. Halachmi and G. Bouckaert (eds.) The enduring challenges of public management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 326–337.
  • Brewer, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2010). The impact of red tape on governmental performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 233–257.
  • Brewer, G. A., Walker, R. M., Bozeman, B., Avellaneda, C. N., & Brewer Jr., G. A. (2012). External control and red tape: The mediating effects of client and organizational feedback. International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 288–314.
  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.
  • Burden, B. C., Canon, D. T., Mayer, K. R., & Moynihan, D. P. (2012). The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic perception of policies: Evidence from election administration. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 741–751.
  • Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C, Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376.
  • Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2013). Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 112–130.
  • Cheung, J. H., Burns, D. K., Sinclair, R., & Sliter, M. (2017). Amazon Mechanical Turk in organizational psychology: An evaluation and practical recommendations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 347–361.
  • Conner-Spady, B. L., Sanmartin, C., Johnston, G. H., McGurran, J. J., Kehler, M., & Noseworthy, T. W. (2011). The importance of patient expectations as a determinant of satisfaction with waiting times for hip and knee replacement surgery. Health Policy, 101(3), 245–252.
  • Cramton, R. C. (1972). Causes and cures of administrative delay. American Bar Association Journal, 58(9), 937–941.
  • Davis, R. S., & Pink-Harper, S. A. (2016). Connecting knowledge of rule-breaking and perceived red tape: How behavioral attribution influences red tape perceptions. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(1), 181–200.
  • DeHart-Davis, L., & Bozeman, B. (2001). Regulatory compliance and air quality permitting: Why do firms overcomply? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 471–508.
  • DeHart-Davis, L., & Pandey, S. K. (2005). Red tape and public employees: Does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 133–148.
  • Dowling, C. M., & Wichowsky, A. (2015). Attacks without consequence? Candidates, parties, groups, and the changing face of negative advertising. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 19–36.
  • Dressel, P. L. (1982). Policy sources of worker dissatisfactions: The case of human services in aging. The Social Service Review, 56(3), 406–423.
  • Eriksson, K., & Simpson, B. (2011). Perceptions of unfairness in allocations between multiple recipients. Cognitive Psychology, 62(3), 225–244.
  • Farber, D. A. (1992). Politics and procedure in environmental law. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 8(1), 59–81.
  • Favero, N., & Bullock, J. B. (2014). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285–308.
  • Feeney, M. K. (2012). Organizational red tape: A measurement experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 427–444.
  • Feeney, M. K., & Bozeman, B. (2009). Stakeholder red tape: Comparing perceptions of public managers and their private consultants. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 710–726.
  • Fishbach, A., Henderson, M. D., & Koo, M. (2011). Pursuing goals with others: Group identification and motivation resulting from things done versus things left undone. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 520–534.
  • Franco, L. M., Bennett, S., & Kanfer, R. (2002). Health sector reform and public sector health worker motivation: A conceptual framework. Social Science & Medicine, 54(1), 1255–1266.
  • George, B., & Pandey, S. K. (2017). We know the yin - but where is the yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270.
  • Germine, L., Nakayama, K., Duchaine, B. C., Chabris, C. F., Chatterjee, G., & Wilmer, J. B. (2012). Is the web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 847–857.
  • Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224.
  • Healy, A., & Lenz, G. S. (2014). Substituting the end for the whole: Why voters respond primarily to the election‐year economy. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 31–47.
  • Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14(3), 399–425.
  • Hoy, W. K., Blazovsky, R., & Newland, W. (1983). Bureaucracy and alienation: A comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 21(2), 109–120.
  • Jacobsen, C. B., & Jakobsen, M. L. (2018). Perceived organizational red tape and organizational performance in public services. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 24–36.
  • Jilke, S., van Ryzin, G. G., & van de Walle, S. (2016). Responses to decline in marketized public services: An experimental evaluation of choice overload. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 421–432.
  • Kammeyer-Mueller, J., Steel, P. D., & Rubenstein, A. (2010). The other side of method bias: The perils of distinct source research designs. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(2), 294–321.
  • Kaufmann, N., Schulze, T. & Veit, D. (2011). More than fun and money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing - A study on Mechanical Turk. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Detroit, Michigan, August 4-7, 1–11.
  • Kaufmann, W., & Feeney, M. K. (2012). Objective formalization, perceived formalization, and perceived red tape. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1195–1214.
  • Kaufmann, W., & Feeney, M. K. (2014). Beyond the rules: The effect of outcome favourability on red tape perceptions. Public Administration, 92(1), 178–191.
  • Kaufmann W., & Tummers, L. G. (2017). The negative effect of red tape on procedural satisfaction. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1311–1327.
  • Kittur, A., Chi, E. H., & Suh, B. (2008). Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 453–456). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Kroll, A. (2015). Exploring the link between performance information use and organizational performance: A contingency approach. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(1), 7–32.
  • Kumar, P., Kalwani, M. U., & Dada, M. (1997). The impact of waiting time guarantees on customers’ waiting experiences. Marketing Science, 16(4), 295–314.
  • Little, G., Chilton, L. B., Goldman, M., & Miller, R. C. (2009). Turkit: Tools for iterative tasks on Mechanical Turk. Presented at the Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD workshop on human computation, ACM, 29-30.
  • Macey, J. R. (1992). Organizational design and political control of administrative agencies. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 8(1), 93–110.
  • Manolitzas, P., & Yannacopoulos, D. (2013). Citizen satisfaction: A multicriteria satisfaction analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(9), 614–621.
  • Marvel, J. D. (2014). The Boston marathon bombings: Who’s to blame and why it matters for public administration. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 713–725.
  • Marvel, J. D. (2015). Public opinion and public sector performance: Are individuals’ beliefs about performance evidence-based or the product of anti-public sector bias? International Public Management Journal, 18(2), 209–227.
  • Marvel, J. D. (2016). Unconscious bias in citizens’ evaluations of public sector performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 143–158.
  • Mausolff, C. (2004). Learning from feedback in performance measurement systems. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(1), 9–29.
  • Mortensen, K., & Hughes, T. L. (2018). Comparing Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform to conventional data collection methods in the health and medical research literature. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 33(4), 533–538.
  • Moynihan, D. P., Wright, B. E., & Pandey, S. K. (2012). Working within constraints: Can transformational leaders alter the experience of red tape? International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 315–336.
  • Moynihan, D. P., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69.
  • Mugion, R. G., & Musella, F. (2013). Customer satisfaction and statistical techniques for the implementation of benchmarking in the public sector. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(5-6), 619–640.
  • Necka, E. A., Cacioppo, S., Norman, G. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2016). Measuring the prevalence of problematic behaviors among MTurk, campus, and community participants. PloS ONE, 11(6), 1–19.
  • Novotney, S., & Callison-Burch, C. (2010). Cheap, fast and good enough: Automatic speech recognition with non-expert transcription. Presented at the Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, 207-215.
  • O’Keeffe, L. H. (1985). Administrative law judges, performance evaluation, and production standards: Judicial independence versus employee accountability. George Washington Law Review, 54(4), 591–597.
  • Pandey, S. K., & Bretschneider, S. (1997). The impact of red tape’s administrative delay on public organizations’ interest in new information technologies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 113–130.
  • Pandey, S. K., Coursey, D. H., & Moynihan, D. P. (2007). Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: A multimethod study. Public Performance and Management Review, 30(3), 398–425.
  • Pandey, S. K., & Kingsley, G. A. (2000). Examining red tape in public and private organizations: Alternative explanations from a social psychological model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 779–799.
  • Pandey, S. K., & Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Bureaucratic red tape and organizational performance: Testing the moderating role of culture and political support. In G A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O’Toole Jr., and R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public service performance (pp. 130–151). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pandey, S.K., Pandey, S., & van Ryzin, G. G. (2017). Prospects for experimental approaches to research on bureaucratic red tape. In O. James, S. Jilke, and G. G. van Ryzin (Eds.), Experiments in Public Management Research (pp. 219–243). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pandey, S. K., & Welch, E. W. (2005). Beyond stereotypes: A multistage model of managerial perceptions of red tape. Administration & Society, 37(5), 542–575.
  • Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188.
  • Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569.
  • Rainey, H. G., Pandey, S. K., & Bozeman, B. (1995). Research note: Public and private managers’ perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 567–574.
  • Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M. S., Zaldivar, A., & Tomlinson, B. (2010). Who are the crowdworkers? Shifting demographics in Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of CHI 2010, Atlanta GA, ACM, 2863-2872.
  • Scott, P. G., & Pandey, S. K. (2000). The influence of red tape on bureaucratic behavior: An experimental simulation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4), 615–633.
  • Scott, P. G., & Pandey, S. K. (2005). Red tape and public service motivation: Findings from a national survey of managers in state health and human services agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25(2), 155–180.
  • Stritch, J. M., Pedersen, M., & Taggart, G. (2017). The opportunities and limitations of using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to advance public management scholarship. International Public Management Journal, 20(3), 489–511.
  • Tom, G., & Lucey, S. (1995). Waiting time delays and customer satisfaction in supermarkets. Journal of Services Marketing, 9(5), 20–29.
  • Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). Public responsiveness of government organizations: Testing a preliminary model. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(2), 215–240.
  • Van Loon, N. M., Leisink, P. L. M., Knies, E., & Brewer, G. A. (2016). Red tape: Developing and validating a new job-centered measure. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 662–673.
  • Van Thiel, S., & Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267–281.
  • Vigoda, E. (2002). Administrative agents of democracy? A structural equation modeling of the relationship between public-sector performance and citizenship involvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2), 241–272.
  • Walker, R. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2008). An organizational echelon analysis of the determinants of red tape in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1112–1127.
  • Wen, B., & Chi, C. G.-Q. (2013). Examine the cognitive and affective antecedents to service recovery satisfaction: A field study of delayed airline passengers. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(3), 306–327.