Key Determinants of Online Fiscal Transparency: A Technology-Organization-Environment Framework

References

• Ahn, M. J. (2011). Adoption of e-communication applications in US municipalities: The role of political environment, bureaucratic structure, and the nature of applications. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(4), 428–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt, J. E., Lassen, D. D., & Rose, S. (2006). The causes of fiscal transparency: Evidence from the U.S. states. IMF Staff Papers, 53, 30–57.
   Google Scholar
• Alt, J., Lassen, D., & Skilling, D. (2002). Fiscal transparency, gubernatorial approval, and the scale of government: Evidence from the states. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 2(3), 230–250.
   Google Scholar
• Arbatli, E., & Escolano, J. (2015). Fiscal transparency, fiscal performance and credit ratings. Fiscal studies, 36(2), 237–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. (2012). The technology–organization–environment framework. In Y. K. Dwivedi, M. R. Wade, & S. C. Schneberger (Eds.), Information systems theory (pp. 231–245). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, J. (2014). The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state: The case of Open Government Data in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 388–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearfield, D. A., & Bowman, A. O. M. (2017). Can you find it on the web? An assessment of municipal E-Government transparency. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 172–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berners-Lee, T. (2009 June 18). Linked Data. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
   Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caamaño-Alegre, J., Lago-Peñas, S., Reyes-Santias, F., & Santiago-Boubeta, A. (2013). Budget transparency in local governments: An empirical analysis. Local Government Studies, 39(2), 182–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Digital Government. (2010-2016). Digital States Survey Results. Retrieved from http://www.govtech.com/cdg/digital-states/
   Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, E., & Bellavance, F. (2012). Blame avoidance in public reporting: Evidence from a provincially mandated municipal performance measurement regime. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(3), 399–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, P. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (1997). Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: An exploratory study. MIS quarterly, 21(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G. (2018). Understanding decisions in state pension systems: A system framework. American Review of Public Administration. 48(3), 260–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. C. (2013). Improving transparency in the financial sector: E-Government XBRL implementation in the United States. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(2), 241–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicatiello, L., Simone, E., & Gaeta, G. (2017). Political determinants of fiscal transparency: A panel data empirical investigation. Economics of Governance, 18(4), 315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 Years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., & Rullani, F. (2008). Online communities and open innovation. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 115–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2008). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of public administration research and theory, 19(3), 495–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B. & Baxandall, P. (2014). Following the money 2014: How the 50 states rate in providing online access to government spending data. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund.
   Google Scholar
• DePietro, R., Wiarda, E., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The context for change: Organization, technology and environment. In L. G. Tornatzy & M. Fleischer (Eds.), The processes of technological innovation (pp. 151–175). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Esteller-Moré, A., & Polo Otero, J. (2012). Fiscal transparency. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1153–1173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferejohn, J. (1999). Accountability and authority: Towards a model of political accountability. In A. Przeworski, S. Stokes, & B. Manin (Eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (pp.131–153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (2014). The use of ICT for open government in U.S. municipalities: Perceptions of chief administrative officers. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(3), 365–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goëta, S., & Davies, T. (2016). The daily shaping of state transparency: Standards, machine-readability and the configuration of open government data policies. Science & Technology Studies, 29(4), 10–30.
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A., & Greiling, D. (2013). Transparency, e-government, and accountability: Some issues and considerations. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(4), 562–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L., & Jennings, E. T. (2011). The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Public Performance & Management Review, 35(1), 202–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed, F. (2005). Fiscal transparency and economic outcomes. (No. 2005-2225). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Hameed, F. (2011). Budget Transparency and Financial Markets. Washington, DC: International Budget Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, T. M., Pardo, T. A., & Cook, M. (2012). Creating open government ecosystems: A research and development agenda. Future Internet, 4(4), 900–928.
   Google Scholar
• Heald, D. (2013). Strengthening fiscal transparency. In R. Allen, R. Hemming, & B. Potter (Eds.), The international handbook of public financial management (pp. 711–741). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2007). What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? Public Management Review, 9(2), 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, A. (2012 April 1). What is smart disclosure? Retrieved from http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/04/what-is-smart-disclosure.html
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, E. T., Hall, J. L., & Zhang, Z. (2012). The american recovery and reinvestment act and state accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(3), 527–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, M., Yusuf, W., Berman, M., & Gilchrist, C. (2017). Popular financial reports as fiscal transparency mechanisms: An assessment using the fiscal transparency index for the Citizen User. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(8), 625–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice, J. B., & McNutt, J. G. (2013). Social capital, E-Government, and fiscal transparency in the states. Public Integrity, 16(1), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Justice, J. B., McNutt, J. G., & Smith Jr, E. S. (2015). Understanding and measuring online fiscal transparency. In A. Manoharan (Ed.), E-Government and websites: A public solutions handbook (pp. 22–46). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Justice, J. B., Melitski, J., & Smith, D. L. (2006). E-government as an instrument of fiscal accountability and responsiveness: Do the best practitioners employ the best practices? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(3), 301–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopits, G., & Craig, J. (1998). Transparency in Government Operations. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Kuan, K. K., & Chau, P. Y. (2001). A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework. Information & Management, 38(8), 507–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, R. P. (2015). An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 323–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowatcharin, G., & Menifield, C. E. (2015). Determinants of Internet-enabled transparency at the local level: A study of Midwestern county web sites. State and Local Government Review, 47(2), 102–115.
   Google Scholar
• Luna-Reyes, L. F., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Estrada-Marroquin, M. (2008). The impact of institutions on interorganizational IT projects in the mexican federal government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(2), 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Manes Rossi, F., Brusca, I., & Aversano, N. (2018). Financial sustainability as a driver for transparency and E-Democracy: A comparative study in Italian and Spanish local governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(1), 22–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoharan, A. (2013). A study of the determinants of county e-government in the United States. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 159–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A. N., Konana, P., & Barua, A. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of Internet use in procurement: An empirical investigation of US manufacturing firms. Information Systems Research, 18(1), 103–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e‐government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J., & Norris, D. F. (2005). Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e‐government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of State Budget Officers. (2010-2016). The Fiscal Survey of States. Spring 2016. Retrieved from https://www.nasbo.org/reports-data/fiscal-survey-of-states
   Google Scholar
• National Association of State Budget Officers. (2015). Budget Processes in the States. Retrieved from https://www.nasbo.org/reports-data/budget-processes-in-the-states
   Google Scholar
• Office of the New York State Comptroller. (2008). Local government management guide: financial condition analysis. Retrieved from https://www.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/pubs/lgmg/financialconditionanalysis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. The electronic journal information systems evaluation, 14(1), 110–121.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, R. (2011 March 31). Building the (Open) data ecosystem. Retrieved from http://blog.okfn.org/2011/03/31/building-the-open-data-ecosystem/
   Google Scholar
• Porumbescu, G. (2017). Linking transparency to trust in government and voice. American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 520–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Pérez, C. C., & López Hernández, A. M. (2007). E-Government and public financial reporting. American Review of Public Administration, 37(2), 142–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, G., Berman, E. M., & West, J. P. (1994). Municipal government financial reporting: Administrative and ethical climate. Public Budgeting & Finance, 14(2), 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2004). Voluntarily reporting performance measures to the public: A test of accounting reports from U.S. cities. International Public Management Journal, 7(1), 19–48.
   Google Scholar
• Styles, A. K., & Tennyson, M. (2007). The accessibility of financial reporting of US municipalities on the Internet. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 19(1), 56–92.
   Google Scholar
• Styrin, E., Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Harrison, T. M. (2017). Open data ecosystems: An international comparison. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(1), 132–156.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2011). Informing Consumers through Smart Disclosure (White House Memorandum). Washington D.C.: White House.
   Google Scholar
• Surka, M., & Ridlington, E. (2016). Following the money 2016: How the 50 states rate in providing online access to government spending data. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Tauberer, J. (2014). The Annotated 8 Principles of Open Government Data. Retrieved from https://opengovdata.org/
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. (2013, May). Smart Disclosure: The Regulatory Future. Presentation presented at the Boulder Summer Conference on Consumer Financial Decision Making, Boulder, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Thong, J. Y. (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 187–214.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. J., Mossberger, K., & McNeal, R. (2008). Institutions, policy innovation, and E-Government in the American States. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 549–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). State & Local Government Finance Definitions. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/govs/local/definitions.html
   Google Scholar
• Vishwanath, T., & Kaufmann, D. (2001). Toward transparency: New approaches and their application to financial markets. The World Bank Research Observer, 16(1), 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T. (2012). An analysis of the effects of online fiscal disclosure on municipal bond issuances. International Review of Public Administration, 17(2), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., & Feeney, M. K. (2016). Determinants of information and communication technology adoption in municipalities. American Review of Public Administration, 46(3), 292–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. J., & Lo, J. (2016). Adoption of open government data among government agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehner, J., & de Renzio, P. (2013). Citizens, legislators, and executive disclosure: The political determinants of fiscal transparency. World Development, 41, 96–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, E. W., & Pandey, S. K. (2006). E-government and bureaucracy: Toward a better understanding of intranet implementation and its effect on red tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 379–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T. M., Lo, J., & Shiang, J. (2015). To open or not to open? Determinants of open government data. Journal of Information Science, 41(5), 596–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, N., & Welch, E. W. (2014). Factors affecting openness of local government Websites: Examining the differences across planning, finance and police departments. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 574–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H., & Robinson, D. (2012). The new ambiguity of “Open Government.” UCLA Law Review, 59, 178–208.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf, J. -E., Jordan, M. M., Neill, K. A., & Hackbart, M. (2013). For the people: Popular financial reporting practices of local governments. Public Budgeting & Finance, 33(1), 95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S. (2016). Fiscal decentralization, budgetary transparency, and local government size in China. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 52(7), 1679–1697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information systems research, 16(1), 61–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., & Xu, S. (2003). Electronic business adoption by European firms: A cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar