Open Data and Transparency: Opportunities and Challenges in the Swiss Context

References

• Aikins, S. K., & Krane, D. (2010). Are public officials obstacles to citizen-centered e-government? An examination of municipal administrators’ motivations and actions. State and Local Government Review, 42(2), 87–103. doi:10.1177/0160323X10369159
   Google Scholar
• Barry, E., & Bannister, F. (2014). Barriers to open data release: A view from the top. Information Polity, 19(1,2), 129–152. doi:10.3233/IP-140327
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (2001 [1791]). Of publicity. In J. Michael, C. Blamires, & C. Pease-Watkin (Eds.), The collected works of Jeremy Bentham: Political tactics. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, S. (1988). Snowball sampling. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 8, pp. 528–532). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. London, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cottier, B. (2013). La transparence au crible de la jurisprudence des tribunaux fédéraux et cantonaux, ainsi que des recommandations du Préposé fédéral à la transparence et à la protection des données. In M. Pasquier (Ed.), Le principe de transparence en Suisse et dans le monde (pp. 37–55). Lausanne, Switzerland: Ppur.
   Google Scholar
• Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44. doi:10.1111/puar.12685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudré-Mauroux, P. (2017, April 20). Big data integration for eGovernment. Keynote Speech Presented at the Fourth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG), Quito, Ecuador.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, T. G., & Bawa, Z. A. (2012). The promises and perils of Open Government Data (OGD). The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(2), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dečman, M. (2016). Open data: One of the cornerstones of open government? NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 8(2), 176–179.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational cost explanation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4(4), 305–336.
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. J., & Frederickson, H. G. (2011). Public accountability: Performance measurement, the extended state, and the search for trust. Washington, DC: National Academy of Public Administration and the Kettering Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2005). New public management is dead – Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E-Government Suisse. (2014). The Open Government Data strategy for Switzerland. Retrieved from https://www.egovernment.ch/en/umsetzung/e-government-schweiz-2008-2015/open-government-data-schweiz/
   Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, P. (1986). The creation and change of organizational cultures: A conceptual framework. Organization Studies, 7(2), 117–134. doi:10.1177/017084068600700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gascó-Hernández, M., Martin, E. G., Reggi, L., Pyo, S., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2018). Promoting the use of open government data: Cases of training and engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007). Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 266–290. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmellikhuijsen, S. G., & Welch, E. W. (2012). Developing and testing a theoretical framework for computer‐mediated transparency of local governments. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 562–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A., & Holzer, M. (2010). Citizen participation and performance measurement: Operationalizing democracy through better accountability. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 378–399.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, T. M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G. B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., … Pardo, T. (2012). Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity, 17(2), 83–97. doi:10.3233/IP-2012-0269
   Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. (1999). Hyperdemocracy. The Wilson Quarterly, 23(1), 62–71.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2001). Public service bargains and public service reform. In G. B. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Politicians, bureaucrats and administrative reform (pp. 12–21). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huijboom, N., & Van den Broek, T. (2011). Open data: An international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice, 12(1), 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• ITU. (2017). ICT development index 2017. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/idi/2017/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Matheus, R., Longo, J., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Transparency-by-design as a foundation for open government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(1), 2–8. doi:10.1108/TG-02-2017-0015
   Google Scholar
• Kassen, M. (2018). Open data and its institutional ecosystems: A comparative cross-jurisdictional analysis of open data platforms. Canadian Public Administration, 61(1), 109–129. doi:10.1111/capa.12251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Linder, W., & Klöti, U. (1998). Schweizer Wahlen (Vol. 1995). Bern, Switzerland: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Litwin, G. H., & Stringer, R. A. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mabillard, V., & Pasquier, M. (2016). Transparency and trust in government (2007–2014): A comparative study. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 8(2), 69–92. doi:10.1515/nispa-2016-0015
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749. doi:10.2307/1961840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2009). Understanding modern transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(2), 255–269. doi:10.1177/0020852309104175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 198–206. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29. doi:10.1177/0020852311429533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017). Government at a glance 2017. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Opendata.swiss. (2018). Données. Retrieved from: https://opendata.swiss/fr/dataset
   Google Scholar
• Pasquier, M. (Ed.) (2013). Le principe de transparence en Suisse et dans le monde. Lausanne, Switzerland: Ppur.
   Google Scholar
• Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. (2017). Open data for democracy: Developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 45–52. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Hogan, M., Enzerink, S., Ojo, A., & Meijer, A. (2017). Connecting social issues, users and data. Scenario-based design of open data platforms. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 470–480. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruijer, E., & Meijer, A. (2019). Open Government Data as an innovation process: Lessons from a living lab experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 1–23. doi:10.1080/15309576.2019.1568884
   Google Scholar
• Safarov, I. (2018). Institutional dimensions of Open Government Data implementation: Evidence from the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(2), 305–328. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1438296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saussois, J. (2006). L’action diffusionniste de l’OCDE dans sa propagation du discours sur les nouvelles pratiques en matière de management public. In F. Dreyfus & J. M. Eymeri (Eds.), Science politique de l’administration. Une approche comparative (pp. 187–200). Paris, France: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. W. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493–511. doi:10.2307/2392880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, E. (2015). Freedom of information, right to access information, open data: Who is at the table? The Round Table, 104(6), 715–726. doi:10.1080/00358533.2015.1112101
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London, UK: .Sage
   Google Scholar
• Susha, I., Grönlund, Å., & Janssen, M. (2015). Organizational measures to stimulate user engagement with open data. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(2), 181–206. doi:10.1108/TG-05-2014-0016
   Google Scholar
• WEF (2016). Switzerland – Key indicators. Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/global-information-technology-report-2016/economies/#indexId=NRI&economy=CHE
   Google Scholar
• Wijnhoven, E., Ehrenhard, M., & Kuhn, J. (2015). Open government objectives and participation motivation. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 30–42. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthy, B. (2010). More open but not more trusted? The effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom central government. Governance, 23(4), 561–582. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthy, B. (2017). The politics of freedom of information. How and why governments pass laws that threaten their power. Manchester, UK: Mup.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H., & Robinson, D. G. (2012). The new ambiguity of “open government”. UCLA Law Review Discourse, 59, 178–200.
   Google Scholar