Size Matters: Toward a Contingency Theory of Diversity Effects on Performance

References

• Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexius, S., & Örnberg, J. C. (2015). Mission(s) impossible? Configuring values in the governance of state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4/5), 286–306. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-08-2015-0151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. C., & Moynihan, D. P. (2016). How leaders respond to diversity: The moderating role of organizational culture on performance information use. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 448–460. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L., Jr., & Walker, R. M. (2005). Representative bureaucracy, organizational strategy, and public service performance: An empirical analysis of English local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 489–504. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2006). Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration. In G A. Boyne, K J. Meier, L J. O’Toole, & R M. Walker (Eds.), Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 14–34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. The Business Lawyer, 54(3), 921–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review, 35(2), 201–218. doi:10.2307/2093199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boje, D. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (1982). Group confidence pressures in iterative decisions. Management Science, 28(10), 1187–1196. doi:10.1287/mnsc.28.10.1187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, R. (2005). Group size and conformity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(4), 331–354. doi:10.1177/1368430205056464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875–893. doi:10.2307/3069319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, J. (2001). A theory of governing the public’s business: Redesigning the jobs of boards, councils, and commissions. Public Management Review, 3(1), 53–72. doi:10.1080/14616670010009450
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2010). Managing diversity in U.S. Federal Agencies: Effects of diversity and diversity management on employee perceptions of organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 109–121. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02115.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornforth, C. (2001). What makes boards effective? An examination of the relationships between board inputs, structures, processes and effectiveness in non-profit organisations. Corporate Governance, 9(3), 217–227. doi:10.1111/1467-8683.00249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, T. H., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Perspectives, 5(3), 45–56. doi:10.5465/ame.1991.4274465
   Google Scholar
• Dahlerup, D. (1988). From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(4), 275–298. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.1988.tb00372.x
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686. doi:10.2307/256988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2003). Cooperation in social dilemmas and the need to belong: The moderating effect of group size. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(2), 168–174. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.2.168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwood, S., & Garcia-Lacalle, J. (2015). The influence of presence and position of women on the boards of directors: The case of NHS Foundation Trusts. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 69–84. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2206-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filley, A. C., House, R. J., & Kerr, S. (1976). Managerial process and organizational behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gazley, B., Chang, W. K., & Bingham, L. B. (2010). Board diversity, stakeholder representation, and collaborative performance in community mediation centers. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 610–620. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02182.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443. doi:10.1086/226707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeneveld, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2010). A contingency approach to representative bureaucracy: Power, equal opportunities and diversity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 239–258. doi:10.1177/0020852309365670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., Papenfuß, U., & Tremblay, M.-S. (2015). Corporate governance and accountability of state-owned enterprises: Relevance for science and society and interdisciplinary research perspectives. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4/5), 274–285. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-09-2015-0166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659–684. doi:10.2307/2393871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. E., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–255. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinna, A., De Nito, E., & Mangia, G. (2010). Board of directors within public organisations: A literature review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 5(3), 131–156. doi:10.1504/IJBGE.2010.033343
   Google Scholar
• Huse, M. (2007). Boards, governance and value creation: The human side of corporate governance (Chapter 7, pp. 175–207). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1982). Victims of groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton-Miffin.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why difference make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763. doi:10.2307/2667054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass? Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61–72. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, C. S., & Lee, G. (2016). Organizational climate, leadership, organization size, and aspiration for innovation in government agencies. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(4), 757–782. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1137764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakabadse, N. K., Figueira, C., Nicolopoulou, K., Yang, J. H., Kakabadse, A. P., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2015). Gender diversity and board performance: Women’s experiences and perspectives. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 265–281. doi:10.1002/hrm.21694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990. doi:10.1086/226425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1987). Men and women of the corporation revisited. Management Review, 76(3), 14–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., & Holland, C. A. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96(3), 553–564. doi:10.1017/S0003055402000321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L. (1989). Illusions of Efficacy: The effect of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(4), 287–313. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(89)90024-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V. W., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvel, J. D. (2018). Change agents or cogs in the machine? Female managers and unofficial gender equality in federal agencies. Public Performance & Management Review, 41(2), 328–364. doi:10.1080/15309576.2017.1400990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, C. (1998). Group dynamics in Janis’s Theory of groupthink: Backward and forward. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2-3), 142–162. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (1993). Latinos and representative bureaucracy: Testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 393–414. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037178
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & Bohte, J. (2001). Structure and discretion: Missing links in representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 455–470. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & Morton, T. S. M. (2015). Representative bureaucracy in a cross-national context: Politics, identity, structure and discretion. In G. G. Peters, P. von Maravic, & E. Schroter (Eds.), The politics of representative bureaucracy: Power, legitimacy, performance (Ch. 5, pp. 94–112). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., & Goerdel, H. T. (2006). Management activity and program performance: Gender as management capital. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 24–36. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00553.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & Stewart, J. Jr. (1992). The impact of representative bureaucracies: Educational systems and public policies. The American Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 157–171. doi:10.1177/027507409202200301
   Google Scholar
• Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–433. doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteduro, F., Hinna, A., & Ferrari, R. (2011). The board of directors and the adoption of quality management tools. Public Management Review, 13(6), 803–824. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.539109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, K.-K. (2016). The effects of diversity and transformational leadership climate on organizational citizenship behavior in the U.S. Federal Government: An organizational-level longitudinal study. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(2), 361–381. doi:10.1080/15309576.2016.1216002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, B., Anthony, T., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1994). Group cohesiveness and quality of decision making: An integration of tests of the groupthink hypothesis. Small Group Research, 25(2), 189–204. doi:10.1177/1046496494252003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opstrup, N., & Villadsen, A. R. (2015). The right mix? Gender diversity in top management teams and financial performance. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 291–301. doi:10.1111/puar.12310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. E. (2008). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2008). Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics, 145(1–2), 121–133. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Cho, Y. (2014). The influence of executive selection factors on performance of public sector organizations in Korea. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(3), 412–440. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576370304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Kim, B. S. (2014). Who is appointed to what position? The politics of appointment in quangos of Korea. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 325–351. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0221-3
   Google Scholar
• Pelled, L. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28. doi:10.2307/2667029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, D. (2009). Diversity management, job satisfaction, and performance: Evidence from U.S. Federal Agencies. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 328–338. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01977.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, D., Hicklin, A. K., Hawes, D. P., & Melton, E. (2010). What drives the implementation of diversity management programs? Evidence from public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 867–886. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pletzer, J. L., Nikolova, R., Kedzior, K. K., & Voelpel, S. C. (2015). Does gender matter? Female representation on corporate boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 10(6), e0130005. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M. (2002). Managing diversity in public sector workforces. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. (1998). The appointed state: Quasi-governmental organizations and democracy. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593. doi:10.1108/17410400610702160
   Google Scholar
• Sowa, J. E., & Selden, S. C. (2003). Administrative discretion and active representation: An expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700–710. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiatczak, M., Morner, M., & Finkbeiner, N. (2015). How can performance measurement systems empower managers? An exploratory study in state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4/5), 371–403. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-08-2015-0142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‘t Hart, P. (1994). Groupthink in government: A study of small groups and policy failure. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ees, H., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2009). Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 307–319. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00741.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S. (2004). Trends in the public sector. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 16(2), 175–201. doi:10.1177/0951629804041120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S. (2015). Boards of public sector organizations: A typology with Dutch illustrations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4/5), 322–334. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-04-2015-0072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., Boyne, G. A., & Brewer, G. A. (2010). Public management and performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegge, J., Roth, C., Neubach, B., Schmidt, K. H., & Kanfer, R. (2008). Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: The role of task complexity and group size. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1301–1313. doi:10.1037/a0012680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, V. M., & Keiser, L. R.  (2006). Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 87–102. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. III. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, L. R., & Tschirhart, M. (2000). Examining empirical evidence on diversity effects: How useful is diversity research for public-sector managers? Public Administration Review, 60(5), 386–394. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar