Red Tape, Rule Burden, and Legitimate Performance Trade-Offs: Results from a Vignette Experiment

References

• Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371. doi:10.1177/1094428114547952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2006). Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O’Toole Jr., & R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 14–34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Aspalter, C. (2006). The East Asian Welfare Model. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15(4), 290–301. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atzmüller, C., & Steiner, P. M. (2010). Experimental vignette studies in survey research. Methodology, 6(3), 128–138. doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R, W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borry, E. L. (2016). A new measure of red tape: Introducing the Three-Item Red Tape (TIRT) Scale. International Public Management Journal, 19(4), 573–593. doi:10.1080/10967494.2016.1143421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borry, E. L., DeHart-Davis, L., Kaufmann, W., Merritt, C. C., Mohr, Z., & Tummers, L. (2018). Formalization and Consistency heighten organizational rule following: Experimental and survey evidence. Public Administration, 96(2), 368–385. doi:10.1111/padm.12407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwman, R., van Thiel, S., van Deemen, A., & Rouwette, E. (2018). Accountability and coalitions: Evidence from a negotiation experiment. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 37–47. doi:10.1111/puar.12858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (1993). A theory of Government “Red Tape”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273–304. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037171
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2015). Rules and red tape: A prism for public administration theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., Reed, P. N., & Scott, P. (1992). Red tape and task delays in public and private organizations. Administration & Society, 24(3), 290–322. doi:10.1177/009539979202400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Scott, P. (1996). Bureaucratic red tape and formalization: Untangling conceptual knots. The American Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 1–17. doi:10.1177/027507409602600101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2010a). Explaining variation in perceptions of red tape: A professionalism-marketization model. Public Administration, 88(2), 418–438. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01827.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2010b). The impact of red tape on governmental performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 233–257. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A., Walker, R. M., Bozeman, B., Avellaneda, C. N., & Brewer, G. A. (2012). External control and red tape: The mediating effects of client and organizational feedback. International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 288–314. doi:10.1080/10967494.2012.725291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. W. (2017a). Public procurement policy in South Korea: Approaches to sustainable development and anti-corruption. In T. Im (Ed.), The experience of democracy and bureaucracy in South Korea (pp. 159–179). Bingley, UK: Emerald Insight.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. W. (2017b). Red tape and transformational leadership: An organizational echelons perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(1), 76–90. doi:10.1108/JOCM-01-2016-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. W. (2019). Obtrusive, obstinate, and conspicuous: Red tape from a Heideggerian perspective. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(5), 1657–1672. doi:10.1108/IJOA-11-2018-1584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. W., & Im, T. (2019). Exchange ideology, performance pay, and pay satisfaction: Evidence from South Korean Central Government. Public Personnel Management, 48(4), 584–607. doi:10.1177/0091026019832632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, É., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2012). Performance measures and parental satisfaction with New York City schools. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 54–65. doi:10.1177/0275074010397333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHart-Davis, L. (2008). Green tape: A theory of effective organizational rules. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 361–384. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. S., & Pink-Harper, S. A. (2016). Connecting knowledge of rule-breaking and perceived red tape: How behavioral attribution influences red tape perceptions. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(1), 181–200.
   Google Scholar
• DeHart-Davis, L., & Pandey, S. K. (2005). Red tape and public employees: Does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 133–148. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2011). Students as experimental participants. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, 1, 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Erridge, A., & McIlroy, J. (2002). Public procurement and supply management strategies. Public Policy and Administration, 17(1), 52–71. doi:10.1177/095207670201700105
   Google Scholar
• Esteve, M., Urbig, D., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Boyne, G. (2016). Prosocial behavior and public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 177–187. doi:10.1111/puar.12480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteve, M., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Boyne, G. (2015). The effects of public service motivation on collaborative behavior: Evidence from three experimental games. International Public Management Journal, 18(2), 171–189. doi:10.1080/10967494.2015.1012573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney, M. K. (2012). Organizational red tape: A measurement experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 427–444. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney, M. K., Moynihan, D. P., & Walker, R. M. (2010). Rethinking and expanding the study of administrative rules (Report of the 2010 Red Tape Research Workshop). Madison, WI: School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, M. K., & Rainey, H. G. (2010). Personnel flexibility and red tape in public and nonprofit organizations: Distinctions due to institutional and political accountability. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 801–826. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., & Anderfuhren-Biget, S. (2012). Resigned but satisfied: The negative impact of public service motivation and red tape on work satisfaction. Public Administration, 90(1), 175–193. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01953.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Knies, E. (2017). Validating a scale for citizen trust in government organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 583–601. doi:10.1177/0020852315585950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. D., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Investigating the cognitive structure of stereotypes: Generic beliefs aboutgroups predict social judgments better than statistical beliefs. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 146(5), 607–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvidman, U., & Andersen, S. C. (2016). Perceptions of public and private performance: Evidence from a survey experiment. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 111–120. doi:10.1111/puar.12441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, T. (2014). Bureaucracy in three different worlds: The assumptions of failed public sector reforms in Korea. Public Organization Review, 14(4), 577–596. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0246-7
   Google Scholar
• Im, T., Campbell, J. W., & Cha, S. (2013). Revisiting Confucian bureaucracy: Roots of the Korean Government’s culture and competitiveness. Public Administration and Development, 33(4), 286–296. doi:10.1002/pad.1656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, C. B., & Jakobsen, M. L. (2018). Perceived organizational red tape and organizational performance in public services. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 24–36. doi:10.1111/puar.12817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O., & Moseley, A. (2014). Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information. Public Administration, 92(2), 493–511. doi:10.1111/padm.12066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, H. (1977). Red tape: Its origins, uses, and abuses. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, W., Borry, E. L., & DeHart‐Davis, L. (2019). More than pathological formalization: Understanding organizational structure and red tape. Public Administration Review, 79(2), 236–245. doi:10.1111/puar.12958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, W., & Feeney, M. K. (2014). Beyond the rules: The effect of outcome favourability on red tape perceptions. Public Administration, 92(1), 178–191. doi:10.1111/padm.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, W., Taggart, G., & Bozeman, B. (2019). Administrative delay, red tape, and organizational performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(3), 529–553. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1474770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, W., & Tummers, L. (2017). The negative effect of red tape on procedural satisfaction. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1311–1327. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1210907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. M., & Swindell, D. (2003). The case for the inexperienced user rethinking filter questions in citizen satisfaction surveys. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 91–108. doi:10.1177/0275074002250256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2016). Politics of the administrative process. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2017). Comparison of a multidimensional to a unidimensional measure of public service motivation: Predicting work attitudes. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(6), 504–515. doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1141426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 347–361. doi:10.2307/2669316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, R. (2002). Experimental methodology in political science. Political Analysis: An Annual Publication of the Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, 10(4), 325–342. doi:10.1093/pan/10.4.325.
   Google Scholar
• Marvel, J. D. (2015). Unconscious bias in citizens’ evaluations of public sector performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18(4), 560–568. doi:10.2307/2570634
   Google Scholar
• Morton, R. B., & Williams, K. C. (2008). Experimentation in political science. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 339–356). Oxford, UK: Oxford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D., & Herd, P. (2010). Red tape and democracy: How rules affect citizenship rights. American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 654–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2013). Does public service motivation lead to budget maximization? Evidence from an experiment. International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 179–196. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.817236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40–53. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00695.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., Wright, B. E., & Pandey, S. K. (2012). Working within constraints: Can transformational leaders alter the experience of red tape? International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 315–336. doi:10.1080/10967494.2012.725318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., & Welch, E. W. (2005). Beyond stereotypes - a multistage model of managerial perceptions of red tape. Administration & Society, 37(5), 542–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., Coursey, D. H., & Moynihan, D. P. (2007). Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: A multimethod study. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 398–425. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576300305
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., & Kingsley, G. A. (2000). Examining red tape in public and private organizations: Alternative explanations from a social psychological model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 779–800. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024291
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., & Marlowe, J. (2015). Assessing survey-based measurement of personnel red tape with anchoring vignettes. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(3), 215–237. doi:10.1177/0734371X14531988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., & Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Bureaucratic red tape and organizational performance: Testing the moderating role of culture and political support. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O’Toole Jr., & R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 113–129). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., & Scott, P. G. (2002). Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts and measures. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553–580. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. J. (2015). Activating the forces of public service motivation: Evidence from a low-intensity randomized survey experiment. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 734–746. doi:10.1111/puar.12325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. doi:10.2307/976618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A., & Merunka, D. R. (2014). Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 1035–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponomariov, B. L., & Boardman, P. C. (2011). Organizational pathology compared to what? Impacts of job characteristics and career trajectory on perceptions of organizational red tape. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 582–597. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02390.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., Pandey, S., & Bozeman, B. (1995). Research note: Public and private managers’ perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 567–574. doi:10.2307/3110348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P. G. (2002). Examining Red Tape in Public and Private Organizations: A Further Look at the Role of Individual Perceptions and Attributes. The Social Science Journal, 39(3), 477–482. doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(02)00198-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P. G., & Pandey, S. K. (2005). Red Tape and public service motivation: Findings from a national survey of managers in state health and human services agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25(2), 155–180. doi:10.1177/0734371X04271526
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515–530. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shingler, J., Van Loon, M. E., Alter, T. R., & Bridger, J. C. (2008). The importance of subjective data for public agency performance evaluation. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1101–1111. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00958.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2016). The motivational effects of mission matching: A lab-experimental test of a moderated mediation model. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 626. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12514/pdf doi:10.1111/puar.12514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stazyk, E. C., & Goerdel, H. T. (2011). The benefits of bureaucracy: Public managers’ perceptions of political support, goal ambiguity, and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 645–672. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepe, M. (2016). In public servants we trust? A behavioural experiment on public service motivation and trust among students of public administration, business sciences and law. Public Management Review, 18(4), 508–538. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1014396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepe, M., & Vanhuysse, P. (2017). Are future bureaucrats more prosocial? Public Administration, 95(4), 957–975. doi:10.1111/padm.12359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2001). Clarify: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Torenvlied, R., & Akkerman, A. (2012). Effects of managers’ work motivation and networking activity on their reported levels of external red tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 445–471. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trottier, K., & Gordon, I. M. (2018). Students as surrogates for managers: Evidence from a replicated experiment. The Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 35(1), 146–161.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., Weske, U., Bouwman, R., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2016). The impact of red tape on citizen satisfaction: An experimental study. International Public Management Journal, 19(3), 320–341. doi:10.1080/10967494.2015.1027800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turaga, R., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Red tape and public managers’ decision making. The American Review of Public Administration, 35(4), 363–379. doi:10.1177/0275074005278503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003). Public service performance and trust in government: The problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8–9), 891–913. doi:10.1081/PAD-120019352
   Google Scholar
• van den Bekerom, P., Torenvlied, R., & Akkerman, A. (2017). Constrained by red tape: How managerial networking moderates the effects of red tape on public service performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(3), 300–322. doi:10.1177/0275074015623856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Voet, J. (2016). Change leadership and public sector organizational change: Examining the interactions of transformational leadership style and red tape. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(6), 660–682. doi:10.1177/0275074015574769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loon, N. M., Leisink, P. L. M., Knies, E., & Brewer, G. A. (2016). Red tape: Developing and validating a new job-centered measure. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 662–673. doi:10.1111/puar.12569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G. (2013). An experimental test of the expectancy‐disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 597–614. doi:10.1002/pam.21702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G., & Immerwahr, S. (2007). Importance‐performance analysis of citizen satisfaction surveys. Public Administration, 85(1), 215–226. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00641.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2008). An organizational echelon analysis of the determinants of red tape in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1112–1127. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00959.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2009a). Can management strategy minimize the impact of red tape on organizational performance? Administration & Society, 41(4), 423–448. doi:10.1177/0095399709338027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2009b). Can public managers reduce red tape? The role of internal management in overcoming external constraints. Policy & Politics, 37(2), 255–272. doi:10.1332/030557309X39787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E., Christensen, R. K., & Pandey, S. K. (2013). Measuring public service motivation: Exploring the equivalence of existing global measures. International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 197–223. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.817242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The performance–trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114–126. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00560.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar