The Mediating Effect of Trust in Supervisors in the Relationship between Constructive Performance Feedback and Perceived Fairness of Performance Appraisal

References

• Aguinis, H. (2013). Performance management (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., Edwards, J. R., & Bradley, K. J. (2017). Improving our understanding of moderation and mediation in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 665–685. doi:10.1177/1094428115627498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32(3), 370–398. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(83)90156-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwater, L., & Brett, J. (2006). Feedback format: Does it influence manager's reactions to feedback? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(4), 517–532. doi:10.1348/096317905X58656
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1), 1–44. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.01431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broecka, A. V. D., Vansteenkisteb, M., Wittea, H. D., & Lensa, W. (2008). Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work & Stress, 22(3), 277–294. doi:10.1080/02678370802393672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K., & Whetten, D. (1998). Developing management skills (4th ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen-Salem, A., Kinicki, A., Zhang, Z., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2018). Responses to feedback: The role of acceptance, affect, and creative behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(4), 416–429. doi:10.1177/1548051818757691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 130–135. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.74.1.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahling, J. J., Chau, S. L., & O’Malley, A. (2012). Correlates and consequences of feedback orientation in organizations. Journal of Management, 38(2), 531–546. doi:10.1177/0149206310375467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. S., & Stazyk, E. C. (2017). Putting the methodological cart before the theoretical horse? Examining the application of SEM to connect theory and method in public administration research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 202–218. doi:10.1177/0734371X17704268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNisi, A. S., & Pritchard, R. D. (2006). Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational Framework. Management and Organization Review, 2(2), 253–277. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00042.x
   Google Scholar
• Doornik, J. A., & Hansen, H. (2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin Of Economics and Statistics, 70(s1), 927–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, P. W., Stephan, W. G., & Loveland, J. (1986). Performance appraisal behaviors: Supervisor perceptions and subordinate reactions. Personnel Psychology, 39(3), 579–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994). An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Vol. 57). New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Elicker, J. D., Levy, P. E., & Hall, R. J. (2006). The role of leader-member exchange in the performance appraisal process. Journal of Management, 32(4), 531–551. doi:10.1177/0149206306286622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, B. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review, 12(4), 555–578. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00070-0
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S., Resh, W. G., Moldogaziev, T., & Oberfield, Z. W. (2015). Assessing the past and promise of the federal employee viewpoint survey for public management research: A research synthesis. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 382–394. doi:10.1111/puar.12368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 473–487. doi:10.1348/096317901167488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulk, J., Brief, A. P., & Barr, S. H. (1985). Trust-in-supervisor and perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 13(4), 301–313. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(85)90003-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabris, G. T., & Ihrke, D. M. (2000). Improving employee acceptance toward performance appraisal and merit pay systems: The role of leadership credibility. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(1), 41–53. doi:10.1177/0734371X0002000104
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, D. (1993). Examining the dimensionality of performance feedback messages: Source and recipient perceptions of influence attempts. Communication Studies, 44(3–4), 200–215. doi:10.1080/10510979309368395
   Google Scholar
• Gilley, J. W., Shelton, P. M., & Gilley, A. (2011). Developmental leadership. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(3), 386–405. doi:10.1177/1523422311424264
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. doi:10.1177/014920639001600208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greller, M. M., & Herold, D. M. (1975). Sources of feedback: A preliminary investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(2), 244–256. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90048-3
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, J. R., & Lee, J. H. (2015). What drives perceived fairness of performance appraisal? Exploring the effects of psychological contract fulfillment on employees’ perceived fairness of performance appraisal in U.S. federal agencies. Public Personnel Management, 44(2), 214–238. doi:10.1177/0091026014564071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hind, P., & Baruch, Y. (1997). Gender variations in perceptions of performance appraisal. Women in Management Review, 12(7), 276–289.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S. (2019). A behavioral model of public organizations: Bounded rationality, performance feedback, and negativity bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(1), 1–17. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ikramullah, M., Shah, B., Hassan, F., Zaman, T., & Khan, H. (2011). Fairness perceptions of performance appraisal system: An empirical study of civil servants in district Dera Ismail Khan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(21), 92–100.
   Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D., & Davis, C. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 550–565. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M., & Jensen, R. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30. doi:10.1080/10967494.2014.997906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jong, J. (2016). The role of performance feedback and job autonomy in mitigating the negative effect of role ambiguity on employee satisfaction. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(4), 814–834. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1137771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T., & Holzer, M. (2016). Public employees and performance appraisal: A study of antecedents to employees’ perception of the process. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(1), 31–56. doi:10.1177/0734371X14549673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. W., & Ko, J. (2014). HR practices and knowledge sharing behavior: Focusing on the moderating effect of trust in supervisor. Public Personnel Management, 43(4), 586–607. doi:10.1177/0091026014542342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konovsky, M. A. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 489–511. doi:10.1177/014920630002600306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, M., & Smither, J. W. (2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12(1), 81–100. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00043-2
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. H., Kay, E., & French, J. R. J. (1965). Split roles in performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 43(1), 123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, M. S., & Salleh, R. (2015). Linking performance appraisal justice, trust, and employee engagement: A conceptual framework. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 1155–1162. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.154
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, I. I. I. C. A., & Anderson, J. C. (1980). Trust and the communication of performance appraisal information: The effect of feedback on performance and job satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 6(4), 290–298. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1980.tb00150.x
   Google Scholar
• OPM. (2017). A handbook for measuring employee performance. Government Report. Retrieved from https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/performance-management/measuring/employee_performance_handbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, M. G., Johnson, C. M., & Johnson, D. A. (2015). Objective performance feedback: Is numerical accuracy necessary? Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35(3–4), 206–239. doi:10.1080/01608061.2015.1093059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2014). Motivation of public managers as raters in performance appraisal: Developing a model of rater motivation. Public Personnel Management, 43(4), 387–414. doi:10.1177/0091026014530675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phin, L. W. (2015). The effectiveness of performance appraisal in the private education industry in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Information, 10(1), 95–125.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinke, S. J. (2003). Does the form really matter? Leadership, trust, and acceptance of the performance appraisal process. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23(1), 23–37. doi:10.1177/0734371X02250109
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. E. (2003). Employee performance appraisal system participation: A technique that works. Public Personnel Management, 32(1), 89–98. doi:10.1177/009102600303200105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137–152. doi:10.2307/256773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5), 389–400. doi:10.1002/job.4030110506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaerer, M., Kern, M., Berger, G., Medvec, V., & Swaab, R. I. (2018). The illusion of transparency in performance appraisals: When and why accuracy motivation explains unintentional feedback inflation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 171–186. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, K. L., & Kulkarni, M. (2012). Does constructive performance feedback improve citizenship intentions and job satisfaction? The roles of perceived opportunities for advancement, respect, and mood. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23(2), 177–201. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudin, S. (2011). Fairness of and satisfaction with performance appraisal process. Journal of Global Management, 2(1), 66–83.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. M., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, J. K., & Carroll, S. J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 495–523. doi:10.2307/2393795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckey, M., Brewer, N., & Williamson, P. (2002). The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback seeking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(2), 195–216. doi:10.1348/09631790260098677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, K., & Williams, K. J. (2011). Organisational justice, trust and perceptions of fairness in the implementation of agenda for change. Radiography, 17(1), 61–66. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2010.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Kassekert, A. (2009). Linking management reform with employee job satisfaction: Evidence from federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 413–436. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 413–422. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar