Expanding the Toolbox: Why the Citizen-State Encounter Demands It

References

• Albertus, M., & Menaldo, V. (2018, May 8). Why are so many democracies breaking down? New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland, H. (1972). The future executive: A guide for tomorrow's managers. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (2007). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (2005). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. London, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Drury, I. (2014). Performance management for wicked problems. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 36, 398–411.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1962). Introduction: The current meaning of “behavioralism”. In J. Charlesworth (Ed.), Political science (p. 9). Philadelphia, PA: American Academy of Political and Social Science.
   Google Scholar
• Edlins, M., & Dolamore, S. (2018). Ready to serve the public? The role of empathy in public service education programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(3), 300–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1429824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enosh, G., Tzafrir, S. S., & Stolovy, T. (2015). The development of client violence questionnaire (CVQ). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 273–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814525263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1919). Community is a process. The Philosophical Review, 28(6), 576–588. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2178307
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1940a). The giving of orders. In H. C. Metcalf and L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 50–70). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1940b). The psychology of consent and participation. In H. C. Metcalf and L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 210–229). New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodsell, C. T. (Ed.). (1981). The public encounter: Where state and citizen meet. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley, W. T., & Balla, S. J. (2012). Bureaucracy and democracy: Accountability and performance. Washington, DC: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Groeneveld, S., Tummers, L., Bronkhorst, B., Ashikali, T., & van Thiel, S. (2015). Quantitative methods in public administration: Their use and development through time. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 61–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.972484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, M. E., Mastracci, S. H., and Yang, S.B. (Eds.). (2019). Palgrave handbook on global perspectives on emotional labor in public service. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, M. E., Newman, M. A., & Mastracci, S. H. (2008). Emotional labor: Putting the service in public service. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, M. M. (2011). Truth, telling the truth, and being truthful: Affect, nonverbal communication, and the constitution of ethical relationship. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33, 509–529. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806330401
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C.-W., Yang, K., & Fu, K.-J. (2012). Motivational bases and emotional labor: Assessing the impact of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 241–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02499.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M., James, O., Moynihan, D., & Nabatchi, T. (2016). JPART virtual issue on citizen-state interactions in public administration research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw031
   Google Scholar
• Kirlin, J. J., & Kirlin, M. K. (2002). Strengthening effective government-citizen connections through greater civic engagement. Public Administration Review, 62(s1), 80–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.62.s1.14
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., & Van Ryzin, G. (2017). A systematic review of experimental studies in public management journals. In O. O. James, S. Jilke, & G. Van Ryzin (Eds.), Experiments in public management research: Challenges and contributions (pp. 20–36). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mastracci, S. H., Guy, M. E., & Newman, M. A. (2012). Emotional labor and crisis response: Working on the razor’s edge. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Mastracci, S. H., & Hsieh, C.-W. (2016). Emotional labor and job stress in caring professions: Exploring universalism and particularism in construct and culture. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(14), 1125–1133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1068327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. (2011). Behaviorism. The Psychological Record, 61(3), 449–464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, R. S. (2019). Citizen’s academies: Local governments building capacity for citizen engagement. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(1), 79–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360104
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. A., & Guy, M. E. (1998). Taylor’s triangles, Follett’s web. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 20(3), 287–297.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. A., Guy, M. E., & Mastracci, S. H. (2009). Beyond cognition: Affective leadership and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 1, 6–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01935.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, S. M. (2011). Public administration research and the field’s identity. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 957–963. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02449.x
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, F. (1934). People at work. New York, NY: The John Day Co.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; or, Why it's amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the economic development administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation (3rd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M. (2010). Public administration: Traditions of inquiry and philosophies of knowledge. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, F. E. (2001). Reconsidering a therapeutic role for the state: Anti-modernist governance and the reunification of the self. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 23, 231–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2001.11643513
   Google Scholar
• Shields, P. (Ed.). (2017). Jane Addams: Progressive pioneer of peace, philosophy, sociology, social work and public administration. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1963). Behaviorism at fifty. Science (New York, N.Y.), 140(3570), 951–958. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.140.3570.951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2014). The art of social theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. L. (2019). Human error in police involved shootings. Unpublished dissertation. Albany, NY: University at Albany, State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Waldo, D. (1956). Perspectives on administration. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walle, S. V., Kampen, J. K., & Bouckaert, G. (2005). Deep impact for high-impact agencies?: Assessing the role of bureaucratic encounters in evaluations of government. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 532–549.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. (2007). The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 14–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K. (2005). Public administrators’ trust in citizens: A missing link in citizen involvement efforts. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 273–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00453.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2005). Assessing citizen involvement efforts by local governments. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(2), 191–216.
   Google Scholar