References
- Adams, G. B. (1992). Enthralled with modernity: The historical context of knowledge and theory development in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52(4), 363–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3110396
- Adcock, R. (2014). Generalization in comparative and historical social science: The difference that interpretivism makes. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (2nd ed., pp. 80–96). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
- Adler, N., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 72–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2009.37012181
- Ahmed, A., & Sil, R. (2009). Is multi-method research really “better”? Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 7(2), 2–6.
- Baele, S. J., & Bettiza, G. (2017). What do academic metrics do to political scientists? Politics, 37(4), 445–469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395716685727
- Barnes, C. (2015). The use of Altmetrics as a tool for measuring research impact. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 46(2), 121–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2014.1003174
- Birdsall, C. (2018). Performance management in public higher education: Unintended consequences and the implications of organizational diversity. Public Performance and Management Review, 41(4), 669–695. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1481116
- Box, R. C. (1992). An examination of the debate over research in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52(1), 62–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/976547
- Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (Eds.). (2010). Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2018). Thinking about data with grounded theory. Qualitative Inquiry 25, 1–11. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418809
- Cramer, R. (in press, 2019). Trust, transparency, and process. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 16.
- Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1992). Budgets as texts. Accounting, Management and Information Technology, 2(4), 221–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8022(92)90010-P
- Donoghue, F. (2008). The last professors: The corporate university and the fate of the humanities. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
- Dryzek, J. S. (1986). The progress of political science. The Journal of Politics, 48(2), 301–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2131095
- Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. (2015). Proposed Rules. Federal Register, 80(173), 53933–54061 (to be codified at C.F.R 45).
- Fox, C. J. (1990). Implementation research: Why and how to transcend positivist methodologies. In D. J. Palumbo and D. J. Calista (Eds.), Implementation and the policy process (pp. 199–212). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
- Glenn, D. (2009). Notre Dame plans to dissolve the “heterodox” side of its split economics department. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Notre-Dame-to-Dissolve/48460
- Harrison, J. (n.d). Can you publish and still perish? Retrieved from https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/can-you-publish-and-still-perish/
- Harzing, A.-W. (2018). Journal quality list, sixty-third edition. Retrieved from https://harzing.com/blog/2018/07/63rd-edition-of-the-journal-quality-list-on-line
- Havenaar, M. (2018). Is medical research facing a replication crisis? Castor. Retrieved from https://www.castoredc.com/blog/replication-crisis-medical-research/
- Hawkesworth, M. (2014). Contending conceptions of science and politics: Methodology and the constitution of the political. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (2nd ed., pp. 27–49). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
- Heneberg, P. (2016). From excessive journal self-cites to citation stacking. PLoS One, 11(4), 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153730
- Irvine, J. M. (2012). Can't ask, can't tell: How institutional review boards keep sex in the closet. Contexts, 11(2), 28. Online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212446457
- Israel, M. (2015). Research ethics and integrity for social scientists (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
- Jackson, P. T. (2011). The conduct of inquiry in international relations: Philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Knight, S. (2009). Journal self-citation XVI. Communications of the Association of Information Systems, 25(16), 129–140.
- Kuhn, T. S. (1962/1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed., pp. 35–42). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/68.3.700
- Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–195). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Luton, L. S. (2007). Deconstructing public administration empiricism. Administration and Society, 39(4), 527–544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707303813
- Luton, L. S. (2008). Beyond empiricists versus postmodernists. Administration and Society, 40(2), 211–219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308315809
- Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2007). Deconstructing Larry Luton. Administration and Society, 39(6), 786–796. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707307043
- Merry, S. E. (2016). The seductions of quantification. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Merton, R. K. (1957). Bureaucratic structure and personality. From social theory and social structure (pp. 195–206). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
- Michener, G. (2019). Gauging the impact of transparency policies. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 136–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13011
- Moravcsik, A. (2012). Active citation and qualitative methods. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 10(1), 33–37.
- Morse, J. J., & J. W, Lorsch. (1970). Beyond theory Y. Harvard Business Review, May, 61–68.
- Noorani, T., Charlesworth, A., Kite, A., & McDermont, M. (2017). Participatory research and the medicalization of research ethics processes. Social and Legal Studies, 26(3), 378–400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663916677561
- Ospina, S. M., Esteve, E., & Lee, S. (2018). Assessing qualitative studies in public administration research. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 593–605. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12837
- Pachirat, T. (2018). Among wolves: Ethnography and the immersive study of power. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Poteete, A. R. (2010). Multiple methods in practice. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, 8(1), 28–35.
- Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/
- Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2000). Understanding government in society: We see the trees, but could we see the forest? Administrative Theory and Praxis, 22(2), 192–225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2000.11643448
- Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2011). The future study of public administration: Embedding research object and methodology in epistemology and ontology. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 916–924. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02433.x
- Riccucci, N. M. (2010). Public administration: Traditions of inquiry and philosophies of knowledge. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Romero, M. (2017). Reflections on “The department is very male, very white, very old, and very conservative. Social Problems, 64(2), 212–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx004
- Schmidt, M. R. (1993). Grout: Alternative kinds of knowledge and why they are ignored. Public Administration Review, 53(6), 525–530. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/977362
- Schön, D. A. (1995). Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 27–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673
- Schrag, Z. M. (2010). Ethical imperialism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Schwartz-Shea, P. (2003). Is this the curriculum we want? Doctoral requirements and offerings in methods and methodology. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(3), 379–386.
- Schwartz-Shea, P. (2014). Judging quality: Evaluative criteria and epistemic communities. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (2nd ed., pp. 120–146). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
- Schwartz-Shea, P., & Burrington, D. (1990). Free riding, alternative organization and cultural feminism: The case of Seneca women's peace camp. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 10(3), 1–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.1990.9970577
- Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2016). Legitimizing political science or splitting the discipline? Reflections on DA-RT and the policy-making role of a professional association. Politics and Gender, 12(3), e11, 1–19. Online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000428
- Shames, S. L., & Wise, T. (2017). Gender, diversity, and methods in political science. PS: Political Science and Politics, 50, 811–823. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651700066X
- Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Stivers, C. (2018). Beyond calculation: Experience and language in administrative situations. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 40(3), 200–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2018.1485448
- Stout, M. (2012). Competing ontologies: A primer for public administration. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 388–398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02530.x
- Stout, M. (2013). Preparing public administration scholars for qualitative inquiry: A status report. Public Administration Research, 2(1), 1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/par.v2n1p11
- Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London, UK: Routledge.
- Thomas, G. (2011). Models of the whole. From How to do your case study (pp. 45–60). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Tripp, A. M. (2018). Transparency and integrity in conducting field research on politics in challenging contexts. Perspectives on Politics, 16(3), 728–738. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718001056
- van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2011). The seduction of ethics. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
- van Thiel, S., & Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance and Management Review, 25(3), 267–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3381236
- Waldo, D. (1948). The administrative state. New York, NY: Ronald Press.
- Welsh, J. (2019). Ranking academics: Toward a critical politics of academic rankings. Critical Policy Studies, 13(2), 153–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1398673
- Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2018). Framing “deception” and “covertness” in research: Do Milgram, Humphreys, and Zimbardo justify regulating social science research ethics?. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3) Art. 15. doi:https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3102
- Yong, E. (2018). Psychology’s replication crisis is running out of excuses. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/11/psychologys-replication-crisis-real/576223/
- Zhu, L., Witko, C., & Meier, K. J. (2018). The public administration manifesto II: Matching methods to theory and substance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29, 1–12. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy079