Implementing Performance Measurement Systems in Local Governments: Moving from the “How” to the “Why”

References

• Agostino, D., & Arnaboldi, M. (2017). Rational and ritualistic use of key performance indicators in hybrid organizations. Public Money & Management, 37(6), 409–416. doi:10.1080/09540962.2017.1344021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbar, R., Pilcher, R.A., & Perrin, B. (2015). Implementing performance measurement systems: Indonesian local government under pressure. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 12(1), 3–33. doi:10.1108/QRAM-03-2013-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N. (2013). Signs of performance measurement progress among prominent city governments. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(4), 507–528. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576360401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2008). Factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina benchmarking project. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 304–318. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00864.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, M., & Arnaboldi, M. (2013). Debate: Dealing with spending reviews—Italy. Public Money & Management, 33(1), 4–6. doi:10.1080/09540962.2013.744867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argenti, P. A., Howell, R. A., & Beck, K. A. (2005). The strategic communication imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 83–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaboldi, M. (2013). Consultant‐researchers in public sector transformation: An evolving role. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(2), 140–160. doi:10.1111/faam.12008
   Google Scholar
• Azzone, G., & Palermo, T. (2011). Adopting performance appraisal and reward systems: A qualitative analysis of public sector organisational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(1), 90–111. doi:10.1108/09534811111102300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbato, G., & Turri, M. (2017). Understanding public performance measurement through theoretical pluralism. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(1), 15–30. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-11-2015-0202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, M., & Noria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’. Management Accounting Research, 11(3), 281–306. doi:10.1006/mare.2000.0136
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J. (2000). The dynamics of accounting change inter-play between new practices, routines, institutions, power and politics. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), 566–596. doi:10.1108/09513570010353710
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J., & Scapens, R. W. (2000). Conceptualizing management accounting change: An institutional framework. Management Accounting Research, 11(1), 3–25. doi:10.1006/mare.1999.0119
   Google Scholar
• Camilleri, E., & Van Der Heijden, B. (2007). Organizational commitment, public service motivation, and performance within the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 31, 241–274. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576310205
   Google Scholar
• Coram, R., & Burnes, B. (2001). Managing organizational change in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14(2), 94–110. doi:10.1108/09513550110387381
   Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, H. (2003). Managing performance in the public sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deschamps, C., & Mattijs, J. (2018). How organizational learning is supported by performance management systems: Evidence from a longitudinal case study. Public Performance & Management Review, 41(3), 469–496. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1462213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer, K., Antony, J., & Ogden, S. (2009). Performance management in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22(6), 478–498. doi:10.1108/09513550910982850
   Google Scholar
• Gerrish, E. (2016). The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A meta‐analysis. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 48–66. doi:10.1111/puar.12433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, A., Assad, M., Issa, S., Malagila, J., & Mkasiwa, T. (2016). The two publics and institutional theory – A study of public sector accounting in Tanzania. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 40, 8–25. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graetz, F. (2000). Strategic change leadership. Management Decision, 38(8), 550–564. doi:10.1108/00251740010378282
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054. doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9704071862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, T., & Siverbo, S. (2009). Explaining the utilization of relative performance evaluation in local government: A multi‐theoretical study using data from Sweden. Financial Accountability & Management, 25(2), 197–224. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.00474.x
   Google Scholar
• Julnes, P. L., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693–708. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C. J. (2012). Measuring public sector performance and effectiveness. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public administration, (pp. 32–49). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G.M. (1988). The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 166–192.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoontis, P., & Kim, T. (2012). Antecedents to municipal performance measurement implementation: A case study of two New Jersey Municipalities. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(1), 158–173. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576360108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jääskeläinen, A., & Sillanpää, V. (2013). Overcoming challenges in the implementation of performance measurement: Case studies in public welfare services. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(6), 440–454. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-12-2011-0014
   Google Scholar
• Keerasuntonpong, P., & Cordery, C. (2018). How might normative and mimetic pressures improve local government service performance reporting? Accounting & Finance, 58(4), 1169–1200. doi:10.1111/acfi.12252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, R., Doyle, G., & O'Donohoe, S. (2015). Framing performance management of acute‐care hospitals by interlacing npm and institutional perspectives: A new theoretical framework. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(1), 69–91. doi:10.1111/faam.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloot, L. (1997). Organizational learning and management control systems: Responding to environmental change. Management Accounting Research, 8(1), 47–73. doi:10.1006/mare.1996.0033
   Google Scholar
• Kloot, L., & Martin, J. (2000). Strategic performance management: A balanced approach to performance management issues in local government. Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 231–251. doi:10.1006/mare.2000.0130
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2015). Drivers of performance information use: Systematic literature review and directions for future research. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 459–486. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1006469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauro, S. G., Cinquini, L., & Grossi, G. (2018). External pressures and internal dynamics in the institutionalization of performance-based budgeting: An endless process? Public Performance & Management Review, 41(2), 224–252. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1431137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S. (2004). Performance measurement myths in the public sector: A research note. Financial Accountability and Management, 20(1), 39–55. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2004.00185.x
   Google Scholar
• Ohemeng, F. (2010). The dangers of internationalization and one‐size‐fits‐all in public sector management: Lessons from performance management policies in Ontario and Ghana. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(5), 456–478. doi:10.1108/09513551011058484
   Google Scholar
• Pina, V., Torres, L., & Yetano, A. (2009). Accrual accounting in EU local governments: One method, several approaches. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 765–807. doi:10.1080/09638180903118694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice. Public Administration Review, 59(4), 325–335. doi:10.2307/3110115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2001). Clarifying convergence. Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform. Public Management Review, 3(4), 471–492. doi:10.1080/14616670110071847
   Google Scholar
• Propper, C., & Wilson, D. (2003). The use and usefulness of performance measures in the public sector. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(2), 250–267. doi:10.1093/oxrep/19.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radnor, Z., & McGuire, M. (2004). Performance management in the public sector: Fact or fiction? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(3), 245–260. doi:10.1108/17410400410523783
   Google Scholar
• Rantanen, H., Kulmala, H. I., Lönnqvist, A., & Kujansivu, P. (2007). Performance measurement systems in the Finnish public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(5), 415–433. doi:10.1108/09513550710772521
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, R. (2010). Participatory case study. In: A. Mills, G. Durepos, E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 658–661). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, J.A., & Scapens, R.W. (2006). Institutional theories in management accounting change: Contributions, issues and paths for development. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 3(2), 94–111. doi:10.1108/11766090610670640
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2001). Performance management, evaluation and learning in ‘modern’ local government. Public Administration, 79(2), 297–313. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018). Putting the system into performance management systems: A review and agenda for performance management research. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2209–2245. doi:10.1177/0149206318755303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M., & Meier, K. J. (2018). Citizen satisfaction and the kaleidoscope of government performance: How multiple stakeholders see government performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 489–505. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2014). Organizational culture and the paradox of performance management. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(1), 7–22. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576380101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Bogt, H. J. (2008). Management accounting change and new public management in local government: A reassessment of ambitions and results. An institutionalist approach to accounting change in the Dutch public sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(3), 209–241. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00451.x
   Google Scholar
• Ter Bogt, H. J., & van Helden, G. J. (2011). The role of consultant-researchers in the design and implementation process of a programme budget in a local government organization. Management Accounting Research, 22(1), 56–64. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2010.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilcsik, A. (2010). From ritual to reality: Demography, ideology, and decoupling in a post-communist government agency. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1474–1498. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.57318905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Helden, I., Johnsen, A., & Vakkuri, J. (2008). Distinctive research patterns on public sector performance measurement of public administration and accounting disciplines. Public Management Review, 10(5), 641–651. doi:10.1080/14719030802264366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S., & Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267–281. doi:10.2307/3381236
   Google Scholar
• Yetano, A. (2013). What drives the institutionalization of performance measurement and management in local government? Public Performance & Management Review, 37(1), 59–86. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576370103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar