Full Range Leadership Styles and Government IT Team Performance: The Critical Roles of Follower and Team Competence

References

• Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. (2019). Warning for excessive positivity: Authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(4), 383–395. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, S. H., Meier, K. J., Bøllingtoft, A., & Andersen, L. B. (2019). Employee perceived effect of leadership training: Comparing public and private organizations. International Public Management Journal, 22(1), 2–28. doi:10.1080/10967494.2018.1497739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristigueta, M. P., & Zarook, F. N. (2011). Managing for results in six states. Public Performance & Management Review, 35, 177–201. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576350109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. New York, NY: Mindgarden.
   Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Wernsing, T., & Gardner, W. L. (2018). Revisiting the development and validation of the authentic leadership questionnaire: Analytical clarifications. Journal of Management, 44(2), 399–411. doi:10.1177/0149206317739960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, G. C., Gooty, J., Ross, R. L., Williams, C. E., & Harrington, N. T. (2018). Construct redundancy in leader behaviors: A review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 236–251. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbuto, J. E. (2005). Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 26–40. doi:10.1177/107179190501100403
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130–139. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2002). The psychological barriers to performance management. Public Performance & Management Review, 26, 5–25. doi:10.2307/3381295
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E. M., & West, J. P. (2003). Solutions to the problem of managerial mediocrity: Moving up to excellence (Part 2). Public Performance & Management Review, 27, 30–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein, K. J., and Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. doi:10.1177/135910457000100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caillier, J. G. (2014). Toward a better understanding of the relationship between transformational leadership, public service motivation, mission valence, and employee performance: A preliminary study. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 218–239. doi:10.1177/0091026014528478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caillier, J. G. (2015). Towards a better understanding of public service motivation and mission valence in public agencies. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1217–1236. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.895033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caillier, J. G. (2016). Linking transformational leadership to self-efficacy, extra-role behaviors, and turnover intentions in public agencies: The mediating role of goal clarity. Administration & Society, 48(7), 883–906. doi:10.1177/0095399713519093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Miller, D. L. (2011). Robust inference with clustered data. In A. Ullah and D.E. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of empirical economics and finance. Beaverton, OR: Ringgold, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. W. (2017). Efficiency, incentives, and transformational leadership: Understanding collaboration preferences in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 41, 277–299. doi:10.1080/15309576.2017.1403332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceri-Booms, M., Curşeu, P. L., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2017). Task and person-focused leadership behaviors and team performance: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 178–192. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., Getha-Taylor, H., Holmes, M. H., Jacobson, W. S., Morse, R. S., & Sowa, J. E. (2016). How public service leadership is studied: An examination of a quarter century of scholarship. Public Administration, 94(1), 111–128. doi:10.1111/padm.12199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, R. J. (2015). Examining teamwork and leadership in the fields of public administration, leadership, and management. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 21(3/4), 199–216. doi:10.1108/TPM-07-2014-0037
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. A., & Kelder, J. (2019). Do we measure leadership effectively? Articulating and evaluating scale development psychometrics for best practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 133–144. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crede, M., Jong, J., & Harms, P. (2019). The generalizability of transformational leadership across cultures: A meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(3), 139–155. doi:10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2018). Why leadership of public leadership research matters: And what to do about it. Public Management Review, 20(9), 1265–1286. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1348731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, G. J. (2018). Connecting influence tactics with full-range leadership styles. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39, 2–13. doi:10.1108/LODJ-09-2016-0221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, D. V. (2014). The future of leadership: Challenges and prospects. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, G. S., & Rosenzweig, E. D. (2015). Team leader experience in improvement teams: A social networks perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 37(1), 13–30. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2015.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S., Cho, Y. J., & Perry, J. L. (2010). Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 308–323. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabris, G. T., & Giles, W. A. (1983). Improving productivity and performance appraisal through the use of non-economic incentives. Public Productivity Review, 7(2), 173–189. doi:10.2307/3380040
   Google Scholar
• Getha-Taylor, H., Holmes, M. H., Jacobson, W. S., Morse, R. S., & Sowa, J. E. (2011). Focusing the public leadership lens: Research propositions and questions in the Minnowbrook tradition. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21 (Supplement 1), i83–97. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq069
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, R. K., & Aguinis, H. (2017). Leadership behaviors and follower performance: Deductive and inductive examination of theoretical rationales and underlying mechanisms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(4), 558–591. doi:10.1002/job.2152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G., Rowold, J., & Heinitz, K. (2010). Issues in operationalizing and comparing leadership constructs. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 563–575. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., & Harms, P. D. (2008). Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(6), 669–692. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, S. (2013). The importance of role clarification in workgroups: Effects on perceived role clarity, work satisfaction, and turnover rates. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 716–725. doi:10.1111/puar.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. C., & Soonchul, L. S. (1992). Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Science, 38(6), 757–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N+ 1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 517–539. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller, N. J., DeChurch, L. A., Murase, T., & Doty, D. (2011). Searching for outcomes of leadership: A 25-year review. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1137–1177. doi:10.1177/0149206310393520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2008). An examination of “nonleadership”: From laissez-faire leadership to leader reward omission and punishment omission. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1234–1248. doi:10.1037/a0012875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. K., & Im, T. (2015). Challenges in building effective and competitive government in developing countries: An institutional logics perspective. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(3), 263–280. doi:10.1177/0275074013501856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529. doi:10.1177/0149206316665461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control and support for innovation: Key predictors of business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 891–902. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, C. B., & Andersen, L. B. (2015). Is leadership in the eye of the beholder? A study of intended and perceived leadership practices and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 829–841. doi:10.1111/puar.12380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, C. B., & Andersen, L. B. (2017). Leading public service organizations: How to obtain high employee self-efficacy and organizational performance. Public Management Review, 19(2), 253–273. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1153705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, U. T., Andersen, L. B., Bro, L. L., Bøllingtoft, A., Eriksen, T. L. M., Holten, A. L., … Westergård-Nielsen, N. (2019). Conceptualizing and measuring transformational and transactional leadership. Administration & Society, 51, 3–33. doi:10.1177/0095399716667157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, U. T., & Bro, L. L. (2018). How transformational leadership supports intrinsic motivation and public service motivation: The mediating role of basic need satisfaction. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), 535–549. doi:10.1177/0275074017699470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knies, E., Jacobsen, C. B., & Tummers, L. G. (2017). Leadership and organizational performance: State of the art and research agenda. In J. Storey, J. L. Denis, J. Hartley & P. Hart (Eds.), Routledge companion to leadership (pp. 404–418). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kurnia, S., Karnali, R. J., & Rahim, M. M. (2015). A qualitative study of business-to-business electronic commerce adoption within the Indonesian grocery industry: A multi-theory perspective. Information & Management, 52, 518–536. doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Carpenter, N. C. (2018). Seeing eye to eye: A meta-analysis of self-other agreement of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 253–275. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Tan, C. H., & Teo, H. H. (2012). Leadership characteristics and developers’ motivation in open source software development. Information & Management, 49(5), 257–267. doi:10.1016/j.im.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luu, T. T., Rowley, C., Dinh, C. K., Qian, D., & Le, H. Q. (2019). Team creativity in public healthcare organizations: The roles of charismatic leadership, team job crafting, and collective public service motivation. Public Performance & Management Review, 42, 1448–1480. doi:10.1080/15309576.2019.1595067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, G. (2012). The effect of response style bias on the measurement of transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(2), 271–298. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2010.550680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K., & Wright, B. E. (2012). Setting the table: How transformational leadership fosters performance information use. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 143–164. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., Wright, B. E., & Pandey, S. K. (2012). Working within constraints: Can transformational leaders alter the experience of red tape? International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 315–336. doi:10.1080/10967494.2012.725318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, T. W. H. (2017). Transformational leadership and performance outcomes: Analyses of multiple mediation pathways. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 385–417. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Oberfield, Z. W. (2014). Public management in time: A longitudinal examination of the full range of leadership theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 407–429. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oc, B. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 218–235. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oktaviani, F., Rooney, D., McKenna, B., & Zacher, H. (2016). Family, feudalism and selfishness: Looking at Indonesian leadership through a wisdom lens. Leadership, 12(5), 538–563. doi:10.1177/1742715015574319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasha, O., Poister, T.H., Wright, B.E., & Thomas, J.C. (2017). Transformational leadership and mission valence of employees: The varying effects by organizational level. Public Performance & Management Review, 40, 722–740. doi:10.1080/15309576.2017.1335220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, A. W., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2011). The effectiveness of teams in organizations: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(13), 2749–2769. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.573971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Cha, S. E. (2007). Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader’s behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1020–1030. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert, S. E., Sargent, L. D., Kraimer, M. L., & Kiazad, K. (2017). Linking developmental experiences to leaders effectiveness and promotability: The mediating role of leadership self-efficacy and mentor network. Personnel Psychology, 70(2), 357–397. doi:10.1111/peps.12145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvarajah, C., Meyer, D., Roostika, R., & Sukunesan, S. (2017). Exploring managerial leadership in Javanese (Indonesia) organisations: Engaging Asta Brata, the eight principals of Javanese statesmanship. Asia Pacific Business Review, 23(3), 373–395. doi:10.1080/13602381.2016.1213494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, J. A., DeGeest, D., & Li, A. (2016). Tackling the problem of construct proliferation: A guide to assessing the discriminant validity of conceptually related constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 80–110. doi:10.1177/1094428115598239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuffler, M. L., Burke, C. S., Kramer, W. S., & Salas, E. (2013). Leading teams: Past, present, and future perspectives. In M. G. Rumsey (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of leadership (pp. 144–166). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, Y., & Lee, E.-S. (2018). Perceived underqualification and job attitudes: The role of transformational leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(8), 962–974. doi:10.1108/LODJ-03-2018-0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivasubramaniam, N., Murry, W. D., Avolio, B. J., & Jung, D. I. (2002). A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 66–96. doi:10.1177/1059601102027001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M. S., & Hetland, H. (2007). The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(1), 80–92. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Individual empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465. doi:10.5465/256865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subandi, M. A. (2015). Bangkit: The processes of recovery from first episode psychosis in Java. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 39(4), 597–613. doi:10.1007/s11013-015-9427-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, R., & Henderson, A. C. (2017). Transformational leadership and organizational processes: Influencing public performance. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 554–565. doi:10.1111/puar.12654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Roberts, B. W., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2009). Different forces, same consequence: Conscientiousness and competence beliefs are independent predictors of academic effort and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1115–1128. doi:10.1037/a0017048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trottier, T., Van Wart, M., & Wang, X. (2008). Examining the nature and significance of leadership in government organizations. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 319–333. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00865.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., & Knies, E. (2016). Measuring public leadership: Developing scales for four key public leadership roles. Public Administration, 94(2), 433–451. doi:10.1111/padm.12224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60. doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.759433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D., & Kroll, A. (2019). Agreeing to disagree? Explaining self–other disagreement on leadership behaviour. Public Management Review, 21(12), 1867–1892. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1577910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group and Organization Management, 36, 223–270. doi:10.1177/1059601111401017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Van Iddekinge, C. H., Zhang, L., & Bishoff, J. (2019). Meta-analytic and primary investigations of the role of followers in ratings of leadership behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 70–106. doi:10.1037/apl0000345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woehr, D. J., Loignon, A. C., Schmidt, P. B., Loughry, M. L., & Ohland, M. W. (2015). Justifying aggregation with consensus-based constructs: A review and examination of cutoff values for common aggregation indices. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 704–737. doi:10.1177/1094428115582090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S. I., & Giessner, S. R. (2018). The thin line between empowering and laissez-faire leadership: An expectancy-match perspective. Journal of Management, 44(2), 757–783. doi:10.1177/0149206315574597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E., Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2012). Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 206–215. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02496.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaakobi, E., & Weisberg, J. (2018). Individual, group and organizational efficacies in predicting performance. Personnel Review, 47(2), 535–554. doi:10.1108/PR-08-2016-0212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, I. (2015). Positive effects of laissez-faire leadership: Conceptual exploration. Journal of Management Development, 34(10), 1246–1261. doi:10.1108/JMD-02-2015-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S. J., Green, J. P., Dubrow, S., & Kolze, M. (2018). Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 2–43. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareen, M., Razzaq, K., & Mujtaba, B.G. (2015). Impact of transactional, transformational, and laissez-faire leadership styles on motivation: A quantitative study of banking employees in Pakistan. Public Organization Review, 15(4), 531–549. doi:10.1007/s11115-014-0287-6
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. Q., & Chen, H. G. (2016). Empowering leadership in R & D teams: A closer look at its components, process, and outcomes. R & D Management, 46, 726–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar