References
- Ammons, D. (2017). Leading Performance Management in Local Government. ICMA.
- Ammons, D., & Roenigk, D. (2015). Performance management in local government: Is practice influenced by doctrine? Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 514–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1006461
- Berman, E. (2007). Performance and productivity in public and nonprofit organizations. Routledge.
- Berman, E., Sabharwal, M., Wang, C.-Y., West, J., Jing, Y., Jan, C.-Y., Liu, W., Brillantes, A., Chen, C.-A., & Gomes, R. (2013). The impact of societal culture on the use of performance management practices in East Asia: Evidence from a comparative survey. Public Management Review, 15(8), 1065–1089.
- Berman, E., & Wang, X. (2000). Performance measurement in U.S. Counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00104
- Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2007). Managing performance: International comparisons. Routledge.
- Burns, J. P., & Zhou, Z. (2010). Performance management in the government of the People’s Republic of China: Accountability and control in the implementation of public policy. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 10(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-10-5km7h1rvtlnq
- Caruson, K., & MacManus, S. (2006). Mandates and management challenges in the trenches: An intergovernmental perspective on homeland security. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00613.x
- Charbit, C. (2011). Governance of public policies in decentralised contexts: The multi-level approach (OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2011/04). OECD Publishing.
- Cigler, B. (2011). Neglected aspects of intergovernmental relations and federalism. In Menzel, D. C. & White, H. L. (Eds.), The state of public administration: Issues, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 316–334). ME Sharpe.
- Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
- Gao, J. (2009). Governing by goals and numbers: A case study in the use of performance measurement to build state capacity in China. Public Administration and Development, 29(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.514
- Gårseth-Nesbakk, L., & Kjaerland, F. (2016). Management of financial resources in municipalities-the significance of size and alternative regulatory responses to a financial crisis. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 2(4), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2016.10000581
- George, B., & Pandey, S. K. (2017). We know the Yin—But where is the Yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17698189
- Grubnic, S., & Woods, M. (2009). Hierarchical control and performance regimes in local government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22(5), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550910972527
- Guess, G. M. (2018). Building democracy and international governance. Routledge.
- Hair, J. F., Jr, Hult, G., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
- Hall, J. L. (2017). Performance management: Confronting the challenges for local government. Public Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 43–66.
- Helmuth, U. (2010). Better performance with performance budgeting? Analyzing cases of success and failure in public administrations. International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 408–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2010.524833
- Ho, A. (2006). Accounting for the value of performance measurement from the perspective of Midwestern mayors. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui046
- Holzer, M., Ballard, A., Kim, M., Peng, S., & Deat, F. (2019). Obstacles and opportunities for sustaining performance management systems. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), 132–143.
- Hood, C. (2006). Gaming in Targetworld: The targets approach to managing British public services. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 515–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00612.x
- Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2013). A model of cost‐cutting in government? The great management revolution in UK central government reconsidered. Public Administration, 91(1), 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02072.x
- Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.
- Junanto, D. (2018). The use of performance information in the Indonesian public sector: The role of rational/technocratic and political/cultural frameworks [Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham]. University of Birmingham Research Archive. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/8305/2/Junanto18PhD.pdf
- Jurnali, T., & Siti-Nabiha, A. K. (2015). Performance management system for local government: The Indonesian experience. Global Business Review, 16(3), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915569923
- Kettl, D. (2015). From intergovernmental to intersectoral. In M. Guy & M. Rubin (Eds.), Public administration evolving: From foundations to the future (pp. 18–37). Routledge.
- Kincaid, J., & Stenberg, C. W. (2011). Introduction to the Symposium on Intergovernmental Management and ACIR beyond 50: Implications for institutional development and research. Public Administration Review, 71(2), 158–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02324.x
- Koike, O. (2013). Institutionalizing performance management in Asia: Looking East or West? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(5), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2013-0066
- Kroll, A. (2015a). Drivers of performance information use: Systematic literature review and directions for future research. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1006469
- Kroll, A. (2015b). Exploring the link between performance information use and organizational performance: A contingency approach. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1071159
- Kroll, A., & Moynihan, D. P. (2018). The design and practice of integrating evidence: Connecting performance management with program evaluation. Public Administration Review, 78(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12865
- Marsh, I., Crowley, K., Grube, D., & Eccleston, R. (2017). Delivering public services: Locality, learning and reciprocity in place based practice. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12230
- MENPAN. (2015a). SAKIP evaluation guidelines (Ministry of Administrative Reform (MENPAN) Regulation No 12, Year 2015). Deputy of Bureaucratic Reform and Accountability.
- MENPAN. (2015b). Deputy presentation: How to improve effectivity and efficiency in bureaucracy technology (Internal document). Deputy of Bureaucratic Reform and Accountability.
- MENPAN. (2017a). SAKIP evaluation guidelines (Internal document). Deputy of Bureaucratic Reform and Accountability.
- MENPAN. (2017b). SAKIP technical assistance and evaluation: Introduction of performance management and SAKIP (Internal document). Deputy of Bureaucratic Reform and Accountability.
- MENPAN. (2017c). SAKIP technical assistance and evaluation: Cascading, action plan, and use of information and technology (Internal document). Deputy of Bureaucratic Reform and Accountability.
- MENPAN. (2018a). National report on the evaluation results of government agency performance accountability system. Deputy of Bureaucratic Reform and Accountability.
- MENPAN. (2018b). Standard operating procedure of SAKIP technical assistance and evaluation (Internal document). Deputy of Bureaucratic Reform and Accountability.
- MENPAN Regulation 29/2010. (2010). Guidelines for Government Performance Accountability Report. Indonesia Ministry of Administrative Reform, Deputy of Bureacratic Reform and Accountability (Jakarta, Indonesia).
- Milward, B., Jensen, L., Roberts, A., Dussauge-Laguna, M. I., Junjan, V., Torenvlied, R., Boin, A., Colebatch, H. K., Kettl, D., & Durant, R. (2016). Is public management neglecting the state? Governance, 29(3), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12201
- Moynihan, D. (2010). The promises and paradoxes of performance‐based bureaucracy. In: R. Durant (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy (pp. 279–302). Oxford University Press.
- Moynihan, D. P. (2005). Goal‐based learning and the future of performance management. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00445.x
- Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Georgetown University Press.
- Moynihan, D., & Lavertu, S. (2012). Does involvement in performance management routines encourage performance information use? Evaluating GPRA and PART. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02539.x
- Newcomer, K., & Caudle, S. (2011). Public performance management systems: Embedding practices for improved success. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(1), 108–132. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576350106
- NPMAC. (2010). A Performance Management Framework for State and Local Government: From Measurement and Reporting to Management and Improving. National Performance Management Advisory Commission.
- Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120–1149. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.3.1120
- OECD. (2009). Governing regional development policy: The use of performance indicators, OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2013). OECD environmental performance reviews: South Africa 2013. OECD Publishing.
- Olvera, J., & Avellaneda, C. (2017). Performance management in public administration. In W. Thompson & J. Capelos (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.263
- Ongaro, E., Massey, A., Holzer, M., & Wayenberg, E. (Eds.). (2011). Policy, Performance and Management in Governance and Intergovernmental Relations. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Pasha, O. (2018). Can performance management best practices help reduce crime? Public Administration Review, 78(2), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12856
- Poister, T. H. (2003). Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organization. Jossey-Bass.
- Pollanen, R. M. (2014). Performance measurement and control systems evidence from Canadian organizations. International Journal of Business, Accounting, & Finance, 8(1), 79–97.
- Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford University Press.
- Posner, P. (2009). Mandates: The politics of coercive federalism. In T. J. Conlan, P. L. Posner, & A. M. Rivlin (Eds.), Intergovernmental management for the 21st century. Brookings Institution Press.
- Presidential Decree 29/2014. (2014). Government performance accountability system. Ministry of Law and Human Rights, Republic of Indonesia, (Jakarta, Indonesia).
- Radin, B. (2009). Performance management and intergovernmental relations. In T. J. Conlan, P. L. Posner, & A. M. Rivlin (Eds.), Intergovernmental management for the 21st century. Brookings Institution Press.
- Rhodes, L. M., Biondi, L., Gomes, R., Melo, A. I., Ohemeng, F., Perez-Lopez, G., Rossi, A., & Sutiyono, W. (2012). Current state of public sector performance management in seven selected countries. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(3), 235–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211205632
- Richter, N. F., Cepeda, G., Roldán, J. L., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): Editorial. European Management Journal, 34(6), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.001
- Sabel, C. F., & Simon, W. H. (2011). Minimalism and experimentalism in the administrative state. SSRN Electronic Journal, 100, 53.
- Schatteman, A. (2010). The state of Ontario’s municipal performance reports: A critical analysis. Canadian Public Administration, 53(4), 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2010.00137.x
- Siddiquee, N. (2010). Managing for results: Lessons from public management reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(1), 38–53.
- Sitorus, R. L. (2017). The relationship between adopting and utilizing a centralistic management control system in Indonesian local government: Impacts on organisational learning [Doctoral dissertation, Curtin University]. Curtin’s Institutional Repository. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/handle/20.500.11937/70512
- Sofyani, H., Akbar, R., & Ferrer, R. C. (2018). 20 years of Performance Measurement System (PMS) implementation in Indonesian local governments: Why is their performance still poor? Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 11(1), 151–227. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol11no1.6
- Song, C., & Lee, J. (2016). Citizens’ use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798
- Stefan, O. A. (2016). Soft law and the enforcement of EU Law. In A. Jakab & D. Kochenov (Eds.), The enforcement of EU law and values: Ensuring member states’ compliance. Oxford University Press.
- Taylor, J. (2011). Factors influencing the use of performance information for decision making in Australian state agencies. Public Administration, 89(4), 1316–1334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02008.x
- Taylor-Powell, E., & Henert, E. (2008). Developing a logic model: Teaching and training guide. University of Wisconsin System. https://cyfar.org/sites/default/files/lmguidecomplete.pdf
- Telabah, I., Hermanto, H., & Handajani, L. (2018). Implementation of performance accountability system for government institution (SAKIP): Determinants and consequence in local government. International Business and Accounting Research Journal, 2(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.15294/ibarj.v2i2.36
- Thahar, M. (2016). Performance measurement evolution and accountability in Indonesian regional governments [Maser’s thesis: RMIT University]. Reserachbank repository. https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/eserv/rmit:161639/Thahar.pdf
- Thomas, P. G. (2006). Performance measurement, reporting, obstacles and accountability: Recent trends and future directions. ANU Press
- Tribun News. (2018, January 26). Commitment of leaders in improving performance accountability of 62 districts/cities with predicate B. TribunNews. http://www.tribunnews.com/regional/2018/01/26/komitmen-pimpinan-daerah-dalam-perbaikan-akuntabilitas-kinerja-62-kabupatenkota-dengan-predikat-b?page=all
- Tribun News. (2019, January 19). Becoming the best SAKIP outside of Java Island, Sumsel received Rp 12 billion incentive fund. TribunNews. http://palembang.tribunnews.com/2019/01/19/menjadi-sakip-terbaik-di-luar-pulau-jawa-sumsel-diganjar-dana-insentif-rp-12-miliar
- Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector. Routledge.
- Walker, R. M., & Andrews, R. (2015). Local government management and performance: A review of evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 101–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut038
- Weissert, C. S., & Jones, D. B. (2015). Devolution paradox and the US South. Regional & Federal Studies, 25(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2015.1054281
- Wiggins, A., & Tymms, P. (2002). Dysfunctional effects of league tables: A comparison between English and Scottish primary schools. Public Money and Management, 22(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00295
- Wynen, J., & Verhoest, K. (2016). Internal performance-based steering in public sector organizations: Examining the effect of organizational autonomy and external result control. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(3), 535–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1137769
- Yang, K., & Hsieh, J. (2007). Managerial effectiveness of government performance measurement: Testing a middle-range model. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 861–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00774.x
- Yesika, D., & Solehudin, I. (2019, January 28). Through SAKIP, the Government Successfully Prevents Waste and Fake Programs. JawaPos. https://www.jawapos.com/nasional/28/01/2019/lewat-sakip-pemerintah-sukses-cegah-pemborosan-dan-program-siluman.
- Government of Yogyakarta Province. (2017). Meretas jalan menuju tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik: Quo vadis reformasi birokrasi. (Paving the way to good governance: Bureaucratic reform) Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (Yogyakarta, Indonesia).