The Impact of Responsibility Delegation on Policy and Practice Implementation: A Contingency Approach

References

• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2007). Centralization, organizational strategy, and public service performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Scott, P. (1996). Bureaucratic red tape and formalization: Untangling conceptual knots. The American Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409602600101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretschneider, S., & Parker, M. (2016). Organization formalization, sector and social media: Does increased standardization of policy broaden and deepen social media use in organizations? Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudoir, S. R., Dugan, A. G., & Barr, C. H. I. (2013). Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: A systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implementation Science, 8(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggburn, J. D. (2004). Achieving managerial values through green procurement. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(2), 236–258.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, K., & Sheikh, A. (2013). Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: An interpretative review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(5), e73–e86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. L. (1996). Policy implementation: The organizational challenge. World Development, 24(9), 1403–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00050-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossan, M., & Hulland, J. (2002). Leveraging knowledge through leadership of organizational learning. Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, 79(1), 711–723.
   Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management, 34(3), 555–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeon, P., & DeLeon, L. (2002). What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 467–492. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisinga, R., Grotenhuis, M. T., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale. International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooqi, S., & Forbes, T. (2020). Enacted discretion: Policy implementation, local government reform and education services in Pakistan. Public Management Review, 22(8), 1217–1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1630134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favero, N., & Bullock, J. B. (2015). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidler, L. A., & Johnson, J. D. (1984). Communication and Innovation Implementation. Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallais, B., Gagnon, C., Forgues, G., Côté, I., & Laberge, L. (2017). Further evidence for the reliability and validity of the Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness Scale. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 375, 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2017.01.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, V., & Goslar, M. D. (1993). The initiation, adoption, and implementation of telecommunications technologies in US organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1993.11517994
   Google Scholar
• Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. H. (1968). Professionalization and bureaucratization. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 92-104. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. H., Johnson, N. J., & Haas, J. E. (1967). Organizational size, complexity, and formalization. American Sociological Review, 32(6), 903–912. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfrich, C. D., Weiner, B. J., McKinney, M. M., & Minasian, L. (2007). Determinants of implementation effectiveness: Adapting a framework for complex innovations. Medical Care Research and Review, 64(3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558707299887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel, P. S., Zhang, Z. X., & Han, Y. (2012). Team empowerment and the organizational context: Decentralization and the contrasting effects of formalization. Journal of Management, 38(2), 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309342891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/256876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh, L., Bretschneider, S., Stritch, J. M., & Darnall, N. (2020). Implementation of sustainable public procurement in local governments: A measurement approach. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6/7), 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2019-0233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Q., Dinev, T., Hart, P., & Cooke, D. (2012). Managing employee compliance with information security policies: The critical role of top management and organizational culture. Decision Sciences, 43(4), 615–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2012.00361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, D., & Jeffrey, P. (2006). A review of residential demand-side management tool performance and influences on implementation effectiveness. Urban Water Journal, 3(3), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620600961288
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, W., Borry, E. L., & DeHart-Davis, L. (2019). More than pathological formalization: Understanding organizational structure and red tape. Public Administration Review, 79(2), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, W., & Feeney, M. K. (2012). Objective formalization, perceived formalization and perceived red tape: Sorting out concepts. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1195–1214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.662447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A. R., & Khandaker, S. (2016). A critical insight into policy implementation and implementation performance. Public Policy and Administration, 15(4), 538–548. https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-16-15-4-02
   Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Knight, A. P. (2005). Innovation implementation: Overcoming the challenge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9704071863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. W., & Kim, S. E. (2012). Searching for a strategic fit. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D. (2011). Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Managing Knowledge Assets, Creativity and Innovation, 17, 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814295505_0019
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. The Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Love, J. H., Roper, S., & Vahter, P. (2014). Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 35(11), 1703–1716. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J., & Winter, S. C. (2009). Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, D., & Sabatier, P. (1989). Implementation and public policy (rev. ed.). University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2013). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 429–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, S. T. (2001). Employee empowerment: An integrative psychological approach. Applied Psychology, 50(1), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergel, I., & Bretschneider, S. I. (2013). A three-stage adoption process for social media use in government. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546–562. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1978.4305755
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mischen, P. A. (2006). Intraorganizational implementation research: Theory and method. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 553–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (2019). It all depends, but on what? Testing contingency in public strategic implementation. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(4), 783–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1523063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J., & Bretschneiber, S. (2002). Does the perception of red tape constrain IT innovativeness in organizations? Unexpected results from a simultaneous equation model and implications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, C., & Charnley, S. (2014). Understanding micro-processes of institutionalization: Stewardship contracting and national forest management. Policy Sciences, 47(1), 69–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9190-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, F., Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Kolev, J., & Stern, S. (2016). Of mice and academics: Examining the effect of openness on innovation. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(1), 212–252. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A., Hii, J. (1998). Innovation and business performance: A literature review. The Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge, 0–65. http://89.249.21.76/data/696/521/1221/litreview_innov1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., & Scott, P. G. (2002). Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts and measures. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. (2000). Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 263–288.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., Lee, K. H., & Kim, P. S. (2016). Participative management and perceived organizational performance: The moderating effects of innovative organizational culture. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1108773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., & Rueter, H. H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 484-510. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Macdonald, K. M., Turner, C., & Lupton, T. (1963). A Conceptual scheme for organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8(3), 289-315. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonhoven, C. B. (1981). Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency “theory”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 349–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. B. (1973). The policy implementation process. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smollan, R. K. (2015). The personal costs of organizational change: A qualitative study. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(1), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1071174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stritch, J. M., Bretschneider, S., Darnall, N., Hsueh, L., & Chen, Y. (2020). Sustainability policy objectives, centralized decision making, and efficiency in public procurement processes in US local governments. Sustainability, 12(17), 6934–6917. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., & Viale, T. (2011). Professionals and field-level change: Institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59(4), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111402586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai, K. V., & Grimm, R. (2000). Government procurement: Past and current developments. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 12(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-12-02-2000-B003
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosi, H. L., & Slocum, J. W. (1984). Contingency theory: Some suggested directions. Journal of Management, 10(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638401000103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., Ganco, M., & Hinings, C. R. (B. ). (2013). Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 393–440. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.774981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, D. S., & Horn, C. E. V. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2002388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigoda, E. (2003). New public management. Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 2, 812–816. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996362
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., & Andrews, R. (2015). Local government management and performance: A review of evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 101–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, E. W., & Pandey, S. K. (2008). E-government and bureaucracy: Toward a better understanding of intranet implementation and its effect on red tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, A. L. (2011). Assessing the core and dimensional approaches: Human resource management in public, private, and charter schools. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(2), 251–280. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576350202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. B., & Choi, S. O. (2009). Employee empowerment and team performance. Team Performance Management: An International Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Zeithaml, V. A., Varadarajan, P. R., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1988). The contingency approach: Its foundations and relevance to theory building and research in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 22(7), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmud, R. W. (1982). Diffusion of modern software practices: Influence of centralization and formalization. Management Science, 28(12), 1421–1431. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.28.12.1421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar