References
- Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better. Oxford University Press.
- Cousins, J. B., & Shulha, L. M. (2006). A comparative analysis of evaluation utilization and its cognate fields. In I. F. Staw, M. M. Mark, & J. Greene (Eds.), International handbook of evaluation (pp. 266–291). Sage.
- Dahler-Larsen, P. (forthcoming). The practical utility of mixed methods. An empirical study.
- Dahler-Larsen, P., & Sundby, A. (2019). Arbejdspladsvurderinger [Workplace assessments]. University of Southern Denmark Press.
- de Kool, D. (2008). Rational, political and cultural uses of performance monitors: The case of Dutch urban policy. In W. van Dooren & S. Van de Walle (Eds.), Performance information in the public sector. How it is used. Springer.
- Espeland, W., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/517897
- Ferraris, M. (2013). Documentality. Fordham University Press.
- Ferraris, M., & Torrengo, G. (2014). Documentality: A theory of social reality. In P. Bojanić, E. Casetta & G. Torrengo (Eds.), Social objects from intentionality to documentality. E-publication. https://journals.openedition.org/estetica/629.
- Henry, G., & Mark, M. (2003). Beyond use: Understanding evaluation’s influence on attitudes and actions. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 293–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400302
- Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage.
- Hull, M. S. (2012). Documents and bureaucracy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 251–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104953
- James, O., & van Ryzin, G. (2017). Motivated reasoning about public performance: An experimental study of how citizens judge the Affordable Care Act. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 197–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw049
- Korac, S., Saliterer, I., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2020). Contrasting and explaining purposeful and legitimizing uses of performance information: A mayor’s perspective. Public Management Review, 22(4), 553–577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1599059
- Kroll, A. (2015). Drivers of performance information use: Systematic literature review and directions for future research. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 459–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1006469
- Ledermann, S. (2012). Exploring the necessary conditions for evaluation use in program change. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011411573
- LO [The National Organization of Trade Unions]. (2018). Arbejdsmiljørepraesentantens vilkår [The Conditions for Occupational Health and Safety Representatives].
- March, J., & Feldman, M. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2392467
- March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Universitetsforlaget.
- Mathison, S. (2011). Internal Evaluation, Historically Speaking. New Directions for Evaluation, 2011(132), 13–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.393
- Micheli, P., & Mari, L. (2014). The theory and practice of performance measurement. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.005
- Micheli, P., & Pavlov, A. (2020). What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations. Public Administration, 98(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12382
- Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. SAGE.
- Mouritzen, P. E., Opstrup, N., & Pedersen, P. B. (2018). En fremmed kommer til byen, ti år med den bibliometriske forskningsindikator. University Press of Southern Denmark.
- Moynihan, D. P. (2008). Advocacy and learning: An interactive-dialogue approach to performance information use. In W. van Dooren & S. Van de Walle (Eds.), Performance information in the public sector. Governance and Public Management Series. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Moynihan, D. P. (2009). Through a glass, darkly: Understanding the effects of performance regimes. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(4), 592–603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576320409
- Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq004
- Nielsen, K. (2000). Organization theories implicit in various approaches to OHS management. In K. Frick, P. L. Jensen, M. Quinlan, & T. Wilthagen (Eds.), Systematic occupational health and safety management: Perspectives on an international development (pp. 99–124). Pergamon Press.
- Nielsen, K., & Randall, R. (2013). Opening the black box: Presenting a model for evaluating organizational-level interventions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(5), 601–617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.690556
- Nitzl, C., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2019). Exploring the links between different performance information uses, NPM cultural orientation, and organizational performance in the public sector. Public Management Review, 21(5), 686–710. ‒https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1508609
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
- Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press.
- Power, M. (2021). Modelling the microfoundations of the audit society: Organizations and the logic of the audit trail. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 6–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0212
- Preskill, H., & Torres, R. T. (1999). Evaluative inquiry for learning in organization. SAGE.
- Prewitt, K., Schwandt, T., & Straf, M. (2012). Using science as evidence in public policy. National Academies Press.
- Robson, L. S., Clarke, J. A., Cullen, K. L., Bielecky, A., Severin, C., Bigelow, P. L., Irvin, E., Culyer, A. J., & Mahood, Q. (2007). The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: A systematic review. Safety Science, 45(3), 329–353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.003
- Schwandt, T. A. (2015). Evaluation foundations revisited: Cultivating a life of the mind for practice. Stanford University Press.
- Shulha, L. M., & Cousins, J. B. (1997). Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice since 1986. Evaluation Practice, 18(1), 195–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90027-1
- Speklé, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2014). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004
- Taylor, J. (2011). Factors influencing the use of performance information for decision making in Australian State Agencies. Public Administration, 89(4), 1316–1334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02008.x
- The National Research Center for the Working Environment [Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Arbejdsmiljø]. (2018). Belastningsindeks for psykisk arbejdsmiljø og muskel-skeletbesvaer. Arbejdsmiljø og Helbred i Danmark. http://nfa.dk/da/Arbejdsmiljoedata/Arbejdsmiljo-i-Danmark/Arbejdsmiljo-og-helbred-i-Danmark.
- Vedung, E. (1997). Public policy and program evaluation. Transaction.
- Weiss, C. H. (1983). Evaluation research in the political context. In E. L. Struering & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research (pp. 31–45). SAGE.
- Weiss, C. H., Murphy-Graham, E., & Birkeland, S. (2005). An alternate route to policy influence: How evaluations affect D. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214004273337