Disclosing Public Values: Citizens’ Perspectives Based on Group Model Building

References

• Alford, J., & O'Flynn, J. (2009). Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 171–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732731.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, D. (2017). The conduct of intelligence in UN peacekeeping missions: A view from the field. Unpublished UN-report.
   Google Scholar
• Barlas, Y. (2007). System dynamics: Systemic feedback modeling for policy analysis. System, 1(59), 1-68.
   Google Scholar
• Benington, J., & Moore, M. H. (2011). Public value: Theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Black, L. J., & Andersen, D. F. (2012). Using visual representations as boundary objects to resolve conflict in collaborative model-building approaches. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(2), 194–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2002). Public‐value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2019). Public values: Citizens’ perspective. Public Management Review, 21(6), 817–838. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1529878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehmer, B. (2005). The dynamic OODA loop: Amalgamating Boyd’s OODA loop and the cybernetic approach to command and control. Proceedings of the 10th International Command and Control Research Technology Symposium (pp. 365–368).
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. R., & Head, B. W. (2019). Navigating tensions in co‐production: A missing link in leadership for public value. Public Administration, 97(2), 250–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. (1983). O.R. and the systems movement: Mappings and conflicts. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34(8), 661–675. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1983.160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchman, C. W. (1974). Philosophical speculations on systems design. Omega, 2(4), 451–465. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(74)90062-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, A., & Soss, J. (2014). Neoliberalism for the common good? Public value governance and the downsizing of democracy. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 496–504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. (2011). Challenging governance theory: From networks to hegemony. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. K., & Ford, D. N. (1999). Mental models concepts revisited: Some clarifications and a reply to Lane. System Dynamics Review, 14(4), 411–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, N., & Kaufman, S. (2018). Avoiding theoretical stagnation: A systematic review and framework for measuring public value. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fledderus, J., Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2014). Restoring trust through the co-production of public services: A theoretical elaboration. Public Management Review, 16(3), 424–443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.848920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukumoto, E., & Bozeman, B. (2019). Public values theory: What is missing? The American Review of Public Administration, 49(6), 635–648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018814244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L. (2012). Punching clouds: An introduction ot the complexity of public decision-making. Emergent Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2002). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, E., Spencer, B., Kent, J., Clawson, J., Meerkatt, H., & Larsson, S. (2014). The Value-Based Hospital. A transformation agenda for health care providers (Value based hospitals, pp. 1–28). The Boston Consulting Group.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, M. C., & Selten, R. (2009). Data collection methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Rand National Defense Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Huijbregts, R., George, B., & Bekkers, V. (2021). Public values assessment as a practice: Integration of evidence and research agenda. Public Management Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1867227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707300703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, T. B., & Rutgers, M. R. (2015). Public values: Core or confusion? Introduction to the centrality and puzzlement of public values research. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014545781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koliba, C. J., Meek, J. W., Zia, A., & Mills, R. W. (2018). Governance networks in public administration and public policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCardle-Keurentjes, M. H., Rouwette, E. A., Vennix, J. A., & Jacobs, E. (2018). Potential benefits of model use in group model building: Insights from an experimental investigation. System Dynamics Review, 34(1–2), 354–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: What is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732632.
   Google Scholar
• Meynhardt, T. (2015). Public Value: Turning a conceptual framework into a scorecard. In J. M. Bryson, B. Crosby & L. Bloomberg (Eds.), Public value and public administration (pp. 147–169). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (2000). Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit, and governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1_suppl), 183–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291S009.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. (2011). Effective supply and demand and the measurement of public and social value. (pp. 212–224). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. (2011). Exploring the public values universe: Understanding values in public administration. Public Management Research Conference Maxwell School.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. (2012). Putting the “public” back in public values research: designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 699–708. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02544.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00545.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2018). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: Are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, W. (2002). From muddling through to muddling up—evidence based policy making and the modernisation of British government. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 43–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670201700304/
   Google Scholar
• Polese, F., Troisi, O., Carrubbo, L., & Grimaldi, M. (2018). An integrated framework toward public system governance: Insights from viable systems approach. In A. B. Savignon, L. Gnan, A. Hinna, & F. Monteduro (Eds.), Cross-sectoral relations in the delivery of public services (Vol. 6, pp. 23–51). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W., & Wanna, J. (2007). The limits to public value, or rescuing responsible government from the platonic guardians. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(4), 406–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00553.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouwette, E. A., Korzilius, H., Vennix, J. A., & Jacobs, E. (2011). Modeling as persuasion: The impact of group model building on attitudes and behavior. System Dynamics Review, 27(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. (2015). As good as it gets? On the meaning of public value in the study of policy and management. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014525833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlan, C. L. (2020). Preparing for the unanticipated: Challenges in conducting semi-structured, in-depth interviews. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. J., Cavana, R. Y., & Cameron, D. (2016). Mechanisms for understanding mental model change in group model building. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33(1), 100–118.
   Google Scholar
• Spano, A. (2009). Public value creation and management control systems. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 328–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732848.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics-systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Strathoff, T. P. (2016). Strategic perspectives on public value. Difo-Druck GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Thiering, M. (2014). Spatial semiotics and spatial mental models: Figure-ground asymmetries in language (Vol. 27). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
   Google Scholar
• Vaandrager, D. (2020). A systems approach to exploring institutional absorptive capacity and adaptability. Emergence Complexity and Organization (accepted).
   Google Scholar
• Vaandrager, D., Gerrits, L., & Bressers, N. (2015). Reconstructing the blue connection: A systemic inquiry into the improbable project of building a new river through a (sub)urban area: reconstructing the blue connection. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(6), 689–706. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., Nabatchi, T., & de Graaf, G. (2015). From galaxies to universe: A cross-disciplinary review and analysis of public values publications from 1969 to 2012. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013488822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ooijen, C., Ubaldi, B., & Welby, B. (2019). A data-driven public sector: Enabling the strategic use of data for productive, inclusive and trustworthy governance. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No. 33.
   Google Scholar
• Vennix, J. A. M. (1996). Group model building: Facilitating team learning using system dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. (2007). Governance, complexity, and democratic participation: How citizens and public officials harness the complexities of neighborhood decline. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), 17–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074006296208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, J. P. & Litchfield, K. (2015). Investigating the benefits of group model building using system dynamics for engineers without borders students. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 26–1039). American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, S. C., Vickers, B., Bernard, H. R., Blackburn, A. M., Borgatti, S., Gravlee, C. C., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PLoS One, 13(6), e0198606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar