References
- Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Performance management in the public sector: The ultimate challenge. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12049
- Bar-Eli, M., Azar, O. H., Ritov, I., Keidar-Levin, Y., & Schein, G. (2007). Action bias among elite soccer goalkeepers: The case of penalty kicks. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(5), 606–621. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.12.001
- Behn, R. D. (1998). The new public management paradigm and the search for democratic accountability. International Public Management Journal, 1(2), 131–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(99)80088-9
- Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Brookings Institution Press.
- Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00322
- Bovens, M. (2005). Public accountability. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (pp. 182–208). Oxford University Press.
- Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
- Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Goodin, R. E. (2014). Public accountability. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press.
- Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., & Petrovsky, N. (2009). Democracy and government performance: Holding incumbents accountable in English local governments. The Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1273–1284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990089
- Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., & Petrovsky, N. (2012). Party control, party competition and public service performance. British Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 641–660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000482
- Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2015). Performance and accountability—A theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment. Public Organization Review, 15(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0267-2
- Christensen, T., Laegreid, P., & Roness, P. G. (2002). Increasing parliamentary control of the executive? New instruments and emerging effects. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 8(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/714003902
- Christensen, T., Lie, A., & Laegreid, P. (2008). Beyond new public management: Agencification and regulatory reform in Norway. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00441.x
- Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall.
- Dague, L., & Lahey, J. N. (2019). Causal inference methods: Lessons from applied microeconomics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 511–529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy067
- Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. SAGE.
- Dubnick, M. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance and Management Review, 28(3), 376–417.
- Dubnick, M., & Yang, K. (2011). The pursuit of accountability: Promise, problems, and prospects. In D. Menzel & H. White (Eds.), The state of public administration: Issues, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 171–186). M.E. Sharpe.
- Franklin, M. N., Soroka, S., & Wlezien, C. (2014). Elections. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 389–404). Oxford University Press.
- Frederickson, H. G. (1996). Comparing the reinventing government movement with the new public administration. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 263–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/976450
- Frey, B. S., & Schneider, F. (1978). An empirical study of politico-economic interaction in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 60(2), 174–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1924970
- Greve, H. R. (1998). Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 58–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2393591
- Han, Y. (2020). The impact of accountability deficit on agency performance: Performance–accountability regime. Public Management Review, 22(6), 927–948. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1679237
- Han, Y., & Hong, S. (2019). The impact of accountability on organizational performance in the US federal government: The moderating role of autonomy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16682816
- Holm, J. M. (2017). Double standards? How historical and political aspiration levels guide managerial performance information use. Public Administration, 95(4), 1026–1040. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12379
- Hong, S. (2017). What are the areas of competence for central and local governments? Accountability mechanisms in multi-level governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 120–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw048
- Hong, S. (2019). A behavioral model of public organizations: Bounded rationality, performance feedback, and negativity bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy048
- Hong, S. (2020). Performance management meets red tape: Bounded rationality, negativity bias, and resource dependence. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 932–945. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13213
- Hong, S., & Kim, Y. (2019). Loyalty or competence: Political use of performance information and negativity bias. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 829–840. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13108
- Hong, S., Kim, S. H., & Son, J. (2020). Bounded rationality, blame avoidance, and political accountability: how performance information influences management quality. Public Management Review, 22(8), 1240–1263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1630138
- Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
- Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
- Hood, C. (2007). What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? Public Management Review, 9(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701340275
- Iyer, D. N., & Miller, K. D. (2008). Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 808–822.
- James, O. (2011a). Managing citizens’ expectations of public service performance: Evidence from observation and experimentation in local government. Public Administration, 89(4), 1419–1435. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01962.x
- James, O. (2011b). Performance measures and democracy: Information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq057
- James, O., & John, P. (2006). Public management at the ballot box: Performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 567–580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul020
- Jung, C. S. (2013). Navigating a rough terrain of public management: Examining the relationship between organizational size and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(3), 663–686. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus040
- Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry. (n.d.). Economic activity-friendliness map. http://bizmap.korcham.net/
- Laegreid, P. (2014). Accountability and new public management. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 324–338). Oxford University Press.
- Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.281
- Lee, J. W., & Kim, S. E. (2012). Searching for a strategic fit: an empirical analysis of the conditions for performance management implementation in US federal agencies. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360102
- Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
- Ma, L. (2016). Performance feedback, government goal-setting and aspiration level adaptation: Evidence from Chinese provinces. Public Administration, 94(2), 452–471. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12225
- Meier, K. J., Favero, N., & Zhu, L. (2015). Performance gaps and managerial decisions: A Bayesian decision theory of managerial action. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1221–1246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu054
- Meijer, A. J., & Bovens, M. (2005). Public accountability in the information age. In V. Bekkers & V. Homburg (Eds.), The information ecology of e-government: E-government as institutional and technological innovation in public administration (pp. 171–182). IOS Press.
- Min, B. H., & Oh, Y. (2020). How do performance gaps affect improvement in organizational performance? Exploring the mediating roles of proactive activities. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(4), 766–789. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1713826
- Ministry of Security and Public Administration Press Release (2014, September 4). Promote regulatory reform of local governments through beautiful competition among local governments. https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/bbs/type010/commonSelectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000008andnttId=43473
- Moon, M. J. (2020). Shifting from old open government to new open government: Four critical dimensions and case illustrations. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 535–559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1691024
- Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Georgetown University Press.
- Moynihan, D. P., & Hawes, D. P. (2012). Responsiveness to reform values: The influence of the environment on performance information use. Public Administration Review, 72(S1), S95–S105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02653.x
- Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq004
- Mulgan, R. (2000). ‘Accountability’: An ever‐expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00218
- Mulgan, R. (2006). Government accountability for outsourced services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(2), 48–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2006.00481.x
- News1 (2015, May 6). The main remarks of the 3rd Ministerial Meeting on Regulatory Reform. https://www.news1.kr/articles/?2219026
- Nicholson-Crotty, S., Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Fernandez, S. (2017). Performance and management in the public sector: Testing a model of relative risk aversion. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 603–614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12619
- Nielsen, P. A., & Baekgaard, M. (2015). Performance information, blame avoidance, and politicians’ attitudes to spending and reform: Evidence from an experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 545–569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut051
- OECD (2017). Regulatory policy in Korea: Towards better regulation, OECD reviews of regulatory reform. OECD Publishing.
- Peters, G. (2014). Accountability in public administration. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 211–225). Oxford University Press.
- Peterson, P. E. (1981). City limits. University of Chicago Press.
- Pollitt, C. (2001). Integrating financial management and performance management. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1(2), 7–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v1-art9-en
- Pollitt, C. (2011). Performance blight and the Tyranny of light?: Accountability in advanced performance measurement regimes. In M. Dubnick & H. Frederickson (Eds.), Accountable governance: Problems and promises (pp. 81–97). M.E. Sharpe.
- Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
- Pollitt, C., & Dan, S. (2013). Searching for impacts in performance-oriented management reform: A review of the European literature. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576370101
- Radin, B. (2011). Does performance measurement actually improve accountability? In M. Dubnick & H. Frederickson (Eds.), Accountable governance: Problems and promises (pp. 98–110). M.E. Sharpe.
- Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/975901
- Sanderson, I. (2001). Performance management, evaluation and learning in ‘modern’ local government. Public Administration, 79(2), 297–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00257
- Schneider, S. L. (1992). Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1040–1057.
- Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior. Free Press of Glencoe.
- Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138.
- Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/257839
- Van de Walle, S., & Cornelissen, F. (2014). Performance reporting. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 441–455). Oxford University Press.
- Wynen, J., & Verhoest, K. (2016). Internal performance-based steering in public sector organizations: Examining the effect of organizational autonomy and external result control. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(3), 535–559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1137769