References
- Arghiros, D. (2016). Democracy, development and decentralization in provincial Thailand. Curzon.
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
- Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. NY Worth.
- Bangkok Post. (2021, July, 26). Covid rules prolong crisis [Editorial]. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/2154667/covid-rules-prolong-crisis.
- Belabas, W., & Gerrits, L. (2017). Going the extra mile? How street‐level bureaucrats deal with the integration of immigrants. Social Policy & Administration, 51(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12184
- Blom, R., Borst, R. T., & Voorn, B. (2021). Pathology or inconvenience? A meta-analysis of the impact of red tape on people and organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(4), 623–650. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20924117
- Borry, E. L. (2016). A new measure of red tape: Introducing the Three-Item Red Tape (TIRT) Scale. International Public Management Journal, 19(4), 573–593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1143421
- Borry, E. L. (2017). Ethical climate and rule bending: How organizational norms contribute to unintended rule consequences. Public Administration, 95(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12304
- Borry, E. L. (2019). Rules can be good really. International Public Management Journal, 22(1), 207–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1505135
- Borry, E. L., DeHart‐Davis, L., Kaufmann, W., Merritt, C. C., Mohr, Z., & Tummers, L. (2018). Formalization and consistency heighten organizational rule following: Experimental and survey evidence. Public Administration, 96(2), 368–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12407
- Borry, E. L., & Henderson, A. C. (2020). Patients, protocols, and prosocial behavior: Rule breaking in frontline health care. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019862680
- Borst, R. T. (2018). Comparing work engagement in people-changing and people-processing service providers: A mediation model with red tape, autonomy, dimensions of PSM, and performance. Public Personnel Management, 47(3), 287–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026018770225
- Bozeman, B. (1993). A theory of government “red tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273–304.
- Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and red tape. Prentice Hall.
- Bozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2011). Rules and red tape: A orism for public administration theory and research. M.E. Sharpe.
- Bozeman, B., Reed, P. N., & Scott, P. G. (1992). Red tape and task delays in public and private organizations. Administration & Society, 24(3), 290–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979202400302
- Bozeman, B., & Scott, P. G. (1996). Bureaucratic red tape and formalization: Untangling conceptual knots. The American Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409602600101
- Brockmann, J. (2017). Unbureaucratic behavior among street-level bureaucrats: The case of the German state police. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(4), 430–451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X15593990
- Canales, R. (2011). Rule bending, sociological citizenship, and organizational contestation in microfinance. Regulation & Governance, 5(1), 90–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01095.x
- Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2010). Feelings or cognitions? Moral cognitions and emotions as longitudinal predictors of prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 872–877. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.010
- Chen, C.-A., & Rainey, H. G. (2014). Personnel formalization and the enhancement of teamwork: A public–private comparison. Public Management Review, 16(7), 945–968. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.770057
- Chen, Y., Wang, L., Liu, X., Chen, H., Hu, Y., & Yang, H. (2018). The trickle-down effect of leaders’ pro-social rule breaking: Joint moderating role of empowering leadership and courage. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2647), 2647–2649.
- Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2017). Accuracy of parameter estimates and confidence intervals in moderated mediation models: A comparison of regression and latent moderated structural equations. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 746–769. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115595869
- Clark, A. J. (2010). Empathy and sympathy: Therapeutic distinctions in counseling. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 32(2), 95–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.32.2.228n116thw397504
- Cohen, N., & Hertz, U. (2020). Street‐level bureaucrats’ social value orientation on and off duty. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 442–453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13190
- Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 1019–1024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.228
- Dahling, J. J., Chau, S. L., Mayer, D. M., & Gregory, J. B. (2012). Breaking rules for the right reasons? An investigation of pro‐social rule breaking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.730
- Davis, R. S., & Pink-Harper, S. A. (2016). Connecting knowledge of rule-breaking and perceived red tape: How behavioral attribution influences red tape perceptions. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(1), 181–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1214156
- Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
- DeHart-Davis, L. (2007). The unbureaucratic personality. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 892–903. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00776.x
- DeHart-Davis, L. (2009a). Green tape and public employee rule abidance: Why organizational rule attributes matter. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 901–910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02039.x
- DeHart-Davis, L. (2009b). Green tape: A theory of effective organizational rules. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 361–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun004
- DeHart-Davis, L. (2017). Creating effective rules in public sector organizations. Georgetown University Press.
- DeHart-Davis, L., Chen, J., & Little, T. D. (2013). Written versus unwritten rules: The role of rule formalization in green tape. International Public Management Journal, 16(3), 331–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2013.825193
- Feeney, M. K., & Bozeman, B. (2009). Stakeholder red tape: Comparing perceptions of public managers and their private consultants. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 710–726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02019.x
- Fernández‐Gutiérrez, M., & Van de Walle, S. J. P. A. R. (2019). Equity or efficiency? Explaining Public Officials' Values, 79(1), 25–34.
- Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. (Vol. 2). Row, Peterson.
- Fleming, C. J. (2020). Prosocial rule breaking at the street level: The roles of leaders, peers, and bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 22(8), 1191–1216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619817
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
- Frederickson, H. G. (2002). Confucius and the moral basis of bureaucracy. Administration & Society, 33(6), 610–628. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399702336002
- George, B., Pandey, S. K., Steijn, B., Decramer, A., & Audenaert, M. (2021). Red Tape, organizational performance, and employee outcomes: Meta‐analysis, meta‐regression, and research agenda. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 638–651. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13327
- Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., & Anderfuhren-Biget, S. (2012). Resigned but satisfied: The negative impact of public service motivation and red tape on work satisfaction. Public Administration, 90(1), 175–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01953.x
- Gofen, A. (2014). Mind the gap: Dimensions and influence of street-level divergence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 473–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut037
- Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
- Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351328
- Grant, A. M. (2008). Designing jobs to do good: Dimensions and psychological consequences of prosocial job characteristics. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701751012
- Gruen, R. J., & Mendelsohn, G. (1986). Emotional responses to affective displays in others: The distinction between empathy and sympathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 609–614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.609
- Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Hattke, F., Hensel, D., & Kalucza, J. (2020). Emotional responses to bureaucratic red tape. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13116
- Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
- Hollibaugh, G. E., Jr, Miles, M. R., & Newswander, C. B. (2020). Why public employees rebel: guerrilla government in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13118
- Homberg, F., McCarthy, D., & Tabvuma, V. (2015). A meta‐analysis of the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 711–722. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12423
- Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
- Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332
- Jakobsen, M., & Jensen, R. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.997906
- Jilke, S., & Tummers, L. (2018). Which clients are deserving of help? A theoretical model and experimental test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 226–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy002
- Jingjit, R., & Fotaki, M. (2010). Confucian ethics and the limited impact of the new public management reform in Thailand. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(S1), 61–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1073-9
- Jung, J., Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2020). Fear in bureaucracy: Comparing public and private sector workers’ expectations of punishment. Administration & Society, 52(2), 233–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718783647
- Kaufmann, W., Borry, E. L., & DeHart‐Davis, L. (2019). More than pathological formalization: Understanding organizational structure and red tape. Public Administration Review, 79(2), 236–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12958
- Kaufmann, W., Ingrams, A., & Jacobs, D. (2021). Being consistent matters: Experimental evidence on the effect of rule consistency on citizen red tape. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020954250
- Kaufmann, W., Taggart, G., & Bozeman, B. (2019). Administrative delay, red tape, and organizational performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(3), 529–553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1474770
- Kaufmann, W., & Tummers, L. (2017). The negative effect of red tape on procedural satisfaction. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1311–1327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1210907
- Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
- Maslowsky, J., Jager, J., & Hemken, D. (2015). Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(1), 87–96.
- Maynard-Moody, S. W., & Musheno, M. C. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
- Maynard-Moody, S. W., & Musheno, M. C. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.
- Meier, K. J. (2019). Theoretical frontiers in representative bureaucracy: New directions for research. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvy004
- Mooradian, T. A., Davis, M., & Matzler, K. (2011). Dispositional empathy and the hierarchical structure of personality. The American Journal of Psychology, 124(1), 99–109.
- Morrison, E. W. (2006). Doing the job well: An investigation of pro-social rule breaking. Journal of Management, 32(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277790
- Moynihan, D., Gerzina, J., & Herd, P. J. P. o P. M. (2022). Kafka’s bureaucracy: Immigration administrative burdens in the Trump era. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvab025
- Moynihan, D., & Herd, P. (2010). Red tape and democracy: How rules affect citizenship rights. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 654–670. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010366732
- Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009
- Moynihan, D. P., Wright, B. E., & Pandey, S. K. (2012). Working within constraints: can transformational leaders alter the experience of red tape? International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2012.725318
- Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide. Muthén and Muthén.
- Nabatchi, T. (2018). Public values frames in administration and governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx009
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978) Psychometric methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Pandey, S. K. (2020). The psychological process view of bureaucratic red tape. In E. Knies & B. Steijn (Eds.), Research handbook human resource management in the public sector. Edward Elgar.
- Pandey, S. K., & Kingsley, G. A. (2000). Examining red tape in public and private organizations: Alternative explanations from a social psychological model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 779–800. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024291
- Pandey, S. K., & Scott, P. G. (2002). Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts and measures. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553–580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003547
- Park, Y-n., Hyun, H., & Jhang, J. (2019). Do emotional laborers help the needy more or less? The mediating role of sympathy in the effect of emotional dissonance on prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 114–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00118
- Piatak, J., Mohr, Z., & McDonald, J. (2020). Rule formalization, gender, and gender congruence: examining prosocial rule breaking for internal and external stakeholders. International Public Management Journal, 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1790445
- Portillo, S. (2012). The paradox of rules: Rules as resources and constraints. Administration & Society, 44(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711413714
- Potipiroon, W., & Wongpreedee, A. (2021). Ethical climate and whistleblowing intentions: Testing the mediating roles of public service motivation and psychological safety among local government employees. Public Personnel Management, 50(3), 327–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020944547
- Preston, S. D., & De Waal, F. B. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018
- Prysmakova, P. (2021). Contact with citizens and job satisfaction: Expanding person-environment models of public service motivation. Public Management Review, 23(9), 1339–1358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1751252
- Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1968). Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 65–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2391262
- Rainey, H. G., Pandey, S., & Bozeman, B. (1995). Research note: Public and private managers' perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 567–574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3110348
- Ray, V., Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. (2020). Racialized burdens: Applying racialized organization theory to the administrative state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/q3xb8
- Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762–800. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109332834
- Ripoll, G., & Schott, C. (2020). Does public service motivation foster justification of unethical behavior? Evidence from survey research among citizens. International Public Management Journal, 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1825576
- Schott, C., & Ritz, A. (2018). The dark sides of public service motivation: A multi-level theoretical framework. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx011
- Scott, P. G., & Pandey, S. K. (2000). The influence of red tape on bureaucratic behavior: An experimental simulation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4), 615–633. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6688(200023)19:4<615::AID-PAM6>3.0.CO;2-U
- Sinclair, S., Beamer, K., Hack, T. F., McClement, S., Raffin Bouchal, S., Chochinov, H. M., & Hagen, N. A. (2017). Sympathy, empathy, and compassion: A grounded theory study of palliative care patients’ understandings, experiences, and preferences. Palliative Medicine, 31(5), 437–447.
- Steijn, B., & Van der Voet, J. (2019). Relational job characteristics and job satisfaction of public sector employees: When prosocial motivation and red tape collide. Public Administration, 97(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12352
- Stivers, C. (2007). So poor and so black”: Hurricane Katrina, public administration, and the issue of race. Public Administration Review, 67, 48–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00812.x
- Suzuki, K., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2021). Is impartiality enough? Government impartiality and citizens' perceptions of public service quality. Governance, 34(3), 727–764. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12527
- Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
- Transparency International. (2021). Corruption Perception Index 2021. https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/thailand
- Tummers, L., Weske, U., Bouwman, R., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2016). The impact of red tape on citizen satisfaction: An experimental study. International Public Management Journal, 19(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1027800
- Tummers, L. L., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056
- Van der Wal, Z., De Graaf, G., & Lawton, A. (2011). Competing values in public management: introduction to the symposium issue. Public Management Review, 13(3), 331–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.554098
- Van Loon, N. M., Leisink, P. L., Knies, E., & Brewer, G. A. (2016). Red tape: Developing and validating a new job‐centered measure. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 662–673. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12569
- Vossen, H. G., & Fikkers, K. M. (2021). The mediating role of sympathy in the relationship between media violence and Dutch adolescents’ social behaviors. Journal of Children and Media, 15(3), 389–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1828118
- Vossen, H. G., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Development of the adolescent measure of empathy and sympathy (AMES). Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 66–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.040
- Walter, H. (2012). Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: Concepts, circuits, and genes. Emotion Review, 4(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911421379
- Wang, F., Zhang, M., Das, A. K., Weng, H., & Yang, P. (2020). Aiming at the organizational sustainable development: Employees’ pro-social rule breaking as response to high performance expectations. Sustainability, 13(1), 267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010267
- Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1). University of California Press.
- Weißmüller, K. S., De Waele, L., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2022). Public service motivation and prosocial rule-breaking: An international vignettes study in Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(2), 258–286. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20973441.
- Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110366036
- Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books.
- Wispé, L. (1986). The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 314–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.314
- Yang, F., Huang, X., & Li, Z. (2021). Gender, situational visibility, and discretionary decision-making of regulatory street-level bureaucrats under pandemic emergency: An experimental study in China. Public Management Review, 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1886316