Local Government Responses to State Fiscal Controls: The Effects of Fiscal Preemptions on the Methods of Local Service Delivery

References

• Abels, M. (2012). Managing through collaborative networks: A twenty-first century mandate for local government. State and Local Government Review, 44(1_suppl), 29S–43S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X12442517
   Google Scholar
• Aldag, A. M., Kim, Y., & Warner, M. E. (2019). Austerity urbanism or pragmatic municipalism? Local government responses to fiscal stress in New York State. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(6), 1287–1305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19844794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2007). Why do local governments privatise public services? A survey of empirical studies. Local Government Studies, 33(4), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701417528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2009). Factors explaining local privatization: A meta-regression analysis. Public Choice, 139(1-2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9381-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2010). Partial privatisation in local services delivery: An empirical analysis of the choice of mixed firms. Local Government Studies, 36(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930903435856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2017). What have we learned from the last three decades of empirical studies on Factors driving local privatisation? Local Government Studies, 43(4), 503–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1303486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., Fageda, X., & Warner, M. E. (2010). Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta‐regression analysis of solid waste and water services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(3), 553–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, D. R. (2019). Local government and the states: Autonomy, politics, and policy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, A. O. M., & Kearney, R. C. (2012). Are US cities losing power and authority? Perceptions of local government actors. Urban Affairs Review, 48(4), 528–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087412440272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (1998a). Bureaucratic theory meets reality: Public choice and service contracting in US local government. Public Administration Review, 58(6), 474–484. https://doi.org/10.2307/977575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (1998b). The determinants of variations in local service contracting: Garbage in, garbage out? Urban Affairs Review, 34(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808749803400107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, L., Halberstam, Y., & Phillips, J. (2016). Spending within limits: Evidence from municipal fiscal restraints. National Tax Journal, 69(2), 315–351. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2016.2.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003). Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 441–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811241
   Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B. (2006). Local government autonomy and state reliance on special district governments: A reassessment. Political Research Quarterly, 59(3), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. Y., Brudney, J. L., & Jang, S. G. (2013). Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: Investigating the distributional biases. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicke, L. A., & Ott, J. S. (1999). Public agency accountability in human services contracting. Public Productivity & Management Review, 22(4), 502–516. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380933
   Google Scholar
• Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis, N., Langan, T., Mcfarland, C., Panettieri, A., & Rainwater, R. (2018). City rights in an era of preemption: A state-by-state analysis 2018 update. National League of Cities.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, K. L., & Glick, D. M. (2017). Cities in American federalism: Evidence on state–local government conflict from a survey of mayors. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 47(4), 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliason, P., & Lutz, B. (2018). Can fiscal rules constrain the size of government? An analysis of the “crown jewel” of tax and expenditure limitations. Journal of Public Economics, 166, 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Krause, R. M., & Hawkins, C. V. (2017). The Impact of Administrative Structure on the Ability of City Governments to Overcome Functional Collective Action Dilemmas: A Climate and Energy Perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(4), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., & Jang, H. S. (2009). Nonprofits as local government service contractors. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 668–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02016.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, J. M. (1986). The decision to contract out: An empirical analysis. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22(2), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208168602200206
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, J., & Graddy, E. (1986). Contracting out: For what? With whom? Public Administration Review, 46(4), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.2307/976307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, L., & Witt, S. L. (2019). State preemption of local authority: Explaining patterns of state adoption of preemption measures. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 49(3), 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjz011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, C. B., & Leland, S. M. (2019). Do cities and counties attempt to circumvent changes in their autonomy by creating special districts? The American Review of Public Administration, 49(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018804665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebdon, R., & Jalette, P. (2008). The restructuring of municipal services: A Canada—United States comparison. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(1), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobby School of Public Affairs (2019). The effects of tax/revenue caps: A survey. University of Houston. Retrieved September 5, 2020, from https://uh.edu/hobby/_docs/tax-revenue-cap-survey-2019_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2019). Limits of property taxes and charges: City revenue structures after the great recession. Urban Affairs Review, 55(1), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417697199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. (1989). Variance specification in event count models: From restrictive assumptions to a generalized estimator. American Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 762–784. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Aldag, A. M., & Warner, M. E. (2021). Blocking the progressive city: How state pre-emptions undermine labour rights in the USA. Urban Studies, 58(6), 1158–1175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020910337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kioko, S. N., & Zhang, P. (2019). Impact of tax and expenditure limits on local government use of tax-supported debt. Public Finance Review, 47(2), 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142117723706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousser, T., McCubbins, M. D., & Moule, E. (2008). For whom the TEL tolls: Can state tax and expenditure limits effectively reduce spending? State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 8(4), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000800800401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables (advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences Vol. 7.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• López-Hernández, A. M., Zafra-Gómez, J. L., Plata-Díaz, A. M., & de la Higuera-Molina, E. J. (2018). Modeling fiscal stress and contracting out in local government: The influence of time, financial condition, and the great recession. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017699276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, C. S., & Deller, S. C. (2011). Measuring municipal fiscal condition: Do objective measures of fiscal health relate to subjective measures? Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 23(3), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-23-03-2011-B006
   Google Scholar
• Maher, C. S., & Deller, S. C. (2013). Measuring the impacts of TELs on municipal financial conditions. In H. Levine, E. Scorsone, & J. Justice (Eds.), Handbook of local government fiscal health (pp. 405–430). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Malatesta, D., & Smith, C. R. (2014). Lessons from resource dependence theory for contemporary public and nonprofit management. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe, J., & Portillo, S. (2006). Citizen engagement in local budgeting: Does diversity pay dividends? Public Performance & Management Review, 30(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576300203
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. R., & Hirlinger, M. W. (1991). Intergovernmental service contracts: A multivariate explanation. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27(1), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208169102700107
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. R., Hirlinger, M. W., & England, R. E. (1988). The decision to contract out city services: A further explanation. Western Political Quarterly, 41(2), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298804100209
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, D. R. (2004). Tax and expenditure limitations and the fiscal response of local government: Asymmetric intra‐local fiscal effects. Public Budgeting Finance, 24(4), 111–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0275-1100.2004.00350.x
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Park, J., & Butler, J. S. (2021). Forms of government and municipal financial performance. Public Money & Management, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1923168
   Google Scholar
• National League of Cities (NLC). (2018). City rights in an era of preemption: A state-by-state analysis (2018 update). NLC.
   Google Scholar
• National League of Cities (NLC). (2020). Principles of home rule for the 21st century. NLC.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson‐Crotty, S. (2004). The politics and administration of privatization: Contracting out for corrections management in the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 32(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0190-292X.2004.00052.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., & Park, H. J. (2021). Outsourcing services: A theory of special district incorporation. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(6), 1215–1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2021.1972430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2018). The impact of state-imposed fiscal rules on municipal government fiscal outcomes: Does institutional configuration matter? State and Local Government Review, 50(4), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X18823245
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riverstone-Newell, L. (2017). The rise of state preemption laws in response to local policy innovation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 47(3), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden, J., Eskeland, G. S., & Litvack, J. I. (Eds.). (2003). Fiscal decentralization and the challenge of hard budget constraints. MIT press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3021.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Savas, E. S., & Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. Chatham House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff, E. (2018). Preemption and fiscal authority. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 45(5), 1270–1294.
   Google Scholar
• Schragger, R. (2010). The progressive city. In The eleventh annual liman public interest colloquium (pp. 2009–2016). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1471430
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, M. (1999). Tax and expenditure limitations and the fiscal relationships between state and local governments. Public Choice, 99(1/2), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018311425276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, K. (2020). Home rule and state preemption of local land use control. The Urban Lawyer, SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3485872
   Google Scholar
• Staley, T. (2017). The impact of fiscal limits on state revenue volatility. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(4), 443–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015589341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staley, T. (2018). The impact of tax and expenditure limitations on municipal revenue volatility. State and Local Government Review, 50(2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X18785211
   Google Scholar
• Sun, R. (2014). Reevaluating the effect of tax and expenditure limitations: An instrumental variable approach. Public Finance Review, 42(1), 92–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142112459210
   Google Scholar
• Svara, J. H., & Nelson, K. L. (2013). Government structure as context for the finance function. In J. R. Bartle, W. B. Hildreth, & J. Marlowe (Eds.), Management policies in local government finance (pp. 42–66). ICMA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swindell, D., Svara, J. H., & Stenberg, C. (2018). Local government options in the era of state preemption. Local Government Review, 100(6), 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, D. M. (2003). The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Witteloostuijn, A., & De Jong, G. (2010). Ecology of national rule birth: A longitudinal study of Dutch higher education law, 1960–2004. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. (2018). Effects of state-imposed tax and expenditure limits on municipal revenue reliance: A new measure of TEL stringency with mixed methods. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 48(2), 292–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Hefetz, A. (2008). Managing markets for public service: The role of mixed public–private delivery of city services. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00845.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., Aldag, A. M., & Kim, Y. (2021). Privatization and intermunicipal cooperation in US local government services: balancing fiscal stress, need and political interests. Public Management Review, 23(9), 1359–1318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1751255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, C., Xu, Y., Kim, Y., & Warner, M. E. (2020). Starving counties, squeezing cities: Tax and expenditure limits in the US. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 23(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2018.1509711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. R. (2000). Alternative models of government-nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zullo, R. (2009). Does fiscal stress induce privatization? Correlates of private and intermunicipal contracting, 1992–2002. Governance, 22(3), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar