584
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Contracting Out and the Fiscal Sustainability of Public Services

&

References

  • Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2011). Dimensions of publicness and organizational performance: A review of the evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Supplement 3), i301–i319. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur026
  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
  • Baqir, R. (2002). Districting and government overspending. Journal of Political Economy, 110(6), 1318–1354. https://doi.org/10.1086/342804
  • Bauer, Z., & Johnston, J. M. (2020). Who does it better? Comparing immigration detention facility performance in an intergovernmental and intersectoral context. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13127
  • Bel, G., Fageda, X., & Warner, M. E. (2010). Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(3), 553–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20509
  • Bell, A., & Jones, K. (2015). Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7
  • Bergh, A., Erlingsson, G., Gustafsson, A., & Wittberg, E. (2019). Municipally owned enterprises as danger zones for corruption? How politicians having feet in two camps may undermine conditions for accountability. Public Integrity, 21(3), 320–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1522182
  • Bertelli, A. M. (2012). The political economy of public sector governance. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Brody, E. (2006). The legal framework for nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The non-profit sector: A research handbook (pp. 243–266). Yale University Press.
  • Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003). Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 441–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug030
  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using Stata (revised ed.). Stata Press.
  • Clark, T. S., & Linzer, D. A. (2015). Should I use fixed or random effects? Political Science Research and Methods, 3(2), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.32
  • Cohen, D., & Mikaelian, A. (2021). The privatization of everything: How the plunder of public goods transformed America and how we can fight back. The New Press.
  • Debarsy, N. (2012). The Mundlak approach in the spatial Durbin panel data model. Spatial Economic Analysis, 7(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2011.647059
  • Durant, R. F. (2000). Whither the neoadministrative state? Toward a polity-centered theory of administrative reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 79–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024268
  • Grossi, G., & Reichard, C. (2008). Municipal corporatization in Germany and Italy. Public Management Review, 10(5), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802264275
  • Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. The Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–901. https://doi.org/10.2307/796089
  • Hart, O., & Holmström, B. (1987). The theory of contracts. In T. F. Bewley (Ed.), Advances in economic theory: Fifth world congress (pp. 71–156). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521340446.003
  • Hart, O., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). The proper scope of government: Theory and an application to prisons. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1127–1161. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555448
  • Hendrick, R. (2006). The role of slack in local government finances. Public Budgeting Finance, 26(1), 14–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2006.00837.x
  • Hirsch, W. Z. (1995). Factors important in local governments’ privatization decisions. Urban Affairs Review, 31(2), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808749503100206
  • Jimenez, B. S. (2013). Strategic planning and the fiscal performance of city governments during the Great Recession. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(5), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012451051
  • Jin, H., Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. R. (2005). Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese style. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1719–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.11.008
  • Jung, Y.-D. (2001). Public administration in the modern state. Bobmunsa Publishing.
  • Kim, C. (2015). The effects of recessions on contracting moderated by institutional arrangements of government: Evidence from California cities, 1993–2009. Public Budgeting & Finance, 35(2), 40–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12064
  • Kim, C. (2021). Local government growth from a tri-sector perspective. The Social Science Journal, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1851012
  • Kim, Y. (2018). Can alternative service delivery save cities after the Great Recession? Barriers to privatisation and cooperation. Local Government Studies, 44(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1395740
  • Kornai, J. (1998). The place of the soft budget constraint syndrome in economic theory. Journal of Comparative Economics, 26(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.1997.1505
  • Levin, J., & Tadelis, S. (2010). Contracting for government services: Theory and evidence from U.S. cities. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 58(3), 507–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00430.x
  • Lu, J. (2016). The performance of performance-based contracting in human services: A quasi-experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv002
  • Lynn, L. E. Jr., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. (2001). Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Georgetown University Press.
  • Miller, G. (2000). Above politics: Credible commitment and efficiency in the design of public agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024271
  • Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913646
  • North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–832. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700009451
  • Oakerson, R. J. (1999). Governing local public economies: Creating the civic metropolis. ICS Press.
  • Ohlsson, H. (2005). Ownership and production costs: Choosing between public production and contracting-out in the case of Swedish refuse collection. Fiscal Studies, 24(4), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2003.tb00091.x
  • Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1991[1977]). Public goods and public choices: The emergence of public economies and industry structures. In V. Ostrom (Ed.), The meaning of American federalism. (pp. 163–197). ICS Press. (Originally appeared in E. S. Savas (Ed.). (1977). Alternatives for delivering public services: Toward improved performance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press)
  • O’Toole, L. J. Jr., & Meier, K. J. (2004). Parkinson’s Law and the New Public Management? Contracting determinants and service-quality consequences in public education. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00378.x
  • Pallesen, T. (2004). A political perspective on contracting out: The politics of good times: Experiences from Danish local governments. Governance, 17(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00258.x
  • Park, S. (2013). What causes the death of public sector organizations? Understanding structural changes and continuities in Korean quangos. International Public Management Journal, 16(3), 413–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2013.825491
  • Park, S., & Kim, B. S. (2014). Who is appointed to what position? The politics of appointment in quangos of Korea. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0221-3
  • Park, J., Kwon, S.-W., & Choi, D. (2022). Local government responses to state fiscal controls: The effects of fiscal preemptions on the methods of local service delivery. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(6), 1371–1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2092157
  • Park, J. H., & Noh, S. (2021). Does contracting out matter to financial condition? The case of New York local governments. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(6), 1191–1214. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2021.1894186
  • Pérez-López, G., Prior, D., & Zafra-Gómez, J. L. (2015). Rethinking new public management delivery forms and efficiency: Long-term effects in Spanish local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1157–1183. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu088
  • Rho, E. (2013). Contracting revisited: Determinants and consequences of contracting out for public education services. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02682.x
  • Rybnicek, R., Plakolm, J., & Baumgartner, L. (2020). Risks in public–private partnerships: A systematic literature review of risk factors, their impact and risk mitigation strategies. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(5), 1174–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1741406
  • Schoute, M., Budding, T., & Gradus, R. (2018). Municipalities’ choices of service delivery modes: The influence of service, political, governance, and financial characteristics. International Public Management Journal, 21(4), 502–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2017.1297337
  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329497
  • Stein, R. M. (1990). Urban alternatives: Public and private markets in the provision of local services. University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Van Genugten, M., Van Thiel, S., & Voorn, B. (2020). Local governments and their arm’s length bodies. Local Government Studies, 46(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1667774
  • Voorn, B., van Genugten, M. L., & van Thiel, S. (2017). The efficiency and effectiveness of municipally owned corporations: A systematic review. Local Government Studies, 43(5), 820–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1319360
  • Warner, M. E., Aldag, A. M., & Kim, Y. (2021). Privatization and intermunicipal cooperation in US local government services: Balancing fiscal stress, need and political interests. Public Management Review, 23(9), 1359–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1751255
  • Warner, M., & Hebdon, R. (2001). Local government restructuring: Privatization and its alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.2027
  • Wei, W. (2022). Municipal structure matters: Evidence from government fiscal performance. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13183
  • Weingast, B. R. (2009). Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.12.005
  • Weingast, B. R., Shepsle, K. A., & Johnsen, C. (1981). The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach to distributive politics. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1086/260997
  • Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books.
  • Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197. https://doi.org/10.2307/2139277
  • Xu, Q., Jia, G., Hu, Y., & Xiong, W. (2022). Mediating effect of joint action on governing complex public contracting. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(5), 1066–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2040035
  • Yeo, K. (2020). Implications from the analysis of the operations of subnational public service facilities. Policy brief, No. 97. Korea Research Institute for Local Administration. Retrieved from https://krila.re.kr/publication/periodical/brief/97?keyword=&page=2
  • Zhang, Z., Gibson, B., & Schafer, J. G. (2018). Reexamining the relationship between fiscal stress and outsourcing. Public Performance & Management Review, 41(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1358645
  • Zhu, L. (2013). Panel data analysis in public administration: Substantive and statistical considerations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 395–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus064

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.