Explaining Coordination Quality in Public Service Delivery

References

• Andrews, R., Beynon, M. J., & McDermott, A. M. (2016). Organizational capability in the public sector: A configurational approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, T., & Wegrich, K. (Eds.). (2019). The blind spots of public bureaucracy and the politics of non-coordination. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bjurstrøm, K. H. (2020). Principal–agent or principal–steward: How ministry–agency relations condition the impact of performance management in the steering of government agencies. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(5), 1053–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1739087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations: Shifting patterns of public management. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, I. (2023). Understanding tradeoffs in the institutional design and leadership of collaborative governance. Public Performance & Management Review, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2283583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Danielsen, O. A., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2016). Comparing coordination structures for crisis management in six countries. Public Administration, 94(2), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lægreid, O. M., & Lægreid, P. (2019). Administrative coordination capacity; does the wickedness of policy areas matter? Policy and Society, 38(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1584147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2020). Coordination quality in central government – the case of Norway. Public Organization Review, 20(1), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-00434-0
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2022). ICT use in central government: Scope, predictors and effects on coordination quality. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(3), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1851256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dan, S. (2014). The effects of agency reform in Europe: A review of the evidence. Public Policy and Administration, 29(3), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076713517412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Johnson, M. (2022). Preconditions of coordination in regional public organizations. Public Management Review, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2134915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (2012). How bureaucratic structure matters: An organizational perspective. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public administration (pp. 157–168). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Elston, T., MacCarthaigh, M., & Verhoest, K. (2018). Collaborative cost-cutting: productive efficiency as an interdependency between public organizations. Public Management Review, 20(12), 1815–1835. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1438498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, D. J., Somaraju, A. V., Dishop, C., & DeShon, R. P. (2023). Evaluating Interdependence in Workgroups: A Network-Based Method. Organizational Research Methods, 26(3), 459–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211068179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulick, L. (1937). Notes on the theory of organization: With special reference to government in the United States. In L. Gulick & L. Urwick (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration (pp. 3–45). Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. H., Johnson, N. J., & Haas, J. E. (1967). Organizational size, complexity, and formalization. American Sociological Review, 32(6), 903–912. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerschmid, G., Oprisor, A., & Štimac, V. (2013). COCOPS executive survey on public sector reform in Europe (No. ISSN 2211-2006). http://hdl.handle.net/1765/40935.
   Google Scholar
• Heims, E. (2019). Why cooperation between agencies is (sometimes) possible: Turf protection as enabler of regulatory cooperation in the European Union. In T. Bach & K. Wegrich (Eds.), The blind spots of public bureaucracy and the politics of non-coordination (pp. 113–131). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, D. I. (2022). Room for leadership? A comparison of perceived managerial job autonomy in public, private and hybrid organizations. International Public Management Journal, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2077491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M., & Jensen, R. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.997906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, H., Ryssevik, J., Kristoffersen, E. M., Misje, I. (2021). Sluttrapport for Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementets organisasjonsdatabase 2020. ideas2evidence. https://ideas2evidence.com/publications/sluttrapport-kommunal-og-moderniseringsdepartementets-organisasjonsdatabase-2020
   Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., & Hu, Q. (2022). An Old Puzzle and Unprecedented Challenges: Coordination in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(4), 773–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2040039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, C., & Lodge, M. (2014). Exploring the co-ordination of economic regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(9), 1311–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.923023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., Keuffer, N., Baldersheim, H., Hlepas, N., Swianiewicz, P., Steyvers, K., & Navarro, C. (2019). Patterns of local autonomy in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., Randma-Liiv, T., Rykkja, L. H., & Sarapuu, K. (2016). Coordination challenges and administrative reforms. In G. Hammerschmid, S. Van de Walle, R. Andrews, & P. Bezes (Eds.), Public administration reforms in Europe: The view from the top public administration reforms in Europe (pp. 244–258). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (Eds.). (2014). The problem-solving capacity of the modern state: governance challenges and administrative capacities. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin, M. (2006). Explaining cooperation: How resource interdependence, goal congruence, and trust affect joint actions in policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2013). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 429–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overman, S. (2016). Great expectations of public service delegation: A systematic review. Public Management Review, 18(8), 1238–1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1103891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overman, S., & van Thiel, S. (2016). Agencification and public sector performance: A systematic comparison in 20 countries. Public Management Review, 18(4), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1028973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y. (2022). Interpersonal facilitation and goal-oriented managerial behavior in Japan. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1766497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing horizontal government: The politics of co-ordination. Public Administration, 76(2), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance management in practice: A comparative study of executive agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satheesh, S. A., Verweij, S., van Meerkerk, I., Busscher, T., & Arts, J. (2023). The impact of boundary spanning by public managers on collaboration and infrastructure project performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 46(2), 418–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2137212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play – positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692894006001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senninger, R., Finke, D., & Blom-Hansen, J. (2021). Coordination inside government administrations: Lessons from the EU commission. Governance, 34(3), 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soujaa, I., Nukpezah, J. A., & Benavides, A. D. (2021). Coordination effectiveness during public health emergencies: An institutional collective action framework. Administration & Society, 53(7), 1014–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720985440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trein, P., & Ansell, C. K. (2021). Countering fragmentation, taking back the state, or partisan agenda-setting? Explaining policy integration and administrative coordination reforms. Governance, 34(4), 1143–1166. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S., & Smullen, A. (2021). Principals and agents, or principals and stewards? Australian arms length agencies’ perceptions of arm’s length government instruments. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(4), 758–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2021.1881803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegrich, K., & Stimac, V. (2014). Coordination capacity. In M. Lodge & K. Wegrich (Eds.), The problem-solving capacity of the modern state: Governance challenges and administrative capacities. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar