Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations

References

• Abdel-Maksoud, A., Elbanna, S., Mahama, H., & Pollanen, R. (2015). The use of performance information in strategic decision making in public organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(7), 528–549. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2015-0114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N. (1999). A proper mentality for benchmarking. Public Administration Review, 59(2), 105–109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/977630 https://doi.org/10.2307/977630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2008). Factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina benchmarking project. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00864.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. C., & Nielsen, H. S. (2020). Learning from performance information. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. (2012). Strategic management and public service performance. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Askim, J. (2004). Performance management and organizational intelligence: Adapting the balanced scorecard in Larvik municipality. International Public Management Journal, 7(3), 415–438.
   Google Scholar
• Askim, J. (2007). How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307081152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim, J. (2009). The demand side of performance measurement: Explaining councillors’ utilization of performance information in policymaking. International Public Management Journal, 12(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490802649395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim, J., Johnsen, Å., & Christophersen, K. A. (2007). Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking: Experiences from Norwegian municipal benchmarking networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim, J., & Johnsen, Å. (2023). Performance management and accountability: The role of intergovernmental information systems. In Filipe Teles (Ed.), Handbook on local and regional governance (pp. 437–452Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371200.00042
   Google Scholar
• Bedford, D. S., & Malmi, T. (2015). Configurations of control: An exploratory analysis. Management Accounting Research, 27(2), 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2), 103168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: A guide to stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M. (2015). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. In J. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. K. (2009). Understanding strategic planning and the formulation and implementation of strategic plans as ways of knowing: The contributions of actor-network theory. International Public Management Journal, 12(2), 172–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490902873473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., & George, B. (2020). Strategic management in public administration. In B. Guy Peters & Ian Thynne (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia, politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., George, B., & Seo, D. (2024). Understanding goal formation in strategic public management: a proposed theoretical framework. Public Management Review, 26(2), 539–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2103173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3–4), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00013-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daleq, B., & Hobbel, M. A. (2014). Spredning av balansert målstyring i norske kommuner. [The diffusion of balanced scorecard in Norwegian municipalities] [Master Thesis in Business Administration]. Handelshøyskolen i Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruijn, H. (2007). Managing performance in the public sector (2nd Edition). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. Reprinted in revised edition in W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63–82). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevska-Markoski, T., & French, P. E. (2019). Determinants of public administrators’ use of performance information: Evidence from local governments in Florida. Public Administration Review, 79(5), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. (1976). What results should you expect? A user’s guide to MBO. Public Administration Review, 36(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/974736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1967). Mixed scanning. A “third” approach to decision-making. Public Administration Review, 27(5), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.2307/973394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., & Ongaro, E. (2022). Strategic management in public services organizations: Concepts, schools and contemporary issues (2nd edition). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, D. G., & Frederickson, H. G. (2006). Measuring the performance of the hollow state. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, B., & Pandey, S. K. (2017). We know the yin – but where is the yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration Scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17698189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., Baekgaard, M., Decramer, A., Audenaert, M., & Goeminne, S. (2020). Institutional isomorphism, negativity bias and performance information use by politicians: A survey experiment. Public Administration, 98(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., Walker, R., & Monster, J. (2019). Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 810–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrish, E. (2016). The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grøn, C. H., & Kristiansen, M. B. (2022). What gets measured gets managed? The use of performance information across organizational echelons in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(2), 448–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2045615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th edition). Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Han, X., & Moynihan, D. (2022). Does managerial use of performance information matter to organizational outcomes? The American Review of Public Administration, 52(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740211048891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. R. (2011). Application of strategic management tools after an NPM-inspired reform: Strategy as practice in Danish schools. Administration & Society, 43(7), 770–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711417701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. R., Pop, M., Skov, M. B., & George, B. (2022). A review of open strategy: Bridging strategy and public management research. Public Management Review, 26(3), 678–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2116091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. P. (2002). Performance measurement: Fashions and fallacies. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(4), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2002.11643671
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J. (2021). Composite-based structural equation modeling: Analyzing latent and emergent variables. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., & Dijkstra, T. K. (2015). ADANCO 2.0. Composite Modeling. Kleve, Germany: Composite Modeling.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, J. M. (2018). Successful problem solvers? Managerial performance information use to improve low organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2007). Public service management by numbers: Why does it vary? Where has it come from? What are the gaps and the puzzles? Public Money and Management, 27(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00564.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovik, S., & Stigen, I. M. (2008). Kommunal organisering 2008: Redegjørelse for Kommunal- og regionaldepartementets organisasjonsdatabase. [Municipal organization 2008: Documentation of the Ministry for Local Government and Regional Development’s organizational data base] (NIBR-rapport 2008:20). Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M., & Jensen, R. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.997906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, M., Kim, T., & Zhu, L. (2018). Managing for results differently: Examining managers’ purposeful performance information use in public, nonprofit, and private organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016676574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, Å. (1999). Implementation mode and local government performance measurement: A Norwegian experience. Financial Accountability & Management, 15(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.t01-1-00073
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, Å. (2001). Balanced scorecard: Theoretical perspectives and public management implications. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(6), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900110395460
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, Å. (2012). Why does poor performance get so much attention in public policy? Financial Accountability & Management, 28(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00539.x
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, Å. (2016). Strategic planning and management in local government in Norway: Status after three decades. Scandinavian Political Studies, 39(4), 333–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, P., & Drumaux, A. (Eds.) (2014). Strategic management in public organizations: European practices and perspectives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korac, S., Saliterer, I., Sicilia., & Steccolini, I. (2020). Contrasting and explaining purposeful and legitimizing uses of performance information: A mayor’s perspective. Public Management Review, 22(4), 553–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1599059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2013). The other type of performance information: Nonroutine feedback, its relevance and use. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02648.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2015a). Drivers of performance information use: Systematic literature review and directions for future research. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1006469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2015b). Explaining the use of performance information by public managers: A planned-behavior approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013486180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2016). Exploring the link Between performance information use and organizational performance: A contingency approach. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1071159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A., & Moynihan, D. P. (2015). Does training matter? Evidence from performance management reforms. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S. (2010). Performance measurement in European local governments: A comparative analysis of reform experiences in Great Britain, France, Sweden and Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852310372050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Rubecksen, K. (2006). Performance management in practice: The Norwegian way. Financial Accountability & Management, 22(3), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00402.x
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, D. Ø., Azizi, B., Rushiti, A., & Stenheim, T. (2019). The diffusion and implementation of the balanced scorecard in the Norwegian municipality sector: A descriptive analysis. Social Sciences, 8(5), 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050152
   Google Scholar
• Meld. St. 12. (2011–2012). Stat og kommune – styring og samspel [Government and municipality – governance and interplay]. Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. Reprinted in revised edition in W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 41–62). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
   Google Scholar
• Micheli, P., & Pavlov, A. (2019). What is performance measurement for? Multiple uses of performance information within organizations. Public Administration, 98(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development. (2002). Resultat og dialog. Balansert målstyring (BMS) i kommunal sektor. [Results and dialogue. Balanced scorecard (BSC) in the municipal sector]. Oslo: Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development (2004). Veileder: Resultatledelse. Bruk av balansert målstyring og andre former for systematiske resultatmålinger i kommunal sektor. [Guidelines: Results leadership. Use of balanced scorecards and other forms of systematic performance measurements in the municipal sector]. Oslo: Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Lavertu, S. (2016). Does involvement in performance management routines encourage performance information use? Evaluating GPRA and PART. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1540-6210.2012.02539.x
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P. A. (2014). Learning from performance feedback: Performance information, aspiration levels, and managerial priorities. Public Administration, 92(1), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzl, C., Sicilia, M. F., & Steccolini, I. (2018). Exploring the links between different performance information uses, NPM cultural orientation, and organizational performance in the public sector. Public Management Review, 21(5), 686–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1508609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1999.0115
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (2005). Elements of strategic planning and management in municipal government: Status after two decades. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00429.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H. (2010). The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance. Public Administration Review, 70(s1), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02284.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., Edwards, L. H., Pasha, O. Q., & Edwards, J. (2013). Strategy formulation and performance: Evidence from local public transit companies. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(4), 585–615. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollanen, R., Abdel-Maksoud, A., Elbanna, S., & Mahama, H. (2017). Relationships between strategic performance measures, strategic decision making, and organizational performance: Empirical evidence from Canadian public organizations. Public Management Review, 19(5), 725–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1203013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance information for democracy: The missing link? Evaluation, 12(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389006064191
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.) (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. B. (1982). Managing strategies incrementally. Omega International Omega, 10(6), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(82)90064-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, Complexity, and democratic values. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, E., Roch, C., & Roch, S. (2023). Grading teacher performance appraisal systems: understanding the implications of student test scores and performance information use. Public Performance & Management Review, 46(2), 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2118798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siverbo, S., & Johansson, T. (2006). Relative performance evaluation in Swedish local government. Financial Accountability & Management, 22(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00403.x
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, H., Han, D., & Bae, K. B. (2022). The effect of performance information on actual budgeting allocation: The role of policy type. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(5), 1112–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2062014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot, C. (2010). Theories of performance: Organizational and service improvement in the public domain. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2011). Factors influencing the use of performance information for decision making in Australian state agencies. Public Administration, 89(4), 1316–1334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02008.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Bogt, H. J. (2004). Politicians in search of performance information? – Survey research on Dutch Aldermen’s use of performance information. Financial Accountability and Management, 20(3), 221–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0267-4424.2004.00387.x
   Google Scholar
• The Jamovi Project. (2022). Jamovi (version 2.3) [computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org.
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management. (2006). Mål- og resultatstyring i staten: En veileder i resultatmåling. [Management by objectives and results in government: A guideline]. Oslo: The Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/ https://doi.org/10.1086/257839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandersmissen, L., George, B., & Voets, J. (2024). Strategic planning and performance perceptions of managers and citizens: Analysing multiple mediations. Public Management Review, 26(2), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2103172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dooren, W. (2004). Supply and demand of policy indicators. Public Management Review, 6(4), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/1471903042000303319
   Google Scholar
• van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector (2nd Edition). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Helden, G. J., & Johnsen, Å. (2002). A comparative analysis of the development of performance-based management systems in Dutch and Norwegian local government. International Public Management Journal, 5(1), 75–95.
   Google Scholar
• van Helden, J., & Reichard, C. (2016). Commonalities and differences in public and private sector performance management practices: A literature review. In: M. J. Epstein, F. Verbeeten, & S. K. Widener (Eds.), Performance measurement and management control: Contemporary issues (Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, Volume 31, pp. 309–351). Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Vinzant, D. H., & Vinzant, J. C. (1996). Strategy and organizational capacity: Finding a fit. Public Productivity & Management Review, 20(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380482
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., Lee, M. J., James, O., & Ho, S. M. Y. (2018). Analyzing the complexity of performance information use: Experiments with stakeholders to disaggregate dimensions of performance, data sources, and data types. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. S., & Hatry, H. P. (1992). The case for performance monitoring. Public Administration Review, 52(6), 604–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/977173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar