Strategy Formulation Process and Interorganizational Collaboration

References

• Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Inside the matrix: Integrating the paradigms of intergovernmental and network management. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(12), 1401–1422. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120024403
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. E., & Mueller, S. (1982). The evolution of organizational forms: Technology, coordination, and control. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 33–87). JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Altamimi, H., Liu, Q., & Jimenez, B. (2023). Not too much, not too little: Centralization, decentralization, and organizational change. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together (Vol. 191). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D., & Barnett, W. P. (1990). Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1990, pp. 160–164).
   Google Scholar
• Amirkhanyan, A. A. (2009). Collaborative performance measurement: Examining and explaining the prevalence of collaboration in state and local government contracts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 523–554. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Entwistle, T. (2010). Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver? an empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2009). Strategy formulation, strategy content and performance: An empirical analysis. Public Management Review, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802489989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becerra, M., & Gupta, A. K. (2003). Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.32.12815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. (2001). Planning, performance and public services. Public Administration, 79(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2004). Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., Gould-Williams, J. S., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2004). Problems of rational planning in public organizations: An empirical assessment of the conventional wisdom. Administration & Society, 36(3), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704265294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., & Gould-Williams, J. (2003). Planning and performance in public organizations an empirical analysis. Public Management Review, 5(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/146166702200002889
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003). Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 441–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryce, H. J. (2006). Nonprofits as social capital and agents in the public policy process: Toward a new paradigm. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764005283023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. C. (2014). Failing into cross-sector collaboration successfully. In L. B. Bingham & R. O’Leary (Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 55–74). New York: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Ackerman, F. (2004). Strategic planning in a collaborative setting. In J. M. Bryson (Ed.), Strategic planning for public and non-profit organizations (pp. 377–391). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of Cross‐Sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., & George, B. (2020). Strategic management in public administration. In B. Guy Peters and Ian Thynne (Eds.), The Oxford encyclopedia of public administration (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1994). The management of innovation. Oxford Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2018). Structural holes. In D. B. Grusky (Ed.), Social stratification: Class, race, and gender in sociological perspective (pp. 659–663). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B. (2015). What have we learned about the performance of council‐manager government? A review and synthesis of the research. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 673–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Sullivan, A. A. (2023). Should I stay or should I go? Why participants leave collaborative governance arrangements. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(2), 246–261.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. N., & Ferguson, L. C. (1983). City money. Political processes, fiscal strain, and Retrenchment.Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Ellison, L. (1998). Futures and strategic perspectives in school planning. International Journal of Educational Management, 12(3), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513549810209130
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P., & Coates, G. (2005). Competing conceptions and values in school strategy: Rational planning and beyond. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143205048177
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. W., Jr., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368–392. https://doi.org/10.5465/256784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, J. J., & Maynard-Moody, S. (2007). For-profit welfare: Contracts, conflicts, and the performance paradox. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, R., & Elston, T. (2019). Should councils collaborate? Evaluating shared administration and tax services in English local government. Public Money & Management, 39(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1537704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbanna, S. (2006). Strategic decision‐making: Process perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00118.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbanna, S., Andrews, R., & Pollanen, R. (2016). Strategic planning and implementation success in public service organizations: Evidence from Canada. Public Management Review, 18(7), 1017–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1051576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Taliawi, O. G., & Van Der Wal, Z. (2019). Developing administrative capacity: An agenda for research and practice. Policy Design and Practice, 2(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2019.1595916
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Evaluating the Productivity of Collaborative Governance Regimes: A Performance Matrix. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 717–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2007). Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2009). Metropolitan governance and institutional collective action. Urban Affairs Review, 44(3), 356–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087408324000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2013). The institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 397–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Lee, I. W., & Park, H. J. (2012). Administrators’ and elected officials’ collaboration networks: Selecting partners to reduce risk in economic development. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), S58–S68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02659.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Steinacker, A., & Park, H. J. (2009). Institutional collective action and economic development joint ventures. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01972.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1999). The repositioning of American public administration. PS: Political Science & Politics, 32(4), 701–712.
   Google Scholar
• George, B., & Pandey, S. (2017). We know the yin—but where is the yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17698189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., Walker, R. M., & Monster, J. (2019). Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A meta‐analysis. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 810–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrick, R. M., Jimenez, B. S., & Lal, K. (2011). Does local government fragmentation reduce local spending? Urban Affairs Review, 47(4), 467–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087411400379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honey, M. (1979). Corporate planning and the chief executive. Local Government Studies, 5(5), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003937908432817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K., & Provan, K. G. (2007). Resource tangibility and patterns of interaction in a publicly funded health and human services network. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2004). Doing things collaboratively: Realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia? IEEE Engineering Management Review, 32(4), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2004.25132
   Google Scholar
• Imperial, M. T. (2005). Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society, 37(3), 281–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705276111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez, B. S. (2014). Smart cuts?: Strategic planning, performance management and budget cutting in U.S. cities during the Great Recession. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 26(3), 494–526. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-26-03-2014-B005
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, B. S. (2017). When ties bind: Public managers’ networking behavior and municipal fiscal health after the Great Recession. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), muw069. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez, B. S. (2018). Organizational strategy and the outcomes of fiscal retrenchment in major cities in the United States. International Public Management Journal, 21(4), 589–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1236047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez, B. S. (2022). Applying the loss-conflict model of fiscal retrenchment: Understanding city expenditure and revenue responses to a budget crisis. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2021.1955217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. (1988). Rethinking incrementalism. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2015). The job of government: Interweaving public functions and private hands. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirat, T., & Lung, Y. (1999). Innovation and proximity: Territories as loci of collective learning processes. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649900600103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. (2006). Proximity and inter‐organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (1988). The roles of formal strategic planning. Long Range Planning, 21(3), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(88)90032-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., & Hung, C. (2022). Meta-analysis of collaboration and performance: Moderating tests of sectoral differences in collaborative performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(2), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., McGuire, M., & Kim, J.H. (2022). Collaboration, strategic plans, and government performance: The case of efforts to reduce homelessness. Public Management Review, 20(3), 360–376.
   Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K., Brandenburger, P. W., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). Interlocal service cooperation in U.S. cities: A social network explanation. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logsdon, J. M. (1991). Interests and interdependence in the formation of social problem-solving collaborations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391271002
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P. (1999). The impact of collaborative efforts: Changing the face of public. Review of Policy Research, 16(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00838.x
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P., & Keast, R. (2014). Managing strategically in collaborative networks: The importance of strategic leveraging. In P. Joyce, J. M. Bryson, & M. Holzer (Eds.), Developments in strategic and public management: Studies in the US and Europe (pp. 254–267). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M., & Steelman, T. (2003). Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations The importance of typologies, context and management strategies. Public Management Review, 5(2), 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461667032000066417
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O’Toole Jr, L. J. (2010). Beware of managers not bearing gifts: How management capacity augments the impact of managerial networking. Public Administration, 88(4), 1025–1044.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2012). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 429–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methe, D. T., Wilson, D., & Perry, J. L. (2000). A review of research on incremental approaches to strategy. In J. Rabin, G. J. Miller, & W. B. Hildreth (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (2nd ed., pp. 249–272). Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, J. (2005). For-profit and non-profit charter schools: An agency costs approach. The Yale Law Journal, 115(7), 1782. https://doi.org/10.2307/20455669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. L., & Svara, J. (2012). Form of government still matters: Fostering innovation in U.S. municipal governments. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(3), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011399898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Regan, K. M., & Oster, S. M. (2000). Nonprofit and for-profit partnerships: Rationale and challenges of cross-sector contracting. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1_suppl), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291S006
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/976691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., Jr., & Meier, K. J. (2004). Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4), 469–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagano, M. A., & Johnston, J. M. (2000). Life at the bottom of the fiscal food chain: Examining city and county revenue decisions. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 30(1), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a030058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piatak, J., Romzek, B., LeRoux, K., & Johnston, J. (2018). Managing goal conflict in public service delivery networks: Does accountability move up and down, or side to side? Public Performance & Management Review, 41(1), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1400993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., Edwards, L. H., Pasha, O. Q., & Edwards, J. (2013). Strategy formulation and performance: Evidence from local public transit agencies. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(4), 585–615. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchett, L., Woolcock, M., & Andrews, M. (2013). Looking like a state: Techniques of persistent failure in state capability for implementation. Journal of Development Studies, 49(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2012.709614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public‐sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. B. (1985). Strategies for change: Logical incrementalism. Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A. (1996). New governance for rural America: Creating intergovernmenntal partnerships. University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109332834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanelli, E. (1991). The evolution of new organizational forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 17(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.17.1.79
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S., LeRoux, K., & Blackmar, J. M. (2012). A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, M. (1988). Sagas, ventures, quests, and parlays: A typology of strategies in the public sector. In J. Bryson & R. Einsweiler (Eds.), Strategic planning (pp. 84–105). Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Self, P. (1974). Is comprehensive planning possible and rational? Policy & Politics, 2(3), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557374783219835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M. K., & Feiock, R. C. (2009). Governing US metropolitan areas: Self-organizing and multiplex service networks. American Politics Research, 37(5), 801–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X09337466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice. Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting, 6(1), 241–260.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (2009). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinacker, A., Feiock, R. C., & Scholz, J. T. (2010). The institutional collective action perspective on self-organizing mechanisms: Market failures and transaction cost problems. In R. C. Feiock & J. T. Scholz (Eds.), Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action (Vol. 72, p. 51). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, J. N., Feiock, R. C., & Youm, J. (2020). When collaboration is risky business: The influence of collaboration risks on formal and informal collaboration. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019867421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terman, J., & Feiock, R. (2015). Third-party federalism: Using local governments (and their contractors) to implement national policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 45(2), 322–349. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pju041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M. (2001). Collaboration: Meaning and measurement. Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in organizational behavior.
   Google Scholar
• Vansina, L., Taillieu, T. C., & Schruijer, S. G. (1998). Managing multiparty issues: Learning from experience. In W. Pasmore & R. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 11, pp. 159–183). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafra-Gómez, J. L., Pedauga, L. E., Plata-Díaz, A. M., & López-Hernández, A. M. (2014). Do local authorities use NPM delivery forms to overcome problems of fiscal stress? Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 43(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2014.890823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar