Institutional Dimensions in Open Government Data: A Deep Dive Into Indonesia’s Satu Data Initiative and Its Implications for Developing Countries

References

• Ahmadi, F., Ojo, A., & Curry, E. (2016). Exploring the economic value of Open Government Data. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexopoulos, C., Saxena, S., Rizun, N., & Shao, D. (2023). A framework of Open Government Data (OGD) e-service quality dimensions with future research agenda. Records Management Journal, 33(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-06-2022-0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, J. A., Boyera, S., Grewal, A., Iglesias, C., Pawelka, A. (2013). Open Government Data: Readiness assessment Indonesia. https://webfoundation.org/research/open-government-data-readiness-assessment-indonesia/
   Google Scholar
• Altayar, M. (2018). Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 633–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancarani, A. (2005). Towards quality e‐service in the public sector: The evolution of web sites in the local public service sector. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 15(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520510575236
   Google Scholar
• Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of Open Government Data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, J. (2014). The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state: The case of Open Government Data in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 388–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(6), 739–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cahlikova, T., & Mabillard, V. (2020). Open data and transparency: Opportunities and challenges in the Swiss context. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 662–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1657914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caley, M. J., O’Leary, R. A., Fisher, R., Low-Choy, S., Johnson, S., & Mengersen, K. (2014). What is an expert? A systems perspective on expertise. Ecology and Evolution, 4(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañares, M. P., & Shekhar, S. (2016). Open data and subnational governments: Lessons from developing countries. The Journal of Community Informatics, 12(2), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v12i2.3242
   Google Scholar
• Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2017). A longitudinal cross-sector analysis of open data portal service capability: The case of Australian local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., & Lee, B. (2022). Creating value using public big data: Comparison of driving factors from the provider’s perspective. Information Technology & People, 35(2), 467–493. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2019-0169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, C. S., & Stockton, C. M. (2018). The central role of theory in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 160940691879747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918797475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing Open Government Data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directorate General of Information Applications. (2021, April 29). SPBE Links 2700 Government Agency Data Centers. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2021/04/dirjen-aptika-spbe-satukan-2700-pusat-data-instansi-pemerintah/
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 178–182). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gascó-Hernández, M., Martin, E. G., Reggi, L., Pyo, S., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2018). Promoting the use of Open Government Data: Cases of training and engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Zapata, F., & Heeks, R. (2015). The multiple meanings of Open Government Data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haryanto, J. (2023). Indonesia: Advancing Southeast Asia’s largest digital economy.” In P. Cheung & T. Xie (Eds.) The ASEAN Digital Economy (pp. 42–75). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003308751
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, R., & Ojala, A. (2024). Managing artificial intelligence in international business: Toward a research agenda on sustainable production and consumption. Thunderbird International Business Review, 66(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermanto, A., Solimun, S., Fernandes, A. A. R., Wahyono, W., & Zulkarnain, Z. (2018). The importance of Open Government Data for the private sector and NGOs in Indonesia. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20(4), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-09-2017-0047
   Google Scholar
• Indrajit, A. (2018). One Data Indonesia to support the implementation of open data in Indonesia. In B. van Loenen, G. Vancauwenberghe, & J. Crompvoets (Eds.), Open data exposed (pp. 247–267). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-261-3_13
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, D. W., Fudzee, M. F. M., & Salamat, M. A. (2019). Analyzing the barrier to Open Government Data (OGD) in Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 8(1.3), 136–139. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatese/2019/2681.32019
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetzek, T. (2016). Managing complexity across multiple dimensions of liquid open data: The case of the Danish Basic Data Program. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jugend, D., Fiorini, P. D. C., Armellini, F., & Ferrari, A. G. (2020). Public support for innovation: A systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 156, 119985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassen, M. (2017). Open data in Kazakhstan: Incentives, implementation and challenges. Information Technology & People, 30(2), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2015-0243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassen, M. (2018). Adopting and managing open data: Stakeholder perspectives, challenges and policy recommendations. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(5), 518–537. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2017-0250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassen, M. (2019). Open data and e-government? Related or competing ecosystems: A paradox of open government and promise of civic engagement in Estonia. Information Technology for Development, 25(3), 552–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1412289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurnia, N., & Astuti, S. I. (2017, September 26). Researchers find Indonesia needs more digital literacy education. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/researchers-find-indonesia-needs-more-digital-literacy-education-84570
   Google Scholar
• Maail, A. G. (2017). The relational impact of open data intermediation: Experience from Indonesia and the Philippines. In F. v. Schalkwyk, S. G. Verhulst, G. Magalhaes, J. Pane, & J. Walker (Eds.), The social dynamics of open data (pp. 153–166). African Minds. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/28912/1/9781928331568_txt.pdf#page=161
   Google Scholar
• Maarif, S. (2020, September 7). Regulation and Integration of Electronic-Based Government Systems. Ministry of Religion of Indonesia. https://archive.md/TqScX
   Google Scholar
• Matheus, R., & Janssen, M. (2020). A systematic literature study to unravel transparency enabled by Open Government Data: The window theory. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 503–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1691025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusapati, C. A., & Sunindyo, W. D. (2017). Semi-automated data publishing tool for advancing the Indonesian Open Government Data maturity level case study: Badan pusat statistik Indonesia [Paper presentation]. 2017 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICODSE.2017.8285887
   Google Scholar
• OECD & United Cities and Local Governments. (2016, October). Indonesia: Country profile. https://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Indonesia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pan, T., & Fan, B. (2023). Institutional pressures, policy attention, and e-government service capability: Evidence from China’s prefecture-level cities. Public Performance & Management Review, 46(2), 445–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2169834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parung, G. A., Hidayanto, A. N., Sandhyaduhita, P. I., Ulo, K. L. M., & Phusavat, K. (2018). Barriers and strategies of Open Government Data adoption using fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS: A case of Indonesia. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12(3/4), 210–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2017-0055
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J. (2017). The “Open Government Reform” movement: The case of the Open Government Partnership and U.S. transparency policies. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016676575
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Deat, F. (2019). Numbers over narratives? How government message strategies affect citizens’ attitudes. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(5), 1005–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1400992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purwanto, A., Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2020). Citizen engagement with Open Government Data: Lessons learned from Indonesia’s presidential election. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-06-2019-0051
   Google Scholar
• Radjawali, I., & Pye, O. (2015). Counter-mapping land grabs with community drones in Indonesia. Proceedings of the Land Grabbing, Conflict and Agrarian—Environmental Transformations: Perspectives from East and Southeast Asia (pp. 5–6), Chiang Mai, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Riwukore, J. R., Marnisah, L., Habaora, F. H. F., & Yustini, T. (2021). Implementation of One Indonesian Data by the Central Statistics Agency of East Nusa Tenggara Province. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 1(2), 117–128. https://penerbitgoodwood.com/index.php/Jasispol/article/view/1194/264 https://doi.org/10.35912/jasispol.v1i2.1194
   Google Scholar
• Ruijer, E., Détienne, F., Baker, M., Groff, J., & Meijer, A. (2020). The politics of Open Government Data: Understanding organizational responses to pressure for more transparency. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(3), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019888065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarov, I. (2019). Institutional dimensions of Open Government Data implementation: Evidence from the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1438296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarov, I. (2020). Institutional dimensions of Open Government Data implementation: Evidence from transition countries. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(6), 1359–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1805336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarov, I., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). Utilization of Open Government Data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanina, A. (2024). City managers as digital transformation leaders: Exploratory and explanatory notes. Public Performance & Management Review, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2302059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrock, A., & Shaffer, G. (2017). Data ideologies of an interested public: A study of grassroots Open Government Data intermediaries. Big Data & Society, 4(1), 205395171769075. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717690750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Skjott Linneberg, M., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soegiono, A. N. (2018). Investigating digital (dis) engagement of open government: Case study of One Data Indonesia. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik)), 22(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.31848
   Google Scholar
• Srimarga, I. C., Suhaemi, M. A., Narhetali, E., Wahyuni, I. N., & Rendra, M. (2014, November). Open Data Initiative of Ministry of Finance on national budget transparency in Indonesia. http://hdl.handle.net/10625/55348
   Google Scholar
• Syarif, A., Salamat, M. A., & Syafari, R. (2020). A comparative analysis of Open Government Data in several countries: The practices and problems. Proceedings from the Recent Advances on Soft Computing and Data Mining Conference. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36056-6_33
   Google Scholar
• Tjondronegoro, D., Liew, A. W.-C., Verhelst, T., Green, D., Bernot, A., Hasan, R., & Rifai, B. (2022). The state of open data implementation in Indonesia. https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/1610393/RO70-Tjondronegoro-et-al-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tundjungsari, V. (2022). Open health data development for machine learning-based resource sharing: Indonesia case study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 6(2). https://ijair.id/index.php/ijair/article/view/581
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2020). World Economic Situation and Prospects 2020. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/WESP2020_Annex.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Climate Change. (2015). Drones for justice: Inclusive technology for rainforest and promoting social-ecological justice—Indonesia. https://unfccc.int/climate-action/momentum-for-change/activity-database/drones-for-justice-inclusive-technology-for-rainforest-and-promoting-social-ecological-justice
   Google Scholar
• Vetrò, A., Canova, L., Torchiano, M., Minotas, C. O., Iemma, R., & Morando, F. (2016). Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government Data. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, V., & Shepherd, D. (2020). Exploring the extent of openness of Open Government Data—A critique of Open Government Datasets in the UK. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Rösch, M. (2018). Citizen and open government: An empirical analysis of antecedents of Open Government Data. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(4), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1263659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Bi, Y., Kang, F., & Wang, Z. (2022). Incentive mechanisms for government officials’ implementing Open Government Data in China. Online Information Review, 46(2), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Liang, Y., Yao, C., & Han, X. (2022). Key factors and generation mechanisms of Open Government Data performance: A mixed methods study in the case of China. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar