Do Managers Make Use of Increased Autonomy? Evidence from Large Scale Organizational Reform

References

• Allison, G. T, Second Edition (1987). [1979]. Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects?. Proceedings for the Public Management Research Conference, November 19-20, 1979. Reprinted in Jay M. Shafritz and Albert C. Hyde (eds.). Classics of Public Administration. : Dorsey Press (pp. 510–529).
   Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N., & Roenigk, D. J. (2020). Exploring devolved decision authority in Performance management regimes: The relevance of perceived and actual decision authority as elements of performance management success. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1657918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. C., D. P. & Moynihan, (2016). Bureaucratic investments in expertise: Evidence from a randomized controlled field trial. The Journal of Politics, 78(4), 1032–1044. https://doi.org/10.1086/686029]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R. (2011). NPM and the search for efficiency. In T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (Eds.), The ashgate research companion to new public management (pp. 281–294). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2011). Dimensions of publicness and organizational performance: A review of the evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Supplement 3), i301–i319. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P. (2011). The political-administrative design of NPM. In T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (Eds.), The ashgate research companion to new public management (pp. 33–46). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y., & Hansen, K. M. (2011). “Who marries whom? The influence of societal connectedness, economic and political homogeneity, and population size on jurisdictional consolidations. European Journal of Political Research, 50(2), 212–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01928.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørnholt, B., Boye, S., & Falk Mikkelsen, M. (2022). Balancing managerialism and autonomy: A panel study of the link between managerial autonomy, performance goals, and organizational performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(6), 1258–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2048399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørnholt, B., Boye, S., & Hansen, N. W. (2022). The influence of regulative contents, stakeholders, and formalization on managerial autonomy perceived at the front line. Public Management Review, 24(10), 1569–1590. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1912818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., Houlberg, K., & Serritzlew, S. (2014). Size, democracy, and the economic costs of running the political system. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 790–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blotenberg, I., Schang, L., & Boywitt, D. (2022). Should indicators be correlated? Formative indicators for healthcare quality measurement. BMJ Open Quality, 11(2), e001791. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001791
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boadway, R., & Shah, A. (2009). Fiscal federalism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boon, J., & Wynen, J. (2017). On the bureaucracy of bureaucracies: Analysing the size and organization of overhead in public organizations. Public Administration, 95(1), 214–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Berry, F. S., & Yang, K. (2010). The state of public strategic management research: A selective literature review and set of future directions. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(5), 495–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010370361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, S. E. E., & Ramírez de la Cruz, (2017). Controlling administrative discretion promotes social equity? Evidence from a natural experiment. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggburn, J. D. (2000). The effects of deregulation on state government personnel administration. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(4), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X0002000404
   Google Scholar
• Dan, S., & Pollitt, C. (2015). NPM can work: An optimistic review of the impact of new public management reforms in central and eastern Europe. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1305–1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.908662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiTomaso, N., Post, C., & Parks-Yancy, R. (2007). Workforce diversity and inequality: Power, status, and numbers. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 473–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131805
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P. (1991). Democracy, bureaucracy, and public choice. Economic explanations in political science. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• George, B., Van de Walle, S., & Hammerschmid, G. (2019). Institutions or contingencies? A cross country analysis of management tool use by public sector executives. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., Walker, R. M., & Monster, J. (2019). Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A meta–analysis. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 810–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrish, E. (2016). The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodnow, F. J. (1900). Politics and administration. A study in government. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gulick, L. (1937). Notes on the theory of organization. In L. Gulick and L. Urwick (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration (pp. 1–46). Institute of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Guul, T. S., Villadsen, A. R., & Wulff, J. N. (2019). Does good performance reduce bad behavior? Antecedents of ethnic employment discrimination in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(5), 666–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., Andrews, R., & Mostafa, A. M. S. (2019). New public management reforms in Europe and their effects: Findings from a 20-country top executive survey. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317751632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C. J. (2012). Measuring public sector performance and effectiveness. In B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre (Eds.), The Sage handbook of public administration (pp. 32–50). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J. D., & Shipan, C. R. (2002). Deliberate discretion? The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, J. H., & Miller, G. J. (1987). Reforming bureaucracy. The politics of institutional choice. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., Stern, L. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1633–1651. https://doi.org/10.2307/256824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langbein, L. I. (2000). Ownership, empowerment, and productivity: Some empirical evidence on the causes and consequences of employee discretion. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(3), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6688(200022)19:3<427::AID-PAM4>3.0.CO;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J.Jr,. (2008). The proverbs of new public management: Lessons form an evidence-based research agenda. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008326312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. J. (1992). Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, P. E. (2010). The Danish revolution in local government: How and why?. In H. Baldersheim and L. E. Rose (Eds.), Territorial choice. The politics of boundaries and borders (pp. 21–41). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, Poul Erik (Ed.) (2006). Stort er godt. Otte fortællinger om tilblivelsen af de nye kommuner. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00557.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, V. L., M. B. & Madsen, (2017). Does gender diversity in the workplace affect job satisfaction and turnover intentions? International Public Management Review, 18(1), 77–113.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Education at a glance 2013: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Overman, S., & Van Thiel, S. (2016). Agencification and public sector performance: A systematic comparison in 20 countries. Public Management Review, 18(4), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1028973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. S., & Subramaniam, V. (1964). ‘Public’ and ‘Private’ Administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 30(4), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/002085236403000403
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., Pitts, D. W., & Edwards, L. H. (2010). Strategic management research in the public sector: A review, synthesis, and future directions. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(5), 522–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010370617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (1998). Managerialism revisited. In B. Guy Peters and Donald J. Savoie (Eds.), Taking stock: Assessing public sector reforms (pp. 45–77). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Dan, S. (2013). Searching for impacts in performance-oriented management reform: A review of the European literature. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576370101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., Backoff, R. W., & Levine, C. H. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/975145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayre, W. S., Parkinson, C. N., Argyris, C., & Whyte, W. H. (1958). The unhappy bureaucrats: Views ironic, hopeful, indignant. Public Administration Review, 18(3), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/973438
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, B. (2010). The Danish integrated database for labor market research: Towards demystification for the English speaking audience. DRUID Working Paper, 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., Peters, B. G., Bouckaert, G., & Verschuere, B. (2004). The study of organisational autonomy: A conceptual review. Public Administration and Development, 24(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villadsen, A. R., & Wulff, J. N. (2021). Are you 110% sure? modeling of fractions and proportions in strategy and management research. Strategic Organization, 19(2), 312–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019854966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R., & Werkmeister, L. (2020). What is public about public leadership? Exploring implicit public leadership theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 31(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., & Andrews, R. (2015). Local government management and performance: A review of evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 101–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., & Yeung, R. (2019). Testing the effectiveness of “managing for results”: Evidence from an education policy innovation in New York City. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1970). [1922]) Bureaucracy. In H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (Eds.), From Max weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 196–244). Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. What government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wynen, J., & Verhoest, K. (2016). Internal performance-based steering in public sector organizations: Examining the effect of organizational autonomy and external result control. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(3), 535–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1137769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research. design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar